Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries
Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are the top priority for preventive cardiology. The first EUROASPIRE survey among patients with established CHD in nine countries in 1995–96 showed substantial potential for risk reduction. A second survey (EUROASPIRE II) was done in 1999–2000 in the same c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2001-03, Vol.357 (9261), p.995-1001 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1001 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9261 |
container_start_page | 995 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 357 |
creator | Wood, David A |
description | Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are the top priority for preventive cardiology. The first EUROASPIRE survey among patients with established CHD in nine countries in 1995–96 showed substantial potential for risk reduction. A second survey (EUROASPIRE II) was done in 1999–2000 in the same countries to see whether preventive cardiology had improved since the first. We compared the proportion of patients in both studies who achieved the lifestyle, risk-factor, and therapeutic goals recommended by the Joint European Societies report on coronary prevention.
The surveys were undertaken in the same selected geographical areas and hospitals in the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Spain. Consecutive patients (men and women ≤ 70 years of age) were identified after coronary-artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or a hospital admission with acute myocardial infarction or ischaemia, and were interviewed at least 6 months later.
3569 and 3379 patients were interviewed in the first and second surveys, respectively. The prevalence of smoking remained almost unchanged at 19·4%vs 20·8%. The prevalence of obesity (body-mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) increased substantially from 25·3% to 32·8%. The proportion with high blood pressure (≥ 140/90 mm Hg) was virtually the same (55·4%vs 53·9%), whereas the prevalence of high total cholesterol concentrations (≥ 5·0 mmol/L) decreased substantially from 86·2% to 58·8%. Aspirin or other antiplatelet therapy was as widely used in the second survey as the first (83·9% overall), and reported use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, and especially lipid-lowering drugs increased.
The adverse lifestyle trends among European CHD patients are a cause for concern, as is the lack of any improvement in blood-pressure management, and the fact that most CHD patients are still not achieving the cholesterol goal of less than 5 mmol/L. There is a collective failure of medical practice in Europe to achieve the substantial potential among patients with CHD to reduce the risk of recurrent disease and death. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04235-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2067749840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673600042355</els_id><sourcerecordid>70581555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-92272d662cb2689f163ae5a3542124c91520cc0b4b3d730fc1223fb87c8450333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LwzAYwPEgCs7pRxCCXvRQffLa1ovImFoYTKaCt5CmqURqOpNO2Lc3c-JNPOWQ3_OE_BE6JnBBgMjLRyAcMpkzeQZwDpwykYkdNCI855ng-csuGv2SfXQQ4xsAcAlihNykc94Z3eFgdeeGNe5bbPrQex3WeBnsp_WD6z1-XbnGJmvjFdZJvC91cDFdJD99XsxvHh-qxRRXWPsGVxV2Hvukk1z5ITgbD9Feq7toj37OMXq-nT5N7rPZ_K6a3Mwyw2kxZCWlOW2kpKamsihbIpm2QjPBKaHclERQMAZqXrMmZ9AaQilr6yI3BRfAGBuj0-3eZeg_VjYO6q1fBZ-eVBRknvOy4JDUyV-KlCUhQkiZkNgiE_oYg23VMrj3FEYRUJv06ju92nRVAOo7vRJp7no7Z9M_P50NKhpnvbGNC9YMqundPxu-ALFuiGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199115566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Wood, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wood, David A ; EUROASPIRE I and II Group</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are the top priority for preventive cardiology. The first EUROASPIRE survey among patients with established CHD in nine countries in 1995–96 showed substantial potential for risk reduction. A second survey (EUROASPIRE II) was done in 1999–2000 in the same countries to see whether preventive cardiology had improved since the first. We compared the proportion of patients in both studies who achieved the lifestyle, risk-factor, and therapeutic goals recommended by the Joint European Societies report on coronary prevention.
The surveys were undertaken in the same selected geographical areas and hospitals in the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Spain. Consecutive patients (men and women ≤ 70 years of age) were identified after coronary-artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or a hospital admission with acute myocardial infarction or ischaemia, and were interviewed at least 6 months later.
3569 and 3379 patients were interviewed in the first and second surveys, respectively. The prevalence of smoking remained almost unchanged at 19·4%vs 20·8%. The prevalence of obesity (body-mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) increased substantially from 25·3% to 32·8%. The proportion with high blood pressure (≥ 140/90 mm Hg) was virtually the same (55·4%vs 53·9%), whereas the prevalence of high total cholesterol concentrations (≥ 5·0 mmol/L) decreased substantially from 86·2% to 58·8%. Aspirin or other antiplatelet therapy was as widely used in the second survey as the first (83·9% overall), and reported use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, and especially lipid-lowering drugs increased.
The adverse lifestyle trends among European CHD patients are a cause for concern, as is the lack of any improvement in blood-pressure management, and the fact that most CHD patients are still not achieving the cholesterol goal of less than 5 mmol/L. There is a collective failure of medical practice in Europe to achieve the substantial potential among patients with CHD to reduce the risk of recurrent disease and death.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04235-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Angioplasty ; Angiotensin ; Anticoagulants ; Aspirin ; Blood pressure ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Cholesterol ; Comparative analysis ; Coronary artery disease ; Coronary vessels ; Enzyme inhibitors ; Guidelines ; Heart ; Heart attacks ; Heart diseases ; Heart surgery ; Hospitals ; Hypertension ; Immunosuppressive agents ; Ischemia ; Laboratories ; Lipids ; Myocardial infarction ; Patients ; Peptidyl-dipeptidase A ; Polls & surveys ; Prevention ; Risk factors ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2001-03, Vol.357 (9261), p.995-1001</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Mar 31, 2001</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 31, 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-92272d662cb2689f163ae5a3542124c91520cc0b4b3d730fc1223fb87c8450333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-92272d662cb2689f163ae5a3542124c91520cc0b4b3d730fc1223fb87c8450333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673600042355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wood, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EUROASPIRE I and II Group</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are the top priority for preventive cardiology. The first EUROASPIRE survey among patients with established CHD in nine countries in 1995–96 showed substantial potential for risk reduction. A second survey (EUROASPIRE II) was done in 1999–2000 in the same countries to see whether preventive cardiology had improved since the first. We compared the proportion of patients in both studies who achieved the lifestyle, risk-factor, and therapeutic goals recommended by the Joint European Societies report on coronary prevention.
The surveys were undertaken in the same selected geographical areas and hospitals in the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Spain. Consecutive patients (men and women ≤ 70 years of age) were identified after coronary-artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or a hospital admission with acute myocardial infarction or ischaemia, and were interviewed at least 6 months later.
3569 and 3379 patients were interviewed in the first and second surveys, respectively. The prevalence of smoking remained almost unchanged at 19·4%vs 20·8%. The prevalence of obesity (body-mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) increased substantially from 25·3% to 32·8%. The proportion with high blood pressure (≥ 140/90 mm Hg) was virtually the same (55·4%vs 53·9%), whereas the prevalence of high total cholesterol concentrations (≥ 5·0 mmol/L) decreased substantially from 86·2% to 58·8%. Aspirin or other antiplatelet therapy was as widely used in the second survey as the first (83·9% overall), and reported use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, and especially lipid-lowering drugs increased.
The adverse lifestyle trends among European CHD patients are a cause for concern, as is the lack of any improvement in blood-pressure management, and the fact that most CHD patients are still not achieving the cholesterol goal of less than 5 mmol/L. There is a collective failure of medical practice in Europe to achieve the substantial potential among patients with CHD to reduce the risk of recurrent disease and death.</description><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angiotensin</subject><subject>Anticoagulants</subject><subject>Aspirin</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Enzyme inhibitors</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive agents</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peptidyl-dipeptidase A</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LwzAYwPEgCs7pRxCCXvRQffLa1ovImFoYTKaCt5CmqURqOpNO2Lc3c-JNPOWQ3_OE_BE6JnBBgMjLRyAcMpkzeQZwDpwykYkdNCI855ng-csuGv2SfXQQ4xsAcAlihNykc94Z3eFgdeeGNe5bbPrQex3WeBnsp_WD6z1-XbnGJmvjFdZJvC91cDFdJD99XsxvHh-qxRRXWPsGVxV2Hvukk1z5ITgbD9Feq7toj37OMXq-nT5N7rPZ_K6a3Mwyw2kxZCWlOW2kpKamsihbIpm2QjPBKaHclERQMAZqXrMmZ9AaQilr6yI3BRfAGBuj0-3eZeg_VjYO6q1fBZ-eVBRknvOy4JDUyV-KlCUhQkiZkNgiE_oYg23VMrj3FEYRUJv06ju92nRVAOo7vRJp7no7Z9M_P50NKhpnvbGNC9YMqundPxu-ALFuiGc</recordid><startdate>20010331</startdate><enddate>20010331</enddate><creator>Wood, David A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010331</creationdate><title>Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries</title><author>Wood, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-92272d662cb2689f163ae5a3542124c91520cc0b4b3d730fc1223fb87c8450333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angiotensin</topic><topic>Anticoagulants</topic><topic>Aspirin</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Enzyme inhibitors</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive agents</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peptidyl-dipeptidase A</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EUROASPIRE I and II Group</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, David A</au><aucorp>EUROASPIRE I and II Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2001-03-31</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>357</volume><issue>9261</issue><spage>995</spage><epage>1001</epage><pages>995-1001</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are the top priority for preventive cardiology. The first EUROASPIRE survey among patients with established CHD in nine countries in 1995–96 showed substantial potential for risk reduction. A second survey (EUROASPIRE II) was done in 1999–2000 in the same countries to see whether preventive cardiology had improved since the first. We compared the proportion of patients in both studies who achieved the lifestyle, risk-factor, and therapeutic goals recommended by the Joint European Societies report on coronary prevention.
The surveys were undertaken in the same selected geographical areas and hospitals in the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Spain. Consecutive patients (men and women ≤ 70 years of age) were identified after coronary-artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or a hospital admission with acute myocardial infarction or ischaemia, and were interviewed at least 6 months later.
3569 and 3379 patients were interviewed in the first and second surveys, respectively. The prevalence of smoking remained almost unchanged at 19·4%vs 20·8%. The prevalence of obesity (body-mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) increased substantially from 25·3% to 32·8%. The proportion with high blood pressure (≥ 140/90 mm Hg) was virtually the same (55·4%vs 53·9%), whereas the prevalence of high total cholesterol concentrations (≥ 5·0 mmol/L) decreased substantially from 86·2% to 58·8%. Aspirin or other antiplatelet therapy was as widely used in the second survey as the first (83·9% overall), and reported use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, and especially lipid-lowering drugs increased.
The adverse lifestyle trends among European CHD patients are a cause for concern, as is the lack of any improvement in blood-pressure management, and the fact that most CHD patients are still not achieving the cholesterol goal of less than 5 mmol/L. There is a collective failure of medical practice in Europe to achieve the substantial potential among patients with CHD to reduce the risk of recurrent disease and death.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04235-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2001-03, Vol.357 (9261), p.995-1001 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2067749840 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Angioplasty Angiotensin Anticoagulants Aspirin Blood pressure Cardiology Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular diseases Cholesterol Comparative analysis Coronary artery disease Coronary vessels Enzyme inhibitors Guidelines Heart Heart attacks Heart diseases Heart surgery Hospitals Hypertension Immunosuppressive agents Ischemia Laboratories Lipids Myocardial infarction Patients Peptidyl-dipeptidase A Polls & surveys Prevention Risk factors Smoking |
title | Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20reality%20of%20coronary%20prevention%20guidelines:%20a%20comparison%20of%20EUROASPIRE%20I%20and%20II%20in%20nine%20countries&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Wood,%20David%20A&rft.aucorp=EUROASPIRE%20I%20and%20II%20Group&rft.date=2001-03-31&rft.volume=357&rft.issue=9261&rft.spage=995&rft.epage=1001&rft.pages=995-1001&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04235-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70581555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199115566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673600042355&rfr_iscdi=true |