Ground motion model for reference rock sites in Italy

To assess site-specific ground motion it is common practice to calculate seismic hazard at bedrock and then multiply it by a deterministic site-amplification factor typically computed from 1D numerical simulation. For this reason, the ground motion at bedrock should be free from amplification phenom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2018-07, Vol.110, p.276-283
Hauptverfasser: Chiara, Felicetta, Giovanni, Lanzano, Maria, D’Amico, Rodolfo, Puglia, Lucia, Luzi, Francesca, Pacor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 283
container_issue
container_start_page 276
container_title Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)
container_volume 110
creator Chiara, Felicetta
Giovanni, Lanzano
Maria, D’Amico
Rodolfo, Puglia
Lucia, Luzi
Francesca, Pacor
description To assess site-specific ground motion it is common practice to calculate seismic hazard at bedrock and then multiply it by a deterministic site-amplification factor typically computed from 1D numerical simulation. For this reason, the ground motion at bedrock should be free from amplification phenomena and its site response flat. Ground Motion Prediction Equations are generally calibrated using records at stations classified as rock that, however, can be affected by site-effects, caused by peculiar morphological/stratigraphic features. In this work, we propose six proxies based on geological, topographical and geophysical data to identify reference rock sites. We apply these proxies to the same set of recording stations used to derive the most recent ground-motion attenuation model for Italy [6] - ITA10. We find that about half of the analyzed sites, classified as rock on the basis of VS,30 or geological conditions, are unaffected by amplifications and can be actually considered as reference rock sites. Then, we re-calibrate the ITA10 prediction equations for horizontal peak ground acceleration at 20 spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–2s, accounting for sites that we identify as references rock sites. The resulting reference median values are, on average, 35–40% lower than those calculated by Bindi et al. (2011) model for rock sites. Conversely, the ground motion variability is not significantly changed, even if we introduce a new site soil category to describe the reference rock stations. •Rock sites can be affected by site amplification.•Identification of reference rock site has implications in the calibration of GMPEs and in site-specific hazard assessment.•VS,30 value is not able to discriminate between reference and generic rock sites.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2070929142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726117311946</els_id><sourcerecordid>2070929142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-a9137aff171d0bda989110cb400be36101b49db2816e04be885dfbd484894caf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LwzAYDqLgnP4EoeC59X3TLE1OIkPnYOBFwVtImwRSu2YmnbB_b8Z29_Rcnm9C7hEqBOSPfZWCH8xhrCigqAAroOyCzFA0sqwZfl2SGVDelA3leE1uUuoBsEHBZ2SximE_mmIbJh_GDMYOhQuxiNbZaMfOFjF030Xyk02FH4v1pIfDLblyekj27oxz8vn68rF8Kzfvq_XyeVPqmsNUaol1o53LWQZao6WQiNC1DKC1Nc_lWyZNSwVyC6y1QiyMaw0TTEjWaVfPycPJdxfDz96mSfVhH8ccqSg0IKlERjNrcWJ1MaSUi6td9FsdDwpBHR9SvTo_pI4PKUCVH8q6p5PO5gm_3kaVOn-cbHy03aRM8P84_AFdEnEW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2070929142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ground motion model for reference rock sites in Italy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chiara, Felicetta ; Giovanni, Lanzano ; Maria, D’Amico ; Rodolfo, Puglia ; Lucia, Luzi ; Francesca, Pacor</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiara, Felicetta ; Giovanni, Lanzano ; Maria, D’Amico ; Rodolfo, Puglia ; Lucia, Luzi ; Francesca, Pacor</creatorcontrib><description>To assess site-specific ground motion it is common practice to calculate seismic hazard at bedrock and then multiply it by a deterministic site-amplification factor typically computed from 1D numerical simulation. For this reason, the ground motion at bedrock should be free from amplification phenomena and its site response flat. Ground Motion Prediction Equations are generally calibrated using records at stations classified as rock that, however, can be affected by site-effects, caused by peculiar morphological/stratigraphic features. In this work, we propose six proxies based on geological, topographical and geophysical data to identify reference rock sites. We apply these proxies to the same set of recording stations used to derive the most recent ground-motion attenuation model for Italy [6] - ITA10. We find that about half of the analyzed sites, classified as rock on the basis of VS,30 or geological conditions, are unaffected by amplifications and can be actually considered as reference rock sites. Then, we re-calibrate the ITA10 prediction equations for horizontal peak ground acceleration at 20 spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–2s, accounting for sites that we identify as references rock sites. The resulting reference median values are, on average, 35–40% lower than those calculated by Bindi et al. (2011) model for rock sites. Conversely, the ground motion variability is not significantly changed, even if we introduce a new site soil category to describe the reference rock stations. •Rock sites can be affected by site amplification.•Identification of reference rock site has implications in the calibration of GMPEs and in site-specific hazard assessment.•VS,30 value is not able to discriminate between reference and generic rock sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amplification ; Attenuation ; Bedrock ; Computer simulation ; Earthquakes ; Geological hazards ; Geology ; Geophysical data ; Geophysics ; Ground motion ; Ground motion prediction equations ; Mathematical models ; Numerical simulations ; Reference rock-sites ; Rocks ; Seismic hazard ; Seismology ; Site effects ; Stratigraphy</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2018-07, Vol.110, p.276-283</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-a9137aff171d0bda989110cb400be36101b49db2816e04be885dfbd484894caf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-a9137aff171d0bda989110cb400be36101b49db2816e04be885dfbd484894caf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiara, Felicetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovanni, Lanzano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maria, D’Amico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodolfo, Puglia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucia, Luzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francesca, Pacor</creatorcontrib><title>Ground motion model for reference rock sites in Italy</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>To assess site-specific ground motion it is common practice to calculate seismic hazard at bedrock and then multiply it by a deterministic site-amplification factor typically computed from 1D numerical