Legislating religious liberty locally: The possibility of compelling conflicts
In practical application, state Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs) might cause significant harm to those people that the legislation was created to protect. By being applicable to any government act or actor, state RFRAs immediately come into conflict with local anti-discrimination statutes....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of litigation 2000-04, Vol.19 (2), p.289 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 289 |
| container_title | The Review of litigation |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Rubenstein, Cheryl |
| description | In practical application, state Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs) might cause significant harm to those people that the legislation was created to protect. By being applicable to any government act or actor, state RFRAs immediately come into conflict with local anti-discrimination statutes. By creating more narrowly tailored legislation and developing standard analytical procedures, legislators should be able to maintain their role as policy makers. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_206823438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>52844891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2068234383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7EOgjAUADtoIor_0LiTVIrSuBqNg3FiJ9AUfOTJw74y8Pdi4gc43XB3CxGpXGdJpvaHlVgzd0qp3BgVicfdtcBYBehb6R1CCzSyRKidD5NEshXidJLF08mBmKEGhFlQIy29Bof4HS31DYINHItlUyG77Y8bsbteivMtGTy9R8eh7Gj0_azKVB1NqjNt9F_RB2amPis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206823438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Legislating religious liberty locally: The possibility of compelling conflicts</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Rubenstein, Cheryl</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><description>In practical application, state Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs) might cause significant harm to those people that the legislation was created to protect. By being applicable to any government act or actor, state RFRAs immediately come into conflict with local anti-discrimination statutes. By creating more narrowly tailored legislation and developing standard analytical procedures, legislators should be able to maintain their role as policy makers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-4015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>American history ; Church & state ; Discrimination ; Freedom of religion ; Jurisprudence ; Law ; Legislation ; Political power ; Politics ; State laws</subject><ispartof>The Review of litigation, 2000-04, Vol.19 (2), p.289</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc. Spring 2000</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><title>Legislating religious liberty locally: The possibility of compelling conflicts</title><title>The Review of litigation</title><description>In practical application, state Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs) might cause significant harm to those people that the legislation was created to protect. By being applicable to any government act or actor, state RFRAs immediately come into conflict with local anti-discrimination statutes. By creating more narrowly tailored legislation and developing standard analytical procedures, legislators should be able to maintain their role as policy makers.</description><subject>American history</subject><subject>Church & state</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Freedom of religion</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>State laws</subject><issn>0734-4015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi7EOgjAUADtoIor_0LiTVIrSuBqNg3FiJ9AUfOTJw74y8Pdi4gc43XB3CxGpXGdJpvaHlVgzd0qp3BgVicfdtcBYBehb6R1CCzSyRKidD5NEshXidJLF08mBmKEGhFlQIy29Bof4HS31DYINHItlUyG77Y8bsbteivMtGTy9R8eh7Gj0_azKVB1NqjNt9F_RB2amPis</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Rubenstein, Cheryl</creator><general>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Legislating religious liberty locally: The possibility of compelling conflicts</title><author>Rubenstein, Cheryl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2068234383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>American history</topic><topic>Church & state</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Freedom of religion</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>State laws</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Review of litigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubenstein, Cheryl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Legislating religious liberty locally: The possibility of compelling conflicts</atitle><jtitle>The Review of litigation</jtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>289</spage><pages>289-</pages><issn>0734-4015</issn><abstract>In practical application, state Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs) might cause significant harm to those people that the legislation was created to protect. By being applicable to any government act or actor, state RFRAs immediately come into conflict with local anti-discrimination statutes. By creating more narrowly tailored legislation and developing standard analytical procedures, legislators should be able to maintain their role as policy makers.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0734-4015 |
| ispartof | The Review of litigation, 2000-04, Vol.19 (2), p.289 |
| issn | 0734-4015 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_206823438 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | American history Church & state Discrimination Freedom of religion Jurisprudence Law Legislation Political power Politics State laws |
| title | Legislating religious liberty locally: The possibility of compelling conflicts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legislating%20religious%20liberty%20locally:%20The%20possibility%20of%20compelling%20conflicts&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20litigation&rft.au=Rubenstein,%20Cheryl&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=289&rft.pages=289-&rft.issn=0734-4015&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E52844891%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206823438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |