Heterogeneous versus homogeneous electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces: The wrong question?

The exact mechanism of the electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces still remains a source of interrogation. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this topic using a finite element simulation approach to analyze cyclic voltammograms for some previously published systems. Also, we co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2016-10, Vol.779, p.187-198
Hauptverfasser: Peljo, Pekka, Smirnov, Evgeny, Girault, Hubert.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 198
container_issue
container_start_page 187
container_title Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland)
container_volume 779
creator Peljo, Pekka
Smirnov, Evgeny
Girault, Hubert.H.
description The exact mechanism of the electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces still remains a source of interrogation. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this topic using a finite element simulation approach to analyze cyclic voltammograms for some previously published systems. Also, we compare the voltammograms obtained in the absence or presence of an adsorbed gold nanoparticle film. The current results indicate that the electron transfer between ferrocene in the organic phase and hexacyanoferrate(III) in the aqueous phase takes place by a potential independent homogeneous reaction in the aqueous phase, while the observed potential dependence stems from that of the concomitant ion transfer reaction of ferrocenium. In the presence of the interfacial gold nanofilm the electron transfer takes place by a bipolar mechanism where the electrons are shuttled through the metallic nanofilm. [Display omitted] •Electron transfer at liquid–liquid interfaces revisited by simulations of voltammetry.•Reaction takes place by potential independent pre-equilibrium mechanism.•Observed potential dependence stems from concomitant ion transfer
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.02.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2080988823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1572665716300662</els_id><sourcerecordid>2080988823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54b92da26260625afe853e2ecd915a113568fb731e1b7e097971cd5cdefb6bfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUN1KwzAYDaLgnL6CBLxuTVKTpt6oDHXCwJt5HdL065ayNVvSTbzzHXxDn8TUqrfCge-Hc87HdxA6pySlhIrLJm1gBWYJ65TFOSUsIjtAIyrzLGFcFIex5zlLhOD5MToJoSGESUnZCLkpdODdAlpwu4D34EMsS7f-W_XenXct7rxuQw0ee9Cms64NWHd4Zbc7W32-fwwNtm30q7WBcI3nS8CvUbrA2x2EXnJzio5qvQpw9lPH6OXhfj6ZJrPnx6fJ3SwxmZRdwq_KglWaCSaIYFzXIHkGDExVUK4pzbiQdZlnFGiZAynyIqem4qaCuhRlbbIxuhh8N959H1eN2_k2nlSMSFJIKVkWWWJgGe9C8FCrjbdr7d8UJaoPVzXqN1zVh6sIi-iFt4MQ4g97C14FY6E1UFkf41KVs_9ZfAHTA4pU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2080988823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogeneous versus homogeneous electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces: The wrong question?</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Peljo, Pekka ; Smirnov, Evgeny ; Girault, Hubert.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peljo, Pekka ; Smirnov, Evgeny ; Girault, Hubert.H.</creatorcontrib><description>The exact mechanism of the electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces still remains a source of interrogation. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this topic using a finite element simulation approach to analyze cyclic voltammograms for some previously published systems. Also, we compare the voltammograms obtained in the absence or presence of an adsorbed gold nanoparticle film. The current results indicate that the electron transfer between ferrocene in the organic phase and hexacyanoferrate(III) in the aqueous phase takes place by a potential independent homogeneous reaction in the aqueous phase, while the observed potential dependence stems from that of the concomitant ion transfer reaction of ferrocenium. In the presence of the interfacial gold nanofilm the electron transfer takes place by a bipolar mechanism where the electrons are shuttled through the metallic nanofilm. [Display omitted] •Electron transfer at liquid–liquid interfaces revisited by simulations of voltammetry.•Reaction takes place by potential independent pre-equilibrium mechanism.•Observed potential dependence stems from concomitant ion transfer</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-6657</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.02.023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chemical reactions ; Dependence ; Electrodes ; Electrolytes ; Electron transfer ; Electrons ; Finite element method ; Finite element simulations ; Gold ; Interrogation ; Ion transfer ; Liquid–liquid interfaces ; Nanoparticles ; Redox catalysis ; Voltammetry</subject><ispartof>Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2016-10, Vol.779, p.187-198</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 15, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54b92da26260625afe853e2ecd915a113568fb731e1b7e097971cd5cdefb6bfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54b92da26260625afe853e2ecd915a113568fb731e1b7e097971cd5cdefb6bfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1229-2261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.02.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peljo, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smirnov, Evgeny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girault, Hubert.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogeneous versus homogeneous electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces: The wrong question?</title><title>Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland)</title><description>The exact mechanism of the electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces still remains a source of interrogation. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this topic using a finite element simulation approach to analyze cyclic voltammograms for some previously published systems. Also, we compare the voltammograms obtained in the absence or presence of an adsorbed gold nanoparticle film. The current results indicate that the electron transfer between ferrocene in the organic phase and hexacyanoferrate(III) in the aqueous phase takes place by a potential independent homogeneous reaction in the aqueous phase, while the observed potential dependence stems from that of the concomitant ion transfer reaction of ferrocenium. In the presence of the interfacial gold nanofilm the electron transfer takes place by a bipolar mechanism where the electrons are shuttled through the metallic nanofilm. [Display omitted] •Electron transfer at liquid–liquid interfaces revisited by simulations of voltammetry.•Reaction takes place by potential independent pre-equilibrium mechanism.•Observed potential dependence stems from concomitant ion transfer</description><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Electron transfer</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Finite element simulations</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Interrogation</subject><subject>Ion transfer</subject><subject>Liquid–liquid interfaces</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Redox catalysis</subject><subject>Voltammetry</subject><issn>1572-6657</issn><issn>1873-2569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUN1KwzAYDaLgnL6CBLxuTVKTpt6oDHXCwJt5HdL065ayNVvSTbzzHXxDn8TUqrfCge-Hc87HdxA6pySlhIrLJm1gBWYJ65TFOSUsIjtAIyrzLGFcFIex5zlLhOD5MToJoSGESUnZCLkpdODdAlpwu4D34EMsS7f-W_XenXct7rxuQw0ee9Cms64NWHd4Zbc7W32-fwwNtm30q7WBcI3nS8CvUbrA2x2EXnJzio5qvQpw9lPH6OXhfj6ZJrPnx6fJ3SwxmZRdwq_KglWaCSaIYFzXIHkGDExVUK4pzbiQdZlnFGiZAynyIqem4qaCuhRlbbIxuhh8N959H1eN2_k2nlSMSFJIKVkWWWJgGe9C8FCrjbdr7d8UJaoPVzXqN1zVh6sIi-iFt4MQ4g97C14FY6E1UFkf41KVs_9ZfAHTA4pU</recordid><startdate>20161015</startdate><enddate>20161015</enddate><creator>Peljo, Pekka</creator><creator>Smirnov, Evgeny</creator><creator>Girault, Hubert.H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-2261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161015</creationdate><title>Heterogeneous versus homogeneous electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces: The wrong question?</title><author>Peljo, Pekka ; Smirnov, Evgeny ; Girault, Hubert.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54b92da26260625afe853e2ecd915a113568fb731e1b7e097971cd5cdefb6bfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Electron transfer</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Finite element simulations</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Interrogation</topic><topic>Ion transfer</topic><topic>Liquid–liquid interfaces</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Redox catalysis</topic><topic>Voltammetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peljo, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smirnov, Evgeny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girault, Hubert.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peljo, Pekka</au><au>Smirnov, Evgeny</au><au>Girault, Hubert.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogeneous versus homogeneous electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces: The wrong question?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2016-10-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>779</volume><spage>187</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>187-198</pages><issn>1572-6657</issn><eissn>1873-2569</eissn><abstract>The exact mechanism of the electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces still remains a source of interrogation. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this topic using a finite element simulation approach to analyze cyclic voltammograms for some previously published systems. Also, we compare the voltammograms obtained in the absence or presence of an adsorbed gold nanoparticle film. The current results indicate that the electron transfer between ferrocene in the organic phase and hexacyanoferrate(III) in the aqueous phase takes place by a potential independent homogeneous reaction in the aqueous phase, while the observed potential dependence stems from that of the concomitant ion transfer reaction of ferrocenium. In the presence of the interfacial gold nanofilm the electron transfer takes place by a bipolar mechanism where the electrons are shuttled through the metallic nanofilm. [Display omitted] •Electron transfer at liquid–liquid interfaces revisited by simulations of voltammetry.•Reaction takes place by potential independent pre-equilibrium mechanism.•Observed potential dependence stems from concomitant ion transfer</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.02.023</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-2261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1572-6657
ispartof Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2016-10, Vol.779, p.187-198
issn 1572-6657
1873-2569
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2080988823
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Chemical reactions
Dependence
Electrodes
Electrolytes
Electron transfer
Electrons
Finite element method
Finite element simulations
Gold
Interrogation
Ion transfer
Liquid–liquid interfaces
Nanoparticles
Redox catalysis
Voltammetry
title Heterogeneous versus homogeneous electron transfer reactions at liquid–liquid interfaces: The wrong question?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T19%3A19%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogeneous%20versus%20homogeneous%20electron%20transfer%20reactions%20at%20liquid%E2%80%93liquid%20interfaces:%20The%20wrong%20question?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electroanalytical%20chemistry%20(Lausanne,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Peljo,%20Pekka&rft.date=2016-10-15&rft.volume=779&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=187-198&rft.issn=1572-6657&rft.eissn=1873-2569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.02.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2080988823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2080988823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1572665716300662&rfr_iscdi=true