Mating behaviour and semen parameters in dromedary camel bulls (Camelus dromedarius): a comparison between two types of artificial vagina

Semen collection in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) is performed using different types of artificial vagina (AV) (long, short, with cervix imitation, with plastic or silicone inner liner) either held by an operator or fitted inside a camel dummy. However, systematic studies about the accep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emirates journal of food and agriculture 2018-04, Vol.30 (4), p.326-334
Hauptverfasser: Davide, Monaco, Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem, Barbara, Padalino, Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani, Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 334
container_issue 4
container_start_page 326
container_title Emirates journal of food and agriculture
container_volume 30
creator Davide, Monaco
Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem
Barbara, Padalino
Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani
Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele
description Semen collection in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) is performed using different types of artificial vagina (AV) (long, short, with cervix imitation, with plastic or silicone inner liner) either held by an operator or fitted inside a camel dummy. However, systematic studies about the acceptance of such modifications by bulls, and their effects on sperm parameters, have yet to be investigated. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that a silicone inner liner inserted into a standard cow AV could cause discomfort to camel bulls during mating, but at the same time could improve the quality of the ejaculates collected. Five bulls underwent semen collection sessions, with (n=3) and without (n=3) the silicone liner fitted in the AV, for a total of 30 semen collection sessions. A standard methodology and data-recording system were used for evaluating mating behavior, in addition to evaluation of semen parameters. There was no difference between an AV with or without silicone inner liner used during our standardized semen collection procedure. The use of such an AV modification hence still remains debatable, until further studies are able to identify any potential benefits of using this or other AV types or modifications. Such studies, however, should be performed by applying a standardized semen collection methodology and a proper evaluation of mating behaviour and semen parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i4.1669
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2062953749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2062953749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-19817fbfc866653793d5c2c6a08fc27a106615a7cff1348f35bd49d804cccda63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKxDAUhosoOIzzCELAjS6m5tKkrTsZvMGIGwV34TRNxgxtU5N2hnkE39oUZVbn_h_-L0kuCU7LnPNbvTWQUkyKdMdwarOUCFGeJDOK83KJOStOjzn9PE8WIdgKZ1nOeM7JLPl5hcF2G1TpL9hZN3oEXY2CbnWHevDQ6kH7gGyHau9aXYM_IBW7DarGpgnoejUVYziO7Rhu7hAg5dp4b4Provaw11Fv2Ds0HHodkDMI_GCNVRYatION7eAiOTPQBL34j_Pk4_HhffW8XL89vazu10tFCzIsSVmQ3FRGFUIIzvKS1VxRJQAXRtEcCBaCcMiVMYRlhWG8qrOyLnCmlKpBsHly9afbe_c96jDIbbTdxZeSYkHLqJmVcYv_bSnvQvDayN7bNrqXBMsJvJzAywm8jOClzeQEnv0CZJJ69Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062953749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mating behaviour and semen parameters in dromedary camel bulls (Camelus dromedarius): a comparison between two types of artificial vagina</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Davide, Monaco ; Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem ; Barbara, Padalino ; Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani ; Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele</creator><creatorcontrib>Davide, Monaco ; Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem ; Barbara, Padalino ; Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani ; Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele</creatorcontrib><description>Semen collection in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) is performed using different types of artificial vagina (AV) (long, short, with cervix imitation, with plastic or silicone inner liner) either held by an operator or fitted inside a camel dummy. However, systematic studies about the acceptance of such modifications by bulls, and their effects on sperm parameters, have yet to be investigated. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that a silicone inner liner inserted into a standard cow AV could cause discomfort to camel bulls during mating, but at the same time could improve the quality of the ejaculates collected. Five bulls underwent semen collection sessions, with (n=3) and without (n=3) the silicone liner fitted in the AV, for a total of 30 semen collection sessions. A standard methodology and data-recording system were used for evaluating mating behavior, in addition to evaluation of semen parameters. There was no difference between an AV with or without silicone inner liner used during our standardized semen collection procedure. The use of such an AV modification hence still remains debatable, until further studies are able to identify any potential benefits of using this or other AV types or modifications. Such studies, however, should be performed by applying a standardized semen collection methodology and a proper evaluation of mating behaviour and semen parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-052X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-0538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i4.1669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sofia: Pensoft Publishers</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Artificial insemination ; Behavior ; Camelidae ; Camelus dromedarius ; Cervix ; Collection ; Data recording ; Evaluation ; Hypotheses ; Males ; Mating behavior ; Motility ; Parameter modification ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Semen ; Silicones ; Sperm ; Studies ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Emirates journal of food and agriculture, 2018-04, Vol.30 (4), p.326-334</ispartof><rights>Copyright United Arab Emirates University Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-19817fbfc866653793d5c2c6a08fc27a106615a7cff1348f35bd49d804cccda63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davide, Monaco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbara, Padalino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele</creatorcontrib><title>Mating behaviour and semen parameters in dromedary camel bulls (Camelus dromedarius): a comparison between two types of artificial vagina</title><title>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</title><description>Semen collection in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) is performed using different types of artificial vagina (AV) (long, short, with cervix imitation, with plastic or silicone inner liner) either held by an operator or fitted inside a camel dummy. However, systematic studies about the acceptance of such modifications by bulls, and their effects on sperm parameters, have yet to be investigated. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that a silicone inner liner inserted into a standard cow AV could cause discomfort to camel bulls during mating, but at the same time could improve the quality of the ejaculates collected. Five bulls underwent semen collection sessions, with (n=3) and without (n=3) the silicone liner fitted in the AV, for a total of 30 semen collection sessions. A standard methodology and data-recording system were used for evaluating mating behavior, in addition to evaluation of semen parameters. There was no difference between an AV with or without silicone inner liner used during our standardized semen collection procedure. The use of such an AV modification hence still remains debatable, until further studies are able to identify any potential benefits of using this or other AV types or modifications. Such studies, however, should be performed by applying a standardized semen collection methodology and a proper evaluation of mating behaviour and semen parameters.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Artificial insemination</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Camelidae</subject><subject>Camelus dromedarius</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Collection</subject><subject>Data recording</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Parameter modification</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Semen</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>2079-052X</issn><issn>2079-0538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtKxDAUhosoOIzzCELAjS6m5tKkrTsZvMGIGwV34TRNxgxtU5N2hnkE39oUZVbn_h_-L0kuCU7LnPNbvTWQUkyKdMdwarOUCFGeJDOK83KJOStOjzn9PE8WIdgKZ1nOeM7JLPl5hcF2G1TpL9hZN3oEXY2CbnWHevDQ6kH7gGyHau9aXYM_IBW7DarGpgnoejUVYziO7Rhu7hAg5dp4b4Provaw11Fv2Ds0HHodkDMI_GCNVRYatION7eAiOTPQBL34j_Pk4_HhffW8XL89vazu10tFCzIsSVmQ3FRGFUIIzvKS1VxRJQAXRtEcCBaCcMiVMYRlhWG8qrOyLnCmlKpBsHly9afbe_c96jDIbbTdxZeSYkHLqJmVcYv_bSnvQvDayN7bNrqXBMsJvJzAywm8jOClzeQEnv0CZJJ69Q</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Davide, Monaco</creator><creator>Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem</creator><creator>Barbara, Padalino</creator><creator>Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani</creator><creator>Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele</creator><general>Pensoft Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Mating behaviour and semen parameters in dromedary camel bulls (Camelus dromedarius): a comparison between two types of artificial vagina</title><author>Davide, Monaco ; Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem ; Barbara, Padalino ; Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani ; Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-19817fbfc866653793d5c2c6a08fc27a106615a7cff1348f35bd49d804cccda63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Artificial insemination</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Camelidae</topic><topic>Camelus dromedarius</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Collection</topic><topic>Data recording</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Parameter modification</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Semen</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davide, Monaco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbara, Padalino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davide, Monaco</au><au>Lamia Doghbri, Fatnassi Meriem</au><au>Barbara, Padalino</au><au>Touhami, Hammadi Mohamed, Seddik Mabrouk-Mouldi, Khorchani</au><au>Lacalandra, Giovanni Michele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mating behaviour and semen parameters in dromedary camel bulls (Camelus dromedarius): a comparison between two types of artificial vagina</atitle><jtitle>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>326-334</pages><issn>2079-052X</issn><eissn>2079-0538</eissn><abstract>Semen collection in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) is performed using different types of artificial vagina (AV) (long, short, with cervix imitation, with plastic or silicone inner liner) either held by an operator or fitted inside a camel dummy. However, systematic studies about the acceptance of such modifications by bulls, and their effects on sperm parameters, have yet to be investigated. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that a silicone inner liner inserted into a standard cow AV could cause discomfort to camel bulls during mating, but at the same time could improve the quality of the ejaculates collected. Five bulls underwent semen collection sessions, with (n=3) and without (n=3) the silicone liner fitted in the AV, for a total of 30 semen collection sessions. A standard methodology and data-recording system were used for evaluating mating behavior, in addition to evaluation of semen parameters. There was no difference between an AV with or without silicone inner liner used during our standardized semen collection procedure. The use of such an AV modification hence still remains debatable, until further studies are able to identify any potential benefits of using this or other AV types or modifications. Such studies, however, should be performed by applying a standardized semen collection methodology and a proper evaluation of mating behaviour and semen parameters.</abstract><cop>Sofia</cop><pub>Pensoft Publishers</pub><doi>10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i4.1669</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-052X
ispartof Emirates journal of food and agriculture, 2018-04, Vol.30 (4), p.326-334
issn 2079-052X
2079-0538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2062953749
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal reproduction
Artificial insemination
Behavior
Camelidae
Camelus dromedarius
Cervix
Collection
Data recording
Evaluation
Hypotheses
Males
Mating behavior
Motility
Parameter modification
R&D
Research & development
Semen
Silicones
Sperm
Studies
Vagina
title Mating behaviour and semen parameters in dromedary camel bulls (Camelus dromedarius): a comparison between two types of artificial vagina
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A33%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mating%20behaviour%20and%20semen%20parameters%20in%20dromedary%20camel%20bulls%20(Camelus%20dromedarius):%20a%20comparison%20between%20two%20types%20of%20artificial%20vagina&rft.jtitle=Emirates%20journal%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Davide,%20Monaco&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=326-334&rft.issn=2079-052X&rft.eissn=2079-0538&rft_id=info:doi/10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i4.1669&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062953749%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062953749&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true