Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes
This paper contributes to an emerging literature that models votes and text in tandem to better understand polarization of expressed preferences. It introduces a new approach to estimate preference polarization in multidimensional settings, such as international relations, based on developments in t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2019-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Pomeroy, Caleb Dasandi, Niheer Mikhaylov, Slava J |
description | This paper contributes to an emerging literature that models votes and text in tandem to better understand polarization of expressed preferences. It introduces a new approach to estimate preference polarization in multidimensional settings, such as international relations, based on developments in the natural language processing and network science literatures -- namely word embeddings, which retain valuable syntactical qualities of human language, and community detection in multilayer networks, which locates densely connected actors across multiple, complex networks. We find that the employment of these tools in tandem helps to better estimate states' foreign policy preferences expressed in UN votes and speeches beyond that permitted by votes alone. The utility of these located affinity blocs is demonstrated through an application to conflict onset in International Relations, though these tools will be of interest to all scholars faced with the measurement of preferences and polarization in multidimensional settings. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2071300108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2071300108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20713001083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMsKwjAQAIMgKOo_LHgW0kStN6kvvCgexKuUdqvRkNTsBvXvreAHeJrDDNMSXaV1MpqNleqIAdFNSqmmqZpMdFfYlaHoDGMJ-5yNdzSHDHbRsqktvmCP_PThDlldB58XV2APK2Qs2LgLHAJWGNAVCFlVmebzhoX1BUGkrz_iiwlyV8LJM1JftKvcEg5-7InhZn1cbkfN-xGR-HzzMbhGnZVMEy1lImf6v-oDaWRI5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071300108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Pomeroy, Caleb ; Dasandi, Niheer ; Mikhaylov, Slava J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pomeroy, Caleb ; Dasandi, Niheer ; Mikhaylov, Slava J</creatorcontrib><description>This paper contributes to an emerging literature that models votes and text in tandem to better understand polarization of expressed preferences. It introduces a new approach to estimate preference polarization in multidimensional settings, such as international relations, based on developments in the natural language processing and network science literatures -- namely word embeddings, which retain valuable syntactical qualities of human language, and community detection in multilayer networks, which locates densely connected actors across multiple, complex networks. We find that the employment of these tools in tandem helps to better estimate states' foreign policy preferences expressed in UN votes and speeches beyond that permitted by votes alone. The utility of these located affinity blocs is demonstrated through an application to conflict onset in International Relations, though these tools will be of interest to all scholars faced with the measurement of preferences and polarization in multidimensional settings.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Affinity ; Foreign policy ; International relations ; Multilayers ; Natural language processing ; Polarization ; Preferences</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2019-10</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pomeroy, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasandi, Niheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhaylov, Slava J</creatorcontrib><title>Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>This paper contributes to an emerging literature that models votes and text in tandem to better understand polarization of expressed preferences. It introduces a new approach to estimate preference polarization in multidimensional settings, such as international relations, based on developments in the natural language processing and network science literatures -- namely word embeddings, which retain valuable syntactical qualities of human language, and community detection in multilayer networks, which locates densely connected actors across multiple, complex networks. We find that the employment of these tools in tandem helps to better estimate states' foreign policy preferences expressed in UN votes and speeches beyond that permitted by votes alone. The utility of these located affinity blocs is demonstrated through an application to conflict onset in International Relations, though these tools will be of interest to all scholars faced with the measurement of preferences and polarization in multidimensional settings.</description><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Multilayers</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjMsKwjAQAIMgKOo_LHgW0kStN6kvvCgexKuUdqvRkNTsBvXvreAHeJrDDNMSXaV1MpqNleqIAdFNSqmmqZpMdFfYlaHoDGMJ-5yNdzSHDHbRsqktvmCP_PThDlldB58XV2APK2Qs2LgLHAJWGNAVCFlVmebzhoX1BUGkrz_iiwlyV8LJM1JftKvcEg5-7InhZn1cbkfN-xGR-HzzMbhGnZVMEy1lImf6v-oDaWRI5g</recordid><startdate>20191027</startdate><enddate>20191027</enddate><creator>Pomeroy, Caleb</creator><creator>Dasandi, Niheer</creator><creator>Mikhaylov, Slava J</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191027</creationdate><title>Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes</title><author>Pomeroy, Caleb ; Dasandi, Niheer ; Mikhaylov, Slava J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20713001083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Multilayers</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pomeroy, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasandi, Niheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhaylov, Slava J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pomeroy, Caleb</au><au>Dasandi, Niheer</au><au>Mikhaylov, Slava J</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2019-10-27</date><risdate>2019</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>This paper contributes to an emerging literature that models votes and text in tandem to better understand polarization of expressed preferences. It introduces a new approach to estimate preference polarization in multidimensional settings, such as international relations, based on developments in the natural language processing and network science literatures -- namely word embeddings, which retain valuable syntactical qualities of human language, and community detection in multilayer networks, which locates densely connected actors across multiple, complex networks. We find that the employment of these tools in tandem helps to better estimate states' foreign policy preferences expressed in UN votes and speeches beyond that permitted by votes alone. The utility of these located affinity blocs is demonstrated through an application to conflict onset in International Relations, though these tools will be of interest to all scholars faced with the measurement of preferences and polarization in multidimensional settings.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2019-10 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2071300108 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Affinity Foreign policy International relations Multilayers Natural language processing Polarization Preferences |
title | Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A47%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Disunited%20Nations?%20A%20Multiplex%20Network%20Approach%20to%20Detecting%20Preference%20Affinity%20Blocs%20using%20Texts%20and%20Votes&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Pomeroy,%20Caleb&rft.date=2019-10-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2071300108%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071300108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |