HYPOCALORIC DIET- A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING?
Background and objectives: Obesity is associated with highly elevated risks of adverse health outcomes. We evaluated obese patients during a hypocaloric diet to see the nutritional impact assessment regarding macro and micro nutrients and the impact on the health. Methods: A sample of 126 overweight...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of nutrition and metabolism 2017-10, Vol.71 (Suppl. 2), p.1052 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Suppl. 2 |
| container_start_page | 1052 |
| container_title | Annals of nutrition and metabolism |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Camelia, Posea Mihaela Dragomir, Andreea Diana Radulian, Gabriela |
| description | Background and objectives: Obesity is associated with highly elevated risks of adverse health outcomes. We evaluated obese patients during a hypocaloric diet to see the nutritional impact assessment regarding macro and micro nutrients and the impact on the health. Methods: A sample of 126 overweight and obese subjects were investigated. Using a 7-day food self-recorded questionnaire, we evaluated the nutritional content of food intake before and after the program: total kilocalories, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, cholesterol, vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, C, D, E, folic acid, and minerals like calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium, and sodium. We assessed anthropometric data, laboratory data and resting metabolic rate. Results: Data analysis at the end of nutritional intervention program showed significant changes in all parameters except for metabolic rate estimated. 91.18% of men and 85.87% of women recorded overall improved weight while fat percentage decreased. The prevalence of normal intake of protein and carbohydrates decreased significantly after the intervention: 67.95% and 15.38% of patients had adequate protein intake (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000480486 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2061910944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2061910944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20619109443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBA0NNAzNDS11DcwMDCxACIzJgZOQxMjQ11LM0tzFgZOAyNTA10zCwNzDgau4uIsAwNDIwsTU04GPY_IAH9nRx__IE9nBRdP1xBdBUcFd39_F4UQD08_dwX_ICDfyRHKtedhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjAzNDS0MDSxMTY-JUAQDhmzGF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061910944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HYPOCALORIC DIET- A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Camelia, Posea Mihaela ; Dragomir, Andreea Diana ; Radulian, Gabriela</creator><creatorcontrib>Camelia, Posea Mihaela ; Dragomir, Andreea Diana ; Radulian, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objectives: Obesity is associated with highly elevated risks of adverse health outcomes. We evaluated obese patients during a hypocaloric diet to see the nutritional impact assessment regarding macro and micro nutrients and the impact on the health. Methods: A sample of 126 overweight and obese subjects were investigated. Using a 7-day food self-recorded questionnaire, we evaluated the nutritional content of food intake before and after the program: total kilocalories, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, cholesterol, vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, C, D, E, folic acid, and minerals like calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium, and sodium. We assessed anthropometric data, laboratory data and resting metabolic rate. Results: Data analysis at the end of nutritional intervention program showed significant changes in all parameters except for metabolic rate estimated. 91.18% of men and 85.87% of women recorded overall improved weight while fat percentage decreased. The prevalence of normal intake of protein and carbohydrates decreased significantly after the intervention: 67.95% and 15.38% of patients had adequate protein intake (p <0.001) and, respectively, carbohydrates (p = 0.006). At the end, only 12 to 30% of patients had recommended nutritional intake, depending on the vitamin evaluated. 80% of patients consumed excessive vitamins B12, B2, B3 and B6. More than 80% of patients had deficient intake of vitamin D and E. At the end of the intervention we observed to be significantly fewer patients covering the recommended daily allowance for calcium and magnesium. Although there have been deficient intake of minerals, laboratory parameters such as magnesium, calcium and plasma iron were not significant changed at the end of nutritional intervention. Conclusions: Because of the results regarding anthropometric data which get improved, we can say that hypocaloric diet is a good thing. Considering that the participants in this study were compliant in terms of nutritional recommendations, it can be said that, due to the inefficiency to correct the deficiency and excessive intake of vitamins and minerals, we need to pay more attention to the nutritional recommendations during an interventional program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-6807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000480486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Anthropometry ; Body weight ; Calcium ; Carbohydrates ; Cholesterol ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; Diet ; Folic acid ; Food intake ; Health risk assessment ; Hypocaloric diet ; Intervention ; Iron ; Lipids ; Magnesium ; Manganese ; Metabolic rate ; Minerals ; Nutrients ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Parameter estimation ; Patients ; Phosphorus ; Proteins ; Risk factors ; Selenium ; Sodium ; Vitamin B12 ; Vitamin B6 ; Vitamin D ; Vitamins</subject><ispartof>Annals of nutrition and metabolism, 2017-10, Vol.71 (Suppl. 2), p.1052</ispartof><rights>Copyright S. Karger AG Oct 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Camelia, Posea Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragomir, Andreea Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radulian, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><title>HYPOCALORIC DIET- A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING?</title><title>Annals of nutrition and metabolism</title><description>Background and objectives: Obesity is associated with highly elevated risks of adverse health outcomes. We evaluated obese patients during a hypocaloric diet to see the nutritional impact assessment regarding macro and micro nutrients and the impact on the health. Methods: A sample of 126 overweight and obese subjects were investigated. Using a 7-day food self-recorded questionnaire, we evaluated the nutritional content of food intake before and after the program: total kilocalories, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, cholesterol, vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, C, D, E, folic acid, and minerals like calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium, and sodium. We assessed anthropometric data, laboratory data and resting metabolic rate. Results: Data analysis at the end of nutritional intervention program showed significant changes in all parameters except for metabolic rate estimated. 91.18% of men and 85.87% of women recorded overall improved weight while fat percentage decreased. The prevalence of normal intake of protein and carbohydrates decreased significantly after the intervention: 67.95% and 15.38% of patients had adequate protein intake (p <0.001) and, respectively, carbohydrates (p = 0.006). At the end, only 12 to 30% of patients had recommended nutritional intake, depending on the vitamin evaluated. 80% of patients consumed excessive vitamins B12, B2, B3 and B6. More than 80% of patients had deficient intake of vitamin D and E. At the end of the intervention we observed to be significantly fewer patients covering the recommended daily allowance for calcium and magnesium. Although there have been deficient intake of minerals, laboratory parameters such as magnesium, calcium and plasma iron were not significant changed at the end of nutritional intervention. Conclusions: Because of the results regarding anthropometric data which get improved, we can say that hypocaloric diet is a good thing. Considering that the participants in this study were compliant in terms of nutritional recommendations, it can be said that, due to the inefficiency to correct the deficiency and excessive intake of vitamins and minerals, we need to pay more attention to the nutritional recommendations during an interventional program.</description><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Folic acid</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hypocaloric diet</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Metabolic rate</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Vitamin B12</subject><subject>Vitamin B6</subject><subject>Vitamin D</subject><subject>Vitamins</subject><issn>0250-6807</issn><issn>1421-9697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBA0NNAzNDS11DcwMDCxACIzJgZOQxMjQ11LM0tzFgZOAyNTA10zCwNzDgau4uIsAwNDIwsTU04GPY_IAH9nRx__IE9nBRdP1xBdBUcFd39_F4UQD08_dwX_ICDfyRHKtedhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjAzNDS0MDSxMTY-JUAQDhmzGF</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Camelia, Posea Mihaela</creator><creator>Dragomir, Andreea Diana</creator><creator>Radulian, Gabriela</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>HYPOCALORIC DIET- A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING?</title><author>Camelia, Posea Mihaela ; Dragomir, Andreea Diana ; Radulian, Gabriela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20619109443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Folic acid</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hypocaloric diet</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Metabolic rate</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Vitamin B12</topic><topic>Vitamin B6</topic><topic>Vitamin D</topic><topic>Vitamins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Camelia, Posea Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragomir, Andreea Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radulian, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Annals of nutrition and metabolism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Camelia, Posea Mihaela</au><au>Dragomir, Andreea Diana</au><au>Radulian, Gabriela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HYPOCALORIC DIET- A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of nutrition and metabolism</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl. 2</issue><spage>1052</spage><pages>1052-</pages><issn>0250-6807</issn><eissn>1421-9697</eissn><abstract>Background and objectives: Obesity is associated with highly elevated risks of adverse health outcomes. We evaluated obese patients during a hypocaloric diet to see the nutritional impact assessment regarding macro and micro nutrients and the impact on the health. Methods: A sample of 126 overweight and obese subjects were investigated. Using a 7-day food self-recorded questionnaire, we evaluated the nutritional content of food intake before and after the program: total kilocalories, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, cholesterol, vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, C, D, E, folic acid, and minerals like calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium, and sodium. We assessed anthropometric data, laboratory data and resting metabolic rate. Results: Data analysis at the end of nutritional intervention program showed significant changes in all parameters except for metabolic rate estimated. 91.18% of men and 85.87% of women recorded overall improved weight while fat percentage decreased. The prevalence of normal intake of protein and carbohydrates decreased significantly after the intervention: 67.95% and 15.38% of patients had adequate protein intake (p <0.001) and, respectively, carbohydrates (p = 0.006). At the end, only 12 to 30% of patients had recommended nutritional intake, depending on the vitamin evaluated. 80% of patients consumed excessive vitamins B12, B2, B3 and B6. More than 80% of patients had deficient intake of vitamin D and E. At the end of the intervention we observed to be significantly fewer patients covering the recommended daily allowance for calcium and magnesium. Although there have been deficient intake of minerals, laboratory parameters such as magnesium, calcium and plasma iron were not significant changed at the end of nutritional intervention. Conclusions: Because of the results regarding anthropometric data which get improved, we can say that hypocaloric diet is a good thing. Considering that the participants in this study were compliant in terms of nutritional recommendations, it can be said that, due to the inefficiency to correct the deficiency and excessive intake of vitamins and minerals, we need to pay more attention to the nutritional recommendations during an interventional program.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><doi>10.1159/000480486</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0250-6807 |
| ispartof | Annals of nutrition and metabolism, 2017-10, Vol.71 (Suppl. 2), p.1052 |
| issn | 0250-6807 1421-9697 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2061910944 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Anthropometry Body weight Calcium Carbohydrates Cholesterol Data analysis Data processing Diet Folic acid Food intake Health risk assessment Hypocaloric diet Intervention Iron Lipids Magnesium Manganese Metabolic rate Minerals Nutrients Obesity Overweight Parameter estimation Patients Phosphorus Proteins Risk factors Selenium Sodium Vitamin B12 Vitamin B6 Vitamin D Vitamins |
| title | HYPOCALORIC DIET- A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A17%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HYPOCALORIC%20DIET-%20A%20GOOD%20THING%20OR%20A%20BAD%20THING?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20nutrition%20and%20metabolism&rft.au=Camelia,%20Posea%20Mihaela&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl.%202&rft.spage=1052&rft.pages=1052-&rft.issn=0250-6807&rft.eissn=1421-9697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000480486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2061910944%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061910944&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |