Balancing of life cycle carbon and cost appraisal on alternative wall and roof design verification for residential building
Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe life cycle cost (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluation for single story building house in Malaysia. Two objective functions, namely, LCA and LCC, were evaluated for each design and a total of 20 alternatives were analyzed. Two wall schemes t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Construction innovation 2018-07, Vol.18 (3), p.274-300 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 300 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 274 |
| container_title | Construction innovation |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad |
| description | Purpose
The purpose of this study is to describe life cycle cost (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluation for single story building house in Malaysia. Two objective functions, namely, LCA and LCC, were evaluated for each design and a total of 20 alternatives were analyzed. Two wall schemes that have been adopted from two different recent studies toward mitigation of climate change require clarification in both life cycle objectives.
Design/methodology/approach
For this strategic life cycle assessment, Simapro 8.3 tool has been chosen over a 50-year life span. LCC analysis was also used to determine not only the most energy-efficient strategy, but also the most economically feasible one. A present value (PV)-based economic analysis takes LCC into account.
Findings
The results will appear in present value and LC carbon footprint saving, both individually and in combination with each other. Result of life cycle management shows that timber wall−wooden post and beam covered by steel stud (W5) and wood truss with concrete roof tiles (R1) released less carbon emission to atmosphere and have lower life cycle cost over their life span. W5R1 releases 35 per cent less CO2 emission than the second best choice and costs 25 per cent less.
Originality/value
The indicator assessed was global warming, and as the focus was on GHG emissions, the focus of this study was mainly in the context of Malaysian construction, although the principles apply universally. The result would support the adoption of sustainable building for building sector. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/CI-03-2017-0024 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2066490481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2066490481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-dc2f4d2e8df1aaa318d3e5984ed491fe66699dfb315d87dc98b8b5d8fb637c8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9LwzAcxYMoOKdnrwHPdUmTtulRiz8GAy96DmnyzcjI2pp0k-E_b7p5Ebwkjy-f977hBaFbSu4pJWLRLDPCspzQKiMk52doRnmVtCiq86OmGadVcYmuYtxMBC35DH0_Kq867bo17i32zgLWB-3TqULbd1h1Bus-jlgNQ1AuKo-nqR8hdGp0e8BfyvsjFvqUYCC6dYf3EJx1OhGJtn3AIc0NdKNLAe3OeZM2XqMLq3yEm997jj6en96b12z19rJsHlaZZkSMmdG55SYHYSxVSjEqDIOiFhwMr6mFsizr2tiW0cKIyuhatKJN0rYlq7QANkd3p9wh9J87iKPc9Lv0fB9lTsqS14QLmqjFidKhjzGAlUNwWxUOkhI5NSybpSRMTg3Lqb_kuD85YAtBefOP4c-XsB-a135b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2066490481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing of life cycle carbon and cost appraisal on alternative wall and roof design verification for residential building</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali ; Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir ; Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad</creator><creatorcontrib>Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali ; Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir ; Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study is to describe life cycle cost (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluation for single story building house in Malaysia. Two objective functions, namely, LCA and LCC, were evaluated for each design and a total of 20 alternatives were analyzed. Two wall schemes that have been adopted from two different recent studies toward mitigation of climate change require clarification in both life cycle objectives.
Design/methodology/approach
For this strategic life cycle assessment, Simapro 8.3 tool has been chosen over a 50-year life span. LCC analysis was also used to determine not only the most energy-efficient strategy, but also the most economically feasible one. A present value (PV)-based economic analysis takes LCC into account.
Findings
The results will appear in present value and LC carbon footprint saving, both individually and in combination with each other. Result of life cycle management shows that timber wall−wooden post and beam covered by steel stud (W5) and wood truss with concrete roof tiles (R1) released less carbon emission to atmosphere and have lower life cycle cost over their life span. W5R1 releases 35 per cent less CO2 emission than the second best choice and costs 25 per cent less.
Originality/value
The indicator assessed was global warming, and as the focus was on GHG emissions, the focus of this study was mainly in the context of Malaysian construction, although the principles apply universally. The result would support the adoption of sustainable building for building sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-4175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0857</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/CI-03-2017-0024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Building construction ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon footprint ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Concrete ; Construction industry ; Demolition ; Design ; Economic analysis ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental impact ; Feasibility studies ; Global warming ; Green buildings ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Houses ; Landfill ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle costs ; Life cycle engineering ; Life span ; Manufacturing ; Residential areas ; Residential buildings ; Roofing ; Stockholders ; Timber ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Construction innovation, 2018-07, Vol.18 (3), p.274-300</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-dc2f4d2e8df1aaa318d3e5984ed491fe66699dfb315d87dc98b8b5d8fb637c8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-dc2f4d2e8df1aaa318d3e5984ed491fe66699dfb315d87dc98b8b5d8fb637c8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CI-03-2017-0024/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52689,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing of life cycle carbon and cost appraisal on alternative wall and roof design verification for residential building</title><title>Construction innovation</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study is to describe life cycle cost (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluation for single story building house in Malaysia. Two objective functions, namely, LCA and LCC, were evaluated for each design and a total of 20 alternatives were analyzed. Two wall schemes that have been adopted from two different recent studies toward mitigation of climate change require clarification in both life cycle objectives.
Design/methodology/approach
For this strategic life cycle assessment, Simapro 8.3 tool has been chosen over a 50-year life span. LCC analysis was also used to determine not only the most energy-efficient strategy, but also the most economically feasible one. A present value (PV)-based economic analysis takes LCC into account.
Findings
The results will appear in present value and LC carbon footprint saving, both individually and in combination with each other. Result of life cycle management shows that timber wall−wooden post and beam covered by steel stud (W5) and wood truss with concrete roof tiles (R1) released less carbon emission to atmosphere and have lower life cycle cost over their life span. W5R1 releases 35 per cent less CO2 emission than the second best choice and costs 25 per cent less.
Originality/value
The indicator assessed was global warming, and as the focus was on GHG emissions, the focus of this study was mainly in the context of Malaysian construction, although the principles apply universally. The result would support the adoption of sustainable building for building sector.</description><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon footprint</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Houses</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential buildings</subject><subject>Roofing</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>1471-4175</issn><issn>1477-0857</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9LwzAcxYMoOKdnrwHPdUmTtulRiz8GAy96DmnyzcjI2pp0k-E_b7p5Ebwkjy-f977hBaFbSu4pJWLRLDPCspzQKiMk52doRnmVtCiq86OmGadVcYmuYtxMBC35DH0_Kq867bo17i32zgLWB-3TqULbd1h1Bus-jlgNQ1AuKo-nqR8hdGp0e8BfyvsjFvqUYCC6dYf3EJx1OhGJtn3AIc0NdKNLAe3OeZM2XqMLq3yEm997jj6en96b12z19rJsHlaZZkSMmdG55SYHYSxVSjEqDIOiFhwMr6mFsizr2tiW0cKIyuhatKJN0rYlq7QANkd3p9wh9J87iKPc9Lv0fB9lTsqS14QLmqjFidKhjzGAlUNwWxUOkhI5NSybpSRMTg3Lqb_kuD85YAtBefOP4c-XsB-a135b</recordid><startdate>20180709</startdate><enddate>20180709</enddate><creator>Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali</creator><creator>Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir</creator><creator>Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180709</creationdate><title>Balancing of life cycle carbon and cost appraisal on alternative wall and roof design verification for residential building</title><author>Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali ; Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir ; Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-dc2f4d2e8df1aaa318d3e5984ed491fe66699dfb315d87dc98b8b5d8fb637c8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon footprint</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Houses</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential buildings</topic><topic>Roofing</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Construction innovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tighnavard Balasbaneh, Ali</au><au>Bin Marsono, Abdul Kadir</au><au>Kasra Kermanshahi, Emad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balancing of life cycle carbon and cost appraisal on alternative wall and roof design verification for residential building</atitle><jtitle>Construction innovation</jtitle><date>2018-07-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>274-300</pages><issn>1471-4175</issn><eissn>1477-0857</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this study is to describe life cycle cost (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluation for single story building house in Malaysia. Two objective functions, namely, LCA and LCC, were evaluated for each design and a total of 20 alternatives were analyzed. Two wall schemes that have been adopted from two different recent studies toward mitigation of climate change require clarification in both life cycle objectives.
Design/methodology/approach
For this strategic life cycle assessment, Simapro 8.3 tool has been chosen over a 50-year life span. LCC analysis was also used to determine not only the most energy-efficient strategy, but also the most economically feasible one. A present value (PV)-based economic analysis takes LCC into account.
Findings
The results will appear in present value and LC carbon footprint saving, both individually and in combination with each other. Result of life cycle management shows that timber wall−wooden post and beam covered by steel stud (W5) and wood truss with concrete roof tiles (R1) released less carbon emission to atmosphere and have lower life cycle cost over their life span. W5R1 releases 35 per cent less CO2 emission than the second best choice and costs 25 per cent less.
Originality/value
The indicator assessed was global warming, and as the focus was on GHG emissions, the focus of this study was mainly in the context of Malaysian construction, although the principles apply universally. The result would support the adoption of sustainable building for building sector.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/CI-03-2017-0024</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1471-4175 |
| ispartof | Construction innovation, 2018-07, Vol.18 (3), p.274-300 |
| issn | 1471-4175 1477-0857 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2066490481 |
| source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
| subjects | Building construction Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Carbon footprint Climate change Climate change mitigation Concrete Construction industry Demolition Design Economic analysis Emissions Energy consumption Energy efficiency Environmental impact Feasibility studies Global warming Green buildings Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Houses Landfill Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycle costs Life cycle engineering Life span Manufacturing Residential areas Residential buildings Roofing Stockholders Timber Wood |
| title | Balancing of life cycle carbon and cost appraisal on alternative wall and roof design verification for residential building |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing%20of%20life%20cycle%20carbon%20and%20cost%20appraisal%20on%20alternative%20wall%20and%20roof%20design%20verification%20for%20residential%20building&rft.jtitle=Construction%20innovation&rft.au=Tighnavard%20Balasbaneh,%20Ali&rft.date=2018-07-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=274-300&rft.issn=1471-4175&rft.eissn=1477-0857&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/CI-03-2017-0024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2066490481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2066490481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |