Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials
Purpose Sustainability analysis should include the assessment of the environmental, social, and economic impacts throughout the life cycle of a product. However, the social sustainability performance assessment is seldom carried out during materials selection due to its complex nature and the lack o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of life cycle assessment 2018-08, Vol.23 (8), p.1654-1674 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1674 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1654 |
| container_title | The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Hossain, Md. Uzzal Poon, Chi Sun Dong, Ya Hong Lo, Irene M. C. Cheng, Jack C. P. |
| description | Purpose
Sustainability analysis should include the assessment of the environmental, social, and economic impacts throughout the life cycle of a product. However, the social sustainability performance assessment is seldom carried out during materials selection due to its complex nature and the lack of a social life cycle assessment tool. This study presents a single score-based social life cycle assessment methodology, namely social sustainability grading model, for assessing and comparing the social sustainability performance of construction materials using a case study on recycled and natural construction materials.
Methods
The proposed method is developed based on the methodological framework provided by the United Nations Environment Programme
/
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry guidelines published in 2009 and the methodological sheets published in 2013, the indicators and sustainability reporting guidelines provided by the Global Reporting Initiatives and ISO 26000 for social responsibility of products, and the indicators provided by the Hong Kong Business Environment Council Limited for construction sustainability. A twofold research approach is proposed in this model: the first one is the qualitative research based on expert interviews to identify, select, and prioritize the relevant subcategories and indicators, and the second one is the operational research based on the case-specific survey to collect the required data. A social sustainability index was proposed for the interpretation of the results effectively. A case study on construction materials was conducted to illustrate the implementation of the method using case-specific first-hand data.
Results and discussion
The major outcome of this study is the systematic development of a social sustainability assessment tool based on the established standards and guidelines. The case study showed that four subcategories are crucial social concerns for construction materials (i.e., health and safety issues of the materials, health and safety of workers, company’s commitment to sustainability, and company’s policies on energy and water consumption). Based on the sustainability index proposed, using recycled aggregates from locally generated waste materials scored higher (about 31–34%) social sustainability than using imported natural aggregates. In addition, recycled aggregates and natural aggregates achieved “sustainable” and “neutral” rating sustainability levels, respectively. Howeve |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2069376832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2069376832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-46a7ecc66a7f796d71ded189afcb2d927b959e8d700b052608d255ddf07860433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LJDEQxYMoOP75AN4CnlsrSXfSOYq76oKwl_UcMkm1tkx3xlRamNt-9I2O4GkPxTvU770Hj7ELAVcCwFyTEEqbBoRphDKqgQO2Elq0jelAHrIV2LZvlGrtMTshegWQAmy3Yn9_4Dtu0nbCufA0cEph9BtOCxU_zn49bsay454IiT6ZCctLitzP9XhI09ZnX8Z35METcipL3PE0fznG-ZlnDLuwwVjhmUpeQhnrf_IFc22iM3Y0VMHzLz1lT3c__9w-NI-_73_d3jw2oVVQmlZ7gyHoKoOxOhoRMYre-iGsZbTSrG1nsY8GYA2d1NBH2XUxDmB6Da1Sp-xyn7vN6W1BKu41LXmulU6CtsroXslKiT0VciLKOLhtHiefd06A-xja7Yd2dWj3MbSD6pF7D1V2fsb8nfx_0z-934O9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2069376832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hossain, Md. Uzzal ; Poon, Chi Sun ; Dong, Ya Hong ; Lo, Irene M. C. ; Cheng, Jack C. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Md. Uzzal ; Poon, Chi Sun ; Dong, Ya Hong ; Lo, Irene M. C. ; Cheng, Jack C. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Sustainability analysis should include the assessment of the environmental, social, and economic impacts throughout the life cycle of a product. However, the social sustainability performance assessment is seldom carried out during materials selection due to its complex nature and the lack of a social life cycle assessment tool. This study presents a single score-based social life cycle assessment methodology, namely social sustainability grading model, for assessing and comparing the social sustainability performance of construction materials using a case study on recycled and natural construction materials.
Methods
The proposed method is developed based on the methodological framework provided by the United Nations Environment Programme
/
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry guidelines published in 2009 and the methodological sheets published in 2013, the indicators and sustainability reporting guidelines provided by the Global Reporting Initiatives and ISO 26000 for social responsibility of products, and the indicators provided by the Hong Kong Business Environment Council Limited for construction sustainability. A twofold research approach is proposed in this model: the first one is the qualitative research based on expert interviews to identify, select, and prioritize the relevant subcategories and indicators, and the second one is the operational research based on the case-specific survey to collect the required data. A social sustainability index was proposed for the interpretation of the results effectively. A case study on construction materials was conducted to illustrate the implementation of the method using case-specific first-hand data.
Results and discussion
The major outcome of this study is the systematic development of a social sustainability assessment tool based on the established standards and guidelines. The case study showed that four subcategories are crucial social concerns for construction materials (i.e., health and safety issues of the materials, health and safety of workers, company’s commitment to sustainability, and company’s policies on energy and water consumption). Based on the sustainability index proposed, using recycled aggregates from locally generated waste materials scored higher (about 31–34%) social sustainability than using imported natural aggregates. In addition, recycled aggregates and natural aggregates achieved “sustainable” and “neutral” rating sustainability levels, respectively. However, several subcategories (e.g., health and safety, working hour, forced work, training and social benefits of workers, and quality of the materials and information disclosing to public) are still needed to improve the social sustainability performance of recycled aggregates.
Conclusions
An integrated social life cycle assessment method is presented in this study for assessing the social sustainability of construction materials. In addition, the reported case study in this paper is one of the first attempts for social sustainability assessment of recycled construction materials, and the method can be applied to other recycled materials/products for comparative analysis. However, several critical factors, such as integration in other life cycle methods and software, sensitivity analysis, and more case studies, are still needed for further improvement of the developed method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0948-3349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; Case studies ; Comparative studies ; Construction ; Construction materials ; Construction methods ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Economic analysis ; Economic impact ; Energy policy ; Environment ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Evaluation ; Guidelines ; Health ; Indicators ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle engineering ; Life cycles ; Materials selection ; Occupational safety ; Operations research ; Organic chemistry ; Performance assessment ; Qualitative research ; Recycled materials ; Safety ; Sensitivity analysis ; Social responsibility ; Social sustainability ; Societal Lca ; Sustainability ; Sustainability reporting ; Sustainable development ; Toxicology ; Waste materials ; Water consumption</subject><ispartof>The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2018-08, Vol.23 (8), p.1654-1674</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-46a7ecc66a7f796d71ded189afcb2d927b959e8d700b052608d255ddf07860433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-46a7ecc66a7f796d71ded189afcb2d927b959e8d700b052608d255ddf07860433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Md. Uzzal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, Chi Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Ya Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Irene M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Jack C. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials</title><title>The international journal of life cycle assessment</title><addtitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</addtitle><description>Purpose
Sustainability analysis should include the assessment of the environmental, social, and economic impacts throughout the life cycle of a product. However, the social sustainability performance assessment is seldom carried out during materials selection due to its complex nature and the lack of a social life cycle assessment tool. This study presents a single score-based social life cycle assessment methodology, namely social sustainability grading model, for assessing and comparing the social sustainability performance of construction materials using a case study on recycled and natural construction materials.
Methods
The proposed method is developed based on the methodological framework provided by the United Nations Environment Programme
/
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry guidelines published in 2009 and the methodological sheets published in 2013, the indicators and sustainability reporting guidelines provided by the Global Reporting Initiatives and ISO 26000 for social responsibility of products, and the indicators provided by the Hong Kong Business Environment Council Limited for construction sustainability. A twofold research approach is proposed in this model: the first one is the qualitative research based on expert interviews to identify, select, and prioritize the relevant subcategories and indicators, and the second one is the operational research based on the case-specific survey to collect the required data. A social sustainability index was proposed for the interpretation of the results effectively. A case study on construction materials was conducted to illustrate the implementation of the method using case-specific first-hand data.
Results and discussion
The major outcome of this study is the systematic development of a social sustainability assessment tool based on the established standards and guidelines. The case study showed that four subcategories are crucial social concerns for construction materials (i.e., health and safety issues of the materials, health and safety of workers, company’s commitment to sustainability, and company’s policies on energy and water consumption). Based on the sustainability index proposed, using recycled aggregates from locally generated waste materials scored higher (about 31–34%) social sustainability than using imported natural aggregates. In addition, recycled aggregates and natural aggregates achieved “sustainable” and “neutral” rating sustainability levels, respectively. However, several subcategories (e.g., health and safety, working hour, forced work, training and social benefits of workers, and quality of the materials and information disclosing to public) are still needed to improve the social sustainability performance of recycled aggregates.
Conclusions
An integrated social life cycle assessment method is presented in this study for assessing the social sustainability of construction materials. In addition, the reported case study in this paper is one of the first attempts for social sustainability assessment of recycled construction materials, and the method can be applied to other recycled materials/products for comparative analysis. However, several critical factors, such as integration in other life cycle methods and software, sensitivity analysis, and more case studies, are still needed for further improvement of the developed method.</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Construction methods</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Recycled materials</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Societal Lca</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability reporting</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Waste materials</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><issn>0948-3349</issn><issn>1614-7502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LJDEQxYMoOP75AN4CnlsrSXfSOYq76oKwl_UcMkm1tkx3xlRamNt-9I2O4GkPxTvU770Hj7ELAVcCwFyTEEqbBoRphDKqgQO2Elq0jelAHrIV2LZvlGrtMTshegWQAmy3Yn9_4Dtu0nbCufA0cEph9BtOCxU_zn49bsay454IiT6ZCctLitzP9XhI09ZnX8Z35METcipL3PE0fznG-ZlnDLuwwVjhmUpeQhnrf_IFc22iM3Y0VMHzLz1lT3c__9w-NI-_73_d3jw2oVVQmlZ7gyHoKoOxOhoRMYre-iGsZbTSrG1nsY8GYA2d1NBH2XUxDmB6Da1Sp-xyn7vN6W1BKu41LXmulU6CtsroXslKiT0VciLKOLhtHiefd06A-xja7Yd2dWj3MbSD6pF7D1V2fsb8nfx_0z-934O9</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Hossain, Md. Uzzal</creator><creator>Poon, Chi Sun</creator><creator>Dong, Ya Hong</creator><creator>Lo, Irene M. C.</creator><creator>Cheng, Jack C. P.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials</title><author>Hossain, Md. Uzzal ; Poon, Chi Sun ; Dong, Ya Hong ; Lo, Irene M. C. ; Cheng, Jack C. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-46a7ecc66a7f796d71ded189afcb2d927b959e8d700b052608d255ddf07860433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Construction methods</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Recycled materials</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Societal Lca</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability reporting</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Waste materials</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Md. Uzzal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, Chi Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Ya Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Irene M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Jack C. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hossain, Md. Uzzal</au><au>Poon, Chi Sun</au><au>Dong, Ya Hong</au><au>Lo, Irene M. C.</au><au>Cheng, Jack C. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle><stitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1654</spage><epage>1674</epage><pages>1654-1674</pages><issn>0948-3349</issn><eissn>1614-7502</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Sustainability analysis should include the assessment of the environmental, social, and economic impacts throughout the life cycle of a product. However, the social sustainability performance assessment is seldom carried out during materials selection due to its complex nature and the lack of a social life cycle assessment tool. This study presents a single score-based social life cycle assessment methodology, namely social sustainability grading model, for assessing and comparing the social sustainability performance of construction materials using a case study on recycled and natural construction materials.
Methods
The proposed method is developed based on the methodological framework provided by the United Nations Environment Programme
/
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry guidelines published in 2009 and the methodological sheets published in 2013, the indicators and sustainability reporting guidelines provided by the Global Reporting Initiatives and ISO 26000 for social responsibility of products, and the indicators provided by the Hong Kong Business Environment Council Limited for construction sustainability. A twofold research approach is proposed in this model: the first one is the qualitative research based on expert interviews to identify, select, and prioritize the relevant subcategories and indicators, and the second one is the operational research based on the case-specific survey to collect the required data. A social sustainability index was proposed for the interpretation of the results effectively. A case study on construction materials was conducted to illustrate the implementation of the method using case-specific first-hand data.
Results and discussion
The major outcome of this study is the systematic development of a social sustainability assessment tool based on the established standards and guidelines. The case study showed that four subcategories are crucial social concerns for construction materials (i.e., health and safety issues of the materials, health and safety of workers, company’s commitment to sustainability, and company’s policies on energy and water consumption). Based on the sustainability index proposed, using recycled aggregates from locally generated waste materials scored higher (about 31–34%) social sustainability than using imported natural aggregates. In addition, recycled aggregates and natural aggregates achieved “sustainable” and “neutral” rating sustainability levels, respectively. However, several subcategories (e.g., health and safety, working hour, forced work, training and social benefits of workers, and quality of the materials and information disclosing to public) are still needed to improve the social sustainability performance of recycled aggregates.
Conclusions
An integrated social life cycle assessment method is presented in this study for assessing the social sustainability of construction materials. In addition, the reported case study in this paper is one of the first attempts for social sustainability assessment of recycled construction materials, and the method can be applied to other recycled materials/products for comparative analysis. However, several critical factors, such as integration in other life cycle methods and software, sensitivity analysis, and more case studies, are still needed for further improvement of the developed method.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0948-3349 |
| ispartof | The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2018-08, Vol.23 (8), p.1654-1674 |
| issn | 0948-3349 1614-7502 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2069376832 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aggregates Case studies Comparative studies Construction Construction materials Construction methods Earth and Environmental Science Economic analysis Economic impact Energy policy Environment Environmental assessment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Economics Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Evaluation Guidelines Health Indicators Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycle engineering Life cycles Materials selection Occupational safety Operations research Organic chemistry Performance assessment Qualitative research Recycled materials Safety Sensitivity analysis Social responsibility Social sustainability Societal Lca Sustainability Sustainability reporting Sustainable development Toxicology Waste materials Water consumption |
| title | Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A56%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20social%20sustainability%20assessment%20method%20and%20a%20comparative%20case%20study%20on%20assessing%20recycled%20construction%20materials&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20life%20cycle%20assessment&rft.au=Hossain,%20Md.%20Uzzal&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1654&rft.epage=1674&rft.pages=1654-1674&rft.issn=0948-3349&rft.eissn=1614-7502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2069376832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2069376832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |