Distinguishing Thermal Fluctuations from Instrumental Error for High Pressure Charged Gas

Thermodynamic parameters such as temperature and pressure can be defined from the statistical behavior of a system. Therefore, thermal fluctuation is an inseparable characteristic of these parameters which eventually finds its way into experimental data. Analyzing these fluctuations is very useful i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2017-02
Hauptverfasser: Bedroya, Alek, Mahmud Bahmanabadi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Bedroya, Alek
Mahmud Bahmanabadi
description Thermodynamic parameters such as temperature and pressure can be defined from the statistical behavior of a system. Therefore, thermal fluctuation is an inseparable characteristic of these parameters which eventually finds its way into experimental data. Analyzing these fluctuations is very useful in studying the phase transitions of a physical system or its behavior around critical points. However, this approach is not straightforward as most of the times it is impossible to distinguish meaningful thermal fluctuations from those due to the instrumental errors. In this article, we have offered a method by which an experimenter can separate this multi-sourced fluctuation into its constitutive parts according to their sources. Although the article is only focused on a specific system, which is a high pressure charged gas, we have used a computational method which could be used for various other systems. Our proposed idea is very efficient and reduces the required computation time by a remarkable fraction. We have used Euler algorithm, which generally does not hold the internal energy conserved; But we have used this fact as a tool which allows us to surf in the phase space of the system and reach different energy levels in significantly less time. Although system does not spend enough time in a single energy level to equilibrate, but we have been able to extract the details of the equilibrium state out of our data. Using numerical computations combined with theoretical modelings we have given a final expression for the amount of the overall fluctuations existing in the measured pressure values. This expression is given in terms of the characteristics of both the gas and the barometer so that it can be experimentally verified.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2075313227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2075313227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20753132273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEOgjAUABsTE4nyD02cScqriDuCuDmwOJlGCy2BVt9r_18GP8DhcsPdiiUgZZ6dDgAblhKNQgg4llAUMmH3s6Vg3RAtmUW8MxpnNfFmis8QVbDeEe_Rz_zqKGCctQtLrhE98n6htYPhN9REETWvjMJBv_hF0Y6tezWRTn_esn1Td1WbvdF_oqbwGH1Et6QHiLKQuQQo5X_XFz0JQqI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2075313227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinguishing Thermal Fluctuations from Instrumental Error for High Pressure Charged Gas</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Bedroya, Alek ; Mahmud Bahmanabadi</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedroya, Alek ; Mahmud Bahmanabadi</creatorcontrib><description>Thermodynamic parameters such as temperature and pressure can be defined from the statistical behavior of a system. Therefore, thermal fluctuation is an inseparable characteristic of these parameters which eventually finds its way into experimental data. Analyzing these fluctuations is very useful in studying the phase transitions of a physical system or its behavior around critical points. However, this approach is not straightforward as most of the times it is impossible to distinguish meaningful thermal fluctuations from those due to the instrumental errors. In this article, we have offered a method by which an experimenter can separate this multi-sourced fluctuation into its constitutive parts according to their sources. Although the article is only focused on a specific system, which is a high pressure charged gas, we have used a computational method which could be used for various other systems. Our proposed idea is very efficient and reduces the required computation time by a remarkable fraction. We have used Euler algorithm, which generally does not hold the internal energy conserved; But we have used this fact as a tool which allows us to surf in the phase space of the system and reach different energy levels in significantly less time. Although system does not spend enough time in a single energy level to equilibrate, but we have been able to extract the details of the equilibrium state out of our data. Using numerical computations combined with theoretical modelings we have given a final expression for the amount of the overall fluctuations existing in the measured pressure values. This expression is given in terms of the characteristics of both the gas and the barometer so that it can be experimentally verified.