Improving Multi-Objective Ecological Flow Management with Flexible Priorities and Turn-Taking: A Case Study from the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
Management of the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (SRD) is one of California’s greatest challenges, requiring trade-offs between valued components that serve a multiplicity of conflicting purposes. Trade-offs do not signal a failure to create clever enough models, or scenarios that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | San Francisco estuary and watershed science 2018-04, Vol.16 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | San Francisco estuary and watershed science |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Alexander, Clint Poulsen, Frank Robinson, Donald C. E. Ma, Brian O. Luster, Ryan A. |
description | Management of the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (SRD) is one of California’s greatest challenges, requiring trade-offs between valued components that serve a multiplicity of conflicting purposes. Trade-offs do not signal a failure to create clever enough models, or scenarios that find a single optimal solution. Rather, an optimal solution that meets multiple objectives does not exist. We demonstrate an improved method for multiple-objective allocation of water: “turn-taking” optimization (TTO) within a multi-model cloud computing framework. We apply TTO to an array of physical hydrologic models that are linked with the Ecological Flows Tool (EFT): a multi-species decision support framework to evaluate how specific components of the flow regime promote and balance favorable habitat conditions for 15 representative species and 31 indicators within the SRD. Applying the TTO approach incorporates the existing modelled representation of socio-economic water management criteria, priorities, and constraints - and optimizes water-release patterns each water year using a dynamically shifting set of EFT indicators. Rather than attempting to optimize conditions for all ecological indicators every year, TTO creates flexibility and opportunities for different indicators to be successful in different years, informed by the frequency with which each species’ ecological needs should be met. As an individual EFT indicator is successful in a particular year, its priority in one or more subsequent years is reduced (and vice versa). Comparing TTO to a Reference Case scenario based on current management practices, 12 EFT indicators are improved, 14 show no change, and 5 show a reduction in suitability. When grouped into nine species and life-history groups, performance improved in four (late-fall-run Chinook, winter-run Chinook, spring-run Chinook, and Fremont cottonwood), did not change in four (fall-run Chinook Salmon, Delta Smelt, Splittail, and Longfin Smelt), and was worse in one group (Steelhead). |
doi_str_mv | 10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss1/art2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2062971527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2062971527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2492-c70d54388a779ed0b3f8e3ae6c2765653190f5f88836c523a8109a1060029e6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUUtOwzAQjRBIlM8ZsMQ6xZ_EdthVpeUjEAjKOpq6TnFJ49Z2WthxBy7BuTgJpiDBan5v3tPMS5IjgrskzzJx4iu99l2KiVwRbrwnJ-AC3Uo6ccxTyjjf_pfvJnvezzCmAsu8k3xczhfOrkwzRTdtHUx6O55pFcxKo4GytZ0aBTUa1naNbqCBqZ7rJqC1CU-xqV_MuNbozhnrTDDaI2gmaNS6Jh3Bc-Q8RT3UB6_RQ2gnr6hydo7CUyxBOfhmsug-SrnN3l_z8-39ARp0ZWHZmgad6TrAQbJTQe314W_cTx6Hg1H_Ir2-Pb_s965TRbOCpkrgSZ4xKUGIQk_wmFVSM9BcUcFznjNS4CqvpJSMq5wykAQXQDCPHykiiu0nxz-88S3LVvtQzmw8KEqWFHNaCJJTEVHiB6Wc9d7pqlw4Mwf3WhJcbmwpN7aU_2wpv21hX9lth2U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062971527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Multi-Objective Ecological Flow Management with Flexible Priorities and Turn-Taking: A Case Study from the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alexander, Clint ; Poulsen, Frank ; Robinson, Donald C. E. ; Ma, Brian O. ; Luster, Ryan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Clint ; Poulsen, Frank ; Robinson, Donald C. E. ; Ma, Brian O. ; Luster, Ryan A. ; The Nature Conservancy ; ESSA Technologies, Ltd</creatorcontrib><description>Management of the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (SRD) is one of California’s greatest challenges, requiring trade-offs between valued components that serve a multiplicity of conflicting purposes. Trade-offs do not signal a failure to create clever enough models, or scenarios that find a single optimal solution. Rather, an optimal solution that meets multiple objectives does not exist. We demonstrate an improved method for multiple-objective allocation of water: “turn-taking” optimization (TTO) within a multi-model cloud computing framework. We apply TTO to an array of physical hydrologic models that are linked with the Ecological Flows Tool (EFT): a multi-species decision support framework to evaluate how specific components of the flow regime promote and balance favorable habitat conditions for 15 representative species and 31 indicators within the SRD. Applying the TTO approach incorporates the existing modelled representation of socio-economic water management criteria, priorities, and constraints - and optimizes water-release patterns each water year using a dynamically shifting set of EFT indicators. Rather than attempting to optimize conditions for all ecological indicators every year, TTO creates flexibility and opportunities for different indicators to be successful in different years, informed by the frequency with which each species’ ecological needs should be met. As an individual EFT indicator is successful in a particular year, its priority in one or more subsequent years is reduced (and vice versa). Comparing TTO to a Reference Case scenario based on current management practices, 12 EFT indicators are improved, 14 show no change, and 5 show a reduction in suitability. When grouped into nine species and life-history groups, performance improved in four (late-fall-run Chinook, winter-run Chinook, spring-run Chinook, and Fremont cottonwood), did not change in four (fall-run Chinook Salmon, Delta Smelt, Splittail, and Longfin Smelt), and was worse in one group (Steelhead).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-2366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-2366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss1/art2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Davis: University of California Digital Library - eScholarship</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Cloud computing ; Components ; Ecological monitoring ; Economic models ; Frameworks ; Freshwater fishes ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Indicators ; Life history ; Multiple objective analysis ; Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ; Optimization ; Priorities ; Rivers ; Species ; Tradeoffs ; Water management</subject><ispartof>San Francisco estuary and watershed science, 2018-04, Vol.16 (1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of California Digital Library - eScholarship Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2492-c70d54388a779ed0b3f8e3ae6c2765653190f5f88836c523a8109a1060029e6c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Clint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Donald C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Brian O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luster, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Nature Conservancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESSA Technologies, Ltd</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Multi-Objective Ecological Flow Management with Flexible Priorities and Turn-Taking: A Case Study from the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta</title><title>San Francisco estuary and watershed science</title><description>Management of the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (SRD) is one of California’s greatest challenges, requiring trade-offs between valued components that serve a multiplicity of conflicting purposes. Trade-offs do not signal a failure to create clever enough models, or scenarios that find a single optimal solution. Rather, an optimal solution that meets multiple objectives does not exist. We demonstrate an improved method for multiple-objective allocation of water: “turn-taking” optimization (TTO) within a multi-model cloud computing framework. We apply TTO to an array of physical hydrologic models that are linked with the Ecological Flows Tool (EFT): a multi-species decision support framework to evaluate how specific components of the flow regime promote and balance favorable habitat conditions for 15 representative species and 31 indicators within the SRD. Applying the TTO approach incorporates the existing modelled representation of socio-economic water management criteria, priorities, and constraints - and optimizes water-release patterns each water year using a dynamically shifting set of EFT indicators. Rather than attempting to optimize conditions for all ecological indicators every year, TTO creates flexibility and opportunities for different indicators to be successful in different years, informed by the frequency with which each species’ ecological needs should be met. As an individual EFT indicator is successful in a particular year, its priority in one or more subsequent years is reduced (and vice versa). Comparing TTO to a Reference Case scenario based on current management practices, 12 EFT indicators are improved, 14 show no change, and 5 show a reduction in suitability. When grouped into nine species and life-history groups, performance improved in four (late-fall-run Chinook, winter-run Chinook, spring-run Chinook, and Fremont cottonwood), did not change in four (fall-run Chinook Salmon, Delta Smelt, Splittail, and Longfin Smelt), and was worse in one group (Steelhead).</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cloud computing</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Water management</subject><issn>1546-2366</issn><issn>1546-2366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUUtOwzAQjRBIlM8ZsMQ6xZ_EdthVpeUjEAjKOpq6TnFJ49Z2WthxBy7BuTgJpiDBan5v3tPMS5IjgrskzzJx4iu99l2KiVwRbrwnJ-AC3Uo6ccxTyjjf_pfvJnvezzCmAsu8k3xczhfOrkwzRTdtHUx6O55pFcxKo4GytZ0aBTUa1naNbqCBqZ7rJqC1CU-xqV_MuNbozhnrTDDaI2gmaNS6Jh3Bc-Q8RT3UB6_RQ2gnr6hydo7CUyxBOfhmsug-SrnN3l_z8-39ARp0ZWHZmgad6TrAQbJTQe314W_cTx6Hg1H_Ir2-Pb_s965TRbOCpkrgSZ4xKUGIQk_wmFVSM9BcUcFznjNS4CqvpJSMq5wykAQXQDCPHykiiu0nxz-88S3LVvtQzmw8KEqWFHNaCJJTEVHiB6Wc9d7pqlw4Mwf3WhJcbmwpN7aU_2wpv21hX9lth2U</recordid><startdate>20180416</startdate><enddate>20180416</enddate><creator>Alexander, Clint</creator><creator>Poulsen, Frank</creator><creator>Robinson, Donald C. E.</creator><creator>Ma, Brian O.</creator><creator>Luster, Ryan A.</creator><general>University of California Digital Library - eScholarship</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180416</creationdate><title>Improving Multi-Objective Ecological Flow Management with Flexible Priorities and Turn-Taking: A Case Study from the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta</title><author>Alexander, Clint ; Poulsen, Frank ; Robinson, Donald C. E. ; Ma, Brian O. ; Luster, Ryan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2492-c70d54388a779ed0b3f8e3ae6c2765653190f5f88836c523a8109a1060029e6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cloud computing</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Water management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Clint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Donald C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Brian O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luster, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Nature Conservancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESSA Technologies, Ltd</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><jtitle>San Francisco estuary and watershed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alexander, Clint</au><au>Poulsen, Frank</au><au>Robinson, Donald C. E.</au><au>Ma, Brian O.</au><au>Luster, Ryan A.</au><aucorp>The Nature Conservancy</aucorp><aucorp>ESSA Technologies, Ltd</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Multi-Objective Ecological Flow Management with Flexible Priorities and Turn-Taking: A Case Study from the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta</atitle><jtitle>San Francisco estuary and watershed science</jtitle><date>2018-04-16</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1546-2366</issn><eissn>1546-2366</eissn><abstract>Management of the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (SRD) is one of California’s greatest challenges, requiring trade-offs between valued components that serve a multiplicity of conflicting purposes. Trade-offs do not signal a failure to create clever enough models, or scenarios that find a single optimal solution. Rather, an optimal solution that meets multiple objectives does not exist. We demonstrate an improved method for multiple-objective allocation of water: “turn-taking” optimization (TTO) within a multi-model cloud computing framework. We apply TTO to an array of physical hydrologic models that are linked with the Ecological Flows Tool (EFT): a multi-species decision support framework to evaluate how specific components of the flow regime promote and balance favorable habitat conditions for 15 representative species and 31 indicators within the SRD. Applying the TTO approach incorporates the existing modelled representation of socio-economic water management criteria, priorities, and constraints - and optimizes water-release patterns each water year using a dynamically shifting set of EFT indicators. Rather than attempting to optimize conditions for all ecological indicators every year, TTO creates flexibility and opportunities for different indicators to be successful in different years, informed by the frequency with which each species’ ecological needs should be met. As an individual EFT indicator is successful in a particular year, its priority in one or more subsequent years is reduced (and vice versa). Comparing TTO to a Reference Case scenario based on current management practices, 12 EFT indicators are improved, 14 show no change, and 5 show a reduction in suitability. When grouped into nine species and life-history groups, performance improved in four (late-fall-run Chinook, winter-run Chinook, spring-run Chinook, and Fremont cottonwood), did not change in four (fall-run Chinook Salmon, Delta Smelt, Splittail, and Longfin Smelt), and was worse in one group (Steelhead).</abstract><cop>Davis</cop><pub>University of California Digital Library - eScholarship</pub><doi>10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss1/art2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-2366 |
ispartof | San Francisco estuary and watershed science, 2018-04, Vol.16 (1) |
issn | 1546-2366 1546-2366 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2062971527 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Case studies Cloud computing Components Ecological monitoring Economic models Frameworks Freshwater fishes Hydrologic models Hydrology Indicators Life history Multiple objective analysis Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Optimization Priorities Rivers Species Tradeoffs Water management |
title | Improving Multi-Objective Ecological Flow Management with Flexible Priorities and Turn-Taking: A Case Study from the Sacramento River and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T06%3A48%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Multi-Objective%20Ecological%20Flow%20Management%20with%20Flexible%20Priorities%20and%20Turn-Taking:%20A%20Case%20Study%20from%20the%20Sacramento%20River%20and%20Sacramento%E2%80%93San%20Joaquin%20Delta&rft.jtitle=San%20Francisco%20estuary%20and%20watershed%20science&rft.au=Alexander,%20Clint&rft.aucorp=The%20Nature%20Conservancy&rft.date=2018-04-16&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1546-2366&rft.eissn=1546-2366&rft_id=info:doi/10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss1/art2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062971527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062971527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |