The Basics of a Technology-Enhanced Courtroom
[...]the continuing price drop of high-definition monitors has reached the point where large monitors often cost less than high-intensity projectors. [...]counsel may preserve all markings by printing a color copy of the exhibit. [...]a witness monitor or tablet device should have an annotation feat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Judges' journal 2017-09, Vol.56 (4), p.36-39 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | The Judges' journal |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Dixon, Herbert B., Jr |
description | [...]the continuing price drop of high-definition monitors has reached the point where large monitors often cost less than high-intensity projectors. [...]counsel may preserve all markings by printing a color copy of the exhibit. [...]a witness monitor or tablet device should have an annotation feature that allows the witness to electronically mark the displayed image. Courtroom Printing and Electronic Storage of Exhibits A color printer remains a staple of the technology-ready courtroom for printing exhibits on which witnesses have made electronic markings. Besides printing paper copies of images and markings and other notations for review by the judge or jury during deliberations, paper copies often are needed to satisfy the primeval urge for paper backups just in case the electronic Xs and Os disappear into the ether. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2061859059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A535155830</galeid><sourcerecordid>A535155830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1339-7c9b5dc6f00307015a7cb9e713a51bf798a45e74cad6335989bf06c89b39f2433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjk9LxDAQxYMoWFe_Q8FzJGmapnNcy_oHFrzUc0nTSdulTbTpHvz2BhREKHN4zPCb994FSTJeZBRUDpckYSxXNAOVXZObEE5xFcDLhNB6wPRRh9GE1NtUpzWawfnJ91_04AbtDHZp5c_Lung_35Irq6eAd7-6I-9Ph7p6oce359dqf6Q9FwKoMtDKzhSWMcEU41Ir0wIqLrTkrVVQ6lyiyo3uCiEklNBaVpgoAmyWC7Ej9z--H4v_PGNYm1Os4GJkk7GClxKYhD-q1xM2o7N-XbSZx2CavRSSS1kKFim6QfXocNGTd2jHeP7HP2zwcTqcR7Px8A1USmi-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061859059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Basics of a Technology-Enhanced Courtroom</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Dixon, Herbert B., Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Herbert B., Jr</creatorcontrib><description>[...]the continuing price drop of high-definition monitors has reached the point where large monitors often cost less than high-intensity projectors. [...]counsel may preserve all markings by printing a color copy of the exhibit. [...]a witness monitor or tablet device should have an annotation feature that allows the witness to electronically mark the displayed image. Courtroom Printing and Electronic Storage of Exhibits A color printer remains a staple of the technology-ready courtroom for printing exhibits on which witnesses have made electronic markings. Besides printing paper copies of images and markings and other notations for review by the judge or jury during deliberations, paper copies often are needed to satisfy the primeval urge for paper backups just in case the electronic Xs and Os disappear into the ether.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Audiences ; Court administration ; Courthouses ; Evidence ; Influence ; Information technology ; Judges & magistrates ; Methods ; Preferences ; Projected images ; Projectors ; Public speaking ; Testimony ; Trials ; Witnesses</subject><ispartof>The Judges' journal, 2017-09, Vol.56 (4), p.36-39</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Fall 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Herbert B., Jr</creatorcontrib><title>The Basics of a Technology-Enhanced Courtroom</title><title>The Judges' journal</title><description>[...]the continuing price drop of high-definition monitors has reached the point where large monitors often cost less than high-intensity projectors. [...]counsel may preserve all markings by printing a color copy of the exhibit. [...]a witness monitor or tablet device should have an annotation feature that allows the witness to electronically mark the displayed image. Courtroom Printing and Electronic Storage of Exhibits A color printer remains a staple of the technology-ready courtroom for printing exhibits on which witnesses have made electronic markings. Besides printing paper copies of images and markings and other notations for review by the judge or jury during deliberations, paper copies often are needed to satisfy the primeval urge for paper backups just in case the electronic Xs and Os disappear into the ether.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Court administration</subject><subject>Courthouses</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Projected images</subject><subject>Projectors</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>Witnesses</subject><issn>0047-2972</issn><issn>2162-9749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjk9LxDAQxYMoWFe_Q8FzJGmapnNcy_oHFrzUc0nTSdulTbTpHvz2BhREKHN4zPCb994FSTJeZBRUDpckYSxXNAOVXZObEE5xFcDLhNB6wPRRh9GE1NtUpzWawfnJ91_04AbtDHZp5c_Lung_35Irq6eAd7-6I-9Ph7p6oce359dqf6Q9FwKoMtDKzhSWMcEU41Ir0wIqLrTkrVVQ6lyiyo3uCiEklNBaVpgoAmyWC7Ej9z--H4v_PGNYm1Os4GJkk7GClxKYhD-q1xM2o7N-XbSZx2CavRSSS1kKFim6QfXocNGTd2jHeP7HP2zwcTqcR7Px8A1USmi-</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Dixon, Herbert B., Jr</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>The Basics of a Technology-Enhanced Courtroom</title><author>Dixon, Herbert B., Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1339-7c9b5dc6f00307015a7cb9e713a51bf798a45e74cad6335989bf06c89b39f2433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Court administration</topic><topic>Courthouses</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Projected images</topic><topic>Projectors</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>Witnesses</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Herbert B., Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Judges' journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dixon, Herbert B., Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Basics of a Technology-Enhanced Courtroom</atitle><jtitle>The Judges' journal</jtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>36-39</pages><issn>0047-2972</issn><eissn>2162-9749</eissn><abstract>[...]the continuing price drop of high-definition monitors has reached the point where large monitors often cost less than high-intensity projectors. [...]counsel may preserve all markings by printing a color copy of the exhibit. [...]a witness monitor or tablet device should have an annotation feature that allows the witness to electronically mark the displayed image. Courtroom Printing and Electronic Storage of Exhibits A color printer remains a staple of the technology-ready courtroom for printing exhibits on which witnesses have made electronic markings. Besides printing paper copies of images and markings and other notations for review by the judge or jury during deliberations, paper copies often are needed to satisfy the primeval urge for paper backups just in case the electronic Xs and Os disappear into the ether.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2972 |
ispartof | The Judges' journal, 2017-09, Vol.56 (4), p.36-39 |
issn | 0047-2972 2162-9749 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2061859059 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Attorneys Audiences Court administration Courthouses Evidence Influence Information technology Judges & magistrates Methods Preferences Projected images Projectors Public speaking Testimony Trials Witnesses |
title | The Basics of a Technology-Enhanced Courtroom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Basics%20of%20a%20Technology-Enhanced%20Courtroom&rft.jtitle=The%20Judges'%20journal&rft.au=Dixon,%20Herbert%20B.,%20Jr&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=36-39&rft.issn=0047-2972&rft.eissn=2162-9749&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA535155830%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061859059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A535155830&rfr_iscdi=true |