The \(H_0\) and \(\sigma_8\) tensions and the scale invariant spectrum

In a previous communication we showed that a joint analysis of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data and the current measurement of the local expansion rate favours a model with a scale invariant spectrum (HZ) over the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario provided that the effective number of relativist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2018-06
Hauptverfasser: Benetti, Micol, Graef, Leila L, Alcaniz, Jailson S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Benetti, Micol
Graef, Leila L
Alcaniz, Jailson S
description In a previous communication we showed that a joint analysis of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data and the current measurement of the local expansion rate favours a model with a scale invariant spectrum (HZ) over the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario provided that the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, \(N_{eff}\), is taken as a free parameter. Such a result is basically obtained due to the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) value of the Hubble constant, \(H_0 = 73.24 \pm 1.74\) \(\rm{km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}}\) (68\% C.L.), as the CMB data alone discard the HZ+\(N_{eff}\) model. Although such a model is not physically motivated by current scenarios of the early universe, observations pointing to a scale invariant spectrum may indicate that the origin of cosmic perturbations lies in an unknown physical process. Here, we extend the previous results performing a Bayesian analysis using joint CMB, HST, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements. In order to take into account the well-known tension on the value of the fluctuation amplitude parameter, \(\sigma_8\), we also consider Cluster Number counts (CN) and Weak Lensing (WL) data. We use two different samples of BAO data, which are obtained using two-point spatial (BAO 2PCF) and angular (BAO 2PACF) correlation functions. Our results show that a joint CMB+HST+BAO 2PCF analysis discards the HZP\(+N_{eff}\) model with respect to the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario whereas the combination CMB+HST+BAO 2PACF favours the former model, even when an extended dataset with NC and WL is considered.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1712.00677
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2073923812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2073923812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20739238123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNikEKwjAQRYMgWLQHcBdwowvrZNI2dS2KB3BZCEGjRmqqmVQ8vkU8gKv_-O8xNhWQ5VVRwMqEt3tlQgnMAEqlBixBKcWyyhFHLCW6AQCWCotCJmx3uFpez_ca6gU3_tRzTe5yN7rqj2g9udbT18S-pKNpLHf-ZYIzPnJ62GMM3X3ChmfTkE1_O2az3faw2S8foX12lqK-tV3wvdIISq5RVgLlf9UHu7o_1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2073923812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The \(H_0\) and \(\sigma_8\) tensions and the scale invariant spectrum</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Benetti, Micol ; Graef, Leila L ; Alcaniz, Jailson S</creator><creatorcontrib>Benetti, Micol ; Graef, Leila L ; Alcaniz, Jailson S</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous communication we showed that a joint analysis of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data and the current measurement of the local expansion rate favours a model with a scale invariant spectrum (HZ) over the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario provided that the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, \(N_{eff}\), is taken as a free parameter. Such a result is basically obtained due to the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) value of the Hubble constant, \(H_0 = 73.24 \pm 1.74\) \(\rm{km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}}\) (68\% C.L.), as the CMB data alone discard the HZ+\(N_{eff}\) model. Although such a model is not physically motivated by current scenarios of the early universe, observations pointing to a scale invariant spectrum may indicate that the origin of cosmic perturbations lies in an unknown physical process. Here, we extend the previous results performing a Bayesian analysis using joint CMB, HST, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements. In order to take into account the well-known tension on the value of the fluctuation amplitude parameter, \(\sigma_8\), we also consider Cluster Number counts (CN) and Weak Lensing (WL) data. We use two different samples of BAO data, which are obtained using two-point spatial (BAO 2PCF) and angular (BAO 2PACF) correlation functions. Our results show that a joint CMB+HST+BAO 2PCF analysis discards the HZP\(+N_{eff}\) model with respect to the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario whereas the combination CMB+HST+BAO 2PACF favours the former model, even when an extended dataset with NC and WL is considered.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1712.00677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Big Bang theory ; Cosmic microwave background ; Hubble constant ; Hubble Space Telescope ; Invariants ; Mathematical models ; Parameters ; Space telescopes ; Universe ; Variations</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2018-06</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benetti, Micol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graef, Leila L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcaniz, Jailson S</creatorcontrib><title>The \(H_0\) and \(\sigma_8\) tensions and the scale invariant spectrum</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>In a previous communication we showed that a joint analysis of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data and the current measurement of the local expansion rate favours a model with a scale invariant spectrum (HZ) over the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario provided that