Improving the Economic Complexity Index

How much knowledge is there in an economy? In recent years, data on the mix of products that countries export has been used to construct measures of economic complexity that estimate the knowledge available in an economy and predict future economic growth. Here we introduce a new and simpler metric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2017-07
Hauptverfasser: Saleh Albeaik, Kaltenberg, Mary, Alsaleh, Mansour, Hidalgo, Cesar A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Saleh Albeaik
Kaltenberg, Mary
Alsaleh, Mansour
Hidalgo, Cesar A
description How much knowledge is there in an economy? In recent years, data on the mix of products that countries export has been used to construct measures of economic complexity that estimate the knowledge available in an economy and predict future economic growth. Here we introduce a new and simpler metric of economic complexity (ECI+) that measures the total exports of an economy corrected by how difficult it is to export each product. We use data from 1973 to 2013 to compare the ability of ECI+, the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), and Fitness complexity, to predict future economic growth using 5, 10, and 20-year panels in a pooled OLS, a random effects model, and a fixed effects model. We find that ECI+ outperforms ECI and Fitness in its ability to predict economic growth and in the consistency of its estimators across most econometric specifications. On average, one standard deviation increase in ECI+ is associated with an increase in annualized growth of about 4% to 5%. We then combine ECI+ with measures of physical capital, human capital, and institutions, to find a robust model of economic growth. The ability of ECI+ to predict growth, and the value of its coefficient, is robust to these controls. Also, we find that human capital, political stability, and control of corruption; are positively associated with future economic growth, and that income is negatively associated with growth, in agreement with the traditional growth literature. Finally, we use ECI+ to generate economic growth predictions for the next 20 years and compare these predictions with the ones obtained using ECI and Fitness. These findings improve the methods available to estimate the knowledge intensity of economies and predict future economic growth.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2075790505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2075790505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20757905053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQ98wtKMovy8xLVyjJSFVwTc7Py8_NTFZwzs8tyEmtyCypVPDMS0mt4GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHrpA3YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwNzU3NLA1MDU2PiVAEAdx4vyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2075790505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the Economic Complexity Index</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Saleh Albeaik ; Kaltenberg, Mary ; Alsaleh, Mansour ; Hidalgo, Cesar A</creator><creatorcontrib>Saleh Albeaik ; Kaltenberg, Mary ; Alsaleh, Mansour ; Hidalgo, Cesar A</creatorcontrib><description>How much knowledge is there in an economy? In recent years, data on the mix of products that countries export has been used to construct measures of economic complexity that estimate the knowledge available in an economy and predict future economic growth. Here we introduce a new and simpler metric of economic complexity (ECI+) that measures the total exports of an economy corrected by how difficult it is to export each product. We use data from 1973 to 2013 to compare the ability of ECI+, the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), and Fitness complexity, to predict future economic growth using 5, 10, and 20-year panels in a pooled OLS, a random effects model, and a fixed effects model. We find that ECI+ outperforms ECI and Fitness in its ability to predict economic growth and in the consistency of its estimators across most econometric specifications. On average, one standard deviation increase in ECI+ is associated with an increase in annualized growth of about 4% to 5%. We then combine ECI+ with measures of physical capital, human capital, and institutions, to find a robust model of economic growth. The ability of ECI+ to predict growth, and the value of its coefficient, is robust to these controls. Also, we find that human capital, political stability, and control of corruption; are positively associated with future economic growth, and that income is negatively associated with growth, in agreement with the traditional growth literature. Finally, we use ECI+ to generate economic growth predictions for the next 20 years and compare these predictions with the ones obtained using ECI and Fitness. These findings improve the methods available to estimate the knowledge intensity of economies and predict future economic growth.