Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality
In recent years, research information systems (RIS) have become an integral part of the university’s IT landscape. At the same time, many universities and research institutions are still working on the implementation of such information systems. Research information systems support institutions in t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientometrics 2018-06, Vol.115 (3), p.1271-1290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1290 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1271 |
container_title | Scientometrics |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Azeroual, Otmane Saake, Gunter Wastl, Jürgen |
description | In recent years, research information systems (RIS) have become an integral part of the university’s IT landscape. At the same time, many universities and research institutions are still working on the implementation of such information systems. Research information systems support institutions in the measurement, documentation, evaluation and communication of research activities. Implementing such integrative systems requires that institutions assure the quality of the information on research activities entered into them. Since many information and data sources are interwoven, these different data sources can have a negative impact on data quality in different research information systems. Because the topic is currently of interest to many institutions, the aim of the present paper is firstly to consider how data quality can be investigated in the context of RIS, and then to explain how various dimensions of data quality described in the literature can be measured in research information systems. Finally, a framework as a process flow according to UML activity diagram notation is developed for monitoring and improvement of the quality of these data; this framework can be implemented by technical personnel in universities and research institutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2063771756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2063771756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-449f1dd54c13a08ca68ad57c8de9b6d06b529d3628a6627748485253dece2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gOprL5DLuxDsUXOhSCGlyxk7pzLRJRujbmzKCK1cnh3z_f-BD6JLRa0apvkmMsZoTygzhWkgij9CMSVM2o9gxmlEmDKmZoKfoLKU1LRlBzQx9PrjscAcujRE66DNuexwhgYt-Vd7NEDuX26HHaZ8ydOm2wDm2PuHyhfMKMHy7zTgxQ4PDoW83uk2b9-fopHGbBBe_c47enx4_7l_I4u359f5uQbxQVSZVVTcsBFl5Jhw13injgtTeBKiXKlC1lLwOQnHjlOJaV6YykksRwANvxBxdTa3bOOxGSNmuhzH25aDlVAmtmZaqUGyifBxSitDYbWw7F_eWUXtQaCeFtii0B4VWlgyfMqmw_RfEv-b_Qz_puXSf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2063771756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Azeroual, Otmane ; Saake, Gunter ; Wastl, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Azeroual, Otmane ; Saake, Gunter ; Wastl, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, research information systems (RIS) have become an integral part of the university’s IT landscape. At the same time, many universities and research institutions are still working on the implementation of such information systems. Research information systems support institutions in the measurement, documentation, evaluation and communication of research activities. Implementing such integrative systems requires that institutions assure the quality of the information on research activities entered into them. Since many information and data sources are interwoven, these different data sources can have a negative impact on data quality in different research information systems. Because the topic is currently of interest to many institutions, the aim of the present paper is firstly to consider how data quality can be investigated in the context of RIS, and then to explain how various dimensions of data quality described in the literature can be measured in research information systems. Finally, a framework as a process flow according to UML activity diagram notation is developed for monitoring and improvement of the quality of these data; this framework can be implemented by technical personnel in universities and research institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Colleges & universities ; Computer Science ; Data sources ; Evaluation ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information systems ; Information technology ; Institutions ; Library Science ; Quality ; Quality assurance ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research institutions ; Systems analysis</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2018-06, Vol.115 (3), p.1271-1290</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-449f1dd54c13a08ca68ad57c8de9b6d06b529d3628a6627748485253dece2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-449f1dd54c13a08ca68ad57c8de9b6d06b529d3628a6627748485253dece2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azeroual, Otmane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saake, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wastl, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>In recent years, research information systems (RIS) have become an integral part of the university’s IT landscape. At the same time, many universities and research institutions are still working on the implementation of such information systems. Research information systems support institutions in the measurement, documentation, evaluation and communication of research activities. Implementing such integrative systems requires that institutions assure the quality of the information on research activities entered into them. Since many information and data sources are interwoven, these different data sources can have a negative impact on data quality in different research information systems. Because the topic is currently of interest to many institutions, the aim of the present paper is firstly to consider how data quality can be investigated in the context of RIS, and then to explain how various dimensions of data quality described in the literature can be measured in research information systems. Finally, a framework as a process flow according to UML activity diagram notation is developed for monitoring and improvement of the quality of these data; this framework can be implemented by technical personnel in universities and research institutions.</description><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data sources</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research institutions</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4C7gOprL5DLuxDsUXOhSCGlyxk7pzLRJRujbmzKCK1cnh3z_f-BD6JLRa0apvkmMsZoTygzhWkgij9CMSVM2o9gxmlEmDKmZoKfoLKU1LRlBzQx9PrjscAcujRE66DNuexwhgYt-Vd7NEDuX26HHaZ8ydOm2wDm2PuHyhfMKMHy7zTgxQ4PDoW83uk2b9-fopHGbBBe_c47enx4_7l_I4u359f5uQbxQVSZVVTcsBFl5Jhw13injgtTeBKiXKlC1lLwOQnHjlOJaV6YykksRwANvxBxdTa3bOOxGSNmuhzH25aDlVAmtmZaqUGyifBxSitDYbWw7F_eWUXtQaCeFtii0B4VWlgyfMqmw_RfEv-b_Qz_puXSf</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Azeroual, Otmane</creator><creator>Saake, Gunter</creator><creator>Wastl, Jürgen</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality</title><author>Azeroual, Otmane ; Saake, Gunter ; Wastl, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-449f1dd54c13a08ca68ad57c8de9b6d06b529d3628a6627748485253dece2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data sources</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research institutions</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azeroual, Otmane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saake, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wastl, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azeroual, Otmane</au><au>Saake, Gunter</au><au>Wastl, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1271</spage><epage>1290</epage><pages>1271-1290</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><abstract>In recent years, research information systems (RIS) have become an integral part of the university’s IT landscape. At the same time, many universities and research institutions are still working on the implementation of such information systems. Research information systems support institutions in the measurement, documentation, evaluation and communication of research activities. Implementing such integrative systems requires that institutions assure the quality of the information on research activities entered into them. Since many information and data sources are interwoven, these different data sources can have a negative impact on data quality in different research information systems. Because the topic is currently of interest to many institutions, the aim of the present paper is firstly to consider how data quality can be investigated in the context of RIS, and then to explain how various dimensions of data quality described in the literature can be measured in research information systems. Finally, a framework as a process flow according to UML activity diagram notation is developed for monitoring and improvement of the quality of these data; this framework can be implemented by technical personnel in universities and research institutions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0138-9130 |
ispartof | Scientometrics, 2018-06, Vol.115 (3), p.1271-1290 |
issn | 0138-9130 1588-2861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2063771756 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Colleges & universities Computer Science Data sources Evaluation Information Storage and Retrieval Information systems Information technology Institutions Library Science Quality Quality assurance R&D Research & development Research institutions Systems analysis |
title | Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20measurement%20in%20research%20information%20systems:%20metrics%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20data%20quality&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Azeroual,%20Otmane&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1271&rft.epage=1290&rft.pages=1271-1290&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-018-2735-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2063771756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2063771756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |