Franchising (& Distribution) Currents
Apr. 4, 2017) A Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram (CJDR) dealer (Stevens Creek) filed a complaint against Chrysler Group LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, asserting several claims, including a claim for price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Franchise law journal 2017-10, Vol.37 (2), p.305-348 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 348 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 305 |
| container_title | Franchise law journal |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Towle, C. Griffith Gilbert, Jan S. Ginsburg, Elliot R. |
| description | Apr. 4, 2017) A Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram (CJDR) dealer (Stevens Creek) filed a complaint against Chrysler Group LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, asserting several claims, including a claim for price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13 (RPA or Robinson-Patman). [...]the court was persuaded that the jury instruction was an accurate statement of the law, albeit not as detailed as Stevens Creek wanted. [...]the court turned to Stevens Creek's argument that the jury instruction and verdict form question regarding functional availability were confusing because they referred to both "functional availability" and "functional unavailability." Apr. 7, 2017) The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied Charging Bison, LLC's motion to stay an arbitration with its franchisor Interstate Battery Franchising & Development, Inc. Charging Bison entered into a franchise agreement with Interstate Battery pursuant to which it acquired the rights to operate an Interstate Battery franchise in Cheyenne, Wyoming. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2061859098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26421690</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26421690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j508-f0c742e57bcaf60dfea3bc1b4b21cce3c2257466cc31a83e72f8b6d8233ee54f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81KxDAYRYMoWEcfQSiI4iwCyZffLqU6OjDgZvYlySSaoumYpAvf3sK4OpvDudwz1ACVDAMV_Bw1WgmJVSfhEl2VMhICmoFq0P0mm-Q-Y4npo318aJ9jqTnaucYprdt-ztmnWq7RRTBfxd_8c4X2m5d9_4Z376_b_mmHR0E0DsQpDl4o60yQ5BC8YdZRyy1Q5zxzAEJxKZ1j1GjmFQRt5UEDY94LHtgK3Z2yxzz9zL7UYZzmnJbFAYikWnSk04t1e7LGUqc8HHP8Nvl3AMmXwx1hf29GRao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061859098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Franchising (& Distribution) Currents</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Towle, C. Griffith ; Gilbert, Jan S. ; Ginsburg, Elliot R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Towle, C. Griffith ; Gilbert, Jan S. ; Ginsburg, Elliot R.</creatorcontrib><description>Apr. 4, 2017) A Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram (CJDR) dealer (Stevens Creek) filed a complaint against Chrysler Group LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, asserting several claims, including a claim for price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13 (RPA or Robinson-Patman). [...]the court was persuaded that the jury instruction was an accurate statement of the law, albeit not as detailed as Stevens Creek wanted. [...]the court turned to Stevens Creek's argument that the jury instruction and verdict form question regarding functional availability were confusing because they referred to both "functional availability" and "functional unavailability." Apr. 7, 2017) The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied Charging Bison, LLC's motion to stay an arbitration with its franchisor Interstate Battery Franchising & Development, Inc. Charging Bison entered into a franchise agreement with Interstate Battery pursuant to which it acquired the rights to operate an Interstate Battery franchise in Cheyenne, Wyoming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-7962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-2154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association Forum on Franchising</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Arbitration ; Buffalo ; Discounts ; Distribution ; Feature ; Federal court decisions ; Franchisees ; Franchising ; Instructions to juries ; Objectives ; Prices ; State court decisions ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Franchise law journal, 2017-10, Vol.37 (2), p.305-348</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Fall 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26421690$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26421690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Towle, C. Griffith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elliot R.</creatorcontrib><title>Franchising (& Distribution) Currents</title><title>Franchise law journal</title><description>Apr. 4, 2017) A Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram (CJDR) dealer (Stevens Creek) filed a complaint against Chrysler Group LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, asserting several claims, including a claim for price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13 (RPA or Robinson-Patman). [...]the court was persuaded that the jury instruction was an accurate statement of the law, albeit not as detailed as Stevens Creek wanted. [...]the court turned to Stevens Creek's argument that the jury instruction and verdict form question regarding functional availability were confusing because they referred to both "functional availability" and "functional unavailability." Apr. 7, 2017) The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied Charging Bison, LLC's motion to stay an arbitration with its franchisor Interstate Battery Franchising & Development, Inc. Charging Bison entered into a franchise agreement with Interstate Battery pursuant to which it acquired the rights to operate an Interstate Battery franchise in Cheyenne, Wyoming.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>Discounts</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Feature</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Franchisees</subject><subject>Franchising</subject><subject>Instructions to juries</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>8756-7962</issn><issn>2163-2154</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81KxDAYRYMoWEcfQSiI4iwCyZffLqU6OjDgZvYlySSaoumYpAvf3sK4OpvDudwz1ACVDAMV_Bw1WgmJVSfhEl2VMhICmoFq0P0mm-Q-Y4npo318aJ9jqTnaucYprdt-ztmnWq7RRTBfxd_8c4X2m5d9_4Z376_b_mmHR0E0DsQpDl4o60yQ5BC8YdZRyy1Q5zxzAEJxKZ1j1GjmFQRt5UEDY94LHtgK3Z2yxzz9zL7UYZzmnJbFAYikWnSk04t1e7LGUqc8HHP8Nvl3AMmXwx1hf29GRao</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Towle, C. Griffith</creator><creator>Gilbert, Jan S.</creator><creator>Ginsburg, Elliot R.</creator><general>American Bar Association Forum on Franchising</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Franchising (& Distribution) Currents</title><author>Towle, C. Griffith ; Gilbert, Jan S. ; Ginsburg, Elliot R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j508-f0c742e57bcaf60dfea3bc1b4b21cce3c2257466cc31a83e72f8b6d8233ee54f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>Discounts</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Feature</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Franchisees</topic><topic>Franchising</topic><topic>Instructions to juries</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Towle, C. Griffith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elliot R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Franchise law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Towle, C. Griffith</au><au>Gilbert, Jan S.</au><au>Ginsburg, Elliot R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Franchising (& Distribution) Currents</atitle><jtitle>Franchise law journal</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>305-348</pages><issn>8756-7962</issn><eissn>2163-2154</eissn><abstract>Apr. 4, 2017) A Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram (CJDR) dealer (Stevens Creek) filed a complaint against Chrysler Group LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, asserting several claims, including a claim for price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13 (RPA or Robinson-Patman). [...]the court was persuaded that the jury instruction was an accurate statement of the law, albeit not as detailed as Stevens Creek wanted. [...]the court turned to Stevens Creek's argument that the jury instruction and verdict form question regarding functional availability were confusing because they referred to both "functional availability" and "functional unavailability." Apr. 7, 2017) The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied Charging Bison, LLC's motion to stay an arbitration with its franchisor Interstate Battery Franchising & Development, Inc. Charging Bison entered into a franchise agreement with Interstate Battery pursuant to which it acquired the rights to operate an Interstate Battery franchise in Cheyenne, Wyoming.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association Forum on Franchising</pub><tpages>44</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 8756-7962 |
| ispartof | Franchise law journal, 2017-10, Vol.37 (2), p.305-348 |
| issn | 8756-7962 2163-2154 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2061859098 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Agreements Arbitration Buffalo Discounts Distribution Feature Federal court decisions Franchisees Franchising Instructions to juries Objectives Prices State court decisions Trials |
| title | Franchising (& Distribution) Currents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Franchising%20(&%20Distribution)%20Currents&rft.jtitle=Franchise%20law%20journal&rft.au=Towle,%20C.%20Griffith&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=305-348&rft.issn=8756-7962&rft.eissn=2163-2154&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26421690%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061859098&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26421690&rfr_iscdi=true |