Implications of Schedule Response
A construction contract that includes a requirement for the contractor to prepare and submit a progress schedule to the owner necessitates that the owner respond in some manner. The nature of this response depends on the degree to which the owner desires to review and make use of the submitted infor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | AACE International transactions 2007-01, p.OW41 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | OW41 |
| container_title | AACE International transactions |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Hildreth, John C Vorster, Michael C |
| description | A construction contract that includes a requirement for the contractor to prepare and submit a progress schedule to the owner necessitates that the owner respond in some manner. The nature of this response depends on the degree to which the owner desires to review and make use of the submitted information. An owner may choose to indicate that the schedule has been received, reviewed, approved, or accepted. The response methods of state transportation agencies have been reviewed to determine which methods are currently being used, along with pertinent literature to identify previously recommended responses. The purpose of this document is to present the results of this review and formulate a recommendation regarding which response method should be employed. Questions frequently asked regarding the implications of responses to schedule submittals and the answers thereto are provided. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208170618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1466802391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2081706183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDWy0DU3NDDjYOAqLs4yMDA0MjI05WRQ9MwtyMlMTizJzM8rVshPUwhOzkhNKc1JVQhKLS4AiqXyMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GJTfXEGcP3YKi_MLS1OKS-Kz80qI8oFS8kYGFobmBmaGFMVGKAIKzLIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208170618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implications of Schedule Response</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hildreth, John C ; Vorster, Michael C</creator><creatorcontrib>Hildreth, John C ; Vorster, Michael C</creatorcontrib><description>A construction contract that includes a requirement for the contractor to prepare and submit a progress schedule to the owner necessitates that the owner respond in some manner. The nature of this response depends on the degree to which the owner desires to review and make use of the submitted information. An owner may choose to indicate that the schedule has been received, reviewed, approved, or accepted. The response methods of state transportation agencies have been reviewed to determine which methods are currently being used, along with pertinent literature to identify previously recommended responses. The purpose of this document is to present the results of this review and formulate a recommendation regarding which response method should be employed. Questions frequently asked regarding the implications of responses to schedule submittals and the answers thereto are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-7106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Morgantown: American Association of Cost Engineers</publisher><subject>Claims processing ; Construction contracts ; Fines & penalties ; Project management ; Responses ; Scheduling ; Studies</subject><ispartof>AACE International transactions, 2007-01, p.OW41</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Association of Cost Engineers 2007</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hildreth, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorster, Michael C</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of Schedule Response</title><title>AACE International transactions</title><description>A construction contract that includes a requirement for the contractor to prepare and submit a progress schedule to the owner necessitates that the owner respond in some manner. The nature of this response depends on the degree to which the owner desires to review and make use of the submitted information. An owner may choose to indicate that the schedule has been received, reviewed, approved, or accepted. The response methods of state transportation agencies have been reviewed to determine which methods are currently being used, along with pertinent literature to identify previously recommended responses. The purpose of this document is to present the results of this review and formulate a recommendation regarding which response method should be employed. Questions frequently asked regarding the implications of responses to schedule submittals and the answers thereto are provided.</description><subject>Claims processing</subject><subject>Construction contracts</subject><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1528-7106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDWy0DU3NDDjYOAqLs4yMDA0MjI05WRQ9MwtyMlMTizJzM8rVshPUwhOzkhNKc1JVQhKLS4AiqXyMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GJTfXEGcP3YKi_MLS1OKS-Kz80qI8oFS8kYGFobmBmaGFMVGKAIKzLIQ</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Hildreth, John C</creator><creator>Vorster, Michael C</creator><general>American Association of Cost Engineers</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Implications of Schedule Response</title><author>Hildreth, John C ; Vorster, Michael C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2081706183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Claims processing</topic><topic>Construction contracts</topic><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hildreth, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorster, Michael C</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>AACE International transactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hildreth, John C</au><au>Vorster, Michael C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implications of Schedule Response</atitle><jtitle>AACE International transactions</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>OW41</spage><pages>OW41-</pages><issn>1528-7106</issn><abstract>A construction contract that includes a requirement for the contractor to prepare and submit a progress schedule to the owner necessitates that the owner respond in some manner. The nature of this response depends on the degree to which the owner desires to review and make use of the submitted information. An owner may choose to indicate that the schedule has been received, reviewed, approved, or accepted. The response methods of state transportation agencies have been reviewed to determine which methods are currently being used, along with pertinent literature to identify previously recommended responses. The purpose of this document is to present the results of this review and formulate a recommendation regarding which response method should be employed. Questions frequently asked regarding the implications of responses to schedule submittals and the answers thereto are provided.</abstract><cop>Morgantown</cop><pub>American Association of Cost Engineers</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1528-7106 |
| ispartof | AACE International transactions, 2007-01, p.OW41 |
| issn | 1528-7106 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_208170618 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Claims processing Construction contracts Fines & penalties Project management Responses Scheduling Studies |
| title | Implications of Schedule Response |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A15%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implications%20of%20Schedule%20Response&rft.jtitle=AACE%20International%20transactions&rft.au=Hildreth,%20John%20C&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.spage=OW41&rft.pages=OW41-&rft.issn=1528-7106&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1466802391%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208170618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |