Marine bioinvasions: Differences in tropical copepod communities between inside and outside a port

The difficulty of detecting non-indigenous species (NIS) in marine environments is an “invisible problem” in areas where plankton monitoring does not occur. In this study, we investigated the dominance of the NIS Temora turbinata and copepod community structure in two tropical marine habitats: insid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sea research 2018-04, Vol.134, p.42-48
Hauptverfasser: Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira, Campos, Carolina Coelho, Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira, Barroso, Hortência de Sousa, Mota, Erika Maria Targino, Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de, Rossi, Sergio, Garcia, Tatiane Martins
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 48
container_issue
container_start_page 42
container_title Journal of sea research
container_volume 134
creator Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira
Campos, Carolina Coelho
Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira
Barroso, Hortência de Sousa
Mota, Erika Maria Targino
Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de
Rossi, Sergio
Garcia, Tatiane Martins
description The difficulty of detecting non-indigenous species (NIS) in marine environments is an “invisible problem” in areas where plankton monitoring does not occur. In this study, we investigated the dominance of the NIS Temora turbinata and copepod community structure in two tropical marine habitats: inside an offshore port, which had turbid and calm waters, and outside the port, which was more hydrodynamic. Our study area was on the northeast coast of Brazil. We found 17 taxa of Copepoda, which were dominated by T. turbinata and the congener, T. stylifera. The high average density of the NIS (21.03 ind./m3) was in stark contrast with that of the native copepods (0.01–3.27 ind./m3). The NIS density was negatively correlated with the species richness and evenness of the native community, was significantly higher inside the port than outside, and was positively correlated with phytoplankton density. A multivariate analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in copepod community structure between inside and outside the port; outside the port, the community was more diverse, and the native T. stylifera was more abundant. We found that tropical copepod communities inside an offshore port have low diversity, and probably have little biotic resistance against NIS invasions. Our results, combined with those previously obtained, highlight the need to study the spatial distributions of NIS and native species in pelagic environments. [Display omitted] •Zooplankton are important although neglected components of biological invasions.•The results revealed 17 taxa of Copepoda, dominated by Temora turbinata inside the port basin.•The density of the alien species inside the port was significantly higher than in the outside area.•The congener and native Temora stylifera was dominant in stations outside the port.•The impact of invasive species on tropical marine biodiversity requires monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.seares.2018.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2064412201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1385110117302460</els_id><sourcerecordid>2064412201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cd786ed5d44693e11b2544836c9ef2e63cb009619446ad15a9c75e7a715dbc8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOD7-gYuC69bcJn25EGR8wogbXYc0uYWUmaQm6Yj_3gx17eocOOfey_0IuQJaAIX6ZiwCSo-hKCm0BYWC0vKIrKBtWA4c-HHyrK1ySO1TchbCSCk0tGMr0r9JbyxmvXHG7mUwzobb7MEMA3q0CkNmbBa9m4yS20y5CSenk-52szXRpLzH-I1oUy8YjZm0OnNzXHw2OR8vyMkgtwEv__ScfD49fqxf8s378-v6fpMr1tKYK920NepKc153DAH6suK8ZbXqcCixZqqntKuhS7nUUMlONRU2soFK96rt2Tm5XvZO3n3NGKIY3extOilKWnMOZcKTWnxpKe9C8DiIyZud9D8CqDjQFKNYaIoDTUFBJJpp7G4Zw_TB3qAXQZkDIG08qii0M_8v-AWdr4CE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2064412201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marine bioinvasions: Differences in tropical copepod communities between inside and outside a port</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira ; Campos, Carolina Coelho ; Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira ; Barroso, Hortência de Sousa ; Mota, Erika Maria Targino ; Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de ; Rossi, Sergio ; Garcia, Tatiane Martins</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira ; Campos, Carolina Coelho ; Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira ; Barroso, Hortência de Sousa ; Mota, Erika Maria Targino ; Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de ; Rossi, Sergio ; Garcia, Tatiane Martins</creatorcontrib><description>The difficulty of detecting non-indigenous species (NIS) in marine environments is an “invisible problem” in areas where plankton monitoring does not occur. In this study, we investigated the dominance of the NIS Temora turbinata and copepod community structure in two tropical marine habitats: inside an offshore port, which had turbid and calm waters, and outside the port, which was more hydrodynamic. Our study area was on the northeast coast of Brazil. We found 17 taxa of Copepoda, which were dominated by T. turbinata and the congener, T. stylifera. The high average density of the NIS (21.03 ind./m3) was in stark contrast with that of the native copepods (0.01–3.27 ind./m3). The NIS density was negatively correlated with the species richness and evenness of the native community, was significantly higher inside the port than outside, and was positively correlated with phytoplankton density. A multivariate analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in copepod community structure between inside and outside the port; outside the port, the community was more diverse, and the native T. stylifera was more abundant. We found that tropical copepod communities inside an offshore port have low diversity, and probably have little biotic resistance against NIS invasions. Our results, combined with those previously obtained, highlight the need to study the spatial distributions of NIS and native species in pelagic environments. [Display omitted] •Zooplankton are important although neglected components of biological invasions.•The results revealed 17 taxa of Copepoda, dominated by Temora turbinata inside the port basin.•The density of the alien species inside the port was significantly higher than in the outside area.•The congener and native Temora stylifera was dominant in stations outside the port.•The impact of invasive species on tropical marine biodiversity requires monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-1101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2018.01.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aquatic crustaceans ; Aquatic habitats ; Biodiversity ; Communities ; Community structure ; Copepoda ; Density ; Fluid mechanics ; Hydrodynamics ; Invasive species ; Marine ecology ; Marine environment ; Multivariate analysis ; Native organisms ; Nonnative species ; Offshore ; Offshore engineering ; Offshore structures ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Port ; Spatial distribution ; Species richness ; Temora stylifera ; Temora turbinata ; Tropical climate ; Tropical ecosystem ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Journal of sea research, 2018-04, Vol.134, p.42-48</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cd786ed5d44693e11b2544836c9ef2e63cb009619446ad15a9c75e7a715dbc8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cd786ed5d44693e11b2544836c9ef2e63cb009619446ad15a9c75e7a715dbc8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4696-3166</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2018.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Carolina Coelho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Hortência de Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, Erika Maria Targino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Tatiane Martins</creatorcontrib><title>Marine bioinvasions: Differences in tropical copepod communities between inside and outside a port</title><title>Journal of sea research</title><description>The difficulty of detecting non-indigenous species (NIS) in marine environments is an “invisible problem” in areas where plankton monitoring does not occur. In this study, we investigated the dominance of the NIS Temora turbinata and copepod community structure in two tropical marine habitats: inside an offshore port, which had turbid and calm waters, and outside the port, which was more hydrodynamic. Our study area was on the northeast coast of Brazil. We found 17 taxa of Copepoda, which were dominated by T. turbinata and the congener, T. stylifera. The high average density of the NIS (21.03 ind./m3) was in stark contrast with that of the native copepods (0.01–3.27 ind./m3). The NIS density was negatively correlated with the species richness and evenness of the native community, was significantly higher inside the port than outside, and was positively correlated with phytoplankton density. A multivariate analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in copepod community structure between inside and outside the port; outside the port, the community was more diverse, and the native T. stylifera was more abundant. We found that tropical copepod communities inside an offshore port have low diversity, and probably have little biotic resistance against NIS invasions. Our results, combined with those previously obtained, highlight the need to study the spatial distributions of NIS and native species in pelagic environments. [Display omitted] •Zooplankton are important although neglected components of biological invasions.•The results revealed 17 taxa of Copepoda, dominated by Temora turbinata inside the port basin.•The density of the alien species inside the port was significantly higher than in the outside area.•The congener and native Temora stylifera was dominant in stations outside the port.•The impact of invasive species on tropical marine biodiversity requires monitoring.</description><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Copepoda</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Offshore engineering</subject><subject>Offshore structures</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Port</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Temora stylifera</subject><subject>Temora turbinata</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropical ecosystem</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>1385-1101</issn><issn>1873-1414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOD7-gYuC69bcJn25EGR8wogbXYc0uYWUmaQm6Yj_3gx17eocOOfey_0IuQJaAIX6ZiwCSo-hKCm0BYWC0vKIrKBtWA4c-HHyrK1ySO1TchbCSCk0tGMr0r9JbyxmvXHG7mUwzobb7MEMA3q0CkNmbBa9m4yS20y5CSenk-52szXRpLzH-I1oUy8YjZm0OnNzXHw2OR8vyMkgtwEv__ScfD49fqxf8s378-v6fpMr1tKYK920NepKc153DAH6suK8ZbXqcCixZqqntKuhS7nUUMlONRU2soFK96rt2Tm5XvZO3n3NGKIY3extOilKWnMOZcKTWnxpKe9C8DiIyZud9D8CqDjQFKNYaIoDTUFBJJpp7G4Zw_TB3qAXQZkDIG08qii0M_8v-AWdr4CE</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira</creator><creator>Campos, Carolina Coelho</creator><creator>Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira</creator><creator>Barroso, Hortência de Sousa</creator><creator>Mota, Erika Maria Targino</creator><creator>Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de</creator><creator>Rossi, Sergio</creator><creator>Garcia, Tatiane Martins</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4696-3166</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Marine bioinvasions: Differences in tropical copepod communities between inside and outside a port</title><author>Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira ; Campos, Carolina Coelho ; Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira ; Barroso, Hortência de Sousa ; Mota, Erika Maria Targino ; Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de ; Rossi, Sergio ; Garcia, Tatiane Martins</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-cd786ed5d44693e11b2544836c9ef2e63cb009619446ad15a9c75e7a715dbc8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Copepoda</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Offshore engineering</topic><topic>Offshore structures</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Port</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Temora stylifera</topic><topic>Temora turbinata</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropical ecosystem</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Carolina Coelho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Hortência de Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, Erika Maria Targino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Tatiane Martins</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of sea research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, Marcelo de Oliveira</au><au>Campos, Carolina Coelho</au><au>Santos, Nívia Maria Oliveira</au><au>Barroso, Hortência de Sousa</au><au>Mota, Erika Maria Targino</au><au>Menezes, Maria Ozilea Bezerra de</au><au>Rossi, Sergio</au><au>Garcia, Tatiane Martins</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marine bioinvasions: Differences in tropical copepod communities between inside and outside a port</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sea research</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>134</volume><spage>42</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>42-48</pages><issn>1385-1101</issn><eissn>1873-1414</eissn><abstract>The difficulty of detecting non-indigenous species (NIS) in marine environments is an “invisible problem” in areas where plankton monitoring does not occur. In this study, we investigated the dominance of the NIS Temora turbinata and copepod community structure in two tropical marine habitats: inside an offshore port, which had turbid and calm waters, and outside the port, which was more hydrodynamic. Our study area was on the northeast coast of Brazil. We found 17 taxa of Copepoda, which were dominated by T. turbinata and the congener, T. stylifera. The high average density of the NIS (21.03 ind./m3) was in stark contrast with that of the native copepods (0.01–3.27 ind./m3). The NIS density was negatively correlated with the species richness and evenness of the native community, was significantly higher inside the port than outside, and was positively correlated with phytoplankton density. A multivariate analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in copepod community structure between inside and outside the port; outside the port, the community was more diverse, and the native T. stylifera was more abundant. We found that tropical copepod communities inside an offshore port have low diversity, and probably have little biotic resistance against NIS invasions. Our results, combined with those previously obtained, highlight the need to study the spatial distributions of NIS and native species in pelagic environments. [Display omitted] •Zooplankton are important although neglected components of biological invasions.•The results revealed 17 taxa of Copepoda, dominated by Temora turbinata inside the port basin.•The density of the alien species inside the port was significantly higher than in the outside area.•The congener and native Temora stylifera was dominant in stations outside the port.•The impact of invasive species on tropical marine biodiversity requires monitoring.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.seares.2018.01.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4696-3166</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-1101
ispartof Journal of sea research, 2018-04, Vol.134, p.42-48
issn 1385-1101
1873-1414
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2064412201
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aquatic crustaceans
Aquatic habitats
Biodiversity
Communities
Community structure
Copepoda
Density
Fluid mechanics
Hydrodynamics
Invasive species
Marine ecology
Marine environment
Multivariate analysis
Native organisms
Nonnative species
Offshore
Offshore engineering
Offshore structures
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Port
Spatial distribution
Species richness
Temora stylifera
Temora turbinata
Tropical climate
Tropical ecosystem
Zooplankton
title Marine bioinvasions: Differences in tropical copepod communities between inside and outside a port
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A04%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marine%20bioinvasions:%20Differences%20in%20tropical%20copepod%20communities%20between%20inside%20and%20outside%20a%20port&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sea%20research&rft.au=Soares,%20Marcelo%20de%20Oliveira&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=134&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=42-48&rft.issn=1385-1101&rft.eissn=1873-1414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seares.2018.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2064412201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2064412201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1385110117302460&rfr_iscdi=true