Structure and Function Relationships in the Educational Expectations of Professional Societies Across the STEM Disciplines
The concept of structure and function is a fundamental example of a crosscutting concept found in the educational reform documents in multiple STEM disciplines. However, the terms structure and function are words used in everyday language, and their use in various disciplines may be a source of lexi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of college science teaching 2018-07, Vol.47 (6), p.24-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Journal of college science teaching |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Yoho, Rachel Urban-Lurain, Mark Merrill, John Haudek, Kevin |
description | The concept of structure and function is a fundamental example of a crosscutting concept found in the educational reform documents in multiple STEM disciplines. However, the terms structure and function are words used in everyday language, and their use in various disciplines may be a source of lexical ambiguity for students. Discipline-specific professional societies often define pathways of research dissemination as well as the educational expectations for students pursuing a career path related to their discipline. We investigated 16 professional societies 'educational expectations related to structure and function, revealing the presence of multiple discipline-specific disambiguations. As a conservative estimate, the professional societies studied cover the collective interests of at least half of a million practitioners of these disciplines and represent the areas of biology, microbiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, ecology, botany, physiology, chemistry, mathematics, statistics, engineering, and physics. The nature of this crosscutting concept and its discipline-specific uses are a potential learning challenge for students. This work provides an overview of the use of structure andfunction in multiple STEM disciplines from which instructors can contextualize their teaching. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2505/4/jcst18_047_06_24 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2065274457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1184526</ericid><jstor_id>44840697</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44840697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-de0acf01c9e463f5d6759c9cd3e6285b622673b0762115144b80a520b0e5a1f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfQBACPtfdpEnaPg7t_MNEcRN8C22aspTa1iQF9dPbrTLBp3u553cuh4PQOYEryoHP2KxSzpNYAoskCEnZAZqQhIUBi5P4EE1gEAIakrdjdOJcBUCoADJB3ytve-V7q3HWFHjRN8qbtsEvus62i9uYzmHTYL_ROC16tbtmNU4_O638yOC2xM-2LbVzo7hqldHeaIfnyrbO7dyrdfqIb4xTpqtNo90pOiqz2umz3zlFr4t0fX0XLJ9u76_ny0DRkPmg0JCpEohKNBNhyQsR8UQlqgi1oDHPBaUiCnOIBCWEE8byGDJOIQfNM1LScIoux7-dbT967bys2t4OMZ2kIDiNGOPRQNGR2gW2upSdNe-Z_ZIE5LZjyeT_jgfTxWjS1qi9IX0gJGacij-9cr61e4CxmIFIovAHFl-FYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2065274457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structure and Function Relationships in the Educational Expectations of Professional Societies Across the STEM Disciplines</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Yoho, Rachel ; Urban-Lurain, Mark ; Merrill, John ; Haudek, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoho, Rachel ; Urban-Lurain, Mark ; Merrill, John ; Haudek, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of structure and function is a fundamental example of a crosscutting concept found in the educational reform documents in multiple STEM disciplines. However, the terms structure and function are words used in everyday language, and their use in various disciplines may be a source of lexical ambiguity for students. Discipline-specific professional societies often define pathways of research dissemination as well as the educational expectations for students pursuing a career path related to their discipline. We investigated 16 professional societies 'educational expectations related to structure and function, revealing the presence of multiple discipline-specific disambiguations. As a conservative estimate, the professional societies studied cover the collective interests of at least half of a million practitioners of these disciplines and represent the areas of biology, microbiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, ecology, botany, physiology, chemistry, mathematics, statistics, engineering, and physics. The nature of this crosscutting concept and its discipline-specific uses are a potential learning challenge for students. This work provides an overview of the use of structure andfunction in multiple STEM disciplines from which instructors can contextualize their teaching.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-231X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2505/4/jcst18_047_06_24</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: National Science Teachers Association</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Ambiguity (Context) ; Behavioral Objectives ; Biochemistry ; Biological evolution ; Botany ; Careers ; Concept Mapping ; Education reform ; Educational Change ; Educational Objectives ; Educational Practices ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Expectation ; Fundamental Concepts ; Mathematical functions ; Mathematics education ; Microbiology ; Molecular biology ; Physics ; Physiology ; Professional Associations ; Professionals ; Science Curriculum ; Science education ; Scientific Concepts ; STEM Education ; Use Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of college science teaching, 2018-07, Vol.47 (6), p.24-31</ispartof><rights>2018 National Science Teachers Association</rights><rights>Copyright National Science Teachers Association Jul/Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-de0acf01c9e463f5d6759c9cd3e6285b622673b0762115144b80a520b0e5a1f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-de0acf01c9e463f5d6759c9cd3e6285b622673b0762115144b80a520b0e5a1f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44840697$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44840697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1184526$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoho, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban-Lurain, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrill, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haudek, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Structure and Function Relationships in the Educational Expectations of Professional Societies Across the STEM Disciplines</title><title>Journal of college science teaching</title><description>The concept of structure and function is a fundamental example of a crosscutting concept found in the educational reform documents in multiple STEM disciplines. However, the terms structure and function are words used in everyday language, and their use in various disciplines may be a source of lexical ambiguity for students. Discipline-specific professional societies often define pathways of research dissemination as well as the educational expectations for students pursuing a career path related to their discipline. We investigated 16 professional societies 'educational expectations related to structure and function, revealing the presence of multiple discipline-specific disambiguations. As a conservative estimate, the professional societies studied cover the collective interests of at least half of a million practitioners of these disciplines and represent the areas of biology, microbiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, ecology, botany, physiology, chemistry, mathematics, statistics, engineering, and physics. The nature of this crosscutting concept and its discipline-specific uses are a potential learning challenge for students. This work provides an overview of the use of structure andfunction in multiple STEM disciplines from which instructors can contextualize their teaching.</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Ambiguity (Context)</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Concept Mapping</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Expectation</subject><subject>Fundamental Concepts</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Professional Associations</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Use Studies</subject><issn>0047-231X</issn><issn>1943-4898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfQBACPtfdpEnaPg7t_MNEcRN8C22aspTa1iQF9dPbrTLBp3u553cuh4PQOYEryoHP2KxSzpNYAoskCEnZAZqQhIUBi5P4EE1gEAIakrdjdOJcBUCoADJB3ytve-V7q3HWFHjRN8qbtsEvus62i9uYzmHTYL_ROC16tbtmNU4_O638yOC2xM-2LbVzo7hqldHeaIfnyrbO7dyrdfqIb4xTpqtNo90pOiqz2umz3zlFr4t0fX0XLJ9u76_ny0DRkPmg0JCpEohKNBNhyQsR8UQlqgi1oDHPBaUiCnOIBCWEE8byGDJOIQfNM1LScIoux7-dbT967bys2t4OMZ2kIDiNGOPRQNGR2gW2upSdNe-Z_ZIE5LZjyeT_jgfTxWjS1qi9IX0gJGacij-9cr61e4CxmIFIovAHFl-FYA</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Yoho, Rachel</creator><creator>Urban-Lurain, Mark</creator><creator>Merrill, John</creator><creator>Haudek, Kevin</creator><general>National Science Teachers Association</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Structure and Function Relationships in the Educational Expectations of Professional Societies Across the STEM Disciplines</title><author>Yoho, Rachel ; Urban-Lurain, Mark ; Merrill, John ; Haudek, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-de0acf01c9e463f5d6759c9cd3e6285b622673b0762115144b80a520b0e5a1f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Ambiguity (Context)</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Concept Mapping</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Expectation</topic><topic>Fundamental Concepts</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Professional Associations</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Use Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoho, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban-Lurain, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrill, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haudek, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of college science teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoho, Rachel</au><au>Urban-Lurain, Mark</au><au>Merrill, John</au><au>Haudek, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1184526</ericid><atitle>Structure and Function Relationships in the Educational Expectations of Professional Societies Across the STEM Disciplines</atitle><jtitle>Journal of college science teaching</jtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>0047-231X</issn><eissn>1943-4898</eissn><abstract>The concept of structure and function is a fundamental example of a crosscutting concept found in the educational reform documents in multiple STEM disciplines. However, the terms structure and function are words used in everyday language, and their use in various disciplines may be a source of lexical ambiguity for students. Discipline-specific professional societies often define pathways of research dissemination as well as the educational expectations for students pursuing a career path related to their discipline. We investigated 16 professional societies 'educational expectations related to structure and function, revealing the presence of multiple discipline-specific disambiguations. As a conservative estimate, the professional societies studied cover the collective interests of at least half of a million practitioners of these disciplines and represent the areas of biology, microbiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, ecology, botany, physiology, chemistry, mathematics, statistics, engineering, and physics. The nature of this crosscutting concept and its discipline-specific uses are a potential learning challenge for students. This work provides an overview of the use of structure andfunction in multiple STEM disciplines from which instructors can contextualize their teaching.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>National Science Teachers Association</pub><doi>10.2505/4/jcst18_047_06_24</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-231X |
ispartof | Journal of college science teaching, 2018-07, Vol.47 (6), p.24-31 |
issn | 0047-231X 1943-4898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2065274457 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Academic Standards Ambiguity (Context) Behavioral Objectives Biochemistry Biological evolution Botany Careers Concept Mapping Education reform Educational Change Educational Objectives Educational Practices Elementary Secondary Education Expectation Fundamental Concepts Mathematical functions Mathematics education Microbiology Molecular biology Physics Physiology Professional Associations Professionals Science Curriculum Science education Scientific Concepts STEM Education Use Studies |
title | Structure and Function Relationships in the Educational Expectations of Professional Societies Across the STEM Disciplines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A37%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structure%20and%20Function%20Relationships%20in%20the%20Educational%20Expectations%20of%20Professional%20Societies%20Across%20the%20STEM%20Disciplines&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20college%20science%20teaching&rft.au=Yoho,%20Rachel&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=0047-231X&rft.eissn=1943-4898&rft_id=info:doi/10.2505/4/jcst18_047_06_24&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44840697%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2065274457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1184526&rft_jstor_id=44840697&rfr_iscdi=true |