An impediment to gender Equality?: Religion’s influence on development and reproductive policy
•We develop the Comparative Abortion Index, covering 75% of the world population.•Several religions, including Buddhism, correlate with restrictive abortion policy.•Degree of religiosity correlates with restrictive abortion policy.•Freedom of religion, laws of religion and state, and religious diver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World development 2018-05, Vol.105, p.48-58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | World development |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza Sommer, Udi |
description | •We develop the Comparative Abortion Index, covering 75% of the world population.•Several religions, including Buddhism, correlate with restrictive abortion policy.•Degree of religiosity correlates with restrictive abortion policy.•Freedom of religion, laws of religion and state, and religious diversity have no effect.•The connection between religion and gender development is more nuanced than thought.
The effects of religion on development in the area of gender equality have been considered substantial in academic work as well as in popular and political discourse. A common understanding is that religion depresses women’s rights in general and reproductive and abortion rights in particular. The literature on reproductive rights, however, is disproportionately focused on Western cases, and is limited in its definition of religion as a variable. What happens, though, when we switch to a more inclusive framework? To what extent do a variety of religious variables correlate with policy on reproductive rights outside of the Western context? We examine the relevance of the religion-abortion link in a broad comparative framework. We introduce the Comparative Abortion Index and test the effects of a wide range of denominations and religious characteristics on reproductive rights. Our study finds that reproductive rights correlate only with some religious denominations, while others have no significance. Additionally, while religiosity correlates with reproductive policy, variables such as religious freedom, separation of religion and state and religious diversity show no correlative effect. The comparative analyses suggest that the connection between religion and development in general—and in the area of women’s rights in particular—is far more nuanced than previously thought. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2068020242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A639999572</galeid><els_id>S0305750X17304175</els_id><sourcerecordid>A639999572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8f080298008fd65daef7b22a7a72afb81839e6214b954029956c832a078c7043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2OFCEUhYnRxHbGVzAkJu6qvFA_UG60Mxl_kklMzCzcIQ23OnSqoQao1t7Na_h68yTStq6HDZvvnAMfIa8Y1AxY_3ZX_wxxshYPNQcmasZr4O0TsmJSNFU3DOwpWUEDXSU6-P6cvEhpBwBdM4gV-bH21O1ntG6PPtMc6Ba9xUiv7xY9uXx8_45-w8ltXfAP978TdX6cFvQGafC0bOIU5r9R7S2NOMdgF5PdAekcJmeOl-TZqKeEL__dF-T24_Xt1efq5uunL1frm8q0TZ8rOYIEPkgAOdq-sxpHseFcCy24HjeSyWbAnrN2M3RtAYeuN7LhGoQ0Atrmgrw-15YH3C2YstqFJfqyqDj0pboo4YV6c6a2ekLlvAk-46-81UtKSq37ZiinEyewP4MmhpQijmqObq_jUTFQJ-tqp_5bVyfrinFVJkrwwzmI5a8Hh1El4066rItosrLBPVbxB-0ej0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2068020242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An impediment to gender Equality?: Religion’s influence on development and reproductive policy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza ; Sommer, Udi</creator><creatorcontrib>Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza ; Sommer, Udi</creatorcontrib><description>•We develop the Comparative Abortion Index, covering 75% of the world population.•Several religions, including Buddhism, correlate with restrictive abortion policy.•Degree of religiosity correlates with restrictive abortion policy.•Freedom of religion, laws of religion and state, and religious diversity have no effect.•The connection between religion and gender development is more nuanced than thought.
The effects of religion on development in the area of gender equality have been considered substantial in academic work as well as in popular and political discourse. A common understanding is that religion depresses women’s rights in general and reproductive and abortion rights in particular. The literature on reproductive rights, however, is disproportionately focused on Western cases, and is limited in its definition of religion as a variable. What happens, though, when we switch to a more inclusive framework? To what extent do a variety of religious variables correlate with policy on reproductive rights outside of the Western context? We examine the relevance of the religion-abortion link in a broad comparative framework. We introduce the Comparative Abortion Index and test the effects of a wide range of denominations and religious characteristics on reproductive rights. Our study finds that reproductive rights correlate only with some religious denominations, while others have no significance. Additionally, while religiosity correlates with reproductive policy, variables such as religious freedom, separation of religion and state and religious diversity show no correlative effect. The comparative analyses suggest that the connection between religion and development in general—and in the area of women’s rights in particular—is far more nuanced than previously thought.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Academic work ; Academic writing ; Analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Correlation analysis ; Denominations ; Development policy ; Discrimination ; Equal rights ; Equality ; Females ; Freedom of religion ; Gender ; Gender discrimination ; Gender equality ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Political aspects ; Political discourse ; Religion ; Religion and development ; Religion and politics ; Religion and state ; Religiosity ; Reproductive rights ; Sects ; Women ; Women and religion ; Women's rights ; Womens rights</subject><ispartof>World development, 2018-05, Vol.105, p.48-58</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Elsevier Science Publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8f080298008fd65daef7b22a7a72afb81839e6214b954029956c832a078c7043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8f080298008fd65daef7b22a7a72afb81839e6214b954029956c832a078c7043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27847,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Udi</creatorcontrib><title>An impediment to gender Equality?: Religion’s influence on development and reproductive policy</title><title>World development</title><description>•We develop the Comparative Abortion Index, covering 75% of the world population.•Several religions, including Buddhism, correlate with restrictive abortion policy.•Degree of religiosity correlates with restrictive abortion policy.•Freedom of religion, laws of religion and state, and religious diversity have no effect.•The connection between religion and gender development is more nuanced than thought.
