Streambed scour of salmon spawning habitat in a regulated river influenced by management of peak discharge
In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels are susceptible to scour during floods. The threat to egg‐to‐fry survival by streambed scour is mitigated, in part, by the adaptation of salmon to bury their eggs below the typical depth of scour. In regul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater biology 2018-08, Vol.63 (8), p.917-927 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 927 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 917 |
container_title | Freshwater biology |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Gendaszek, Andrew S. Burton, Karl Magirl, Christopher S. Konrad, Christopher P. |
description | In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels are susceptible to scour during floods. The threat to egg‐to‐fry survival by streambed scour is mitigated, in part, by the adaptation of salmon to bury their eggs below the typical depth of scour. In regulated rivers globally, we suggest that water managers consider the effect of dam operations on scour and its impacts on species dependent on benthic habitats.
We instrumented salmon‐spawning habitat with accelerometer scour monitors (ASMs) at 73 locations in 11 reaches of the Cedar River in western Washington State of the United States from Autumn 2013 through the Spring of 2014. The timing of scour was related to the discharge measured at a nearby gage and compared to previously published ASM data at 26 locations in two reaches of the Cedar River collected between Autumn 2010 and Spring 2011.
Thirteen percent of the recovered ASMs recorded scour during a peak‐discharge event in March 2014 (2‐to 3‐year recurrence interval) compared to 71% of the recovered ASMs during a higher peak‐discharge event in January 2011 (10‐year recurrence interval). Of the 23 locations where ASMs recorded scour during the 2011 and 2014 deployments, 35% had scour when the discharge was ≤87.3 m3/s (3,082 ft3/s) (2‐year recurrence interval discharge) with 13% recording scour at or below the 62.3 m3/s (2,200 ft3/s) operational threshold for peak‐discharge management during the incubation of salmon eggs.
Scour to the depth of salmon egg pockets was limited during peak discharges with frequent (1.25‐year or less) recurrence intervals, which managers can regulate through dam operations on the Cedar River. Pairing novel measurements of the timing of streambed scour with discharge data allows the development of peak‐discharge management strategies that protect salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels during floods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/fwb.12987 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2072033563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2072033563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-fc35532612af1e46b248fa4d809c44cc6953d664733ecc49aeb96bfb3bd312743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4A0sceKQ1n-xkyNUFJAqcQDEMbIdO01JnGAnVH17XMKVvaw0-nZWMwBcY7TAcZZ2rxaY5Jk4ATNMeZoQRsQpmCHEeJIigc7BRQg7hFCWCjIDu9fBG9kqU8Kgu9HDzsIgm7ZzMPRy72pXwa1U9SAHWDsooTfV2Mgh8r7-Nj6KthmN01FQB9hKJyvTGjccjXojP2FZB72VvjKX4MzKJpirvz0H7-uHt9VTsnl5fF7dbRJNciESq2maUsIxkRYbxhVhmZWszFCuGdOa5yktOWeCUqM1y6VROVdWUVVSTASjc3Az-fa--xpNGIpdDObiy4IgQRClKaeRup0o7bsQvLFF7-tW-kOBUXGssohVFr9VRnY5sfu6MYf_wWL9cT9d_ADl-HYe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2072033563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Streambed scour of salmon spawning habitat in a regulated river influenced by management of peak discharge</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gendaszek, Andrew S. ; Burton, Karl ; Magirl, Christopher S. ; Konrad, Christopher P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gendaszek, Andrew S. ; Burton, Karl ; Magirl, Christopher S. ; Konrad, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><description>In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels are susceptible to scour during floods. The threat to egg‐to‐fry survival by streambed scour is mitigated, in part, by the adaptation of salmon to bury their eggs below the typical depth of scour. In regulated rivers globally, we suggest that water managers consider the effect of dam operations on scour and its impacts on species dependent on benthic habitats.
We instrumented salmon‐spawning habitat with accelerometer scour monitors (ASMs) at 73 locations in 11 reaches of the Cedar River in western Washington State of the United States from Autumn 2013 through the Spring of 2014. The timing of scour was related to the discharge measured at a nearby gage and compared to previously published ASM data at 26 locations in two reaches of the Cedar River collected between Autumn 2010 and Spring 2011.
Thirteen percent of the recovered ASMs recorded scour during a peak‐discharge event in March 2014 (2‐to 3‐year recurrence interval) compared to 71% of the recovered ASMs during a higher peak‐discharge event in January 2011 (10‐year recurrence interval). Of the 23 locations where ASMs recorded scour during the 2011 and 2014 deployments, 35% had scour when the discharge was ≤87.3 m3/s (3,082 ft3/s) (2‐year recurrence interval discharge) with 13% recording scour at or below the 62.3 m3/s (2,200 ft3/s) operational threshold for peak‐discharge management during the incubation of salmon eggs.
Scour to the depth of salmon egg pockets was limited during peak discharges with frequent (1.25‐year or less) recurrence intervals, which managers can regulate through dam operations on the Cedar River. Pairing novel measurements of the timing of streambed scour with discharge data allows the development of peak‐discharge management strategies that protect salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels during floods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Adaptation ; Autumn ; Cedar ; Dams ; Discharge ; Eggs ; Flood management ; Flood peak ; Floods ; Freshwater fishes ; Gravel ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Incubation period ; Locations (working) ; peak discharge ; regulated river ; Regulated rivers ; River regulations ; Rivers ; Salmon ; salmonids ; Scour ; Scouring ; sediment ; Spawning ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Streambeds ; Water depth ; Water management</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2018-08, Vol.63 (8), p.917-927</ispartof><rights>Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-fc35532612af1e46b248fa4d809c44cc6953d664733ecc49aeb96bfb3bd312743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-fc35532612af1e46b248fa4d809c44cc6953d664733ecc49aeb96bfb3bd312743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2373-8986</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.12987$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.12987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gendaszek, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magirl, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konrad, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><title>Streambed scour of salmon spawning habitat in a regulated river influenced by management of peak discharge</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels are susceptible to scour during floods. The threat to egg‐to‐fry survival by streambed scour is mitigated, in part, by the adaptation of salmon to bury their eggs below the typical depth of scour. In regulated rivers globally, we suggest that water managers consider the effect of dam operations on scour and its impacts on species dependent on benthic habitats.
We instrumented salmon‐spawning habitat with accelerometer scour monitors (ASMs) at 73 locations in 11 reaches of the Cedar River in western Washington State of the United States from Autumn 2013 through the Spring of 2014. The timing of scour was related to the discharge measured at a nearby gage and compared to previously published ASM data at 26 locations in two reaches of the Cedar River collected between Autumn 2010 and Spring 2011.
Thirteen percent of the recovered ASMs recorded scour during a peak‐discharge event in March 2014 (2‐to 3‐year recurrence interval) compared to 71% of the recovered ASMs during a higher peak‐discharge event in January 2011 (10‐year recurrence interval). Of the 23 locations where ASMs recorded scour during the 2011 and 2014 deployments, 35% had scour when the discharge was ≤87.3 m3/s (3,082 ft3/s) (2‐year recurrence interval discharge) with 13% recording scour at or below the 62.3 m3/s (2,200 ft3/s) operational threshold for peak‐discharge management during the incubation of salmon eggs.
Scour to the depth of salmon egg pockets was limited during peak discharges with frequent (1.25‐year or less) recurrence intervals, which managers can regulate through dam operations on the Cedar River. Pairing novel measurements of the timing of streambed scour with discharge data allows the development of peak‐discharge management strategies that protect salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels during floods.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Cedar</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flood peak</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Incubation period</subject><subject>Locations (working)</subject><subject>peak discharge</subject><subject>regulated river</subject><subject>Regulated rivers</subject><subject>River regulations</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>salmonids</subject><subject>Scour</subject><subject>Scouring</subject><subject>sediment</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Streambeds</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water management</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4A0sceKQ1n-xkyNUFJAqcQDEMbIdO01JnGAnVH17XMKVvaw0-nZWMwBcY7TAcZZ2rxaY5Jk4ATNMeZoQRsQpmCHEeJIigc7BRQg7hFCWCjIDu9fBG9kqU8Kgu9HDzsIgm7ZzMPRy72pXwa1U9SAHWDsooTfV2Mgh8r7-Nj6KthmN01FQB9hKJyvTGjccjXojP2FZB72VvjKX4MzKJpirvz0H7-uHt9VTsnl5fF7dbRJNciESq2maUsIxkRYbxhVhmZWszFCuGdOa5yktOWeCUqM1y6VROVdWUVVSTASjc3Az-fa--xpNGIpdDObiy4IgQRClKaeRup0o7bsQvLFF7-tW-kOBUXGssohVFr9VRnY5sfu6MYf_wWL9cT9d_ADl-HYe</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Gendaszek, Andrew S.</creator><creator>Burton, Karl</creator><creator>Magirl, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Konrad, Christopher P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-8986</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Streambed scour of salmon spawning habitat in a regulated river influenced by management of peak discharge</title><author>Gendaszek, Andrew S. ; Burton, Karl ; Magirl, Christopher S. ; Konrad, Christopher P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-fc35532612af1e46b248fa4d809c44cc6953d664733ecc49aeb96bfb3bd312743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Cedar</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flood peak</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Incubation period</topic><topic>Locations (working)</topic><topic>peak discharge</topic><topic>regulated river</topic><topic>Regulated rivers</topic><topic>River regulations</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>salmonids</topic><topic>Scour</topic><topic>Scouring</topic><topic>sediment</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Streambeds</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gendaszek, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magirl, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konrad, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gendaszek, Andrew S.</au><au>Burton, Karl</au><au>Magirl, Christopher S.</au><au>Konrad, Christopher P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Streambed scour of salmon spawning habitat in a regulated river influenced by management of peak discharge</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>917-927</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels are susceptible to scour during floods. The threat to egg‐to‐fry survival by streambed scour is mitigated, in part, by the adaptation of salmon to bury their eggs below the typical depth of scour. In regulated rivers globally, we suggest that water managers consider the effect of dam operations on scour and its impacts on species dependent on benthic habitats.
We instrumented salmon‐spawning habitat with accelerometer scour monitors (ASMs) at 73 locations in 11 reaches of the Cedar River in western Washington State of the United States from Autumn 2013 through the Spring of 2014. The timing of scour was related to the discharge measured at a nearby gage and compared to previously published ASM data at 26 locations in two reaches of the Cedar River collected between Autumn 2010 and Spring 2011.
Thirteen percent of the recovered ASMs recorded scour during a peak‐discharge event in March 2014 (2‐to 3‐year recurrence interval) compared to 71% of the recovered ASMs during a higher peak‐discharge event in January 2011 (10‐year recurrence interval). Of the 23 locations where ASMs recorded scour during the 2011 and 2014 deployments, 35% had scour when the discharge was ≤87.3 m3/s (3,082 ft3/s) (2‐year recurrence interval discharge) with 13% recording scour at or below the 62.3 m3/s (2,200 ft3/s) operational threshold for peak‐discharge management during the incubation of salmon eggs.
Scour to the depth of salmon egg pockets was limited during peak discharges with frequent (1.25‐year or less) recurrence intervals, which managers can regulate through dam operations on the Cedar River. Pairing novel measurements of the timing of streambed scour with discharge data allows the development of peak‐discharge management strategies that protect salmon eggs incubating within streambed gravels during floods.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.12987</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-8986</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-5070 |
ispartof | Freshwater biology, 2018-08, Vol.63 (8), p.917-927 |
issn | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2072033563 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Accelerometers Adaptation Autumn Cedar Dams Discharge Eggs Flood management Flood peak Floods Freshwater fishes Gravel Habitat selection Habitats Incubation period Locations (working) peak discharge regulated river Regulated rivers River regulations Rivers Salmon salmonids Scour Scouring sediment Spawning Spring Spring (season) Streambeds Water depth Water management |
title | Streambed scour of salmon spawning habitat in a regulated river influenced by management of peak discharge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A29%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Streambed%20scour%20of%20salmon%20spawning%20habitat%20in%20a%20regulated%20river%20influenced%20by%20management%20of%20peak%20discharge&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Gendaszek,%20Andrew%20S.&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=917-927&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.12987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2072033563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2072033563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |