An initial exploration of vicarious and in-scene calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems
The use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) for applications in the field of precision agriculture has demonstrated the need to produce temporally consistent imagery to allow for quantitative comparisons. In order for these aerial images to be used to identify actual changes on the ground, con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2018-04 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Mamaghani, Baabak Sasaki, Geoffrey Ryan Connal Kha, Kevin Jackson Knappen Hartzell, Ryan Marcellus, Evan Bauch, Timothy Raqueno, Nina Salvaggio, Carl |
description | The use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) for applications in the field of precision agriculture has demonstrated the need to produce temporally consistent imagery to allow for quantitative comparisons. In order for these aerial images to be used to identify actual changes on the ground, conversion of raw digital count to reflectance, or to an atmospherically normalized space, needs to be carried out. This paper will describe an experiment that compares the use of reflectance calibration panels, for use with the empirical line method (ELM), against a newly proposed ratio of the target radiance and the downwelling radiance, to predict the reflectance of known targets in the scene. We propose that the use of an on-board downwelling light sensor (DLS) may provide the sUAS remote sensing practitioner with an approach that does not require the expensive and time consuming task of placing known reflectance standards in the scene. Three calibration methods were tested in this study: 2-Point ELM, 1-Point ELM, and At-altitude Radiance Ratio (AARR). Our study indicates that the traditional 2-Point ELM produces the lowest mean error in band effective reflectance factor, 0.0165. The 1-Point ELM and AARR produce mean errors of 0.0343 and 0.0287 respectively. A modeling of the proposed AARR approach indicates that the technique has the potential to perform better than the 2-Point ELM method, with a 0.0026 mean error in band effective reflectance factor, indicating that this newly proposed technique may prove to be a viable alternative with suitable on-board sensors. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2072097001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2072097001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20720970013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzEEKwjAQheEgCBb1DgOuCzG1VpciigdwL2Oa4mg6qZlU9PYqeABXb_F_vIHKTFHM89XCmJGaily11mZZmbIsMnXbMBBTIvTgnp0PERMFhtDAgyxGCr0Acv1BuVjHDix6Ov9UcvbCdO-dQBMiSIveQ88tMrsakKKN2CSQlyTXykQNG_Tipr8dq9l-d9we8i6G70c6XUMf-ZNORldGryut58V_6g3Av0ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2072097001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An initial exploration of vicarious and in-scene calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Mamaghani, Baabak ; Sasaki, Geoffrey ; Ryan Connal ; Kha, Kevin ; Jackson Knappen ; Hartzell, Ryan ; Marcellus, Evan ; Bauch, Timothy ; Raqueno, Nina ; Salvaggio, Carl</creator><creatorcontrib>Mamaghani, Baabak ; Sasaki, Geoffrey ; Ryan Connal ; Kha, Kevin ; Jackson Knappen ; Hartzell, Ryan ; Marcellus, Evan ; Bauch, Timothy ; Raqueno, Nina ; Salvaggio, Carl</creatorcontrib><description>The use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) for applications in the field of precision agriculture has demonstrated the need to produce temporally consistent imagery to allow for quantitative comparisons. In order for these aerial images to be used to identify actual changes on the ground, conversion of raw digital count to reflectance, or to an atmospherically normalized space, needs to be carried out. This paper will describe an experiment that compares the use of reflectance calibration panels, for use with the empirical line method (ELM), against a newly proposed ratio of the target radiance and the downwelling radiance, to predict the reflectance of known targets in the scene. We propose that the use of an on-board downwelling light sensor (DLS) may provide the sUAS remote sensing practitioner with an approach that does not require the expensive and time consuming task of placing known reflectance standards in the scene. Three calibration methods were tested in this study: 2-Point ELM, 1-Point ELM, and At-altitude Radiance Ratio (AARR). Our study indicates that the traditional 2-Point ELM produces the lowest mean error in band effective reflectance factor, 0.0165. The 1-Point ELM and AARR produce mean errors of 0.0343 and 0.0287 respectively. A modeling of the proposed AARR approach indicates that the technique has the potential to perform better than the 2-Point ELM method, with a 0.0026 mean error in band effective reflectance factor, indicating that this newly proposed technique may prove to be a viable alternative with suitable on-board sensors.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Agricultural aircraft ; Aircraft ; Calibration ; Imagery ; Radiance ; Reflectance ; Remote sensing ; Remote sensors ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Unmanned aircraft</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2018-04</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mamaghani, Baabak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan Connal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kha, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson Knappen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartzell, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellus, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauch, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raqueno, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaggio, Carl</creatorcontrib><title>An initial exploration of vicarious and in-scene calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>The use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) for applications in the field of precision agriculture has demonstrated the need to produce temporally consistent imagery to allow for quantitative comparisons. In order for these aerial images to be used to identify actual changes on the ground, conversion of raw digital count to reflectance, or to an atmospherically normalized