Socially responsible innovation in health care: Cycles of actualization

This paper seeks to theorize the mechanism by which socially responsible innovation can provide high quality care for patients within the U.S. health care system. By analyzing three exemplary case studies of health care innovation using content analysis, we reveal the mechanism for socially responsi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technology in society 2018-05, Vol.53, p.14-22
Hauptverfasser: Batayeh, Brian G., Artzberger, Georgia H., Williams, Logan D.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue
container_start_page 14
container_title Technology in society
container_volume 53
creator Batayeh, Brian G.
Artzberger, Georgia H.
Williams, Logan D.A.
description This paper seeks to theorize the mechanism by which socially responsible innovation can provide high quality care for patients within the U.S. health care system. By analyzing three exemplary case studies of health care innovation using content analysis, we reveal the mechanism for socially responsible innovation and also suggest places for future implementation. Socially responsible innovation has already taken place in India through design problem solving (at Aravind Eye Care System), and in the United States through both the Chronic Care Model (across hundreds of hospitals), and Lean Management™ principles (at ThedaCare in Wisconsin). Unlike previous theories of organizational learning such as incrementalism and design problem solving, socially responsible innovation puts the patient at the center of systemic health care solutions. Also unlike previous definitions of socially responsible innovation, our conceptualization provides a mechanism for practical application. When analyzing the three exemplary cases of socially responsible innovation, we drew out elements of previous mechanisms of organizational learning (e.g., psychological safety, trial and error, and positive applied theory, etc.) to create a novel reflective mechanism: cycles of actualization. This new reflective mechanism promotes continuous development and implementation of ideal models of practice. Finally, this paper suggests that medical waste management could benefit from socially responsible innovation. If the U.S. health care system adopted socially responsible innovation, facilities could think more holistically about their duties, enacting patient-centered change, and creating a culture of medicine that promotes learning, reflection, and action. •Socially responsible innovation represents a philosophical turn in medical innovation.•This innovation actualized by teams provides multiple opportunities for improvement.•This study compared three cases to illuminate thematic links in a content analysis.•Cycles of actualization includes naming problems, making changes, and reflecting.•With green medicine the patient's fiscal and physical health, and home environment are examined.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.11.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2071304920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0160791X17300477</els_id><sourcerecordid>2071304920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-93fdcedefeffad5256427c5ae4f110cc8b9a3df707f598e2bcfbae92225534733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKd_glDw3PqStEvrRWToFAYeVPAW0vSFpdRmJtlg_vVmbndP7x0-3_fjQ8g1hYICnd32RUS9Ck4XDKgoKC0A2AmZ0Fo0OWeiPCWTxEEuGvp5Ti5C6AGA87KekMWb01YNwy7zGNZuDLYdMLPj6LYqWjemNluhGuIq08rjXTbf6QFD5kymdNyowf78cZfkzKgh4NWxTsnH0-P7_Dlfvi5e5g_LXHMuYt5w02ns0KAxqqtYNSuZ0JXC0lAKWtdto3hnBAhTNTWyVptWYcMYqypeCs6n5OYwd-3d9wZDlL3b-DGtlAwE5VA2DBJVHSjtXQgejVx7-6X8TlKQe2eyl0dncu9MUiqTs5S7P-QwvbC16GXQFsd0sfWoo-yc_WfCL12seRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071304920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socially responsible innovation in health care: Cycles of actualization</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Batayeh, Brian G. ; Artzberger, Georgia H. ; Williams, Logan D.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Batayeh, Brian G. ; Artzberger, Georgia H. ; Williams, Logan D.A.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper seeks to theorize the mechanism by which socially responsible innovation can provide high quality care for patients within the U.S. health care system. By analyzing three exemplary case studies of health care innovation using content analysis, we reveal the mechanism for socially responsible innovation and also suggest places for future implementation. Socially responsible innovation has already taken place in India through design problem solving (at Aravind Eye Care System), and in the United States through both the Chronic Care Model (across hundreds of hospitals), and Lean Management™ principles (at ThedaCare in Wisconsin). Unlike previous theories of organizational learning such as incrementalism and design problem solving, socially responsible innovation puts the patient at the center of systemic health care solutions. Also unlike previous definitions of socially responsible innovation, our conceptualization provides a mechanism for practical application. When analyzing the three exemplary cases of socially responsible innovation, we drew out elements of previous mechanisms of organizational learning (e.g., psychological safety, trial and error, and positive applied theory, etc.) to create a novel reflective mechanism: cycles of actualization. This new reflective mechanism promotes continuous development and implementation of ideal models of practice. Finally, this paper suggests that medical waste management could benefit from socially responsible innovation. If the U.S. health care system adopted socially responsible innovation, facilities could think more holistically about their duties, enacting patient-centered change, and creating a culture of medicine that promotes learning, reflection, and action. •Socially responsible innovation represents a philosophical turn in medical innovation.•This innovation actualized by teams provides multiple opportunities for improvement.•This study compared three cases to illuminate thematic links in a content analysis.•Cycles of actualization includes naming problems, making changes, and reflecting.•With green medicine the patient's fiscal and physical health, and home environment are examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-791X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.11.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Actualization ; Case studies ; Clinical practice patterns/guidelines /resource use/evidence based practice ; Content analysis ; Cultural change ; Definitions ; Health care ; Health care management ; Health problems ; Health services ; Healthcare organizations and systems ; Hospitals ; Implementation ; Incentives in health care ; Innovations ; Learning ; Medical technology ; Medical wastes ; Medicine ; Organization development ; Organizational learning ; Patient-centered care ; Patients ; Problem solving ; Psychological safety ; Psychological theories ; Quality improvement/report cards/interventions ; Quality of care ; Technological planning ; Waste disposal ; Waste management</subject><ispartof>Technology in society, 2018-05, Vol.53, p.14-22</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-93fdcedefeffad5256427c5ae4f110cc8b9a3df707f598e2bcfbae92225534733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-93fdcedefeffad5256427c5ae4f110cc8b9a3df707f598e2bcfbae92225534733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.11.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,33774,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batayeh, Brian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artzberger, Georgia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Logan D.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Socially responsible innovation in health care: Cycles of actualization</title><title>Technology in society</title><description>This paper seeks to theorize the mechanism by which socially responsible innovation can provide high quality care for patients within the U.S. health care system. By analyzing three exemplary case studies of health care innovation using content analysis, we reveal the mechanism for socially responsible innovation and also suggest places for future implementation. Socially responsible innovation has already taken place in India through design problem solving (at Aravind Eye Care System), and in the United States through both the Chronic Care Model (across hundreds of hospitals), and Lean Management™ principles (at ThedaCare in Wisconsin). Unlike previous theories of organizational learning such as incrementalism and design problem solving, socially responsible innovation puts the patient at the center of systemic health care solutions. Also unlike previous definitions of socially responsible innovation, our conceptualization provides a mechanism for practical application. When analyzing the three exemplary cases of socially responsible innovation, we drew out elements of previous mechanisms of organizational learning (e.g., psychological safety, trial and error, and positive applied theory, etc.) to create a novel reflective mechanism: cycles of actualization. This new reflective mechanism promotes continuous development and implementation of ideal models of practice. Finally, this paper suggests that medical waste management could benefit from socially responsible innovation. If the U.S. health care system adopted socially responsible innovation, facilities could think more holistically about their duties, enacting patient-centered change, and creating a culture of medicine that promotes learning, reflection, and action. •Socially responsible innovation represents a philosophical turn in medical innovation.•This innovation actualized by teams provides multiple opportunities for improvement.•This study compared three cases to illuminate thematic links in a content analysis.•Cycles of actualization includes naming problems, making changes, and reflecting.•With green medicine the patient's fiscal and physical health, and home environment are examined.</description><subject>Actualization</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clinical practice patterns/guidelines /resource use/evidence based practice</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care management</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Healthcare organizations and systems</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Incentives in health care</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medical wastes</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Organization development</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Psychological safety</subject><subject>Psychological theories</subject><subject>Quality improvement/report cards/interventions</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Technological planning</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><issn>0160-791X</issn><issn>1879-3274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKd_glDw3PqStEvrRWToFAYeVPAW0vSFpdRmJtlg_vVmbndP7x0-3_fjQ8g1hYICnd32RUS9Ck4XDKgoKC0A2AmZ0Fo0OWeiPCWTxEEuGvp5Ti5C6AGA87KekMWb01YNwy7zGNZuDLYdMLPj6LYqWjemNluhGuIq08rjXTbf6QFD5kymdNyowf78cZfkzKgh4NWxTsnH0-P7_Dlfvi5e5g_LXHMuYt5w02ns0KAxqqtYNSuZ0JXC0lAKWtdto3hnBAhTNTWyVptWYcMYqypeCs6n5OYwd-3d9wZDlL3b-DGtlAwE5VA2DBJVHSjtXQgejVx7-6X8TlKQe2eyl0dncu9MUiqTs5S7P-QwvbC16GXQFsd0sfWoo-yc_WfCL12seRU</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Batayeh, Brian G.</creator><creator>Artzberger, Georgia H.</creator><creator>Williams, Logan D.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Socially responsible innovation in health care: Cycles of actualization</title><author>Batayeh, Brian G. ; Artzberger, Georgia H. ; Williams, Logan D.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-93fdcedefeffad5256427c5ae4f110cc8b9a3df707f598e2bcfbae92225534733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Actualization</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clinical practice patterns/guidelines /resource use/evidence based practice</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care management</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Healthcare organizations and systems</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Incentives in health care</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medical wastes</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Organization development</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Psychological safety</topic><topic>Psychological theories</topic><topic>Quality improvement/report cards/interventions</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Technological planning</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batayeh, Brian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artzberger, Georgia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Logan D.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Technology in society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batayeh, Brian G.</au><au>Artzberger, Georgia H.</au><au>Williams, Logan D.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socially responsible innovation in health care: Cycles of actualization</atitle><jtitle>Technology in society</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>14</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>14-22</pages><issn>0160-791X</issn><eissn>1879-3274</eissn><abstract>This paper seeks to theorize the mechanism by which socially responsible innovation can provide high quality care for patients within the U.S. health care system. By analyzing three exemplary case studies of health care innovation using content analysis, we reveal the mechanism for socially responsible innovation and also suggest places for future implementation. Socially responsible innovation has already taken place in India through design problem solving (at Aravind Eye Care System), and in the United States through both the Chronic Care Model (across hundreds of hospitals), and Lean Management™ principles (at ThedaCare in Wisconsin). Unlike previous theories of organizational learning such as incrementalism and design problem solving, socially responsible innovation puts the patient at the center of systemic health care solutions. Also unlike previous definitions of socially responsible innovation, our conceptualization provides a mechanism for practical application. When analyzing the three exemplary cases of socially responsible innovation, we drew out elements of previous mechanisms of organizational learning (e.g., psychological safety, trial and error, and positive applied theory, etc.) to create a novel reflective mechanism: cycles of actualization. This new reflective mechanism promotes continuous development and implementation of ideal models of practice. Finally, this paper suggests that medical waste management could benefit from socially responsible innovation. If the U.S. health care system adopted socially responsible innovation, facilities could think more holistically about their duties, enacting patient-centered change, and creating a culture of medicine that promotes learning, reflection, and action. •Socially responsible innovation represents a philosophical turn in medical innovation.•This innovation actualized by teams provides multiple opportunities for improvement.•This study compared three cases to illuminate thematic links in a content analysis.•Cycles of actualization includes naming problems, making changes, and reflecting.•With green medicine the patient's fiscal and physical health, and home environment are examined.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.11.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-791X
ispartof Technology in society, 2018-05, Vol.53, p.14-22
issn 0160-791X
1879-3274
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2071304920
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Actualization
Case studies
Clinical practice patterns/guidelines /resource use/evidence based practice
Content analysis
Cultural change
Definitions
Health care
Health care management
Health problems
Health services
Healthcare organizations and systems
Hospitals
Implementation
Incentives in health care
Innovations
Learning
Medical technology
Medical wastes
Medicine
Organization development
Organizational learning
Patient-centered care
Patients
Problem solving
Psychological safety
Psychological theories
Quality improvement/report cards/interventions
Quality of care
Technological planning
Waste disposal
Waste management
title Socially responsible innovation in health care: Cycles of actualization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A55%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socially%20responsible%20innovation%20in%20health%20care:%20Cycles%20of%20actualization&rft.jtitle=Technology%20in%20society&rft.au=Batayeh,%20Brian%20G.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=14-22&rft.issn=0160-791X&rft.eissn=1879-3274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2071304920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071304920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0160791X17300477&rfr_iscdi=true