Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba- Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field- Scale Investigation
Research was conducted from 2011 to 2015 to determine the effect of herbicide strategy on efficacy and evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds in a continuous glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant (GDr) soybean system. The nine herbicide strategies included sequential applications of glyphosate only,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2018-04, Vol.32 (2), p.166-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Shergill, Lovreet S Bish, Mandy D Biggs, Meghan E Bradley, Kevin W |
description | Research was conducted from 2011 to 2015 to determine the effect of herbicide strategy on efficacy and evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds in a continuous glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant (GDr) soybean system. The nine herbicide strategies included sequential applications of glyphosate only, glyphosate plus dicamba with or without acetochlor, PRE application of residual herbicides with POST glyphosate or non-glyphosate herbicides, and their biennial rotation with one another. Giant foxtail and horseweed were the least problematic during all growing seasons. An increase in horseweed was observed by the end of the experiment especially in the plots where POST glyphosate was not used with PRE application of residual herbicides. Giant ragweed evolved resistance to glyphosate over a 4-yr period of selection with strategies that predominantly included PRE and POST glyphosate. Herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate-only and PRE application of residual herbicides fb POST glyphosate annually or in a biennial rotation were ineffective in controlling giant ragweed and glyphosate-resistant (GR) common waterhemp. Over the years, application of PRE herbicide mixtures before POST glyphosate application improved weed control and soybean yields compared with the glyphosate-only strategy. During all growing seasons, the greatest yield and reduction in total weed density before harvest was provided by herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate plus dicamba annually or in a biennial rotation regardless of the inclusion of acetochlor POST. Dicamba proved to be a valuable addition to improve the control of GR weeds. GDr soybean will provide growers with a new option for managing resistant weeds, but it needs to be used with caution, as multiple resistance in weeds, including waterhemp and giant ragweed, is already widespread. Nomenclature: Acetochlor; dicamba; glyphosate; common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2017.105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2071270075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26567580</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26567580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-761bf3734220fe8f28652c3248121edc9a88bedc1ad1200fafbab7db5e60cbfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PGzEQxa0KpAbaG1ckS9xQTcfe7HrpDaUEkEBFpBXtaTXenU0cbeyw9oLyPfqBcUjFsac3f36ap3mMHUk4kyD11xeKZyoVqcs_sJHMcxBKj2GPjaA8BwGZ_v2RHYSwBJCFUjBif--8s9H31s15XBCfLNDNKXDr-CNRw-_9eugwWu_eZsgn3kXrBj8EftVt1gsfMJLg6Br-3da4Mij4AwUbIrrIZ35jCB2fbUKk1Td-waf2mcQfwj5V1DWCz2rsiN-4ZwrRzt-sPrH9FrtAn__pIfs1vfw5uRa3P65uJhe3wmQKotCFNG2ms3H6pKWyVWWRqzpT41IqSU19jmVpkkpspAJosTVodGNyKqA2LWaH7GR3d937pyH5V0s_9C5ZVgq0VBpA54n6sqPq3ofQU1ute7vCflNJqLa5Vyn3apt76rb48Q5fhpTrO6uKvNB5CWl_utsb672j_x97BQsljv0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071270075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba- Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field- Scale Investigation</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Shergill, Lovreet S ; Bish, Mandy D ; Biggs, Meghan E ; Bradley, Kevin W</creator><creatorcontrib>Shergill, Lovreet S ; Bish, Mandy D ; Biggs, Meghan E ; Bradley, Kevin W</creatorcontrib><description>Research was conducted from 2011 to 2015 to determine the effect of herbicide strategy on efficacy and evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds in a continuous glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant (GDr) soybean system. The nine herbicide strategies included sequential applications of glyphosate only, glyphosate plus dicamba with or without acetochlor, PRE application of residual herbicides with POST glyphosate or non-glyphosate herbicides, and their biennial rotation with one another. Giant foxtail and horseweed were the least problematic during all growing seasons. An increase in horseweed was observed by the end of the experiment especially in the plots where POST glyphosate was not used with PRE application of residual herbicides. Giant ragweed evolved resistance to glyphosate over a 4-yr period of selection with strategies that predominantly included PRE and POST glyphosate. Herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate-only and PRE application of residual herbicides fb POST glyphosate annually or in a biennial rotation were ineffective in controlling giant ragweed and glyphosate-resistant (GR) common waterhemp. Over the years, application of PRE herbicide mixtures before POST glyphosate application improved weed control and soybean yields compared with the glyphosate-only strategy. During all growing seasons, the greatest yield and reduction in total weed density before harvest was provided by herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate plus dicamba annually or in a biennial rotation regardless of the inclusion of acetochlor POST. Dicamba proved to be a valuable addition to improve the control of GR weeds. GDr soybean will provide growers with a new option for managing resistant weeds, but it needs to be used with caution, as multiple resistance in weeds, including waterhemp and giant ragweed, is already widespread. Nomenclature: Acetochlor; dicamba; glyphosate; common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2017.105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Acetochlor ; Crops ; Evolution ; Glyphosate ; Growing season ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicide-resistance management ; Herbicides ; long-term trial ; multiple resistance ; Pesticides ; Population ; resistance evolution ; Rotation ; Soybeans ; Weed control ; WEED MANAGEMENT-MAJOR CROPS ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2018-04, Vol.32 (2), p.166-173</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2017.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-761bf3734220fe8f28652c3248121edc9a88bedc1ad1200fafbab7db5e60cbfa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-761bf3734220fe8f28652c3248121edc9a88bedc1ad1200fafbab7db5e60cbfa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26567580$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26567580$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shergill, Lovreet S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bish, Mandy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Meghan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Kevin W</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba- Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field- Scale Investigation</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Research was conducted from 2011 to 2015 to determine the effect of herbicide strategy on efficacy and evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds in a continuous glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant (GDr) soybean system. The nine herbicide strategies included sequential applications of glyphosate only, glyphosate plus dicamba with or without acetochlor, PRE application of residual herbicides with POST glyphosate or non-glyphosate herbicides, and their biennial rotation with one another. Giant foxtail and horseweed were the least problematic during all growing seasons. An increase in horseweed was observed by the end of the experiment especially in the plots where POST glyphosate was not used with PRE application of residual herbicides. Giant ragweed evolved resistance to glyphosate over a 4-yr period of selection with strategies that predominantly included PRE and POST glyphosate. Herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate-only and PRE application of residual herbicides fb POST glyphosate annually or in a biennial rotation were ineffective in controlling giant ragweed and glyphosate-resistant (GR) common waterhemp. Over the years, application of PRE herbicide mixtures before POST glyphosate application improved weed control and soybean yields compared with the glyphosate-only strategy. During all growing seasons, the greatest yield and reduction in total weed density before harvest was provided by herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate plus dicamba annually or in a biennial rotation regardless of the inclusion of acetochlor POST. Dicamba proved to be a valuable addition to improve the control of GR weeds. GDr soybean will provide growers with a new option for managing resistant weeds, but it needs to be used with caution, as multiple resistance in weeds, including waterhemp and giant ragweed, is already widespread. Nomenclature: Acetochlor; dicamba; glyphosate; common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><subject>Acetochlor</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicide-resistance management</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>long-term trial</subject><subject>multiple resistance</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>resistance evolution</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT-MAJOR CROPS</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PGzEQxa0KpAbaG1ckS9xQTcfe7HrpDaUEkEBFpBXtaTXenU0cbeyw9oLyPfqBcUjFsac3f36ap3mMHUk4kyD11xeKZyoVqcs_sJHMcxBKj2GPjaA8BwGZ_v2RHYSwBJCFUjBif--8s9H31s15XBCfLNDNKXDr-CNRw-_9eugwWu_eZsgn3kXrBj8EftVt1gsfMJLg6Br-3da4Mij4AwUbIrrIZ35jCB2fbUKk1Td-waf2mcQfwj5V1DWCz2rsiN-4ZwrRzt-sPrH9FrtAn__pIfs1vfw5uRa3P65uJhe3wmQKotCFNG2ms3H6pKWyVWWRqzpT41IqSU19jmVpkkpspAJosTVodGNyKqA2LWaH7GR3d937pyH5V0s_9C5ZVgq0VBpA54n6sqPq3ofQU1ute7vCflNJqLa5Vyn3apt76rb48Q5fhpTrO6uKvNB5CWl_utsb672j_x97BQsljv0</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Shergill, Lovreet S</creator><creator>Bish, Mandy D</creator><creator>Biggs, Meghan E</creator><creator>Bradley, Kevin W</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba- Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field- Scale Investigation</title><author>Shergill, Lovreet S ; Bish, Mandy D ; Biggs, Meghan E ; Bradley, Kevin W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-761bf3734220fe8f28652c3248121edc9a88bedc1ad1200fafbab7db5e60cbfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acetochlor</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicide-resistance management</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>long-term trial</topic><topic>multiple resistance</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>resistance evolution</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT-MAJOR CROPS</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shergill, Lovreet S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bish, Mandy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Meghan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Kevin W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shergill, Lovreet S</au><au>Bish, Mandy D</au><au>Biggs, Meghan E</au><au>Bradley, Kevin W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba- Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field- Scale Investigation</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>166-173</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Research was conducted from 2011 to 2015 to determine the effect of herbicide strategy on efficacy and evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds in a continuous glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant (GDr) soybean system. The nine herbicide strategies included sequential applications of glyphosate only, glyphosate plus dicamba with or without acetochlor, PRE application of residual herbicides with POST glyphosate or non-glyphosate herbicides, and their biennial rotation with one another. Giant foxtail and horseweed were the least problematic during all growing seasons. An increase in horseweed was observed by the end of the experiment especially in the plots where POST glyphosate was not used with PRE application of residual herbicides. Giant ragweed evolved resistance to glyphosate over a 4-yr period of selection with strategies that predominantly included PRE and POST glyphosate. Herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate-only and PRE application of residual herbicides fb POST glyphosate annually or in a biennial rotation were ineffective in controlling giant ragweed and glyphosate-resistant (GR) common waterhemp. Over the years, application of PRE herbicide mixtures before POST glyphosate application improved weed control and soybean yields compared with the glyphosate-only strategy. During all growing seasons, the greatest yield and reduction in total weed density before harvest was provided by herbicide use strategies that included glyphosate plus dicamba annually or in a biennial rotation regardless of the inclusion of acetochlor POST. Dicamba proved to be a valuable addition to improve the control of GR weeds. GDr soybean will provide growers with a new option for managing resistant weeds, but it needs to be used with caution, as multiple resistance in weeds, including waterhemp and giant ragweed, is already widespread. Nomenclature: Acetochlor; dicamba; glyphosate; common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2017.105</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2018-04, Vol.32 (2), p.166-173 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2071270075 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Acetochlor Crops Evolution Glyphosate Growing season Herbicide resistance Herbicide-resistance management Herbicides long-term trial multiple resistance Pesticides Population resistance evolution Rotation Soybeans Weed control WEED MANAGEMENT-MAJOR CROPS Weeds |
title | Monitoring the Changes in Weed Populations in a Continuous Glyphosate- and Dicamba- Resistant Soybean System: A Five-Year Field- Scale Investigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A06%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20the%20Changes%20in%20Weed%20Populations%20in%20a%20Continuous%20Glyphosate-%20and%20Dicamba-%20Resistant%20Soybean%20System:%20A%20Five-Year%20Field-%20Scale%20Investigation&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Shergill,%20Lovreet%20S&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=166-173&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2017.105&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26567580%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071270075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26567580&rfr_iscdi=true |