space, needs to be carried out. This paper will describe an experiment that compares the use of reflectance calibration panels, for use with the empirical line method (ELM), against a newly proposed ratio of the target radiance and the downwelling radiance, to predict the reflectance of known targets in the scene. We propose that the use of an on-board downwelling light sensor (DLS) may provide the sUAS remote sensing practitioner with an approach that does not require the expensive and time consuming task of placing known reflectance standards in the scene. Three calibration methods were tested in this study: 2-Point ELM, 1-Point ELM, and At-altitude Radiance Ratio (AARR). Our study indicates that the traditional 2-Point ELM produces the lowest mean error in band effective reflectance factor, 0.0165. The 1-Point ELM and AARR produce mean errors of 0.0343 and 0.0287 respectively. A modeling of the proposed AARR approach indicates that the technique has the potential to perform better than the 2-Point ELM method, with a 0.0026 mean error in band effective reflectance factor, indicating that this newly proposed technique may prove to be a viable alternative with suitable on-board sensors.</description><subject>Agricultural aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Radiance</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Remote sensors</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Unmanned aircraft</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzEEKwjAQheEgCBb1DgOuCzG1VpciigdwL2Oa4mg6qZlU9PYqeABXb_F_vIHKTFHM89XCmJGaily11mZZmbIsMnXbMBBTIvTgnp0PERMFhtDAgyxGCr0Acv1BuVjHDix6Ov9UcvbCdO-dQBMiSIveQ88tMrsakKKN2CSQlyTXykQNG_Tipr8dq9l-d9we8i6G70c6XUMf-ZNORldGryut58V_6g3Av0ng</recordid><startdate>20180425</startdate><enddate>20180425</enddate><creator>Mamaghani, Baabak</creator><creator>Sasaki, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Ryan Connal</creator><creator>Kha, Kevin</creator><creator>Jackson Knappen</creator><creator>Hartzell, Ryan</creator><creator>Marcellus, Evan</creator><creator>Bauch, Timothy</creator><creator>Raqueno, Nina</creator><creator>Salvaggio, Carl</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180425</creationdate><title>An initial exploration of vicarious and in-scene calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems</title><author>Mamaghani, Baabak ; Sasaki, Geoffrey ; Ryan Connal ; Kha, Kevin ; Jackson Knappen ; Hartzell, Ryan ; Marcellus, Evan ; Bauch, Timothy ; Raqueno, Nina ; Salvaggio, Carl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20720970013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Radiance</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Remote sensors</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Unmanned aircraft</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mamaghani, Baabak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan Connal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kha, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson Knappen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartzell, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellus, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauch, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raqueno, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaggio, Carl</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mamaghani, Baabak</au><au>Sasaki, Geoffrey</au><au>Ryan Connal</au><au>Kha, Kevin</au><au>Jackson Knappen</au><au>Hartzell, Ryan</au><au>Marcellus, Evan</au><au>Bauch, Timothy</au><au>Raqueno, Nina</au><au>Salvaggio, Carl</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>An initial exploration of vicarious and in-scene calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2018-04-25</date><risdate>2018</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>The use of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) for applications in the field of precision agriculture has demonstrated the need to produce temporally consistent imagery to allow for quantitative comparisons. In order for these aerial images to be used to identify actual changes on the ground, conversion of raw digital count to reflectance, or to an atmospherically normalized space, needs to be carried out. This paper will describe an experiment that compares the use of reflectance calibration panels, for use with the empirical line method (ELM), against a newly proposed ratio of the target radiance and the downwelling radiance, to predict the reflectance of known targets in the scene. We propose that the use of an on-board downwelling light sensor (DLS) may provide the sUAS remote sensing practitioner with an approach that does not require the expensive and time consuming task of placing known reflectance standards in the scene. Three calibration methods were tested in this study: 2-Point ELM, 1-Point ELM, and At-altitude Radiance Ratio (AARR). Our study indicates that the traditional 2-Point ELM produces the lowest mean error in band effective reflectance factor, 0.0165. The 1-Point ELM and AARR produce mean errors of 0.0343 and 0.0287 respectively. A modeling of the proposed AARR approach indicates that the technique has the potential to perform better than the 2-Point ELM method, with a 0.0026 mean error in band effective reflectance factor, indicating that this newly proposed technique may prove to be a viable alternative with suitable on-board sensors.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2018-04 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2072097001 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Agricultural aircraft Aircraft Calibration Imagery Radiance Reflectance Remote sensing Remote sensors Unmanned aerial vehicles Unmanned aircraft |
title | An initial exploration of vicarious and in-scene calibration techniques for small unmanned aircraft systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=An%20initial%20exploration%20of%20vicarious%20and%20in-scene%20calibration%20techniques%20for%20small%20unmanned%20aircraft%20systems&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Mamaghani,%20Baabak&rft.date=2018-04-25&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2072097001%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2072097001&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |