Determinants of Auditor Expertise; Discussion

A view of expertise is explored in which specific experiences and training create knowledge and knowledge is combined with innate ability to perform specific audit tasks. A test is conducted of the extent to which cross-sectional variation in auditors' performance in several audit tasks can be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of accounting research 1990-01, Vol.28, p.1
Hauptverfasser: Bonner, Sarah E, Lewis, Barry L, Marchant, Garry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of accounting research
container_volume 28
creator Bonner, Sarah E
Lewis, Barry L
Marchant, Garry
description A view of expertise is explored in which specific experiences and training create knowledge and knowledge is combined with innate ability to perform specific audit tasks. A test is conducted of the extent to which cross-sectional variation in auditors' performance in several audit tasks can be explained using various types of knowledge and ability measures that have been identified in the literature as important determinants of auditor expertise. These results are compared to the explanatory power of a simple measure of general audit experience. The results indicate that, although more experienced auditors outperform less experienced auditors on average, knowledge and innate ability provide a better explanation of variation in performance. A discussion prompted by this analysis suggests an alternative framework for conceptualizing the role of various factors in performance: think of performance as the output, and identify the inputs and their relations.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_206710870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7652340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p540-6334eb6ef2fc7c8d0d8c55d577a3ca82502f64c99ed079e6d42a9924cb1e972e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjctKAzEUQIMoOFb_YXAfuHknuCptfUDBTRfuSprcQIpOxiQDfr6C7l2dzeGcCzIwaRTVxr1dkgGAM2ql0tfkprUzADgl2EDoFjvWjzz5qbexpHG9xNxLHXdfM9aeGz6M29zC0lou0y25Sv694d0fV-TwuDtsnun-9ells97TWUmgWgiJJ42Jp2CCjRBtUCoqY7wI3nIFPGkZnMMIxqGOknvnuAwnhs5wFCty_5uda_lcsPXjuSx1-jkeOWjDwBr4TwJnwIpvsyVKiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206709708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of Auditor Expertise; Discussion</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Bonner, Sarah E ; Lewis, Barry L ; Marchant, Garry</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonner, Sarah E ; Lewis, Barry L ; Marchant, Garry</creatorcontrib><description>A view of expertise is explored in which specific experiences and training create knowledge and knowledge is combined with innate ability to perform specific audit tasks. A test is conducted of the extent to which cross-sectional variation in auditors' performance in several audit tasks can be explained using various types of knowledge and ability measures that have been identified in the literature as important determinants of auditor expertise. These results are compared to the explanatory power of a simple measure of general audit experience. The results indicate that, although more experienced auditors outperform less experienced auditors on average, knowledge and innate ability provide a better explanation of variation in performance. A discussion prompted by this analysis suggests an alternative framework for conceptualizing the role of various factors in performance: think of performance as the output, and identify the inputs and their relations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACRBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Auditing procedures ; Auditors ; Experts ; Knowledge ; Roles ; Skills ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 1990-01, Vol.28, p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Professional Accounting 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonner, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchant, Garry</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of Auditor Expertise; Discussion</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>A view of expertise is explored in which specific experiences and training create knowledge and knowledge is combined with innate ability to perform specific audit tasks. A test is conducted of the extent to which cross-sectional variation in auditors' performance in several audit tasks can be explained using various types of knowledge and ability measures that have been identified in the literature as important determinants of auditor expertise. These results are compared to the explanatory power of a simple measure of general audit experience. The results indicate that, although more experienced auditors outperform less experienced auditors on average, knowledge and innate ability provide a better explanation of variation in performance. A discussion prompted by this analysis suggests an alternative framework for conceptualizing the role of various factors in performance: think of performance as the output, and identify the inputs and their relations.</description><subject>Auditing procedures</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjctKAzEUQIMoOFb_YXAfuHknuCptfUDBTRfuSprcQIpOxiQDfr6C7l2dzeGcCzIwaRTVxr1dkgGAM2ql0tfkprUzADgl2EDoFjvWjzz5qbexpHG9xNxLHXdfM9aeGz6M29zC0lou0y25Sv694d0fV-TwuDtsnun-9ells97TWUmgWgiJJ42Jp2CCjRBtUCoqY7wI3nIFPGkZnMMIxqGOknvnuAwnhs5wFCty_5uda_lcsPXjuSx1-jkeOWjDwBr4TwJnwIpvsyVKiw</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>Bonner, Sarah E</creator><creator>Lewis, Barry L</creator><creator>Marchant, Garry</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Determinants of Auditor Expertise; Discussion</title><author>Bonner, Sarah E ; Lewis, Barry L ; Marchant, Garry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p540-6334eb6ef2fc7c8d0d8c55d577a3ca82502f64c99ed079e6d42a9924cb1e972e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Auditing procedures</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonner, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchant, Garry</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonner, Sarah E</au><au>Lewis, Barry L</au><au>Marchant, Garry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of Auditor Expertise; Discussion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>28</volume><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><coden>JACRBR</coden><abstract>A view of expertise is explored in which specific experiences and training create knowledge and knowledge is combined with innate ability to perform specific audit tasks. A test is conducted of the extent to which cross-sectional variation in auditors' performance in several audit tasks can be explained using various types of knowledge and ability measures that have been identified in the literature as important determinants of auditor expertise. These results are compared to the explanatory power of a simple measure of general audit experience. The results indicate that, although more experienced auditors outperform less experienced auditors on average, knowledge and innate ability provide a better explanation of variation in performance. A discussion prompted by this analysis suggests an alternative framework for conceptualizing the role of various factors in performance: think of performance as the output, and identify the inputs and their relations.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8456
ispartof Journal of accounting research, 1990-01, Vol.28, p.1
issn 0021-8456
1475-679X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_206710870
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Auditing procedures
Auditors
Experts
Knowledge
Roles
Skills
Statistical analysis
Studies
title Determinants of Auditor Expertise; Discussion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A14%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20Auditor%20Expertise;%20Discussion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Bonner,%20Sarah%20E&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft.coden=JACRBR&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E7652340%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206709708&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true