Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts

When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bohemia (München) 2017-01, Vol.57 (1), p.115
1. Verfasser: Janáč, Jiří
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title Bohemia (München)
container_volume 57
creator Janáč, Jiří
description When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2061965183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2061965183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20619651833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTFOw0AQRbcAiQhyh5FoWcmJZcdUSJAgSyloIlFGE3sij73eDTtrIlFxEMpcgDPkJpyEBUGfaf6f-f9pztQoyaapLrJidqHGIm0SJ8vTuI_UZ4kbsrBnD3bwUKPAM4qQv_n1r66HkvueDGyPB2PC3df7ByydDWwHDsdDiHCgqrGu8xhYqiYe5mQ7sgJsoSYP4t4YDct_vPqRqnFi3B47YsAe7ollx_FNTQJzZ3HQT5HVC7MhvUSLZuddS12QK3W-RSM0_tNLdf24WD2UOhZeBpKwbt3gIyDraZJPbvNsUqTpaa1vsKFliw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061965183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Janáč, Jiří</creator><creatorcontrib>Janáč, Jiří</creatorcontrib><description>When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources</description><identifier>ISSN: 0523-8587</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Munich: Collegium Carolinum e. V</publisher><subject>20th century ; Agriculture ; Bureaucracy ; Falls ; Modernization ; Political culture ; Popularity ; Rivers ; Socialism ; Technocracy ; Technology ; Water resources management ; Water shortages ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Bohemia (München), 2017-01, Vol.57 (1), p.115</ispartof><rights>Copyright Collegium Carolinum e. V. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janáč, Jiří</creatorcontrib><title>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</title><title>Bohemia (München)</title><description>When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Political culture</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>Technocracy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>0523-8587</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjTFOw0AQRbcAiQhyh5FoWcmJZcdUSJAgSyloIlFGE3sij73eDTtrIlFxEMpcgDPkJpyEBUGfaf6f-f9pztQoyaapLrJidqHGIm0SJ8vTuI_UZ4kbsrBnD3bwUKPAM4qQv_n1r66HkvueDGyPB2PC3df7ByydDWwHDsdDiHCgqrGu8xhYqiYe5mQ7sgJsoSYP4t4YDct_vPqRqnFi3B47YsAe7ollx_FNTQJzZ3HQT5HVC7MhvUSLZuddS12QK3W-RSM0_tNLdf24WD2UOhZeBpKwbt3gIyDraZJPbvNsUqTpaa1vsKFliw</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Janáč, Jiří</creator><general>Collegium Carolinum e. V</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</title><author>Janáč, Jiří</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20619651833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Political culture</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>Technocracy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janáč, Jiří</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Bohemia (München)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janáč, Jiří</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts</atitle><jtitle>Bohemia (München)</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><pages>115-</pages><issn>0523-8587</issn><abstract>When a society is to be modernized, among the prerequisites is a dependable supply of water for people, agriculture, and industry. As a consequence, modern technocratic schemes for future development have always dealt, among other things, with control and administration of water resources. In the case of Czechoslovakia, the plan to link three important rivers, thus forming a nationwide water system, became the symbol of these endeavors. The idea to construct a channel joining the rivers Danube, Oder (Czech: Odra), and Elbe (Czech: Labe), was first promoted at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and gained greater popularity in the 1930s. At the center of the whole story were the members of the bureaucracy regulating water supply and distribution. Adapting to changes in the economic, cultural and political environment, they interpreted the channel scheme in a different way each time such a change occurred. They managed to keep it important even when socialist modernization was the order of the day. Only in the 1950s, when Stalinist productivism was the norm, was it temporarily shelved. Nor was it realized in the 1960s. But far from being abandoned, it remained part of the long-term planning that was to be realized as soon as the economic advantages of the channel would be proven. This serves to demonstrate that state socialism did not represent a turning point in the thinking about utilizing water resources</abstract><cop>Munich</cop><pub>Collegium Carolinum e. V</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0523-8587
ispartof Bohemia (München), 2017-01, Vol.57 (1), p.115
issn 0523-8587
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2061965183
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 20th century
Agriculture
Bureaucracy
Falls
Modernization
Political culture
Popularity
Rivers
Socialism
Technocracy
Technology
Water resources management
Water shortages
Water supply
title Haben wir nur das Wasser, das vom Himmel fällt?“ Kontinuitäten technokratischen Denkens in der sozialistischen Tschechoslowakei am Beispiel des Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T01%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Haben%20wir%20nur%20das%20Wasser,%20das%20vom%20Himmel%20f%C3%A4llt?%E2%80%9C%20Kontinuit%C3%A4ten%20technokratischen%20Denkens%20in%20der%20sozialistischen%20Tschechoslowakei%20am%20Beispiel%20des%20Donau-Oder-Elbe-Kanalprojekts&rft.jtitle=Bohemia%20(M%C3%BCnchen)&rft.au=Jan%C3%A1%C4%8D,%20Ji%C5%99%C3%AD&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.pages=115-&rft.issn=0523-8587&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2061965183%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061965183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true