Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective

This article argues that rent-seeking competition over tax reform can exhaust prospective efficiency gains, thus making tax reform a potential negative-sum activity—especially when considered over the entire rent-seeking cycle. It concludes that a positive defense against negative-sum tax reform gam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public finance quarterly 1994-01, Vol.22 (1), p.3-21
Hauptverfasser: de Vanssay, Xavier, Spindler, Zane A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Public finance quarterly
container_volume 22
creator de Vanssay, Xavier
Spindler, Zane A.
description This article argues that rent-seeking competition over tax reform can exhaust prospective efficiency gains, thus making tax reform a potential negative-sum activity—especially when considered over the entire rent-seeking cycle. It concludes that a positive defense against negative-sum tax reform games can arise from public choice economists debunking the game's ideological basis and constructing "rent-seeking impact statements" for proposed tax reforms.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/109114219402200101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_207618231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A14914495</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_109114219402200101</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A14914495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f9423e060a280da004f8e426cd67e3e38960cfc87f1bf798af21b5ea3d353d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtLw0AQhRdRsFb_gE_BZ2Nn9pLLkxbxUihYtD6H7WY2prZJ3U1F_70rEXywOPMwMHxn5sBh7BThAjFNRwg5ouSYS-AcAAH32ACV4nGqBOyzAYDMYpUpcciOvF9CqFzwAbua-GiuP6JHsq1bR3UTdS8UzbaLVW2iSdORI99dRjoATRc_Eb3WTRXNyPkNma5-p2N2YPXK08nPHLLn25v59X08fbibXI-nsZEKu1jYXHJBkIDmGZQ6-LEZSZ6YMklJkMjyBIw1WWpxYdM805bjQpEWpVCiBDFkZ_3djWvftsFUsWy3rgkvCw5pghkXGKDzHqr0ioq6sW3ntKmoIadXbUO2DusxyhylzFXA4x146JLWtdnF8543rvXekS02rl5r91kgFN85FH9zCKJRL_K6ol_T_yi-AGKIhNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207618231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>de Vanssay, Xavier ; Spindler, Zane A.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Vanssay, Xavier ; Spindler, Zane A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues that rent-seeking competition over tax reform can exhaust prospective efficiency gains, thus making tax reform a potential negative-sum activity—especially when considered over the entire rent-seeking cycle. It concludes that a positive defense against negative-sum tax reform games can arise from public choice economists debunking the game's ideological basis and constructing "rent-seeking impact statements" for proposed tax reforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5853</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1091-1421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/109114219402200101</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PFQADD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Finance ; Fiscal policy ; Government spending ; Public finance ; Social costs ; Tax reform ; Tax revenue estimating ; Taxation ; Taxpayer compliance</subject><ispartof>Public finance quarterly, 1994-01, Vol.22 (1), p.3-21</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1994 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jan 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f9423e060a280da004f8e426cd67e3e38960cfc87f1bf798af21b5ea3d353d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f9423e060a280da004f8e426cd67e3e38960cfc87f1bf798af21b5ea3d353d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/109114219402200101$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114219402200101$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27865,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Vanssay, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spindler, Zane A.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective</title><title>Public finance quarterly</title><description>This article argues that rent-seeking competition over tax reform can exhaust prospective efficiency gains, thus making tax reform a potential negative-sum activity—especially when considered over the entire rent-seeking cycle. It concludes that a positive defense against negative-sum tax reform games can arise from public choice economists debunking the game's ideological basis and constructing "rent-seeking impact statements" for proposed tax reforms.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Social costs</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Tax revenue estimating</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxpayer compliance</subject><issn>0048-5853</issn><issn>1091-1421</issn><issn>1552-7530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtLw0AQhRdRsFb_gE_BZ2Nn9pLLkxbxUihYtD6H7WY2prZJ3U1F_70rEXywOPMwMHxn5sBh7BThAjFNRwg5ouSYS-AcAAH32ACV4nGqBOyzAYDMYpUpcciOvF9CqFzwAbua-GiuP6JHsq1bR3UTdS8UzbaLVW2iSdORI99dRjoATRc_Eb3WTRXNyPkNma5-p2N2YPXK08nPHLLn25v59X08fbibXI-nsZEKu1jYXHJBkIDmGZQ6-LEZSZ6YMklJkMjyBIw1WWpxYdM805bjQpEWpVCiBDFkZ_3djWvftsFUsWy3rgkvCw5pghkXGKDzHqr0ioq6sW3ntKmoIadXbUO2DusxyhylzFXA4x146JLWtdnF8543rvXekS02rl5r91kgFN85FH9zCKJRL_K6ol_T_yi-AGKIhNI</recordid><startdate>199401</startdate><enddate>199401</enddate><creator>de Vanssay, Xavier</creator><creator>Spindler, Zane A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199401</creationdate><title>Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective</title><author>de Vanssay, Xavier ; Spindler, Zane A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f9423e060a280da004f8e426cd67e3e38960cfc87f1bf798af21b5ea3d353d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Social costs</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Tax revenue estimating</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxpayer compliance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Vanssay, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spindler, Zane A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public finance quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Vanssay, Xavier</au><au>Spindler, Zane A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Public finance quarterly</jtitle><date>1994-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>3-21</pages><issn>0048-5853</issn><issn>1091-1421</issn><eissn>1552-7530</eissn><coden>PFQADD</coden><abstract>This article argues that rent-seeking competition over tax reform can exhaust prospective efficiency gains, thus making tax reform a potential negative-sum activity—especially when considered over the entire rent-seeking cycle. It concludes that a positive defense against negative-sum tax reform games can arise from public choice economists debunking the game's ideological basis and constructing "rent-seeking impact statements" for proposed tax reforms.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/109114219402200101</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5853
ispartof Public finance quarterly, 1994-01, Vol.22 (1), p.3-21
issn 0048-5853
1091-1421
1552-7530
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_207618231
source PAIS Index; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Finance
Fiscal policy
Government spending
Public finance
Social costs
Tax reform
Tax revenue estimating
Taxation
Taxpayer compliance
title Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A16%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Tax%20Reform%20in%20the%20Public%20Interest?%20a%20Rent-Seeking%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Public%20finance%20quarterly&rft.au=de%20Vanssay,%20Xavier&rft.date=1994-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=3-21&rft.issn=0048-5853&rft.eissn=1552-7530&rft.coden=PFQADD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/109114219402200101&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA14914495%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207618231&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A14914495&rft_sage_id=10.1177_109114219402200101&rfr_iscdi=true