Reassessing the Trump presidency, one year on
Steinberg and colleagues reassesses the first year of presidency of US President Donald Trump. They explore the editorials on the surging popularity of Trump leading up to the 2016 US presidential election. Banu Gökariksel and Sara Smith find that masculinist politics identified in their original ed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political geography 2018-01, Vol.62, p.207-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Political geography |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Steinberg, Philip E. Page, Sam Dittmer, Jason Gökariksel, Banu Smith, Sara Ingram, Alan Koch, Natalie |
description | Steinberg and colleagues reassesses the first year of presidency of US President Donald Trump. They explore the editorials on the surging popularity of Trump leading up to the 2016 US presidential election. Banu Gökariksel and Sara Smith find that masculinist politics identified in their original editorial continued unabated. Sam Page and Jason Dittmer acknowledge that they were wrong in predicting the defeat of Trump. They noted that the most optimistic contribution to the intervention set is by Alan Ingram who stresses that the damages done by populist movements in both the US during the Trump election and the UK during the Brexit referendum have been limited by forces that limit their leaders' efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2062623357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0962629817303797</els_id><sourcerecordid>2062623357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e79de4bc1b7ebb8d1ac0a7dfeca49fb92466e338c65f269ce369423d0a2eb3963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UNFKwzAUDaLgnP6BDwVfbb1JurR5EWQ4FQaCzOeQJrczZWtq0gn7ezPqsy_3Xg7nnMs5hNxSKChQ8dAVg99t0RcMaJWgAiickRmtK54vQIpzMkuT5YLJ-pJcxdgBgIQKZiT_QB0jxuj6bTZ-YbYJh_2QDQGjs9ib433me8yOqEM6rslFq3cRb_72nHyunjfL13z9_vK2fFrnhtcw5lhJi2VjaFNh09SWagO6si0aXcq2kawUAjmvjVi0TEiDXMiScQuaYcOl4HNyN_kOwX8fMI6q84fQp5eKgWCCcb6oEqucWCb4GAO2aghur8NRUVCnYlSnpmLUqZgTmopJssdJhinBj8OgonEpKloX0IzKeve_wS9FRG1a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062623357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reassessing the Trump presidency, one year on</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Steinberg, Philip E. ; Page, Sam ; Dittmer, Jason ; Gökariksel, Banu ; Smith, Sara ; Ingram, Alan ; Koch, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Philip E. ; Page, Sam ; Dittmer, Jason ; Gökariksel, Banu ; Smith, Sara ; Ingram, Alan ; Koch, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>Steinberg and colleagues reassesses the first year of presidency of US President Donald Trump. They explore the editorials on the surging popularity of Trump leading up to the 2016 US presidential election. Banu Gökariksel and Sara Smith find that masculinist politics identified in their original editorial continued unabated. Sam Page and Jason Dittmer acknowledge that they were wrong in predicting the defeat of Trump. They noted that the most optimistic contribution to the intervention set is by Alan Ingram who stresses that the damages done by populist movements in both the US during the Trump election and the UK during the Brexit referendum have been limited by forces that limit their leaders' efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-6298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Efficacy ; Elections ; EU membership ; First year ; Intervention ; Masculinity ; Optimism ; Politics ; Popularity ; Populism ; Presidency ; Presidential elections ; Presidents ; Referendums ; Trump, Donald J</subject><ispartof>Political geography, 2018-01, Vol.62, p.207-215</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e79de4bc1b7ebb8d1ac0a7dfeca49fb92466e338c65f269ce369423d0a2eb3963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e79de4bc1b7ebb8d1ac0a7dfeca49fb92466e338c65f269ce369423d0a2eb3963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1022-4978 ; 0000-0003-4064-4620 ; 0000-0001-5824-5092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629817303797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65308</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dittmer, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gökariksel, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>Reassessing the Trump presidency, one year on</title><title>Political geography</title><description>Steinberg and colleagues reassesses the first year of presidency of US President Donald Trump. They explore the editorials on the surging popularity of Trump leading up to the 2016 US presidential election. Banu Gökariksel and Sara Smith find that masculinist politics identified in their original editorial continued unabated. Sam Page and Jason Dittmer acknowledge that they were wrong in predicting the defeat of Trump. They noted that the most optimistic contribution to the intervention set is by Alan Ingram who stresses that the damages done by populist movements in both the US during the Trump election and the UK during the Brexit referendum have been limited by forces that limit their leaders' efficacy.</description><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>EU membership</subject><subject>First year</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Optimism</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Presidency</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><subject>Trump, Donald J</subject><issn>0962-6298</issn><issn>1873-5096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UNFKwzAUDaLgnP6BDwVfbb1JurR5EWQ4FQaCzOeQJrczZWtq0gn7ezPqsy_3Xg7nnMs5hNxSKChQ8dAVg99t0RcMaJWgAiickRmtK54vQIpzMkuT5YLJ-pJcxdgBgIQKZiT_QB0jxuj6bTZ-YbYJh_2QDQGjs9ib433me8yOqEM6rslFq3cRb_72nHyunjfL13z9_vK2fFrnhtcw5lhJi2VjaFNh09SWagO6si0aXcq2kawUAjmvjVi0TEiDXMiScQuaYcOl4HNyN_kOwX8fMI6q84fQp5eKgWCCcb6oEqucWCb4GAO2aghur8NRUVCnYlSnpmLUqZgTmopJssdJhinBj8OgonEpKloX0IzKeve_wS9FRG1a</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Steinberg, Philip E.</creator><creator>Page, Sam</creator><creator>Dittmer, Jason</creator><creator>Gökariksel, Banu</creator><creator>Smith, Sara</creator><creator>Ingram, Alan</creator><creator>Koch, Natalie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-4978</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-4620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-5092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Reassessing the Trump presidency, one year on</title><author>Steinberg, Philip E. ; Page, Sam ; Dittmer, Jason ; Gökariksel, Banu ; Smith, Sara ; Ingram, Alan ; Koch, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e79de4bc1b7ebb8d1ac0a7dfeca49fb92466e338c65f269ce369423d0a2eb3963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>EU membership</topic><topic>First year</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Optimism</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Presidency</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><topic>Trump, Donald J</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dittmer, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gökariksel, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steinberg, Philip E.</au><au>Page, Sam</au><au>Dittmer, Jason</au><au>Gökariksel, Banu</au><au>Smith, Sara</au><au>Ingram, Alan</au><au>Koch, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reassessing the Trump presidency, one year on</atitle><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>62</volume><spage>207</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>207-215</pages><issn>0962-6298</issn><eissn>1873-5096</eissn><abstract>Steinberg and colleagues reassesses the first year of presidency of US President Donald Trump. They explore the editorials on the surging popularity of Trump leading up to the 2016 US presidential election. Banu Gökariksel and Sara Smith find that masculinist politics identified in their original editorial continued unabated. Sam Page and Jason Dittmer acknowledge that they were wrong in predicting the defeat of Trump. They noted that the most optimistic contribution to the intervention set is by Alan Ingram who stresses that the damages done by populist movements in both the US during the Trump election and the UK during the Brexit referendum have been limited by forces that limit their leaders' efficacy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-4978</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-4620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-5092</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-6298 |
ispartof | Political geography, 2018-01, Vol.62, p.207-215 |
issn | 0962-6298 1873-5096 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2062623357 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Efficacy Elections EU membership First year Intervention Masculinity Optimism Politics Popularity Populism Presidency Presidential elections Presidents Referendums Trump, Donald J |
title | Reassessing the Trump presidency, one year on |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reassessing%20the%20Trump%20presidency,%20one%20year%20on&rft.jtitle=Political%20geography&rft.au=Steinberg,%20Philip%20E.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=207-215&rft.issn=0962-6298&rft.eissn=1873-5096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062623357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062623357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0962629817303797&rfr_iscdi=true |