Evaluating the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey for Scaup
Potential bias in breeding population estimates of certain duck species from the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (WBPHS) has been a concern for decades. The WBPHS does not differentiate between lesser (Aythya affinis) and greater (A. marila) scaup, but lesser scaup comprise 89% of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2018-08, Vol.82 (6), p.1252-1262 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1252 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L. AFTON, ALAN D. BADZINSKI, SHANNON S. PETRIE, SCOTT A. OLSEN, GLENN H. MITCHELL, MARK A. |
description | Potential bias in breeding population estimates of certain duck species from the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (WBPHS) has been a concern for decades. The WBPHS does not differentiate between lesser (Aythya affinis) and greater (A. marila) scaup, but lesser scaup comprise 89% of the combined scaup population and their population estimates are suspected to be biased. We marked female lesser scaup (i.e., marked scaup) in the Mississippi and Atlantic Flyways, Canada and United States, with implantable satellite transmitters to track their spring migration through the traditional and eastern survey areas of the WBPHS, 2005–2010. Our goal was to use data independent of the WBPHS to evaluate whether breeding population estimates for scaup were biased and identify variables that might be used in the future to refine population estimates. We found that the WBPHS estimates of breeding scaup are biased because, across years, only 30% of our marked scaup had settled for the breeding period when the strata in which they settled were surveyed, 43% were available to be counted in multiple survey strata as their migration continued during the WBPHS, 32% settled outside the WBPHS area, the number of times a marked scaup was available to be counted by survey crews varied positively with the latitude that a marked scaup settled on breeding areas, the probability of a marked scaup being in a stratum while it was surveyed varied among years, and these probabilities were positively correlated with the traditional and eastern breeding population estimates for scaup. Annual population estimates derived from banding data provide a less biased and preferable method of monitoring scaup population status and trend. Development of models that include metrics such as survey stratum latitude and annual spring environmental conditions might potentially be used to improve scaup breeding population estimates derived from the WBPHS, but independent estimates from banding data would be important to evaluate such models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.21478 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2072265462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26608412</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26608412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3238-1c6162decb7326b5b68436e5a7a788eb454bcaad764060dffe1aefd4135892a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKcX70LAm9CZl6RJdtQxt8lEYcq8hbRNZ0vXzLTd2H9vZ9Wjpwe_9_3egw-hSyADIITe5rv1akCBS3WEejBkMqAK5DHqtUsahBzeT9FZVeWEMAAlemg23pqiMXVWrnD9YfHS1Nanblfge29tcohf3KYpWsKV2JQJnpooq02NF43f2j1OnceL2DSbc3SSmqKyFz-zj94exq-jaTB_nsxGd_MgZpSpAGIBgiY2jiSjIgojoTgTNjTSSKVsxEMexcYkUnAiSJKmFoxNEw4sVENqgPXRdXd3491nY6ta567xZftSUyIpFSEXtKVuOir2rqq8TfXGZ2vj9xqIPqjSB1X6W1ULQwfvssLu_yH14_Jp8tu56jp5VTv_16FCEMWBsi8CcnU-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2072265462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey for Scaup</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L. ; AFTON, ALAN D. ; BADZINSKI, SHANNON S. ; PETRIE, SCOTT A. ; OLSEN, GLENN H. ; MITCHELL, MARK A.</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L. ; AFTON, ALAN D. ; BADZINSKI, SHANNON S. ; PETRIE, SCOTT A. ; OLSEN, GLENN H. ; MITCHELL, MARK A.</creatorcontrib><description>Potential bias in breeding population estimates of certain duck species from the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (WBPHS) has been a concern for decades. The WBPHS does not differentiate between lesser (Aythya affinis) and greater (A. marila) scaup, but lesser scaup comprise 89% of the combined scaup population and their population estimates are suspected to be biased. We marked female lesser scaup (i.e., marked scaup) in the Mississippi and Atlantic Flyways, Canada and United States, with implantable satellite transmitters to track their spring migration through the traditional and eastern survey areas of the WBPHS, 2005–2010. Our goal was to use data independent of the WBPHS to evaluate whether breeding population estimates for scaup were biased and identify variables that might be used in the future to refine population estimates. We found that the WBPHS estimates of breeding scaup are biased because, across years, only 30% of our marked scaup had settled for the breeding period when the strata in which they settled were surveyed, 43% were available to be counted in multiple survey strata as their migration continued during the WBPHS, 32% settled outside the WBPHS area, the number of times a marked scaup was available to be counted by survey crews varied positively with the latitude that a marked scaup settled on breeding areas, the probability of a marked scaup being in a stratum while it was surveyed varied among years, and these probabilities were positively correlated with the traditional and eastern breeding population estimates for scaup. Annual population estimates derived from banding data provide a less biased and preferable method of monitoring scaup population status and trend. Development of models that include metrics such as survey stratum latitude and annual spring environmental conditions might potentially be used to improve scaup breeding population estimates derived from the WBPHS, but independent estimates from banding data would be important to evaluate such models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>aerial surveys ; Aquatic birds ; Aythya affinis ; Banding ; Bird migration ; Breeding ; Environmental conditions ; Estimates ; Latitude ; Monitoring methods ; Polls & surveys ; Population ; Population Ecology ; population estimates ; Population statistics ; Population status ; satellite telemetry ; Satellite tracking ; Strata ; survey bias ; survey coverage ; Transmitters ; Waterfowl ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2018-08, Vol.82 (6), p.1252-1262</ispartof><rights>2018 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3238-1c6162decb7326b5b68436e5a7a788eb454bcaad764060dffe1aefd4135892a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3238-1c6162decb7326b5b68436e5a7a788eb454bcaad764060dffe1aefd4135892a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26608412$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26608412$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AFTON, ALAN D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BADZINSKI, SHANNON S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETRIE, SCOTT A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLSEN, GLENN H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MITCHELL, MARK A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey for Scaup</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Potential bias in breeding population estimates of certain duck species from the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (WBPHS) has been a concern for decades. The WBPHS does not differentiate between lesser (Aythya affinis) and greater (A. marila) scaup, but lesser scaup comprise 89% of the combined scaup population and their population estimates are suspected to be biased. We marked female lesser scaup (i.e., marked scaup) in the Mississippi and Atlantic Flyways, Canada and United States, with implantable satellite transmitters to track their spring migration through the traditional and eastern survey areas of the WBPHS, 2005–2010. Our goal was to use data independent of the WBPHS to evaluate whether breeding population estimates for scaup were biased and identify variables that might be used in the future to refine population estimates. We found that the WBPHS estimates of breeding scaup are biased because, across years, only 30% of our marked scaup had settled for the breeding period when the strata in which they settled were surveyed, 43% were available to be counted in multiple survey strata as their migration continued during the WBPHS, 32% settled outside the WBPHS area, the number of times a marked scaup was available to be counted by survey crews varied positively with the latitude that a marked scaup settled on breeding areas, the probability of a marked scaup being in a stratum while it was surveyed varied among years, and these probabilities were positively correlated with the traditional and eastern breeding population estimates for scaup. Annual population estimates derived from banding data provide a less biased and preferable method of monitoring scaup population status and trend. Development of models that include metrics such as survey stratum latitude and annual spring environmental conditions might potentially be used to improve scaup breeding population estimates derived from the WBPHS, but independent estimates from banding data would be important to evaluate such models.</description><subject>aerial surveys</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Aythya affinis</subject><subject>Banding</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Ecology</subject><subject>population estimates</subject><subject>Population statistics</subject><subject>Population status</subject><subject>satellite telemetry</subject><subject>Satellite tracking</subject><subject>Strata</subject><subject>survey bias</subject><subject>survey coverage</subject><subject>Transmitters</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKcX70LAm9CZl6RJdtQxt8lEYcq8hbRNZ0vXzLTd2H9vZ9Wjpwe_9_3egw-hSyADIITe5rv1akCBS3WEejBkMqAK5DHqtUsahBzeT9FZVeWEMAAlemg23pqiMXVWrnD9YfHS1Nanblfge29tcohf3KYpWsKV2JQJnpooq02NF43f2j1OnceL2DSbc3SSmqKyFz-zj94exq-jaTB_nsxGd_MgZpSpAGIBgiY2jiSjIgojoTgTNjTSSKVsxEMexcYkUnAiSJKmFoxNEw4sVENqgPXRdXd3491nY6ta567xZftSUyIpFSEXtKVuOir2rqq8TfXGZ2vj9xqIPqjSB1X6W1ULQwfvssLu_yH14_Jp8tu56jp5VTv_16FCEMWBsi8CcnU-</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L.</creator><creator>AFTON, ALAN D.</creator><creator>BADZINSKI, SHANNON S.</creator><creator>PETRIE, SCOTT A.</creator><creator>OLSEN, GLENN H.</creator><creator>MITCHELL, MARK A.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Evaluating the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey for Scaup</title><author>SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L. ; AFTON, ALAN D. ; BADZINSKI, SHANNON S. ; PETRIE, SCOTT A. ; OLSEN, GLENN H. ; MITCHELL, MARK A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3238-1c6162decb7326b5b68436e5a7a788eb454bcaad764060dffe1aefd4135892a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>aerial surveys</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Aythya affinis</topic><topic>Banding</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Ecology</topic><topic>population estimates</topic><topic>Population statistics</topic><topic>Population status</topic><topic>satellite telemetry</topic><topic>Satellite tracking</topic><topic>Strata</topic><topic>survey bias</topic><topic>survey coverage</topic><topic>Transmitters</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AFTON, ALAN D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BADZINSKI, SHANNON S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETRIE, SCOTT A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLSEN, GLENN H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MITCHELL, MARK A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHUMMER, MICHAEL L.</au><au>AFTON, ALAN D.</au><au>BADZINSKI, SHANNON S.</au><au>PETRIE, SCOTT A.</au><au>OLSEN, GLENN H.</au><au>MITCHELL, MARK A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey for Scaup</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1252</spage><epage>1262</epage><pages>1252-1262</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Potential bias in breeding population estimates of certain duck species from the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (WBPHS) has been a concern for decades. The WBPHS does not differentiate between lesser (Aythya affinis) and greater (A. marila) scaup, but lesser scaup comprise 89% of the combined scaup population and their population estimates are suspected to be biased. We marked female lesser scaup (i.e., marked scaup) in the Mississippi and Atlantic Flyways, Canada and United States, with implantable satellite transmitters to track their spring migration through the traditional and eastern survey areas of the WBPHS, 2005–2010. Our goal was to use data independent of the WBPHS to evaluate whether breeding population estimates for scaup were biased and identify variables that might be used in the future to refine population estimates. We found that the WBPHS estimates of breeding scaup are biased because, across years, only 30% of our marked scaup had settled for the breeding period when the strata in which they settled were surveyed, 43% were available to be counted in multiple survey strata as their migration continued during the WBPHS, 32% settled outside the WBPHS area, the number of times a marked scaup was available to be counted by survey crews varied positively with the latitude that a marked scaup settled on breeding areas, the probability of a marked scaup being in a stratum while it was surveyed varied among years, and these probabilities were positively correlated with the traditional and eastern breeding population estimates for scaup. Annual population estimates derived from banding data provide a less biased and preferable method of monitoring scaup population status and trend. Development of models that include metrics such as survey stratum latitude and annual spring environmental conditions might potentially be used to improve scaup breeding population estimates derived from the WBPHS, but independent estimates from banding data would be important to evaluate such models.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21478</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2018-08, Vol.82 (6), p.1252-1262 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2072265462 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | aerial surveys Aquatic birds Aythya affinis Banding Bird migration Breeding Environmental conditions Estimates Latitude Monitoring methods Polls & surveys Population Population Ecology population estimates Population statistics Population status satellite telemetry Satellite tracking Strata survey bias survey coverage Transmitters Waterfowl Wildlife Wildlife habitats |
title | Evaluating the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey for Scaup |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A57%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20Waterfowl%20Breeding%20Population%20and%20Habitat%20Survey%20for%20Scaup&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=SCHUMMER,%20MICHAEL%20L.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1252&rft.epage=1262&rft.pages=1252-1262&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21478&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26608412%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2072265462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26608412&rfr_iscdi=true |