Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses

This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and predniso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2015-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2655-2664
Hauptverfasser: Tedesco‐ Silva, H., Felipe, C., Ferreira, A., Cristelli, M., Oliveira, N., Sandes‐Freitas, T., Aguiar, W., Campos, E., Gerbase‐DeLima, M., Franco, M., Medina‐Pestana, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2664
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2655
container_title American journal of transplantation
container_volume 15
creator Tedesco‐ Silva, H.
Felipe, C.
Ferreira, A.
Cristelli, M.
Oliveira, N.
Sandes‐Freitas, T.
Aguiar, W.
Campos, E.
Gerbase‐DeLima, M.
Franco, M.
Medina‐Pestana, J.
description This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r‐ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end‐point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention‐to‐treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r‐ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037–0.29; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajt.13327
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2069424998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2069424998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-f0354f4211a5ab8195b7f50ec7792254ef9533fe0c386930aa16b5a417c6b17f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWh8L_4AEXLmo5jFJJstS6xsEqeshk7mRlGmmTmYq3fnTTa11p9nkcPPlHC4HoVNKLmk6V2bWXVLOmdpBAyoJGUqa8d1fzcUBOoxxRghVLGf76IAJneeaiwH6fIGqt1Dh-2B9BcECbhwer7pmDm-mbpa-7WN6dGA73wTsA370VYAVnrYmxEVtQodfwPqFh9DFtQS_9OENT5bQNrWfp-8mVHibMzV2O75uIsRjtOdMHeHk5z5CrzeT6fhu-PR8ez8ePQ1tlks1dISLzGWMUiNMmVMtSuUEAauUZkxk4LTg3AGxPJeaE2OoLIXJqLKypMrxI3S-8V20zXsPsStmTd-GFFkwInXGMq3z_yiqKJdKprBEXWyotEqMLbhi0fq5aVcFJcW6kSI1Unw3ktizH8e-nEP1S24rSMDVBvjwNaz-dipGD9ON5RekN5VE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1713676225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tedesco‐ Silva, H. ; Felipe, C. ; Ferreira, A. ; Cristelli, M. ; Oliveira, N. ; Sandes‐Freitas, T. ; Aguiar, W. ; Campos, E. ; Gerbase‐DeLima, M. ; Franco, M. ; Medina‐Pestana, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tedesco‐ Silva, H. ; Felipe, C. ; Ferreira, A. ; Cristelli, M. ; Oliveira, N. ; Sandes‐Freitas, T. ; Aguiar, W. ; Campos, E. ; Gerbase‐DeLima, M. ; Franco, M. ; Medina‐Pestana, J.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r‐ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end‐point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention‐to‐treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r‐ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037–0.29; p &lt; 0.001), while those treated with BAS/EVR showed a 75% proportional reduction (10.8% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13–0.48; p &lt; 0.001) in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to BAS/MPS. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection (9.4 vs. 18.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.403), wound‐healing complications, delayed graft function, and proteinuria. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in BAS/EVR (65.7 ± 21.8 vs. 60.6 ± 20.9 vs. 69.5 ± 21.5 ml/min, p = 0.021). In de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no pharmacological CMV prophylaxis, reduced‐dose tacrolimus and everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to standard tacrolimus dose and mycophenolate (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01354301). This study shows that in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis, the use of everolimus and low‐dose tacrolimus is associated with lower incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to a standard tacrolimus and mycophenolate combination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13327</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25988935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use ; Antilymphocyte serum ; Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use ; Basiliximab ; Cytomegalovirus ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention & control ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Everolimus - administration & dosage ; Everolimus - therapeutic use ; Female ; Globulins ; Glomerular filtration rate ; Graft rejection ; Graft Rejection - prevention & control ; Humans ; Immune modulation ; immunosuppression ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Incidence ; Infections ; Inhibitor drugs ; Kidney Transplantation ; Kidney transplants ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Motivation ; Mycophenolic acid ; Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use ; nephrology ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - immunology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Prednisone ; Prednisone - therapeutic use ; Prophylaxis ; Prospective Studies ; Proteinuria ; Recombinant Fusion Proteins - therapeutic use ; Sirolimus - therapeutic use ; Tacrolimus ; Tacrolimus - administration & dosage ; Tacrolimus - therapeutic use ; Thymocytes ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound healing]]></subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2015-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2655-2664</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-f0354f4211a5ab8195b7f50ec7792254ef9533fe0c386930aa16b5a417c6b17f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-f0354f4211a5ab8195b7f50ec7792254ef9533fe0c386930aa16b5a417c6b17f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajt.13327$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajt.13327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25988935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tedesco‐ Silva, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felipe, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristelli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandes‐Freitas, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbase‐DeLima, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medina‐Pestana, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r‐ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end‐point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention‐to‐treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r‐ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037–0.29; p &lt; 0.001), while those treated with BAS/EVR showed a 75% proportional reduction (10.8% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13–0.48; p &lt; 0.001) in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to BAS/MPS. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection (9.4 vs. 18.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.403), wound‐healing complications, delayed graft function, and proteinuria. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in BAS/EVR (65.7 ± 21.8 vs. 60.6 ± 20.9 vs. 69.5 ± 21.5 ml/min, p = 0.021). In de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no pharmacological CMV prophylaxis, reduced‐dose tacrolimus and everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to standard tacrolimus dose and mycophenolate (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01354301). This study shows that in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis, the use of everolimus and low‐dose tacrolimus is associated with lower incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to a standard tacrolimus and mycophenolate combination.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antilymphocyte serum</subject><subject>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Basiliximab</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Everolimus - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Everolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Globulins</subject><subject>Glomerular filtration rate</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune modulation</subject><subject>immunosuppression</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inhibitor drugs</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Mycophenolic acid</subject><subject>Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>nephrology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - immunology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prednisone</subject><subject>Prednisone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Proteinuria</subject><subject>Recombinant Fusion Proteins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Tacrolimus</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Thymocytes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWh8L_4AEXLmo5jFJJstS6xsEqeshk7mRlGmmTmYq3fnTTa11p9nkcPPlHC4HoVNKLmk6V2bWXVLOmdpBAyoJGUqa8d1fzcUBOoxxRghVLGf76IAJneeaiwH6fIGqt1Dh-2B9BcECbhwer7pmDm-mbpa-7WN6dGA73wTsA370VYAVnrYmxEVtQodfwPqFh9DFtQS_9OENT5bQNrWfp-8mVHibMzV2O75uIsRjtOdMHeHk5z5CrzeT6fhu-PR8ez8ePQ1tlks1dISLzGWMUiNMmVMtSuUEAauUZkxk4LTg3AGxPJeaE2OoLIXJqLKypMrxI3S-8V20zXsPsStmTd-GFFkwInXGMq3z_yiqKJdKprBEXWyotEqMLbhi0fq5aVcFJcW6kSI1Unw3ktizH8e-nEP1S24rSMDVBvjwNaz-dipGD9ON5RekN5VE</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Tedesco‐ Silva, H.</creator><creator>Felipe, C.</creator><creator>Ferreira, A.</creator><creator>Cristelli, M.</creator><creator>Oliveira, N.</creator><creator>Sandes‐Freitas, T.</creator><creator>Aguiar, W.</creator><creator>Campos, E.</creator><creator>Gerbase‐DeLima, M.</creator><creator>Franco, M.</creator><creator>Medina‐Pestana, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses</title><author>Tedesco‐ Silva, H. ; Felipe, C. ; Ferreira, A. ; Cristelli, M. ; Oliveira, N. ; Sandes‐Freitas, T. ; Aguiar, W. ; Campos, E. ; Gerbase‐DeLima, M. ; Franco, M. ; Medina‐Pestana, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4867-f0354f4211a5ab8195b7f50ec7792254ef9533fe0c386930aa16b5a417c6b17f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antilymphocyte serum</topic><topic>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Basiliximab</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Everolimus - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Everolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Globulins</topic><topic>Glomerular filtration rate</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune modulation</topic><topic>immunosuppression</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inhibitor drugs</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Mycophenolic acid</topic><topic>Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>nephrology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - immunology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prednisone</topic><topic>Prednisone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Proteinuria</topic><topic>Recombinant Fusion Proteins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Tacrolimus</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Thymocytes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tedesco‐ Silva, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felipe, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristelli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandes‐Freitas, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbase‐DeLima, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medina‐Pestana, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tedesco‐ Silva, H.</au><au>Felipe, C.</au><au>Ferreira, A.</au><au>Cristelli, M.</au><au>Oliveira, N.</au><au>Sandes‐Freitas, T.</au><au>Aguiar, W.</au><au>Campos, E.</au><au>Gerbase‐DeLima, M.</au><au>Franco, M.</au><au>Medina‐Pestana, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2655</spage><epage>2664</epage><pages>2655-2664</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r‐ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end‐point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention‐to‐treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r‐ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037–0.29; p &lt; 0.001), while those treated with BAS/EVR showed a 75% proportional reduction (10.8% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13–0.48; p &lt; 0.001) in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to BAS/MPS. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection (9.4 vs. 18.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.403), wound‐healing complications, delayed graft function, and proteinuria. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in BAS/EVR (65.7 ± 21.8 vs. 60.6 ± 20.9 vs. 69.5 ± 21.5 ml/min, p = 0.021). In de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no pharmacological CMV prophylaxis, reduced‐dose tacrolimus and everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to standard tacrolimus dose and mycophenolate (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01354301). This study shows that in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis, the use of everolimus and low‐dose tacrolimus is associated with lower incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to a standard tacrolimus and mycophenolate combination.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>25988935</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajt.13327</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-6135
ispartof American journal of transplantation, 2015-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2655-2664
issn 1600-6135
1600-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2069424998
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use
Antilymphocyte serum
Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use
Basiliximab
Cytomegalovirus
Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology
Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology
Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention & control
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Therapy, Combination
Everolimus - administration & dosage
Everolimus - therapeutic use
Female
Globulins
Glomerular filtration rate
Graft rejection
Graft Rejection - prevention & control
Humans
Immune modulation
immunosuppression
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Incidence
Infections
Inhibitor drugs
Kidney Transplantation
Kidney transplants
Male
Middle Aged
Monoclonal antibodies
Motivation
Mycophenolic acid
Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use
nephrology
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - immunology
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Prednisone
Prednisone - therapeutic use
Prophylaxis
Prospective Studies
Proteinuria
Recombinant Fusion Proteins - therapeutic use
Sirolimus - therapeutic use
Tacrolimus
Tacrolimus - administration & dosage
Tacrolimus - therapeutic use
Thymocytes
Treatment Outcome
Wound healing
title Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A26%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduced%20Incidence%20of%20Cytomegalovirus%20Infection%20in%20Kidney%20Transplant%20Recipients%20Receiving%20Everolimus%20and%20Reduced%20Tacrolimus%20Doses&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Tedesco%E2%80%90%20Silva,%20H.&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2655&rft.epage=2664&rft.pages=2655-2664&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajt.13327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2069424998%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1713676225&rft_id=info:pmid/25988935&rfr_iscdi=true