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Complexity ; Control stability ; Econometrics ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economic models ; Exports ; Fitness ; Human capital ; Mathematical models ; Political factors ; Robust control</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2017-07</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saleh Albeaik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltenberg, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaleh, Mansour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo, Cesar A</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the Economic Complexity Index</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>How much knowledge is there in an economy? In recent years, data on the mix of products that countries export has been used to construct measures of economic complexity that estimate the knowledge available in an economy and predict future economic growth. Here we introduce a new and simpler metric of economic complexity (ECI+) that measures the total exports of an economy corrected by how difficult it is to export each product. We use data from 1973 to 2013 to compare the ability of ECI+, the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), and Fitness complexity, to predict future economic growth using 5, 10, and 20-year panels in a pooled OLS, a random effects model, and a fixed effects model. We find that ECI+ outperforms ECI and Fitness in its ability to predict economic growth and in the consistency of its estimators across most econometric specifications. On average, one standard deviation increase in ECI+ is associated with an increase in annualized growth of about 4% to 5%. We then combine ECI+ with measures of physical capital, human capital, and institutions, to find a robust model of economic growth. The ability of ECI+ to predict growth, and the value of its coefficient, is robust to these controls. Also, we find that human capital, political stability, and control of corruption; are positively associated with future economic growth, and that income is negatively associated with growth, in agreement with the traditional growth literature. Finally, we use ECI+ to generate economic growth predictions for the next 20 years and compare these predictions with the ones obtained using ECI and Fitness. These findings improve the methods available to estimate the knowledge intensity of economies and predict future economic growth.</description><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Robust control</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRQ98wtKMovy8xLVyjJSFVwTc7Py8_NTFZwzs8tyEmtyCypVPDMS0mt4GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHrpA3YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4IwNzU3NLA1MDU2PiVAEAdx4vyw</recordid><startdate>20170724</startdate><enddate>20170724</enddate><creator>Saleh Albeaik</creator><creator>Kaltenberg, Mary</creator><creator>Alsaleh, Mansour</creator><creator>Hidalgo, Cesar A</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170724</creationdate><title>Improving the Economic Complexity Index</title><author>Saleh Albeaik ; Kaltenberg, Mary ; Alsaleh, Mansour ; Hidalgo, Cesar A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20757905053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Robust control</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saleh Albeaik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltenberg, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaleh, Mansour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo, Cesar A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saleh Albeaik</au><au>Kaltenberg, Mary</au><au>Alsaleh, Mansour</au><au>Hidalgo, Cesar A</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Improving the Economic Complexity Index</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2017-07-24</date><risdate>2017</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>How much knowledge is there in an economy? In recent years, data on the mix of products that countries export has been used to construct measures of economic complexity that estimate the knowledge available in an economy and predict future economic growth. Here we introduce a new and simpler metric of economic complexity (ECI+) that measures the total exports of an economy corrected by how difficult it is to export each product. We use data from 1973 to 2013 to compare the ability of ECI+, the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), and Fitness complexity, to predict future economic growth using 5, 10, and 20-year panels in a pooled OLS, a random effects model, and a fixed effects model. We find that ECI+ outperforms ECI and Fitness in its ability to predict economic growth and in the consistency of its estimators across most econometric specifications. On average, one standard deviation increase in ECI+ is associated with an increase in annualized growth of about 4% to 5%. We then combine ECI+ with measures of physical capital, human capital, and institutions, to find a robust model of economic growth. The ability of ECI+ to predict growth, and the value of its coefficient, is robust to these controls. Also, we find that human capital, political stability, and control of corruption; are positively associated with future economic growth, and that income is negatively associated with growth, in agreement with the traditional growth literature. Finally, we use ECI+ to generate economic growth predictions for the next 20 years and compare these predictions with the ones obtained using ECI and Fitness. These findings improve the methods available to estimate the knowledge intensity of economies and predict future economic growth.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2017-07
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2075790505
source Free E- Journals
subjects Complexity
Control stability
Econometrics
Economic development
Economic growth
Economic models
Exports
Fitness
Human capital
Mathematical models
Political factors
Robust control
title Improving the Economic Complexity Index
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A53%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20Economic%20Complexity%20Index&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Saleh%20Albeaik&rft.date=2017-07-24&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2075790505%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2075790505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true