the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, \(N_{eff}\), is taken as a free parameter. Such a result is basically obtained due to the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) value of the Hubble constant, \(H_0 = 73.24 \pm 1.74\) \(\rm{km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}}\) (68\% C.L.), as the CMB data alone discard the HZ+\(N_{eff}\) model. Although such a model is not physically motivated by current scenarios of the early universe, observations pointing to a scale invariant spectrum may indicate that the origin of cosmic perturbations lies in an unknown physical process. Here, we extend the previous results performing a Bayesian analysis using joint CMB, HST, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements. In order to take into account the well-known tension on the value of the fluctuation amplitude parameter, \(\sigma_8\), we also consider Cluster Number counts (CN) and Weak Lensing (WL) data. We use two different samples of BAO data, which are obtained using two-point spatial (BAO 2PCF) and angular (BAO 2PACF) correlation functions. Our results show that a joint CMB+HST+BAO 2PCF analysis discards the HZP\(+N_{eff}\) model with respect to the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario whereas the combination CMB+HST+BAO 2PACF favours the former model, even when an extended dataset with NC and WL is considered.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Big Bang theory</subject><subject>Cosmic microwave background</subject><subject>Hubble constant</subject><subject>Hubble Space Telescope</subject><subject>Invariants</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Space telescopes</subject><subject>Universe</subject><subject>Variations</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNikEKwjAQRYMgWLQHcBdwowvrZNI2dS2KB3BZCEGjRmqqmVQ8vkU8gKv_-O8xNhWQ5VVRwMqEt3tlQgnMAEqlBixBKcWyyhFHLCW6AQCWCotCJmx3uFpez_ca6gU3_tRzTe5yN7rqj2g9udbT18S-pKNpLHf-ZYIzPnJ62GMM3X3ChmfTkE1_O2az3faw2S8foX12lqK-tV3wvdIISq5RVgLlf9UHu7o_1g</recordid><startdate>20180621</startdate><enddate>20180621</enddate><creator>Benetti, Micol</creator><creator>Graef, Leila L</creator><creator>Alcaniz, Jailson S</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180621</creationdate><title>The \(H_0\) and \(\sigma_8\) tensions and the scale invariant spectrum</title><author>Benetti, Micol ; Graef, Leila L ; Alcaniz, Jailson S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20739238123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Big Bang theory</topic><topic>Cosmic microwave background</topic><topic>Hubble constant</topic><topic>Hubble Space Telescope</topic><topic>Invariants</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Space telescopes</topic><topic>Universe</topic><topic>Variations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benetti, Micol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graef, Leila L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcaniz, Jailson S</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benetti, Micol</au><au>Graef, Leila L</au><au>Alcaniz, Jailson S</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>The \(H_0\) and \(\sigma_8\) tensions and the scale invariant spectrum</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2018-06-21</date><risdate>2018</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>In a previous communication we showed that a joint analysis of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data and the current measurement of the local expansion rate favours a model with a scale invariant spectrum (HZ) over the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario provided that the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, \(N_{eff}\), is taken as a free parameter. Such a result is basically obtained due to the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) value of the Hubble constant, \(H_0 = 73.24 \pm 1.74\) \(\rm{km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}}\) (68\% C.L.), as the CMB data alone discard the HZ+\(N_{eff}\) model. Although such a model is not physically motivated by current scenarios of the early universe, observations pointing to a scale invariant spectrum may indicate that the origin of cosmic perturbations lies in an unknown physical process. Here, we extend the previous results performing a Bayesian analysis using joint CMB, HST, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements. In order to take into account the well-known tension on the value of the fluctuation amplitude parameter, \(\sigma_8\), we also consider Cluster Number counts (CN) and Weak Lensing (WL) data. We use two different samples of BAO data, which are obtained using two-point spatial (BAO 2PCF) and angular (BAO 2PACF) correlation functions. Our results show that a joint CMB+HST+BAO 2PCF analysis discards the HZP\(+N_{eff}\) model with respect to the minimal \(\Lambda\)CDM scenario whereas the combination CMB+HST+BAO 2PACF favours the former model, even when an extended dataset with NC and WL is considered.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1712.00677</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2018-06
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2073923812
source Free E- Journals
subjects Bayesian analysis
Big Bang theory
Cosmic microwave background
Hubble constant
Hubble Space Telescope
Invariants
Mathematical models
Parameters
Space telescopes
Universe
Variations
title The \(H_0\) and \(\sigma_8\) tensions and the scale invariant spectrum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T21%3A09%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=The%20%5C(H_0%5C)%20and%20%5C(%5Csigma_8%5C)%20tensions%20and%20the%20scale%20invariant%20spectrum&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Benetti,%20Micol&rft.date=2018-06-21&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1712.00677&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2073923812%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2073923812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true