Energy retrofit alternatives and cost-optimal analysis for large public housing stocks

•Cost effective solutions for energy retrofitting projects are of capital importance for owners, especially for public or semi-public real estate companies who are dealing with large housing stocks.•The aim of the present research work is to make a proposal for a DSS to help identifying the optimal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy and buildings 2018-05, Vol.166, p.48-59
Hauptverfasser: Guardigli, Luca, Bragadin, Marco A., Della Fornace, Francesco, Mazzoli, Cecilia, Prati, Davide
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 59
container_issue
container_start_page 48
container_title Energy and buildings
container_volume 166
creator Guardigli, Luca
Bragadin, Marco A.
Della Fornace, Francesco
Mazzoli, Cecilia
Prati, Davide
description •Cost effective solutions for energy retrofitting projects are of capital importance for owners, especially for public or semi-public real estate companies who are dealing with large housing stocks.•The aim of the present research work is to make a proposal for a DSS to help identifying the optimal intervention strategy for the energy retrofitting of public housing stocks.•The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are compared with the building energy performance index (EP).•For energy and cost calculations all the required data of the DSS are implemented into a novel tool called BQE (Building Quality Evaluator), which can produce the requested results. The study of cost effective solutions for the energy retrofitting of existing buildings is of capital importance for building asset owners, since high up-front investments are required and long payback times are encountered in building renovation projects. The aim of the work is to propose a decision support system (DSS) for the assessment of different renovation strategies through the measure of their economic sustainability in relation to the achieved energy efficiency. The cost optimal analysis of energy retrofit alternatives is performed in the case of a large housing stock owned by a semi-public real estate company, with the goal of meeting nearly zero energy building standards. Energy performances as well as related energy and construction costs are analysed for different retrofit options, adopting Italian laws and regulations. The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are finally compared with the building energy performance index (EP), providing the most efficient design alternatives for each building typology and the most advantageous renovation project among the considered ones.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2065057351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378778818304468</els_id><sourcerecordid>2065057351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7a5d0fe84c1fa409306be43a5f66b9024a29d0b9560dad008adb83a098dd1f593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAUxIMouK5-BCHgufWlaZv0JLKsf2DBi3oNaZKuqbWpSbqw394su3dPD4aZ4c0PoVsCOQFS3_e5GdvZDjovgPAcihyAnqEF4azIasL4OVoAZTxjjPNLdBVCDwB1xcgCfa5H47d77E30rrMRyyEaP8podyZgOWqsXIiZm6L9kUMS5LAPNuDOeTxIvzV4mtvBKvzl5mDHLQ7Rqe9wjS46OQRzc7pL9PG0fl-9ZJu359fV4yZTJWUxY7LS0BleKtLJEhoKdWtKKquurtsGilIWjYa2qWrQUgNwqVtOJTRca9JVDV2iu2Pv5N3vbEIUvZvT-0MQRVoIFaMVSa7q6FLeheBNJyaf5vi9ICAOCEUvTgjFAaGAQiSEKfdwzJk0YWeNF0FZMyqjrTcqCu3sPw1_SYR-DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2065057351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy retrofit alternatives and cost-optimal analysis for large public housing stocks</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Guardigli, Luca ; Bragadin, Marco A. ; Della Fornace, Francesco ; Mazzoli, Cecilia ; Prati, Davide</creator><creatorcontrib>Guardigli, Luca ; Bragadin, Marco A. ; Della Fornace, Francesco ; Mazzoli, Cecilia ; Prati, Davide</creatorcontrib><description>•Cost effective solutions for energy retrofitting projects are of capital importance for owners, especially for public or semi-public real estate companies who are dealing with large housing stocks.•The aim of the present research work is to make a proposal for a DSS to help identifying the optimal intervention strategy for the energy retrofitting of public housing stocks.•The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are compared with the building energy performance index (EP).•For energy and cost calculations all the required data of the DSS are implemented into a novel tool called BQE (Building Quality Evaluator), which can produce the requested results. The study of cost effective solutions for the energy retrofitting of existing buildings is of capital importance for building asset owners, since high up-front investments are required and long payback times are encountered in building renovation projects. The aim of the work is to propose a decision support system (DSS) for the assessment of different renovation strategies through the measure of their economic sustainability in relation to the achieved energy efficiency. The cost optimal analysis of energy retrofit alternatives is performed in the case of a large housing stock owned by a semi-public real estate company, with the goal of meeting nearly zero energy building standards. Energy performances as well as related energy and construction costs are analysed for different retrofit options, adopting Italian laws and regulations. The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are finally compared with the building energy performance index (EP), providing the most efficient design alternatives for each building typology and the most advantageous renovation project among the considered ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6178</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Building construction ; Building design ; Buildings ; Construction ; Construction costs ; Construction standards ; Cost analysis ; Cost optimal analysis ; Decision support system ; Decision support systems ; Design alternatives ; Economic sustainability ; Energy costs ; Energy efficiency ; Energy performance index ; Energy retrofit ; Global cost ; Green buildings ; Housing ; Housing stock ; Net present value ; Payback period ; Performance indices ; Public housing ; Real estate ; Retrofitting ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Typology</subject><ispartof>Energy and buildings, 2018-05, Vol.166, p.48-59</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7a5d0fe84c1fa409306be43a5f66b9024a29d0b9560dad008adb83a098dd1f593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7a5d0fe84c1fa409306be43a5f66b9024a29d0b9560dad008adb83a098dd1f593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2679-4836</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guardigli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragadin, Marco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Fornace, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzoli, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Davide</creatorcontrib><title>Energy retrofit alternatives and cost-optimal analysis for large public housing stocks</title><title>Energy and buildings</title><description>•Cost effective solutions for energy retrofitting projects are of capital importance for owners, especially for public or semi-public real estate companies who are dealing with large housing stocks.•The aim of the present research work is to make a proposal for a DSS to help identifying the optimal intervention strategy for the energy retrofitting of public housing stocks.•The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are compared with the building energy performance index (EP).•For energy and cost calculations all the required data of the DSS are implemented into a novel tool called BQE (Building Quality Evaluator), which can produce the requested results. The study of cost effective solutions for the energy retrofitting of existing buildings is of capital importance for building asset owners, since high up-front investments are required and long payback times are encountered in building renovation projects. The aim of the work is to propose a decision support system (DSS) for the assessment of different renovation strategies through the measure of their economic sustainability in relation to the achieved energy efficiency. The cost optimal analysis of energy retrofit alternatives is performed in the case of a large housing stock owned by a semi-public real estate company, with the goal of meeting nearly zero energy building standards. Energy performances as well as related energy and construction costs are analysed for different retrofit options, adopting Italian laws and regulations. The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are finally compared with the building energy performance index (EP), providing the most efficient design alternatives for each building typology and the most advantageous renovation project among the considered ones.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Building design</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Construction standards</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost optimal analysis</subject><subject>Decision support system</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Design alternatives</subject><subject>Economic sustainability</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy performance index</subject><subject>Energy retrofit</subject><subject>Global cost</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing stock</subject><subject>Net present value</subject><subject>Payback period</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Public housing</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Retrofitting</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Typology</subject><issn>0378-7788</issn><issn>1872-6178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAUxIMouK5-BCHgufWlaZv0JLKsf2DBi3oNaZKuqbWpSbqw394su3dPD4aZ4c0PoVsCOQFS3_e5GdvZDjovgPAcihyAnqEF4azIasL4OVoAZTxjjPNLdBVCDwB1xcgCfa5H47d77E30rrMRyyEaP8podyZgOWqsXIiZm6L9kUMS5LAPNuDOeTxIvzV4mtvBKvzl5mDHLQ7Rqe9wjS46OQRzc7pL9PG0fl-9ZJu359fV4yZTJWUxY7LS0BleKtLJEhoKdWtKKquurtsGilIWjYa2qWrQUgNwqVtOJTRca9JVDV2iu2Pv5N3vbEIUvZvT-0MQRVoIFaMVSa7q6FLeheBNJyaf5vi9ICAOCEUvTgjFAaGAQiSEKfdwzJk0YWeNF0FZMyqjrTcqCu3sPw1_SYR-DA</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Guardigli, Luca</creator><creator>Bragadin, Marco A.</creator><creator>Della Fornace, Francesco</creator><creator>Mazzoli, Cecilia</creator><creator>Prati, Davide</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-4836</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Energy retrofit alternatives and cost-optimal analysis for large public housing stocks</title><author>Guardigli, Luca ; Bragadin, Marco A. ; Della Fornace, Francesco ; Mazzoli, Cecilia ; Prati, Davide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7a5d0fe84c1fa409306be43a5f66b9024a29d0b9560dad008adb83a098dd1f593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Building design</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Construction standards</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost optimal analysis</topic><topic>Decision support system</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Design alternatives</topic><topic>Economic sustainability</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy performance index</topic><topic>Energy retrofit</topic><topic>Global cost</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing stock</topic><topic>Net present value</topic><topic>Payback period</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Public housing</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Retrofitting</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Typology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guardigli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragadin, Marco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Fornace, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzoli, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Davide</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guardigli, Luca</au><au>Bragadin, Marco A.</au><au>Della Fornace, Francesco</au><au>Mazzoli, Cecilia</au><au>Prati, Davide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy retrofit alternatives and cost-optimal analysis for large public housing stocks</atitle><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>166</volume><spage>48</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>48-59</pages><issn>0378-7788</issn><eissn>1872-6178</eissn><abstract>•Cost effective solutions for energy retrofitting projects are of capital importance for owners, especially for public or semi-public real estate companies who are dealing with large housing stocks.•The aim of the present research work is to make a proposal for a DSS to help identifying the optimal intervention strategy for the energy retrofitting of public housing stocks.•The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are compared with the building energy performance index (EP).•For energy and cost calculations all the required data of the DSS are implemented into a novel tool called BQE (Building Quality Evaluator), which can produce the requested results. The study of cost effective solutions for the energy retrofitting of existing buildings is of capital importance for building asset owners, since high up-front investments are required and long payback times are encountered in building renovation projects. The aim of the work is to propose a decision support system (DSS) for the assessment of different renovation strategies through the measure of their economic sustainability in relation to the achieved energy efficiency. The cost optimal analysis of energy retrofit alternatives is performed in the case of a large housing stock owned by a semi-public real estate company, with the goal of meeting nearly zero energy building standards. Energy performances as well as related energy and construction costs are analysed for different retrofit options, adopting Italian laws and regulations. The proposed DSS evaluates the economic sustainability of various design alternatives with the net present value (NPV) and the global cost (GC), as suggested by the EPBD recast EU directive. These indicators are finally compared with the building energy performance index (EP), providing the most efficient design alternatives for each building typology and the most advantageous renovation project among the considered ones.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-4836</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-7788
ispartof Energy and buildings, 2018-05, Vol.166, p.48-59
issn 0378-7788
1872-6178
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2065057351
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Alternative energy sources
Building construction
Building design
Buildings
Construction
Construction costs
Construction standards
Cost analysis
Cost optimal analysis
Decision support system
Decision support systems
Design alternatives
Economic sustainability
Energy costs
Energy efficiency
Energy performance index
Energy retrofit
Global cost
Green buildings
Housing
Housing stock
Net present value
Payback period
Performance indices
Public housing
Real estate
Retrofitting
Studies
Sustainability
Typology
title Energy retrofit alternatives and cost-optimal analysis for large public housing stocks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A41%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20retrofit%20alternatives%20and%20cost-optimal%20analysis%20for%20large%20public%20housing%20stocks&rft.jtitle=Energy%20and%20buildings&rft.au=Guardigli,%20Luca&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=166&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=48-59&rft.issn=0378-7788&rft.eissn=1872-6178&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2065057351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2065057351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378778818304468&rfr_iscdi=true