Non-destructive evaluation of Roman coin patinas from the 3rd and 4th century
Roman bronze coins from the 3rd and 4th century AD exhibit a wide variety of chemistries on their surfaces. This variation has been attributed to the variable methods used to produce the coins, a large number of mints producing bronze currency, and the periods of currency devaluation within the Roma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Powder diffraction 2018-06, Vol.33 (2), p.88-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | Powder diffraction |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Fawcett, T. G. Blanton, J. R. Blanton, T. N. Arias, L. Suscavage, T. |
description | Roman bronze coins from the 3rd and 4th century AD exhibit a wide variety of chemistries on their surfaces. This variation has been attributed to the variable methods used to produce the coins, a large number of mints producing bronze currency, and the periods of currency devaluation within the Roman Empire. Besides the base bronze metallurgy (Cu,Sn), Ag, Pb, and Zn were frequently used as coinage metals. Silver coatings were often applied to increase the apparent value of the coins. Over the centuries these surfaces corroded producing a range of patinas. Non-destructive X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence methods were used to evaluate ancient bronze coins. These methods are limited by their half depth of penetration into the coins, so the focus was on the chemistry of the patina's and how they related to the current appearance. Several 3rd-century bronze coins exhibited a very dark patina that was often composed of CuCl, Cu2O (cuprite) and several forms of copper hydroxyl chloride, resulting from surface deterioration caused by corrosion and is often referred to as bronze disease. Coins of the latter 3rd century and 4th century often exhibit patinas that are corrosion products of lead, silver, and tin, as lead and tin preferentially oxidize relative to the bronze alloys. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0885715618000180 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cambr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2061995612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0885715618000180</cupid><sourcerecordid>2061995612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c142t-78b4739c82a8c760a3671e91835f79442e05f6d020b1da59f43f051ff63fa3023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA8-rMJtkkRylqhargx3lJs4nd0iY1my34792lggcvMzDvw8zwEHKJcI2A8uYNlBISRYUKAIZyRCaouSgkR3ZMJmNcjPkpOeu69YCgEuWEPD3HUDSuy6m3ud076vZm05vcxkCjp69xawK1sQ10NwyD6ahPcUvzylGWGmpCQ3leUetC7tP3OTnxZtO5i98-JR_3d--zebF4eXic3S4Ki7zMhVRLLpm2qjTKygoMqyQ6jYoJLzXnpQPhqwZKWGJjhPaceRDofcW8YVCyKbk67N2l-NUP39fr2KcwnKxLqFDrwcNIsQNlzXaZ2ubT_WEI9eit_ueN_QCl7l4T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061995612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-destructive evaluation of Roman coin patinas from the 3rd and 4th century</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Fawcett, T. G. ; Blanton, J. R. ; Blanton, T. N. ; Arias, L. ; Suscavage, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fawcett, T. G. ; Blanton, J. R. ; Blanton, T. N. ; Arias, L. ; Suscavage, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Roman bronze coins from the 3rd and 4th century AD exhibit a wide variety of chemistries on their surfaces. This variation has been attributed to the variable methods used to produce the coins, a large number of mints producing bronze currency, and the periods of currency devaluation within the Roman Empire. Besides the base bronze metallurgy (Cu,Sn), Ag, Pb, and Zn were frequently used as coinage metals. Silver coatings were often applied to increase the apparent value of the coins. Over the centuries these surfaces corroded producing a range of patinas. Non-destructive X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence methods were used to evaluate ancient bronze coins. These methods are limited by their half depth of penetration into the coins, so the focus was on the chemistry of the patina's and how they related to the current appearance. Several 3rd-century bronze coins exhibited a very dark patina that was often composed of CuCl, Cu2O (cuprite) and several forms of copper hydroxyl chloride, resulting from surface deterioration caused by corrosion and is often referred to as bronze disease. Coins of the latter 3rd century and 4th century often exhibit patinas that are corrosion products of lead, silver, and tin, as lead and tin preferentially oxidize relative to the bronze alloys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7413</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0885715618000180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bronze ; Coins ; Copper ; Corrosion ; Corrosion products ; Destructive testing ; Historical metallurgy ; Identification ; Lead ; Methods ; Museum exhibits ; Museums ; Nondestructive testing ; Organic chemistry ; Patina ; Principal components analysis ; Production methods ; Silver ; Software ; Technical Article ; Tin bronzes ; X-ray diffraction ; X-ray fluorescence ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Powder diffraction, 2018-06, Vol.33 (2), p.88-97</ispartof><rights>Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0885715618000180/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27922,27923,55626</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fawcett, T. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, T. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suscavage, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Non-destructive evaluation of Roman coin patinas from the 3rd and 4th century</title><title>Powder diffraction</title><addtitle>Powder Diffr</addtitle><description>Roman bronze coins from the 3rd and 4th century AD exhibit a wide variety of chemistries on their surfaces. This variation has been attributed to the variable methods used to produce the coins, a large number of mints producing bronze currency, and the periods of currency devaluation within the Roman Empire. Besides the base bronze metallurgy (Cu,Sn), Ag, Pb, and Zn were frequently used as coinage metals. Silver coatings were often applied to increase the apparent value of the coins. Over the centuries these surfaces corroded producing a range of patinas. Non-destructive X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence methods were used to evaluate ancient bronze coins. These methods are limited by their half depth of penetration into the coins, so the focus was on the chemistry of the patina's and how they related to the current appearance. Several 3rd-century bronze coins exhibited a very dark patina that was often composed of CuCl, Cu2O (cuprite) and several forms of copper hydroxyl chloride, resulting from surface deterioration caused by corrosion and is often referred to as bronze disease. Coins of the latter 3rd century and 4th century often exhibit patinas that are corrosion products of lead, silver, and tin, as lead and tin preferentially oxidize relative to the bronze alloys.</description><subject>Bronze</subject><subject>Coins</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>Corrosion products</subject><subject>Destructive testing</subject><subject>Historical metallurgy</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Museum exhibits</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Patina</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Silver</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Technical Article</subject><subject>Tin bronzes</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><subject>X-ray fluorescence</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0885-7156</issn><issn>1945-7413</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA8-rMJtkkRylqhargx3lJs4nd0iY1my34792lggcvMzDvw8zwEHKJcI2A8uYNlBISRYUKAIZyRCaouSgkR3ZMJmNcjPkpOeu69YCgEuWEPD3HUDSuy6m3ud076vZm05vcxkCjp69xawK1sQ10NwyD6ahPcUvzylGWGmpCQ3leUetC7tP3OTnxZtO5i98-JR_3d--zebF4eXic3S4Ki7zMhVRLLpm2qjTKygoMqyQ6jYoJLzXnpQPhqwZKWGJjhPaceRDofcW8YVCyKbk67N2l-NUP39fr2KcwnKxLqFDrwcNIsQNlzXaZ2ubT_WEI9eit_ueN_QCl7l4T</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Fawcett, T. G.</creator><creator>Blanton, J. R.</creator><creator>Blanton, T. N.</creator><creator>Arias, L.</creator><creator>Suscavage, T.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0W</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Non-destructive evaluation of Roman coin patinas from the 3rd and 4th century</title><author>Fawcett, T. G. ; Blanton, J. R. ; Blanton, T. N. ; Arias, L. ; Suscavage, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c142t-78b4739c82a8c760a3671e91835f79442e05f6d020b1da59f43f051ff63fa3023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bronze</topic><topic>Coins</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>Corrosion products</topic><topic>Destructive testing</topic><topic>Historical metallurgy</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Museum exhibits</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Patina</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Silver</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Technical Article</topic><topic>Tin bronzes</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><topic>X-ray fluorescence</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fawcett, T. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, T. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suscavage, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><jtitle>Powder diffraction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fawcett, T. G.</au><au>Blanton, J. R.</au><au>Blanton, T. N.</au><au>Arias, L.</au><au>Suscavage, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-destructive evaluation of Roman coin patinas from the 3rd and 4th century</atitle><jtitle>Powder diffraction</jtitle><addtitle>Powder Diffr</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>88-97</pages><issn>0885-7156</issn><eissn>1945-7413</eissn><abstract>Roman bronze coins from the 3rd and 4th century AD exhibit a wide variety of chemistries on their surfaces. This variation has been attributed to the variable methods used to produce the coins, a large number of mints producing bronze currency, and the periods of currency devaluation within the Roman Empire. Besides the base bronze metallurgy (Cu,Sn), Ag, Pb, and Zn were frequently used as coinage metals. Silver coatings were often applied to increase the apparent value of the coins. Over the centuries these surfaces corroded producing a range of patinas. Non-destructive X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence methods were used to evaluate ancient bronze coins. These methods are limited by their half depth of penetration into the coins, so the focus was on the chemistry of the patina's and how they related to the current appearance. Several 3rd-century bronze coins exhibited a very dark patina that was often composed of CuCl, Cu2O (cuprite) and several forms of copper hydroxyl chloride, resulting from surface deterioration caused by corrosion and is often referred to as bronze disease. Coins of the latter 3rd century and 4th century often exhibit patinas that are corrosion products of lead, silver, and tin, as lead and tin preferentially oxidize relative to the bronze alloys.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0885715618000180</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-7156 |
ispartof | Powder diffraction, 2018-06, Vol.33 (2), p.88-97 |
issn | 0885-7156 1945-7413 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2061995612 |
source | Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Bronze Coins Copper Corrosion Corrosion products Destructive testing Historical metallurgy Identification Lead Methods Museum exhibits Museums Nondestructive testing Organic chemistry Patina Principal components analysis Production methods Silver Software Technical Article Tin bronzes X-ray diffraction X-ray fluorescence Zinc |
title | Non-destructive evaluation of Roman coin patinas from the 3rd and 4th century |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T02%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cambr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-destructive%20evaluation%20of%20Roman%20coin%20patinas%20from%20the%203rd%20and%204th%20century&rft.jtitle=Powder%20diffraction&rft.au=Fawcett,%20T.%20G.&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=88-97&rft.issn=0885-7156&rft.eissn=1945-7413&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0885715618000180&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cambr%3E2061995612%3C/proquest_cambr%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061995612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0885715618000180&rfr_iscdi=true |