Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site‐specific weed management in arable crops?

Summary Weed monitoring is the first step in any site‐specific weed management programme. A relatively large variety of platforms, cameras, sensors and image analysis procedures are available to detect and map weed presence/abundance at various times and spatial scales. Remote sensing from satellite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed research 2018-08, Vol.58 (4), p.259-272
Hauptverfasser: Fernández‐Quintanilla, C, Peña, J M, Andújar, D, Dorado, J, Ribeiro, A, López‐Granados, F, Smith, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 272
container_issue 4
container_start_page 259
container_title Weed research
container_volume 58
creator Fernández‐Quintanilla, C
Peña, J M
Andújar, D
Dorado, J
Ribeiro, A
López‐Granados, F
Smith, Richard
description Summary Weed monitoring is the first step in any site‐specific weed management programme. A relatively large variety of platforms, cameras, sensors and image analysis procedures are available to detect and map weed presence/abundance at various times and spatial scales. Remote sensing from satellites or aircraft can provide accurate weed maps when the images are obtained at late weed phenological stages. Cameras located on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been shown to be adequate for early‐season weed detection in a variety of wide‐row crops, providing images with relatively high spatial resolutions. Alternatively, weed detection/mapping systems from ground‐based platforms can achieve even higher resolutions using a variety of non‐imaging and imaging technologies. These ground systems are suited, in some cases, for real‐time site‐specific weed management. Despite this rich arsenal of technologies, their commercial adoption is, apparently, low. In this study, we describe the state of the art of remotely sensed and ground‐based weed monitoring in arable crops and the current level of adoption of these technologies, exploring major constraints for adoption and trying to identify research gaps and bottlenecks.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/wre.12307
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2068178258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2068178258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-9985b2e3ba0837f02a3407135871957274a9b75e6f2d6cfeb177aaef1b90ca8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsH3yDgycO2-dPdJCeR4p9CQRDFY8huJzWl3axJltKbj-Az-iRuu706lxmG33zf8CF0TcmIdjXeBhhRxok4QQPKizzjVJJTNCBkwjMquDhHFzGuCCFFodQANbOI0yfgqg0B6oRjMgmwt4elCWk_bgEWeONrl3xw9RLH1iVTrgFbH3B0CX6_f2IDlbOuOsKmNkvY7AVd3ckc6Cr4Jt5dojNr1hGujn2I3h8f3qbP2fzlaTa9n2cV50xkSsm8ZMBLQyQXljDDJ0RQnktBVS6YmBhVihwKyxZFZaGkQhgDlpaKVEZaPkQ3vW4T_FcLMemVb0PdWWpGCkmFZLnsqNue6p6LMYDVTXAbE3aaEr0PVHeB6kOgHTvu2a1bw-5_UH-8PvQXf4I8eMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2068178258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site‐specific weed management in arable crops?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fernández‐Quintanilla, C ; Peña, J M ; Andújar, D ; Dorado, J ; Ribeiro, A ; López‐Granados, F ; Smith, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Quintanilla, C ; Peña, J M ; Andújar, D ; Dorado, J ; Ribeiro, A ; López‐Granados, F ; Smith, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Weed monitoring is the first step in any site‐specific weed management programme. A relatively large variety of platforms, cameras, sensors and image analysis procedures are available to detect and map weed presence/abundance at various times and spatial scales. Remote sensing from satellites or aircraft can provide accurate weed maps when the images are obtained at late weed phenological stages. Cameras located on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been shown to be adequate for early‐season weed detection in a variety of wide‐row crops, providing images with relatively high spatial resolutions. Alternatively, weed detection/mapping systems from ground‐based platforms can achieve even higher resolutions using a variety of non‐imaging and imaging technologies. These ground systems are suited, in some cases, for real‐time site‐specific weed management. Despite this rich arsenal of technologies, their commercial adoption is, apparently, low. In this study, we describe the state of the art of remotely sensed and ground‐based weed monitoring in arable crops and the current level of adoption of these technologies, exploring major constraints for adoption and trying to identify research gaps and bottlenecks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wre.12307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Arable land ; Cameras ; Crops ; ground‐based platforms ; Image analysis ; Image detection ; Image processing ; Management ; Monitoring ; Platforms ; real‐time detection ; Remote sensing ; Satellites ; sensors ; Spatial discrimination ; State of the art ; unmanned aerial vehicle ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Weed control ; weed maps ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed research, 2018-08, Vol.58 (4), p.259-272</ispartof><rights>2018 European Weed Research Society</rights><rights>Weed Research © 2018 European Weed Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-9985b2e3ba0837f02a3407135871957274a9b75e6f2d6cfeb177aaef1b90ca8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-9985b2e3ba0837f02a3407135871957274a9b75e6f2d6cfeb177aaef1b90ca8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2886-9176</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwre.12307$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwre.12307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Quintanilla, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andújar, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorado, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Granados, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site‐specific weed management in arable crops?</title><title>Weed research</title><description>Summary Weed monitoring is the first step in any site‐specific weed management programme. A relatively large variety of platforms, cameras, sensors and image analysis procedures are available to detect and map weed presence/abundance at various times and spatial scales. Remote sensing from satellites or aircraft can provide accurate weed maps when the images are obtained at late weed phenological stages. Cameras located on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been shown to be adequate for early‐season weed detection in a variety of wide‐row crops, providing images with relatively high spatial resolutions. Alternatively, weed detection/mapping systems from ground‐based platforms can achieve even higher resolutions using a variety of non‐imaging and imaging technologies. These ground systems are suited, in some cases, for real‐time site‐specific weed management. Despite this rich arsenal of technologies, their commercial adoption is, apparently, low. In this study, we describe the state of the art of remotely sensed and ground‐based weed monitoring in arable crops and the current level of adoption of these technologies, exploring major constraints for adoption and trying to identify research gaps and bottlenecks.</description><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>ground‐based platforms</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Platforms</subject><subject>real‐time detection</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>sensors</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>State of the art</subject><subject>unmanned aerial vehicle</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>weed maps</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1737</issn><issn>1365-3180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsH3yDgycO2-dPdJCeR4p9CQRDFY8huJzWl3axJltKbj-Az-iRuu706lxmG33zf8CF0TcmIdjXeBhhRxok4QQPKizzjVJJTNCBkwjMquDhHFzGuCCFFodQANbOI0yfgqg0B6oRjMgmwt4elCWk_bgEWeONrl3xw9RLH1iVTrgFbH3B0CX6_f2IDlbOuOsKmNkvY7AVd3ckc6Cr4Jt5dojNr1hGujn2I3h8f3qbP2fzlaTa9n2cV50xkSsm8ZMBLQyQXljDDJ0RQnktBVS6YmBhVihwKyxZFZaGkQhgDlpaKVEZaPkQ3vW4T_FcLMemVb0PdWWpGCkmFZLnsqNue6p6LMYDVTXAbE3aaEr0PVHeB6kOgHTvu2a1bw-5_UH-8PvQXf4I8eMk</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Fernández‐Quintanilla, C</creator><creator>Peña, J M</creator><creator>Andújar, D</creator><creator>Dorado, J</creator><creator>Ribeiro, A</creator><creator>López‐Granados, F</creator><creator>Smith, Richard</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-9176</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site‐specific weed management in arable crops?</title><author>Fernández‐Quintanilla, C ; Peña, J M ; Andújar, D ; Dorado, J ; Ribeiro, A ; López‐Granados, F ; Smith, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-9985b2e3ba0837f02a3407135871957274a9b75e6f2d6cfeb177aaef1b90ca8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>ground‐based platforms</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Platforms</topic><topic>real‐time detection</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>sensors</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>State of the art</topic><topic>unmanned aerial vehicle</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>weed maps</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Quintanilla, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andújar, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorado, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Granados, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernández‐Quintanilla, C</au><au>Peña, J M</au><au>Andújar, D</au><au>Dorado, J</au><au>Ribeiro, A</au><au>López‐Granados, F</au><au>Smith, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site‐specific weed management in arable crops?</atitle><jtitle>Weed research</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>259-272</pages><issn>0043-1737</issn><eissn>1365-3180</eissn><abstract>Summary Weed monitoring is the first step in any site‐specific weed management programme. A relatively large variety of platforms, cameras, sensors and image analysis procedures are available to detect and map weed presence/abundance at various times and spatial scales. Remote sensing from satellites or aircraft can provide accurate weed maps when the images are obtained at late weed phenological stages. Cameras located on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been shown to be adequate for early‐season weed detection in a variety of wide‐row crops, providing images with relatively high spatial resolutions. Alternatively, weed detection/mapping systems from ground‐based platforms can achieve even higher resolutions using a variety of non‐imaging and imaging technologies. These ground systems are suited, in some cases, for real‐time site‐specific weed management. Despite this rich arsenal of technologies, their commercial adoption is, apparently, low. In this study, we describe the state of the art of remotely sensed and ground‐based weed monitoring in arable crops and the current level of adoption of these technologies, exploring major constraints for adoption and trying to identify research gaps and bottlenecks.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/wre.12307</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-9176</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1737
ispartof Weed research, 2018-08, Vol.58 (4), p.259-272
issn 0043-1737
1365-3180
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2068178258
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Arable land
Cameras
Crops
ground‐based platforms
Image analysis
Image detection
Image processing
Management
Monitoring
Platforms
real‐time detection
Remote sensing
Satellites
sensors
Spatial discrimination
State of the art
unmanned aerial vehicle
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Weed control
weed maps
Weeds
title Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site‐specific weed management in arable crops?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A41%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20current%20state%20of%20the%20art%20of%20weed%20monitoring%20suitable%20for%20site%E2%80%90specific%20weed%20management%20in%20arable%20crops?&rft.jtitle=Weed%20research&rft.au=Fern%C3%A1ndez%E2%80%90Quintanilla,%20C&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=259-272&rft.issn=0043-1737&rft.eissn=1365-3180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wre.12307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2068178258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2068178258&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true