Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts
When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bohemia (München) 2017-01, Vol.57 (1), p.115 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Bohemia (München) |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Janáč, Jiří |
description | When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2061965183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2061965183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20619651833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTFOw0AQRbcAiQhyh5FoWcmJZcdUSJAgSyloIlFGE3sij73eDTtrIlFxEMpcgDPkJpyEBUGfaf6f-f9pztQoyaapLrJidqHGIm0SJ8vTuI_UZ4kbsrBnD3bwUKPAM4qQv_n1r66HkvueDGyPB2PC3df7ByydDWwHDsdDiHCgqrGu8xhYqiYe5mQ7sgJsoSYP4t4YDct_vPqRqnFi3B47YsAe7ollx_FNTQJzZ3HQT5HVC7MhvUSLZuddS12QK3W-RSM0_tNLdf24WD2UOhZeBpKwbt3gIyDraZJPbvNsUqTpaa1vsKFliw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061965183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Janáč, Jiří</creator><creatorcontrib>Janáč, Jiří</creatorcontrib><description>When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources</description><identifier>ISSN: 0523-8587</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Munich: Collegium Carolinum e. V</publisher><subject>20th century ; Agriculture ; Bureaucracy ; Falls ; Modernization ; Political culture ; Popularity ; Rivers ; Socialism ; Technocracy ; Technology ; Water resources management ; Water shortages ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Bohemia (München), 2017-01, Vol.57 (1), p.115</ispartof><rights>Copyright Collegium Carolinum e. V. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janáč, Jiří</creatorcontrib><title>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</title><title>Bohemia (München)</title><description>When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Political culture</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>Technocracy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>0523-8587</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjTFOw0AQRbcAiQhyh5FoWcmJZcdUSJAgSyloIlFGE3sij73eDTtrIlFxEMpcgDPkJpyEBUGfaf6f-f9pztQoyaapLrJidqHGIm0SJ8vTuI_UZ4kbsrBnD3bwUKPAM4qQv_n1r66HkvueDGyPB2PC3df7ByydDWwHDsdDiHCgqrGu8xhYqiYe5mQ7sgJsoSYP4t4YDct_vPqRqnFi3B47YsAe7ollx_FNTQJzZ3HQT5HVC7MhvUSLZuddS12QK3W-RSM0_tNLdf24WD2UOhZeBpKwbt3gIyDraZJPbvNsUqTpaa1vsKFliw</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Janáč, Jiří</creator><general>Collegium Carolinum e. V</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</title><author>Janáč, Jiří</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20619651833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Political culture</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>Technocracy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janáč, Jiří</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Bohemia (München)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janáč, Jiří</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</atitle><jtitle>Bohemia (München)</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><pages>115-</pages><issn>0523-8587</issn><abstract>When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources</abstract><cop>Munich</cop><pub>Collegium Carolinum e. V</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0523-8587 |
ispartof | Bohemia (München), 2017-01, Vol.57 (1), p.115 |
issn | 0523-8587 |
language | ger |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2061965183 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 20th century Agriculture Bureaucracy Falls Modernization Political culture Popularity Rivers Socialism Technocracy Technology Water resources management Water shortages Water supply |
title | Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T01%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Haben%20wir%20nur%20das%20Wasser,%20das%20vom%20Himmel%20f%C3%A4llt?%E2%80%9C%20Kontinuit%C3%A4ten%20technokratischen%20Denkens%20in%20der%20sozialistischen%20Tschechoslowakei%20am%20Beispiel%20des%20Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts&rft.jtitle=Bohemia%20(M%C3%BCnchen)&rft.au=Jan%C3%A1%C4%8D,%20Ji%C5%99%C3%AD&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.pages=115-&rft.issn=0523-8587&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2061965183%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061965183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |