Optimal combined heat-and-power plant for a low-temperature geothermal source
This work compares the performance of four combined heat-and-power (CHP) configurations for application in a binary geothermal plant connected to a low-temperature 65/40 and a high-temperature 90/60 district heating system. The investigated configurations are the series, the parallel, the preheat-pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2018-05, Vol.150, p.396-409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 409 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 396 |
container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
container_volume | 150 |
creator | Van Erdeweghe, Sarah Van Bael, Johan Laenen, Ben D'haeseleer, William |
description | This work compares the performance of four combined heat-and-power (CHP) configurations for application in a binary geothermal plant connected to a low-temperature 65/40 and a high-temperature 90/60 district heating system. The investigated configurations are the series, the parallel, the preheat-parallel and the HB4 configurations. The geothermal source conditions have been defined based on existing geothermal plants in the northwest of Europe. Production temperatures in the range of 110–150 °C and mass flow rates in the range of 100–200 kg/s are considered. The goal is to identify the best-performing CHP configuration for every set of geothermal source conditions (temperature and flow rate) and for multiple values of the heat demand. The electrical power output is used as the optimization objective and the different CHP plants are compared based on the exergetic plant efficiency. The optimal CHP plant has always a higher exergetic plant efficiency than the pure electrical power plant; up to 22.8%-pts higher for the connection to a 65/40 DH system and up to 20.9%-pts higher for the connection to a 90/60 DH system. The highest increase of the exergetic plant efficiency over the pure electrical power plant is obtained for low values of the geothermal source temperature and flow rate.
•Comparison of four low-T fueled CHP plants based on exergetic plant efficiency.•Thermodynamic optimization of four CHP plants, coupled to district heating system.•Series, parallel, preheat-parallel and HB4 CHP configurations are studied.•Better utilization of low-T source in CHP plant than in pure power plant.•Exergetic efficiency of HB4 CHP up to 22.8%-pts higher than pure power plant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2076198640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544218301646</els_id><sourcerecordid>2076198640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cb093f99ddcf07dce1cd9d81ebdf5c450710563e205dd5b3bf58eac30eeaf3d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwDxgiMTtcx3HiLEio4iUVdYHZcuybNlEaB9ul4t-TKsxMZzkPnY-QWwYpA1bcdykO6Lc_aQZMpsBSxoszsmCy5LQopTgnC-AFUJHn2SW5CqEDACGrakHeN2Ns97pPjNvX7YA22aGOVA-Wju6IPhl7PcSkcT7RSe-ONOJ-RK_jwWOyRRd36E_x4A7e4DW5aHQf8OZPl-Tz-elj9UrXm5e31eOaGi4hUlNDxZuqstY0UFqDzNjKSoa1bYTJBZQMRMExA2GtqHndCInacEDUDbfAl-Ru7h29-zpgiKqb9odpUmVQFqySRX5y5bPLeBeCx0aNfvrqfxQDdQKnOjWDUydwCpiawE2xhzmG04PvFr0KpsXBoG09mqisa_8v-AX4xXp1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2076198640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal combined heat-and-power plant for a low-temperature geothermal source</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Van Erdeweghe, Sarah ; Van Bael, Johan ; Laenen, Ben ; D'haeseleer, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Erdeweghe, Sarah ; Van Bael, Johan ; Laenen, Ben ; D'haeseleer, William</creatorcontrib><description>This work compares the performance of four combined heat-and-power (CHP) configurations for application in a binary geothermal plant connected to a low-temperature 65/40 and a high-temperature 90/60 district heating system. The investigated configurations are the series, the parallel, the preheat-parallel and the HB4 configurations. The geothermal source conditions have been defined based on existing geothermal plants in the northwest of Europe. Production temperatures in the range of 110–150 °C and mass flow rates in the range of 100–200 kg/s are considered. The goal is to identify the best-performing CHP configuration for every set of geothermal source conditions (temperature and flow rate) and for multiple values of the heat demand. The electrical power output is used as the optimization objective and the different CHP plants are compared based on the exergetic plant efficiency. The optimal CHP plant has always a higher exergetic plant efficiency than the pure electrical power plant; up to 22.8%-pts higher for the connection to a 65/40 DH system and up to 20.9%-pts higher for the connection to a 90/60 DH system. The highest increase of the exergetic plant efficiency over the pure electrical power plant is obtained for low values of the geothermal source temperature and flow rate.
•Comparison of four low-T fueled CHP plants based on exergetic plant efficiency.•Thermodynamic optimization of four CHP plants, coupled to district heating system.•Series, parallel, preheat-parallel and HB4 CHP configurations are studied.•Better utilization of low-T source in CHP plant than in pure power plant.•Exergetic efficiency of HB4 CHP up to 22.8%-pts higher than pure power plant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CHP ; Configuration management ; Configurations ; District heating ; Electric power ; Energy efficiency ; Energy industry ; Exergy ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Geothermal ; Geothermal power ; Geothermal power plants ; Low temperature ; Mass flow ; Optimization ; ORC ; Power efficiency ; Power plants ; Temperature effects ; Thermodynamic optimization ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2018-05, Vol.150, p.396-409</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cb093f99ddcf07dce1cd9d81ebdf5c450710563e205dd5b3bf58eac30eeaf3d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cb093f99ddcf07dce1cd9d81ebdf5c450710563e205dd5b3bf58eac30eeaf3d03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1799-270X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218301646$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Erdeweghe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Bael, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laenen, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'haeseleer, William</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal combined heat-and-power plant for a low-temperature geothermal source</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>This work compares the performance of four combined heat-and-power (CHP) configurations for application in a binary geothermal plant connected to a low-temperature 65/40 and a high-temperature 90/60 district heating system. The investigated configurations are the series, the parallel, the preheat-parallel and the HB4 configurations. The geothermal source conditions have been defined based on existing geothermal plants in the northwest of Europe. Production temperatures in the range of 110–150 °C and mass flow rates in the range of 100–200 kg/s are considered. The goal is to identify the best-performing CHP configuration for every set of geothermal source conditions (temperature and flow rate) and for multiple values of the heat demand. The electrical power output is used as the optimization objective and the different CHP plants are compared based on the exergetic plant efficiency. The optimal CHP plant has always a higher exergetic plant efficiency than the pure electrical power plant; up to 22.8%-pts higher for the connection to a 65/40 DH system and up to 20.9%-pts higher for the connection to a 90/60 DH system. The highest increase of the exergetic plant efficiency over the pure electrical power plant is obtained for low values of the geothermal source temperature and flow rate.
•Comparison of four low-T fueled CHP plants based on exergetic plant efficiency.•Thermodynamic optimization of four CHP plants, coupled to district heating system.•Series, parallel, preheat-parallel and HB4 CHP configurations are studied.•Better utilization of low-T source in CHP plant than in pure power plant.•Exergetic efficiency of HB4 CHP up to 22.8%-pts higher than pure power plant.</description><subject>CHP</subject><subject>Configuration management</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>District heating</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Geothermal</subject><subject>Geothermal power</subject><subject>Geothermal power plants</subject><subject>Low temperature</subject><subject>Mass flow</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>ORC</subject><subject>Power efficiency</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Thermodynamic optimization</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwDxgiMTtcx3HiLEio4iUVdYHZcuybNlEaB9ul4t-TKsxMZzkPnY-QWwYpA1bcdykO6Lc_aQZMpsBSxoszsmCy5LQopTgnC-AFUJHn2SW5CqEDACGrakHeN2Ns97pPjNvX7YA22aGOVA-Wju6IPhl7PcSkcT7RSe-ONOJ-RK_jwWOyRRd36E_x4A7e4DW5aHQf8OZPl-Tz-elj9UrXm5e31eOaGi4hUlNDxZuqstY0UFqDzNjKSoa1bYTJBZQMRMExA2GtqHndCInacEDUDbfAl-Ru7h29-zpgiKqb9odpUmVQFqySRX5y5bPLeBeCx0aNfvrqfxQDdQKnOjWDUydwCpiawE2xhzmG04PvFr0KpsXBoG09mqisa_8v-AX4xXp1</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Van Erdeweghe, Sarah</creator><creator>Van Bael, Johan</creator><creator>Laenen, Ben</creator><creator>D'haeseleer, William</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1799-270X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Optimal combined heat-and-power plant for a low-temperature geothermal source</title><author>Van Erdeweghe, Sarah ; Van Bael, Johan ; Laenen, Ben ; D'haeseleer, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cb093f99ddcf07dce1cd9d81ebdf5c450710563e205dd5b3bf58eac30eeaf3d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>CHP</topic><topic>Configuration management</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>District heating</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Geothermal</topic><topic>Geothermal power</topic><topic>Geothermal power plants</topic><topic>Low temperature</topic><topic>Mass flow</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>ORC</topic><topic>Power efficiency</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Thermodynamic optimization</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Erdeweghe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Bael, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laenen, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'haeseleer, William</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Erdeweghe, Sarah</au><au>Van Bael, Johan</au><au>Laenen, Ben</au><au>D'haeseleer, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal combined heat-and-power plant for a low-temperature geothermal source</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>150</volume><spage>396</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>396-409</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>This work compares the performance of four combined heat-and-power (CHP) configurations for application in a binary geothermal plant connected to a low-temperature 65/40 and a high-temperature 90/60 district heating system. The investigated configurations are the series, the parallel, the preheat-parallel and the HB4 configurations. The geothermal source conditions have been defined based on existing geothermal plants in the northwest of Europe. Production temperatures in the range of 110–150 °C and mass flow rates in the range of 100–200 kg/s are considered. The goal is to identify the best-performing CHP configuration for every set of geothermal source conditions (temperature and flow rate) and for multiple values of the heat demand. The electrical power output is used as the optimization objective and the different CHP plants are compared based on the exergetic plant efficiency. The optimal CHP plant has always a higher exergetic plant efficiency than the pure electrical power plant; up to 22.8%-pts higher for the connection to a 65/40 DH system and up to 20.9%-pts higher for the connection to a 90/60 DH system. The highest increase of the exergetic plant efficiency over the pure electrical power plant is obtained for low values of the geothermal source temperature and flow rate.
•Comparison of four low-T fueled CHP plants based on exergetic plant efficiency.•Thermodynamic optimization of four CHP plants, coupled to district heating system.•Series, parallel, preheat-parallel and HB4 CHP configurations are studied.•Better utilization of low-T source in CHP plant than in pure power plant.•Exergetic efficiency of HB4 CHP up to 22.8%-pts higher than pure power plant.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.136</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1799-270X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2018-05, Vol.150, p.396-409 |
issn | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2076198640 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | CHP Configuration management Configurations District heating Electric power Energy efficiency Energy industry Exergy Flow rates Flow velocity Geothermal Geothermal power Geothermal power plants Low temperature Mass flow Optimization ORC Power efficiency Power plants Temperature effects Thermodynamic optimization Thermodynamics |
title | Optimal combined heat-and-power plant for a low-temperature geothermal source |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T15%3A49%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20combined%20heat-and-power%20plant%20for%20a%20low-temperature%20geothermal%20source&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Van%20Erdeweghe,%20Sarah&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=150&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=396-409&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2076198640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2076198640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544218301646&rfr_iscdi=true |