Optimization of a multistage vapor-compression refrigeration system for various refrigerants

•Energy, exergy and economic analysis of compression refrigeration are conducted.•The comparative study of the eight common refrigerants is provided.•The COP of refrigeration systems is maximized using four optimization variables.•The comparative study shows that ammonia has maximum COP. This work f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied thermal engineering 2018-05, Vol.136, p.84-96
Hauptverfasser: Baakeem, Saleh S., Orfi, Jamel, Alabdulkarem, Abdullah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Energy, exergy and economic analysis of compression refrigeration are conducted.•The comparative study of the eight common refrigerants is provided.•The COP of refrigeration systems is maximized using four optimization variables.•The comparative study shows that ammonia has maximum COP. This work focuses on theoretical investigation of the performance of a multistage vapor-compression refrigeration system using energy, exergy and economic analysis. The system was modeled using Engineering Equation Solver (EES) software and the model was validated against published data with maximum error of 1.14%. System optimization was carried out using Conjugate Directions Method. Optimization objective function was maximizing the coefficient of performance (COP) of the multistage vapor-compression refrigeration system by varying four optimization variables. Those variables are sub-cooling, de-superheating parameters, and evaporator and condenser temperatures of the system. Eight refrigerants were used in the investigation. They are: R717, R22, R134a, R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R410A, R404A, and R407C. Results show that COP increases with increasing the sub-cooling parameter. The maximum COP of 6.17 was achieved with ammonia while minimum COP of 4.95 was achieved with R407C. The optimization results give also that, R717 is a best option compared with all refrigerants, while R407C is not recommended to use.
ISSN:1359-4311
1873-5606
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.071