Regulating Scientific Research: A Constitutional Moment?
This article discusses how and to what extent a transnational societal constitution for science is emerging. It outlines how specific norms and rules secure the autonomy of science (the ‘constitutive function') as well as defining the limits of the operations of science with respect to other so...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of law and society 2018-07, Vol.45 (S1), p.S163-S184 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | S184 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S1 |
| container_start_page | S163 |
| container_title | Journal of law and society |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Verschraegen, Gert |
| description | This article discusses how and to what extent a transnational societal constitution for science is emerging. It outlines how specific norms and rules secure the autonomy of science (the ‘constitutive function') as well as defining the limits of the operations of science with respect to other social systems and the individuals in their environments (the ‘limitative function'). It also discusses to what extent complex trends and dynamics in the current science system can be understood in terms of a constitutional recalibration, in which the unleashed dynamism of scientific and technological innovation is counteracted by a varied array of norm‐producing initiatives, such as the increasing importance of ethics bodies in research, public engagement strategies, and initiatives aimed at ‘open science’ and ‘responsible research and innovation'. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jols.12108 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2071428795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2071428795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-9602aeca2510ade618d0e7b263e05ee4dec5f626da0f6005cf9a477d9442f6d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GCN2HrJJtNdr2IFD-pFFoFbyFmZ2vKdlOTXaT_3tT17Fzm8rwzLw8h5xQmNM7V2jVhQhmF4oCMKBcyFVwWh2QETGRpxrL3Y3ISwhoAaCaLESkWuOob3dl2lSyNxbaztTXJAgNqbz6vk9tk6trQ2a7vrGt1k7y4TaRuTslRrZuAZ397TN7u716nj-ls_vA0vZ2lJosP0lIA02g0yynoCgUtKkD5Edsg5Ii8QpPXgolKQy0AclOXmktZlZyzWlQyG5OL4e7Wu68eQ6fWrvexSFAMJOWskGUeqcuBMt6F4LFWW2832u8UBbU3o_Zm1K-ZCNMB_rYN7v4h1fN8thwyP6hKZVs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071428795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulating Scientific Research: A Constitutional Moment?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Verschraegen, Gert</creator><creatorcontrib>Verschraegen, Gert</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses how and to what extent a transnational societal constitution for science is emerging. It outlines how specific norms and rules secure the autonomy of science (the ‘constitutive function') as well as defining the limits of the operations of science with respect to other social systems and the individuals in their environments (the ‘limitative function'). It also discusses to what extent complex trends and dynamics in the current science system can be understood in terms of a constitutional recalibration, in which the unleashed dynamism of scientific and technological innovation is counteracted by a varied array of norm‐producing initiatives, such as the increasing importance of ethics bodies in research, public engagement strategies, and initiatives aimed at ‘open science’ and ‘responsible research and innovation'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-323X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-6478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jols.12108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Constitutions ; Ethics ; Innovations ; Regulation ; Research ethics ; Social systems ; Technological change ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Journal of law and society, 2018-07, Vol.45 (S1), p.S163-S184</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author. Journal of Law and Society © 2018 Cardiff University Law School</rights><rights>2018 Cardiff University Law School</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-9602aeca2510ade618d0e7b263e05ee4dec5f626da0f6005cf9a477d9442f6d73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjols.12108$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjols.12108$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,33773,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verschraegen, Gert</creatorcontrib><title>Regulating Scientific Research: A Constitutional Moment?</title><title>Journal of law and society</title><description>This article discusses how and to what extent a transnational societal constitution for science is emerging. It outlines how specific norms and rules secure the autonomy of science (the ‘constitutive function') as well as defining the limits of the operations of science with respect to other social systems and the individuals in their environments (the ‘limitative function'). It also discusses to what extent complex trends and dynamics in the current science system can be understood in terms of a constitutional recalibration, in which the unleashed dynamism of scientific and technological innovation is counteracted by a varied array of norm‐producing initiatives, such as the increasing importance of ethics bodies in research, public engagement strategies, and initiatives aimed at ‘open science’ and ‘responsible research and innovation'.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Social systems</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>0263-323X</issn><issn>1467-6478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GCN2HrJJtNdr2IFD-pFFoFbyFmZ2vKdlOTXaT_3tT17Fzm8rwzLw8h5xQmNM7V2jVhQhmF4oCMKBcyFVwWh2QETGRpxrL3Y3ISwhoAaCaLESkWuOob3dl2lSyNxbaztTXJAgNqbz6vk9tk6trQ2a7vrGt1k7y4TaRuTslRrZuAZ397TN7u716nj-ls_vA0vZ2lJosP0lIA02g0yynoCgUtKkD5Edsg5Ii8QpPXgolKQy0AclOXmktZlZyzWlQyG5OL4e7Wu68eQ6fWrvexSFAMJOWskGUeqcuBMt6F4LFWW2832u8UBbU3o_Zm1K-ZCNMB_rYN7v4h1fN8thwyP6hKZVs</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Verschraegen, Gert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Regulating Scientific Research: A Constitutional Moment?</title><author>Verschraegen, Gert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-9602aeca2510ade618d0e7b263e05ee4dec5f626da0f6005cf9a477d9442f6d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Social systems</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verschraegen, Gert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of law and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verschraegen, Gert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulating Scientific Research: A Constitutional Moment?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of law and society</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S163</spage><epage>S184</epage><pages>S163-S184</pages><issn>0263-323X</issn><eissn>1467-6478</eissn><abstract>This article discusses how and to what extent a transnational societal constitution for science is emerging. It outlines how specific norms and rules secure the autonomy of science (the ‘constitutive function') as well as defining the limits of the operations of science with respect to other social systems and the individuals in their environments (the ‘limitative function'). It also discusses to what extent complex trends and dynamics in the current science system can be understood in terms of a constitutional recalibration, in which the unleashed dynamism of scientific and technological innovation is counteracted by a varied array of norm‐producing initiatives, such as the increasing importance of ethics bodies in research, public engagement strategies, and initiatives aimed at ‘open science’ and ‘responsible research and innovation'.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jols.12108</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0263-323X |
| ispartof | Journal of law and society, 2018-07, Vol.45 (S1), p.S163-S184 |
| issn | 0263-323X 1467-6478 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2071428795 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Autonomy Constitutions Ethics Innovations Regulation Research ethics Social systems Technological change Transnationalism |
| title | Regulating Scientific Research: A Constitutional Moment? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A42%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulating%20Scientific%20Research:%20A%20Constitutional%20Moment?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20law%20and%20society&rft.au=Verschraegen,%20Gert&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S163&rft.epage=S184&rft.pages=S163-S184&rft.issn=0263-323X&rft.eissn=1467-6478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jols.12108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2071428795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071428795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |