A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program

This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human-wildlife interactions 2018-04, Vol.12 (1), p.58-74
1. Verfasser: Jakus, Paul M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Human-wildlife interactions
container_volume 12
creator Jakus, Paul M
description This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2059605130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2059605130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-816da0fdc160aa2ac6af9e502a9c10091cef9df62fd64c4c94995178881c76c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jUFLxDAUhIsouKz7Hx548FRI2iRNjuuirlDRw4LH5ZG8rF3aZk1S_ft2UZzLDHzDzEWxqLiUZa0bcfmfpb4uVikd2SwpGqPNonBriPTV0TcED2TDGIbOQsqT6yjNqMdMDnKA_EFwP0XC6dxscXTwgiMeaKAx3yV473oH2xATwZnN1RjgLYZDxOGmuPLYJ1r9-bLYPT7sNtuyfX163qzb8mR0LjVXDpl3liuGWKFV6A1JVqGxnDHDLXnjvKq8U8IKa4Qxkjdaa24bZUW9LG5_Z08xfE6U8v4YpjjOj_uKSaOY5DWrfwBFAVL2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2059605130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Jakus, Paul M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2155-3858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Logan: Jack H. Berryman Institute</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Animals ; Bans ; Cost analysis ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost estimates ; Costs ; Ecological effects ; Economics ; Estimates ; Horses ; Land management ; Land use planning ; Livestock ; Opportunity costs ; Population ; Tourism</subject><ispartof>Human-wildlife interactions, 2018-04, Vol.12 (1), p.58-74</ispartof><rights>Copyright Jack H. Berryman Institute Spring 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M</creatorcontrib><title>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</title><title>Human-wildlife interactions</title><description>This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><issn>2155-3858</issn><issn>2155-3874</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jUFLxDAUhIsouKz7Hx548FRI2iRNjuuirlDRw4LH5ZG8rF3aZk1S_ft2UZzLDHzDzEWxqLiUZa0bcfmfpb4uVikd2SwpGqPNonBriPTV0TcED2TDGIbOQsqT6yjNqMdMDnKA_EFwP0XC6dxscXTwgiMeaKAx3yV473oH2xATwZnN1RjgLYZDxOGmuPLYJ1r9-bLYPT7sNtuyfX163qzb8mR0LjVXDpl3liuGWKFV6A1JVqGxnDHDLXnjvKq8U8IKa4Qxkjdaa24bZUW9LG5_Z08xfE6U8v4YpjjOj_uKSaOY5DWrfwBFAVL2</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Jakus, Paul M</creator><general>Jack H. Berryman Institute</general><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</title><author>Jakus, Paul M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-816da0fdc160aa2ac6af9e502a9c10091cef9df62fd64c4c94995178881c76c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M</creatorcontrib><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Human-wildlife interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakus, Paul M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</atitle><jtitle>Human-wildlife interactions</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>58-74</pages><issn>2155-3858</issn><eissn>2155-3874</eissn><abstract>This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research.</abstract><cop>Logan</cop><pub>Jack H. Berryman Institute</pub><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2155-3858
ispartof Human-wildlife interactions, 2018-04, Vol.12 (1), p.58-74
issn 2155-3858
2155-3874
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2059605130
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; JSTOR Open Access Journals; Free E- Journals
subjects Accountability
Animals
Bans
Cost analysis
Cost benefit analysis
Cost estimates
Costs
Ecological effects
Economics
Estimates
Horses
Land management
Land use planning
Livestock
Opportunity costs
Population
Tourism
title A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20economic%20studies%20related%20to%20the%20Bureau%20of%20Land%20Management's%20Wild%20Horse%20and%20Burro%20Program&rft.jtitle=Human-wildlife%20interactions&rft.au=Jakus,%20Paul%20M&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=58-74&rft.issn=2155-3858&rft.eissn=2155-3874&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2059605130%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2059605130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true