UPMIFA, Three Years Later

When the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) approved the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) in July 2006, they could not have predicted how imprudent the financial world would seem to nonprofit board members three years later. The NCCUSL d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business law today 2009-07, Vol.18 (6), p.41
1. Verfasser: Rowland, Cynthia R
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 41
container_title Business law today
container_volume 18
creator Rowland, Cynthia R
description When the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) approved the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) in July 2006, they could not have predicted how imprudent the financial world would seem to nonprofit board members three years later. The NCCUSL drafting committee worked hard to improve the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA) by modernizing endowment fund rules for fiduciaries. Indeed, UPMIFA does take into account important facts and circumstances for investment policies, spending policies, expense management, and delegation in ways that UMIFA did not. Under UMIFA, the rules were fairly straightforward: as long as the institution did not invade the historic dollar value, any spending rate would be fine. There is little guidance in UPMIFA or the comments about how a prudent board resolves this dilemma, but it is clear that if they get it wrong, the state's attorney general can enforce the charitable interests of the public.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_207372816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1833857591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2073728163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY31bUwNDRiYeA0NDC11LU0MTbjYOAqLs4yMDCxACJOBsnQAF9PN0cdhZCMotRUhcjUxKJiBZ_EktQiHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOTmGuLsoVtQlF9YmlpcEp-VX1qUB5SKNzIwNzY3sjA0MyZKEQB5sSoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>207372816</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>UPMIFA, Three Years Later</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Rowland, Cynthia R</creator><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Cynthia R</creatorcontrib><description>When the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) approved the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) in July 2006, they could not have predicted how imprudent the financial world would seem to nonprofit board members three years later. The NCCUSL drafting committee worked hard to improve the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA) by modernizing endowment fund rules for fiduciaries. Indeed, UPMIFA does take into account important facts and circumstances for investment policies, spending policies, expense management, and delegation in ways that UMIFA did not. Under UMIFA, the rules were fairly straightforward: as long as the institution did not invade the historic dollar value, any spending rate would be fine. There is little guidance in UPMIFA or the comments about how a prudent board resolves this dilemma, but it is clear that if they get it wrong, the state's attorney general can enforce the charitable interests of the public.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-9436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-8112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Boards of directors ; Decision making ; Deflation ; Directors ; Economic conditions ; Endowment ; Investment policy ; Investments ; Nonprofit organizations ; Purchasing power ; Rates of return ; State laws</subject><ispartof>Business law today, 2009-07, Vol.18 (6), p.41</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Jul/Aug 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Cynthia R</creatorcontrib><title>UPMIFA, Three Years Later</title><title>Business law today</title><description>When the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) approved the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) in July 2006, they could not have predicted how imprudent the financial world would seem to nonprofit board members three years later. The NCCUSL drafting committee worked hard to improve the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA) by modernizing endowment fund rules for fiduciaries. Indeed, UPMIFA does take into account important facts and circumstances for investment policies, spending policies, expense management, and delegation in ways that UMIFA did not. Under UMIFA, the rules were fairly straightforward: as long as the institution did not invade the historic dollar value, any spending rate would be fine. There is little guidance in UPMIFA or the comments about how a prudent board resolves this dilemma, but it is clear that if they get it wrong, the state's attorney general can enforce the charitable interests of the public.</description><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deflation</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Endowment</subject><subject>Investment policy</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Purchasing power</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>State laws</subject><issn>1059-9436</issn><issn>2375-8112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY31bUwNDRiYeA0NDC11LU0MTbjYOAqLs4yMDCxACJOBsnQAF9PN0cdhZCMotRUhcjUxKJiBZ_EktQiHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOTmGuLsoVtQlF9YmlpcEp-VX1qUB5SKNzIwNzY3sjA0MyZKEQB5sSoQ</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Rowland, Cynthia R</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>UPMIFA, Three Years Later</title><author>Rowland, Cynthia R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2073728163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deflation</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Endowment</topic><topic>Investment policy</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Purchasing power</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>State laws</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Cynthia R</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Business law today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rowland, Cynthia R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UPMIFA, Three Years Later</atitle><jtitle>Business law today</jtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>41</spage><pages>41-</pages><issn>1059-9436</issn><eissn>2375-8112</eissn><abstract>When the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) approved the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA) in July 2006, they could not have predicted how imprudent the financial world would seem to nonprofit board members three years later. The NCCUSL drafting committee worked hard to improve the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA) by modernizing endowment fund rules for fiduciaries. Indeed, UPMIFA does take into account important facts and circumstances for investment policies, spending policies, expense management, and delegation in ways that UMIFA did not. Under UMIFA, the rules were fairly straightforward: as long as the institution did not invade the historic dollar value, any spending rate would be fine. There is little guidance in UPMIFA or the comments about how a prudent board resolves this dilemma, but it is clear that if they get it wrong, the state's attorney general can enforce the charitable interests of the public.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-9436
ispartof Business law today, 2009-07, Vol.18 (6), p.41
issn 1059-9436
2375-8112
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_207372816
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Boards of directors
Decision making
Deflation
Directors
Economic conditions
Endowment
Investment policy
Investments
Nonprofit organizations
Purchasing power
Rates of return
State laws
title UPMIFA, Three Years Later
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A58%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UPMIFA,%20Three%20Years%20Later&rft.jtitle=Business%20law%20today&rft.au=Rowland,%20Cynthia%20R&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=41&rft.pages=41-&rft.issn=1059-9436&rft.eissn=2375-8112&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1833857591%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207372816&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true