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Barometers ; Critical point ; Energy levels ; Internal energy ; Mathematical models ; Parameters ; Phase transitions ; Variation</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2017-02</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedroya, Alek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmud Bahmanabadi</creatorcontrib><title>Distinguishing Thermal Fluctuations from Instrumental Error for High Pressure Charged Gas</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Thermodynamic parameters such as temperature and pressure can be defined from the statistical behavior of a system. Therefore, thermal fluctuation is an inseparable characteristic of these parameters which eventually finds its way into experimental data. Analyzing these fluctuations is very useful in studying the phase transitions of a physical system or its behavior around critical points. However, this approach is not straightforward as most of the times it is impossible to distinguish meaningful thermal fluctuations from those due to the instrumental errors. In this article, we have offered a method by which an experimenter can separate this multi-sourced fluctuation into its constitutive parts according to their sources. Although the article is only focused on a specific system, which is a high pressure charged gas, we have used a computational method which could be used for various other systems. Our proposed idea is very efficient and reduces the required computation time by a remarkable fraction. We have used Euler algorithm, which generally does not hold the internal energy conserved; But we have used this fact as a tool which allows us to surf in the phase space of the system and reach different energy levels in significantly less time. Although system does not spend enough time in a single energy level to equilibrate, but we have been able to extract the details of the equilibrium state out of our data. Using numerical computations combined with theoretical modelings we have given a final expression for the amount of the overall fluctuations existing in the measured pressure values. This expression is given in terms of the characteristics of both the gas and the barometer so that it can be experimentally verified.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Barometers</subject><subject>Critical point</subject><subject>Energy levels</subject><subject>Internal energy</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Phase transitions</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirEOgjAUABsTE4nyD02cScqriDuCuDmwOJlGCy2BVt9r_18GP8DhcsPdiiUgZZ6dDgAblhKNQgg4llAUMmH3s6Vg3RAtmUW8MxpnNfFmis8QVbDeEe_Rz_zqKGCctQtLrhE98n6htYPhN9REETWvjMJBv_hF0Y6tezWRTn_esn1Td1WbvdF_oqbwGH1Et6QHiLKQuQQo5X_XFz0JQqI</recordid><startdate>20170226</startdate><enddate>20170226</enddate><creator>Bedroya, Alek</creator><creator>Mahmud Bahmanabadi</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170226</creationdate><title>Distinguishing Thermal Fluctuations from Instrumental Error for High Pressure Charged Gas</title><author>Bedroya, Alek ; Mahmud Bahmanabadi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20753132273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Barometers</topic><topic>Critical point</topic><topic>Energy levels</topic><topic>Internal energy</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Phase transitions</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedroya, Alek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmud Bahmanabadi</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedroya, Alek</au><au>Mahmud Bahmanabadi</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Distinguishing Thermal Fluctuations from Instrumental Error for High Pressure Charged Gas</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2017-02-26</date><risdate>2017</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Thermodynamic parameters such as temperature and pressure can be defined from the statistical behavior of a system. Therefore, thermal fluctuation is an inseparable characteristic of these parameters which eventually finds its way into experimental data. Analyzing these fluctuations is very useful in studying the phase transitions of a physical system or its behavior around critical points. However, this approach is not straightforward as most of the times it is impossible to distinguish meaningful thermal fluctuations from those due to the instrumental errors. In this article, we have offered a method by which an experimenter can separate this multi-sourced fluctuation into its constitutive parts according to their sources. Although the article is only focused on a specific system, which is a high pressure charged gas, we have used a computational method which could be used for various other systems. Our proposed idea is very efficient and reduces the required computation time by a remarkable fraction. We have used Euler algorithm, which generally does not hold the internal energy conserved; But we have used this fact as a tool which allows us to surf in the phase space of the system and reach different energy levels in significantly less time. Although system does not spend enough time in a single energy level to equilibrate, but we have been able to extract the details of the equilibrium state out of our data. Using numerical computations combined with theoretical modelings we have given a final expression for the amount of the overall fluctuations existing in the measured pressure values. This expression is given in terms of the characteristics of both the gas and the barometer so that it can be experimentally verified.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2017-02
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2075313227
source Free E- Journals
subjects Algorithms
Barometers
Critical point
Energy levels
Internal energy
Mathematical models
Parameters
Phase transitions
Variation
title Distinguishing Thermal Fluctuations from Instrumental Error for High Pressure Charged Gas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A40%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Distinguishing%20Thermal%20Fluctuations%20from%20Instrumental%20Error%20for%20High%20Pressure%20Charged%20Gas&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Bedroya,%20Alek&rft.date=2017-02-26&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2075313227%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2075313227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true