Survey of electromagnetic and magnetoelectric vibration energy harvesters for low frequency excitation

•Overview of the recent developments of vibration energy harvesters is presented.•Devices are compared depending in the energy outcome and working frequency.•Electromagnetic and magnetoelectric principles are classified by design aspects.•Converters are compared via delivered energy and the type of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2017-08, Vol.106, p.251-263
Hauptverfasser: Naifar, Slim, Bradai, Sonia, Viehweger, Christian, Kanoun, Olfa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Overview of the recent developments of vibration energy harvesters is presented.•Devices are compared depending in the energy outcome and working frequency.•Electromagnetic and magnetoelectric principles are classified by design aspects.•Converters are compared via delivered energy and the type of vibration excitation. The main challenge in the design of vibration energy harvesters is the optimization of energy outcome relative to the applied excitation. This depends strongly on the used energy harvesting principle. Possible principles to generate energy from common existing vibration sources are electromagnetic, magnetoelectric, electrostatic and piezoelectric. At low vibration frequencies, electromagnetic and magnetoelectric energy harvesting techniques deliver energy with the highest efficiencies and are therefore the most promising principles. In this paper, an overview of the recent developments in the state of the art of vibration energy harvesters is presented. Mainly, electromagnetic and magnetoelectric principle are discussed and they have been classified relative to design aspects. Considering delivered energy and depending on the type of vibration excitation, reported converters are compared.
ISSN:0263-2241
1873-412X
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.074