The effects of religion on development in the area of gender equality have been considered substantial in academic work as well as in popular and political discourse. A common understanding is that religion depresses women’s rights in general and reproductive and abortion rights in particular. The literature on reproductive rights, however, is disproportionately focused on Western cases, and is limited in its definition of religion as a variable. What happens, though, when we switch to a more inclusive framework? To what extent do a variety of religious variables correlate with policy on reproductive rights outside of the Western context? We examine the relevance of the religion-abortion link in a broad comparative framework. We introduce the Comparative Abortion Index and test the effects of a wide range of denominations and religious characteristics on reproductive rights. Our study finds that reproductive rights correlate only with some religious denominations, while others have no significance. Additionally, while religiosity correlates with reproductive policy, variables such as religious freedom, separation of religion and state and religious diversity show no correlative effect. The comparative analyses suggest that the connection between religion and development in general—and in the area of women’s rights in particular—is far more nuanced than previously thought.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Academic work</subject><subject>Academic writing</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Denominations</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Freedom of religion</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender discrimination</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion and development</subject><subject>Religion and politics</subject><subject>Religion and state</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Reproductive rights</subject><subject>Sects</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women and religion</subject><subject>Women's rights</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM2OFCEUhYnRxHbGVzAkJu6qvFA_UG60Mxl_kklMzCzcIQ23OnSqoQao1t7Na_h68yTStq6HDZvvnAMfIa8Y1AxY_3ZX_wxxshYPNQcmasZr4O0TsmJSNFU3DOwpWUEDXSU6-P6cvEhpBwBdM4gV-bH21O1ntG6PPtMc6Ba9xUiv7xY9uXx8_45-w8ltXfAP978TdX6cFvQGafC0bOIU5r9R7S2NOMdgF5PdAekcJmeOl-TZqKeEL__dF-T24_Xt1efq5uunL1frm8q0TZ8rOYIEPkgAOdq-sxpHseFcCy24HjeSyWbAnrN2M3RtAYeuN7LhGoQ0Atrmgrw-15YH3C2YstqFJfqyqDj0pboo4YV6c6a2ekLlvAk-46-81UtKSq37ZiinEyewP4MmhpQijmqObq_jUTFQJ-tqp_5bVyfrinFVJkrwwzmI5a8Hh1El4066rItosrLBPVbxB-0ej0A</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza</creator><creator>Sommer, Udi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishers</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>An impediment to gender Equality?: Religion’s influence on development and reproductive policy</title><author>Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza ; Sommer, Udi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8f080298008fd65daef7b22a7a72afb81839e6214b954029956c832a078c7043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Academic work</topic><topic>Academic writing</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Denominations</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Freedom of religion</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender discrimination</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion and development</topic><topic>Religion and politics</topic><topic>Religion and state</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Reproductive rights</topic><topic>Sects</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women and religion</topic><topic>Women's rights</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Udi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forman-Rabinovici, Aliza</au><au>Sommer, Udi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An impediment to gender Equality?: Religion’s influence on development and reproductive policy</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>105</volume><spage>48</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>48-58</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><abstract>•We develop the Comparative Abortion Index, covering 75% of the world population.•Several religions, including Buddhism, correlate with restrictive abortion policy.•Degree of religiosity correlates with restrictive abortion policy.•Freedom of religion, laws of religion and state, and religious diversity have no effect.•The connection between religion and gender development is more nuanced than thought.
The effects of religion on development in the area of gender equality have been considered substantial in academic work as well as in popular and political discourse. A common understanding is that religion depresses women’s rights in general and reproductive and abortion rights in particular. The literature on reproductive rights, however, is disproportionately focused on Western cases, and is limited in its definition of religion as a variable. What happens, though, when we switch to a more inclusive framework? To what extent do a variety of religious variables correlate with policy on reproductive rights outside of the Western context? We examine the relevance of the religion-abortion link in a broad comparative framework. We introduce the Comparative Abortion Index and test the effects of a wide range of denominations and religious characteristics on reproductive rights. Our study finds that reproductive rights correlate only with some religious denominations, while others have no significance. Additionally, while religiosity correlates with reproductive policy, variables such as religious freedom, separation of religion and state and religious diversity show no correlative effect. The comparative analyses suggest that the connection between religion and development in general—and in the area of women’s rights in particular—is far more nuanced than previously thought.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.024</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-750X |
ispartof | World development, 2018-05, Vol.105, p.48-58 |
issn | 0305-750X 1873-5991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2068020242 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Abortion Academic work Academic writing Analysis Comparative analysis Correlation analysis Denominations Development policy Discrimination Equal rights Equality Females Freedom of religion Gender Gender discrimination Gender equality Gender equity Gender inequality Political aspects Political discourse Religion Religion and development Religion and politics Religion and state Religiosity Reproductive rights Sects Women Women and religion Women's rights Womens rights |
title | An impediment to gender Equality?: Religion’s influence on development and reproductive policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A29%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20impediment%20to%20gender%20Equality?:%20Religion%E2%80%99s%20influence%20on%20development%20and%20reproductive%20policy&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Forman-Rabinovici,%20Aliza&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=48-58&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.024&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA639999572%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2068020242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A639999572&rft_els_id=S0305750X17304175&rfr_iscdi=true |