How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?
Innovativeness is already highlighted in many engineering subjects, and some recent studies aimed at investigating whether handedness differences are reflected in the learning-style and the creativity of individuals. This paper presents a study administered among a sample of 508 university students...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technology and design education 2019-09, Vol.29 (4), p.897-914 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 914 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 897 |
| container_title | International journal of technology and design education |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Law, Kris M. Y. Geng, Shuang |
| description | Innovativeness is already highlighted in many engineering subjects, and some recent studies aimed at investigating whether handedness differences are reflected in the learning-style and the creativity of individuals. This paper presents a study administered among a sample of 508 university students (59 out of 508 are left-handers and 389 out of 508 are engineering students). The results show that left-handed students have a higher level of innovativeness, while non-engineering students have higher levels of self-efficacy and motivation. Innovativeness has an indirect positive effect on motivation among engineering students, which implies that innovativeness training for engineering students is critical for enhancing their learning motivation, and among these, left-handers may need different facilitative approaches that inspire their self-efficacy and motivation to actualize their innovativeness potential. This study thus brings this issue to light in order that the educators and course designers should pay due attention. The learning setting can be developed with better accommodation for these ‘specific’ groups to achieve the expected learning outcomes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10798-018-9462-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2068658779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1226410</ericid><sourcerecordid>2068658779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-364b726602b101b135396d09152da8e20e280340681be4b817c0665205a8711f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKA0EQHETB-PgAD8KC59HumZ3HnkRCNErAi3od9tEbNySzcWYT8e_dZUVPXrppqqqLKsYuEK4RwNxEBJNZDmh5lmrB5QGboDKSo4X0kE0gU4YbZcQxO4lxBYBaWDVhb_P2M2m8b_d51-zJU4xJ7qvkvR9UjWddU9kla8qDb_wy2VKo27DJfUlJWyfkl40nCgMUu11Fvou3Z-yozteRzn_2KXu9n71M53zx_PA4vVvwUkrbcanTwgitQRQIWKBUMtMVZKhElVsSQMKCTEFbLCgtLJoStFYCVG4NYi1P2dX4dxvajx3Fzq3aXfC9pRO9SitrTNazcGSVoY0xUO22odnk4cshuKE-N9bn-vrcUJ-TveZy1PTJyl_-7AmF0ClCj4sRj9shOoU_5_-ffgOA6Xrp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2068658779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Law, Kris M. Y. ; Geng, Shuang</creator><creatorcontrib>Law, Kris M. Y. ; Geng, Shuang</creatorcontrib><description>Innovativeness is already highlighted in many engineering subjects, and some recent studies aimed at investigating whether handedness differences are reflected in the learning-style and the creativity of individuals. This paper presents a study administered among a sample of 508 university students (59 out of 508 are left-handers and 389 out of 508 are engineering students). The results show that left-handed students have a higher level of innovativeness, while non-engineering students have higher levels of self-efficacy and motivation. Innovativeness has an indirect positive effect on motivation among engineering students, which implies that innovativeness training for engineering students is critical for enhancing their learning motivation, and among these, left-handers may need different facilitative approaches that inspire their self-efficacy and motivation to actualize their innovativeness potential. This study thus brings this issue to light in order that the educators and course designers should pay due attention. The learning setting can be developed with better accommodation for these ‘specific’ groups to achieve the expected learning outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-7572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10798-018-9462-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; College Students ; Colleges & universities ; Contests ; Education ; Educational Innovation ; Educational Technology ; Engineering ; Engineering Education ; Handedness ; Innovations ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Motivation ; Science Education ; Self Efficacy ; Student Motivation ; Students</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology and design education, 2019-09, Vol.29 (4), p.897-914</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>International Journal of Technology and Design Education is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-364b726602b101b135396d09152da8e20e280340681be4b817c0665205a8711f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-364b726602b101b135396d09152da8e20e280340681be4b817c0665205a8711f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8146-0786</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10798-018-9462-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10798-018-9462-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1226410$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Law, Kris M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Shuang</creatorcontrib><title>How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?</title><title>International journal of technology and design education</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Des Educ</addtitle><description>Innovativeness is already highlighted in many engineering subjects, and some recent studies aimed at investigating whether handedness differences are reflected in the learning-style and the creativity of individuals. This paper presents a study administered among a sample of 508 university students (59 out of 508 are left-handers and 389 out of 508 are engineering students). The results show that left-handed students have a higher level of innovativeness, while non-engineering students have higher levels of self-efficacy and motivation. Innovativeness has an indirect positive effect on motivation among engineering students, which implies that innovativeness training for engineering students is critical for enhancing their learning motivation, and among these, left-handers may need different facilitative approaches that inspire their self-efficacy and motivation to actualize their innovativeness potential. This study thus brings this issue to light in order that the educators and course designers should pay due attention. The learning setting can be developed with better accommodation for these ‘specific’ groups to achieve the expected learning outcomes.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Contests</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Innovation</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Education</subject><subject>Handedness</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Motivation</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0957-7572</issn><issn>1573-1804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKA0EQHETB-PgAD8KC59HumZ3HnkRCNErAi3od9tEbNySzcWYT8e_dZUVPXrppqqqLKsYuEK4RwNxEBJNZDmh5lmrB5QGboDKSo4X0kE0gU4YbZcQxO4lxBYBaWDVhb_P2M2m8b_d51-zJU4xJ7qvkvR9UjWddU9kla8qDb_wy2VKo27DJfUlJWyfkl40nCgMUu11Fvou3Z-yozteRzn_2KXu9n71M53zx_PA4vVvwUkrbcanTwgitQRQIWKBUMtMVZKhElVsSQMKCTEFbLCgtLJoStFYCVG4NYi1P2dX4dxvajx3Fzq3aXfC9pRO9SitrTNazcGSVoY0xUO22odnk4cshuKE-N9bn-vrcUJ-TveZy1PTJyl_-7AmF0ClCj4sRj9shOoU_5_-ffgOA6Xrp</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Law, Kris M. Y.</creator><creator>Geng, Shuang</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8146-0786</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?</title><author>Law, Kris M. Y. ; Geng, Shuang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-364b726602b101b135396d09152da8e20e280340681be4b817c0665205a8711f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Contests</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Innovation</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Education</topic><topic>Handedness</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Motivation</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Law, Kris M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Shuang</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology and design education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Law, Kris M. Y.</au><au>Geng, Shuang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1226410</ericid><atitle>How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology and design education</jtitle><stitle>Int J Technol Des Educ</stitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>897-914</pages><issn>0957-7572</issn><eissn>1573-1804</eissn><abstract>Innovativeness is already highlighted in many engineering subjects, and some recent studies aimed at investigating whether handedness differences are reflected in the learning-style and the creativity of individuals. This paper presents a study administered among a sample of 508 university students (59 out of 508 are left-handers and 389 out of 508 are engineering students). The results show that left-handed students have a higher level of innovativeness, while non-engineering students have higher levels of self-efficacy and motivation. Innovativeness has an indirect positive effect on motivation among engineering students, which implies that innovativeness training for engineering students is critical for enhancing their learning motivation, and among these, left-handers may need different facilitative approaches that inspire their self-efficacy and motivation to actualize their innovativeness potential. This study thus brings this issue to light in order that the educators and course designers should pay due attention. The learning setting can be developed with better accommodation for these ‘specific’ groups to achieve the expected learning outcomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10798-018-9462-3</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8146-0786</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0957-7572 |
| ispartof | International journal of technology and design education, 2019-09, Vol.29 (4), p.897-914 |
| issn | 0957-7572 1573-1804 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2068658779 |
| source | Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Academic Achievement College Students Colleges & universities Contests Education Educational Innovation Educational Technology Engineering Engineering Education Handedness Innovations Instructional Effectiveness Learning Learning and Instruction Learning Motivation Science Education Self Efficacy Student Motivation Students |
| title | How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A12%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20innovativeness%20and%20handedness%20affect%20learning%20performance%20of%20engineering%20students?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20and%20design%20education&rft.au=Law,%20Kris%20M.%20Y.&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=897-914&rft.issn=0957-7572&rft.eissn=1573-1804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10798-018-9462-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2068658779%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2068658779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1226410&rfr_iscdi=true |