Numerical calibration of mechanical behaviour of composite shell tunnel linings
•Four-point bending tests were carried out on composite shell lining beam samples.•Strain distribution across composite lining cross-section identified.•Numerical analyses verified the suggested range of interface stiffnesses.•Proposed numerical model was capable of predicting the composite mechanic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tunnelling and underground space technology 2018-06, Vol.76, p.107-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 120 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Tunnelling and underground space technology |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Su, Jiang Bloodworth, Alan |
description | •Four-point bending tests were carried out on composite shell lining beam samples.•Strain distribution across composite lining cross-section identified.•Numerical analyses verified the suggested range of interface stiffnesses.•Proposed numerical model was capable of predicting the composite mechanical behavior.•Sensitivity study investigates the impact of interface stiffnesses and position.
Composite shell linings consist of primary and secondary sprayed concrete linings separated by a layer of spray-applied waterproofing membrane. In order to design such a lining configuration, a calibrated numerical simulation approach is needed and the impact of interface properties on the composite mechanical behaviour should be understood.
A programme of laboratory tests was carried out on beam samples cut from composite shell test panels and subjected to four-point bending under short-term loading. A range of membrane thicknesses and substrate roughness were compared and composite mechanical behaviour quantification methods developed. The behaviour of composite beams was understood and the strain distribution across composite lining cross-section was identified.
A numerical model by the finite difference method was then set up for the beams and verified against the test data. With interface stiffnesses obtained from previous element tests, the composite beam model is capable of predicting the strain distribution across the cross-section and real behaviour of composite beam members to within an acceptable level of accuracy taking into account variations arising from workmanship. Sensitivity studies were carried out to understand the impact of interface properties and membrane interface position on the degree of composite action. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2072281417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886779816307301</els_id><sourcerecordid>2072281417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58d89bc956f4650e0bdf2dd7412beb76eea8ebb02f77704b2e0bde1530f462ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AU8Fz62T9CMpeJHFL1jci55Dk07dlLZZk3TBf2_qevYwDMy878zLQ8gNhYwCre76LMw-ZAyoyCDPgNITsqKCi7TIq-KUrECIKuW8FufkwvseAErG6hXZvs0jOqObIYlllGuCsVNiu2REvWum343CXXMwdnbLXNtxb70JmPgdDkMS5mnCIRnMZKZPf0XOumbweP3XL8nH0-P7-iXdbJ9f1w-bVOechbQUraiVrsuqK6oSEFTbsbblBWUKFa8QG4FKAes451AotiiQljlEPUPML8nt8e7e2a8ZfZB9zDfFl5IBZ0zQgvKoYkeVdtZ7h53cOzM27ltSkAs42csFnFzASchlBBdN90cTxvwHg056bXDS2BqHOsjWmv_sP9q7eJE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2072281417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical calibration of mechanical behaviour of composite shell tunnel linings</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Su, Jiang ; Bloodworth, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Su, Jiang ; Bloodworth, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>•Four-point bending tests were carried out on composite shell lining beam samples.•Strain distribution across composite lining cross-section identified.•Numerical analyses verified the suggested range of interface stiffnesses.•Proposed numerical model was capable of predicting the composite mechanical behavior.•Sensitivity study investigates the impact of interface stiffnesses and position.
Composite shell linings consist of primary and secondary sprayed concrete linings separated by a layer of spray-applied waterproofing membrane. In order to design such a lining configuration, a calibrated numerical simulation approach is needed and the impact of interface properties on the composite mechanical behaviour should be understood.
A programme of laboratory tests was carried out on beam samples cut from composite shell test panels and subjected to four-point bending under short-term loading. A range of membrane thicknesses and substrate roughness were compared and composite mechanical behaviour quantification methods developed. The behaviour of composite beams was understood and the strain distribution across composite lining cross-section was identified.
A numerical model by the finite difference method was then set up for the beams and verified against the test data. With interface stiffnesses obtained from previous element tests, the composite beam model is capable of predicting the strain distribution across the cross-section and real behaviour of composite beam members to within an acceptable level of accuracy taking into account variations arising from workmanship. Sensitivity studies were carried out to understand the impact of interface properties and membrane interface position on the degree of composite action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-7798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4364</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Composite beams ; Composite materials ; Composite mechanical behaviour ; Composite structures ; Computer simulation ; Configuration management ; Cross-sections ; Finite difference method ; Laboratory tests ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical properties ; Numerical analysis ; Shells (structural forms) ; Spray-applied waterproofing membrane ; Sprayed concrete ; Strain distribution ; Substrates ; Tunnel linings ; Tunnels ; Waterproofing</subject><ispartof>Tunnelling and underground space technology, 2018-06, Vol.76, p.107-120</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58d89bc956f4650e0bdf2dd7412beb76eea8ebb02f77704b2e0bde1530f462ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58d89bc956f4650e0bdf2dd7412beb76eea8ebb02f77704b2e0bde1530f462ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Su, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloodworth, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical calibration of mechanical behaviour of composite shell tunnel linings</title><title>Tunnelling and underground space technology</title><description>•Four-point bending tests were carried out on composite shell lining beam samples.•Strain distribution across composite lining cross-section identified.•Numerical analyses verified the suggested range of interface stiffnesses.•Proposed numerical model was capable of predicting the composite mechanical behavior.•Sensitivity study investigates the impact of interface stiffnesses and position.
Composite shell linings consist of primary and secondary sprayed concrete linings separated by a layer of spray-applied waterproofing membrane. In order to design such a lining configuration, a calibrated numerical simulation approach is needed and the impact of interface properties on the composite mechanical behaviour should be understood.
A programme of laboratory tests was carried out on beam samples cut from composite shell test panels and subjected to four-point bending under short-term loading. A range of membrane thicknesses and substrate roughness were compared and composite mechanical behaviour quantification methods developed. The behaviour of composite beams was understood and the strain distribution across composite lining cross-section was identified.
A numerical model by the finite difference method was then set up for the beams and verified against the test data. With interface stiffnesses obtained from previous element tests, the composite beam model is capable of predicting the strain distribution across the cross-section and real behaviour of composite beam members to within an acceptable level of accuracy taking into account variations arising from workmanship. Sensitivity studies were carried out to understand the impact of interface properties and membrane interface position on the degree of composite action.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Composite beams</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite mechanical behaviour</subject><subject>Composite structures</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Configuration management</subject><subject>Cross-sections</subject><subject>Finite difference method</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Shells (structural forms)</subject><subject>Spray-applied waterproofing membrane</subject><subject>Sprayed concrete</subject><subject>Strain distribution</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Tunnel linings</subject><subject>Tunnels</subject><subject>Waterproofing</subject><issn>0886-7798</issn><issn>1878-4364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AU8Fz62T9CMpeJHFL1jci55Dk07dlLZZk3TBf2_qevYwDMy878zLQ8gNhYwCre76LMw-ZAyoyCDPgNITsqKCi7TIq-KUrECIKuW8FufkwvseAErG6hXZvs0jOqObIYlllGuCsVNiu2REvWum343CXXMwdnbLXNtxb70JmPgdDkMS5mnCIRnMZKZPf0XOumbweP3XL8nH0-P7-iXdbJ9f1w-bVOechbQUraiVrsuqK6oSEFTbsbblBWUKFa8QG4FKAes451AotiiQljlEPUPML8nt8e7e2a8ZfZB9zDfFl5IBZ0zQgvKoYkeVdtZ7h53cOzM27ltSkAs42csFnFzASchlBBdN90cTxvwHg056bXDS2BqHOsjWmv_sP9q7eJE</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Su, Jiang</creator><creator>Bloodworth, Alan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Numerical calibration of mechanical behaviour of composite shell tunnel linings</title><author>Su, Jiang ; Bloodworth, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58d89bc956f4650e0bdf2dd7412beb76eea8ebb02f77704b2e0bde1530f462ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Composite beams</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite mechanical behaviour</topic><topic>Composite structures</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Configuration management</topic><topic>Cross-sections</topic><topic>Finite difference method</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Shells (structural forms)</topic><topic>Spray-applied waterproofing membrane</topic><topic>Sprayed concrete</topic><topic>Strain distribution</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Tunnel linings</topic><topic>Tunnels</topic><topic>Waterproofing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Su, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloodworth, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Tunnelling and underground space technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Su, Jiang</au><au>Bloodworth, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical calibration of mechanical behaviour of composite shell tunnel linings</atitle><jtitle>Tunnelling and underground space technology</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>76</volume><spage>107</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>107-120</pages><issn>0886-7798</issn><eissn>1878-4364</eissn><abstract>•Four-point bending tests were carried out on composite shell lining beam samples.•Strain distribution across composite lining cross-section identified.•Numerical analyses verified the suggested range of interface stiffnesses.•Proposed numerical model was capable of predicting the composite mechanical behavior.•Sensitivity study investigates the impact of interface stiffnesses and position.
Composite shell linings consist of primary and secondary sprayed concrete linings separated by a layer of spray-applied waterproofing membrane. In order to design such a lining configuration, a calibrated numerical simulation approach is needed and the impact of interface properties on the composite mechanical behaviour should be understood.
A programme of laboratory tests was carried out on beam samples cut from composite shell test panels and subjected to four-point bending under short-term loading. A range of membrane thicknesses and substrate roughness were compared and composite mechanical behaviour quantification methods developed. The behaviour of composite beams was understood and the strain distribution across composite lining cross-section was identified.
A numerical model by the finite difference method was then set up for the beams and verified against the test data. With interface stiffnesses obtained from previous element tests, the composite beam model is capable of predicting the strain distribution across the cross-section and real behaviour of composite beam members to within an acceptable level of accuracy taking into account variations arising from workmanship. Sensitivity studies were carried out to understand the impact of interface properties and membrane interface position on the degree of composite action.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.011</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-7798 |
ispartof | Tunnelling and underground space technology, 2018-06, Vol.76, p.107-120 |
issn | 0886-7798 1878-4364 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2072281417 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Calibration Composite beams Composite materials Composite mechanical behaviour Composite structures Computer simulation Configuration management Cross-sections Finite difference method Laboratory tests Mathematical models Mechanical properties Numerical analysis Shells (structural forms) Spray-applied waterproofing membrane Sprayed concrete Strain distribution Substrates Tunnel linings Tunnels Waterproofing |
title | Numerical calibration of mechanical behaviour of composite shell tunnel linings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A20%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20calibration%20of%20mechanical%20behaviour%20of%20composite%20shell%20tunnel%20linings&rft.jtitle=Tunnelling%20and%20underground%20space%20technology&rft.au=Su,%20Jiang&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=107-120&rft.issn=0886-7798&rft.eissn=1878-4364&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2072281417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2072281417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0886779816307301&rfr_iscdi=true |