simulation. For this reason, the ground motion at bedrock should be free from amplification phenomena and its site response flat. Ground Motion Prediction Equations are generally calibrated using records at stations classified as rock that, however, can be affected by site-effects, caused by peculiar morphological/stratigraphic features. In this work, we propose six proxies based on geological, topographical and geophysical data to identify reference rock sites. We apply these proxies to the same set of recording stations used to derive the most recent ground-motion attenuation model for Italy [6] - ITA10. We find that about half of the analyzed sites, classified as rock on the basis of VS,30 or geological conditions, are unaffected by amplifications and can be actually considered as reference rock sites. Then, we re-calibrate the ITA10 prediction equations for horizontal peak ground acceleration at 20 spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–2s, accounting for sites that we identify as references rock sites. The resulting reference median values are, on average, 35–40% lower than those calculated by Bindi et al. (2011) model for rock sites. Conversely, the ground motion variability is not significantly changed, even if we introduce a new site soil category to describe the reference rock stations. •Rock sites can be affected by site amplification.•Identification of reference rock site has implications in the calibration of GMPEs and in site-specific hazard assessment.•VS,30 value is not able to discriminate between reference and generic rock sites.</description><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysical data</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Ground motion prediction equations</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Reference rock-sites</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Site effects</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LwzAYDqLgnP4EoeC59X3TLE1OIkPnYOBFwVtImwRSu2YmnbB_b8Z29_Rcnm9C7hEqBOSPfZWCH8xhrCigqAAroOyCzFA0sqwZfl2SGVDelA3leE1uUuoBsEHBZ2SximE_mmIbJh_GDMYOhQuxiNbZaMfOFjF030Xyk02FH4v1pIfDLblyekj27oxz8vn68rF8Kzfvq_XyeVPqmsNUaol1o53LWQZao6WQiNC1DKC1Nc_lWyZNSwVyC6y1QiyMaw0TTEjWaVfPycPJdxfDz96mSfVhH8ccqSg0IKlERjNrcWJ1MaSUi6td9FsdDwpBHR9SvTo_pI4PKUCVH8q6p5PO5gm_3kaVOn-cbHy03aRM8P84_AFdEnEW</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Chiara, Felicetta</creator><creator>Giovanni, Lanzano</creator><creator>Maria, D’Amico</creator><creator>Rodolfo, Puglia</creator><creator>Lucia, Luzi</creator><creator>Francesca, Pacor</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Ground motion model for reference rock sites in Italy</title><author>Chiara, Felicetta ; Giovanni, Lanzano ; Maria, D’Amico ; Rodolfo, Puglia ; Lucia, Luzi ; Francesca, Pacor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-a9137aff171d0bda989110cb400be36101b49db2816e04be885dfbd484894caf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysical data</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Ground motion prediction equations</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Reference rock-sites</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Site effects</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiara, Felicetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovanni, Lanzano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maria, D’Amico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodolfo, Puglia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucia, Luzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francesca, Pacor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiara, Felicetta</au><au>Giovanni, Lanzano</au><au>Maria, D’Amico</au><au>Rodolfo, Puglia</au><au>Lucia, Luzi</au><au>Francesca, Pacor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ground motion model for reference rock sites in Italy</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>276</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>276-283</pages><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>To assess site-specific ground motion it is common practice to calculate seismic hazard at bedrock and then multiply it by a deterministic site-amplification factor typically computed from 1D numerical simulation. For this reason, the ground motion at bedrock should be free from amplification phenomena and its site response flat. Ground Motion Prediction Equations are generally calibrated using records at stations classified as rock that, however, can be affected by site-effects, caused by peculiar morphological/stratigraphic features. In this work, we propose six proxies based on geological, topographical and geophysical data to identify reference rock sites. We apply these proxies to the same set of recording stations used to derive the most recent ground-motion attenuation model for Italy [6] - ITA10. We find that about half of the analyzed sites, classified as rock on the basis of VS,30 or geological conditions, are unaffected by amplifications and can be actually considered as reference rock sites. Then, we re-calibrate the ITA10 prediction equations for horizontal peak ground acceleration at 20 spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–2s, accounting for sites that we identify as references rock sites. The resulting reference median values are, on average, 35–40% lower than those calculated by Bindi et al. (2011) model for rock sites. Conversely, the ground motion variability is not significantly changed, even if we introduce a new site soil category to describe the reference rock stations. •Rock sites can be affected by site amplification.•Identification of reference rock site has implications in the calibration of GMPEs and in site-specific hazard assessment.•VS,30 value is not able to discriminate between reference and generic rock sites.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.024</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-7261
ispartof Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2018-07, Vol.110, p.276-283
issn 0267-7261
1879-341X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2070929142
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Amplification
Attenuation
Bedrock
Computer simulation
Earthquakes
Geological hazards
Geology
Geophysical data
Geophysics
Ground motion
Ground motion prediction equations
Mathematical models
Numerical simulations
Reference rock-sites
Rocks
Seismic hazard
Seismology
Site effects
Stratigraphy
title Ground motion model for reference rock sites in Italy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T15%3A22%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ground%20motion%20model%20for%20reference%20rock%20sites%20in%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Chiara,%20Felicetta&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=276-283&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2070929142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2070929142&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726117311946&rfr_iscdi=true