A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program
This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human-wildlife interactions 2018-04, Vol.12 (1), p.58-74 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | Human-wildlife interactions |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Jakus, Paul M |
description | This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2059605130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2059605130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-816da0fdc160aa2ac6af9e502a9c10091cef9df62fd64c4c94995178881c76c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jUFLxDAUhIsouKz7Hx548FRI2iRNjuuirlDRw4LH5ZG8rF3aZk1S_ft2UZzLDHzDzEWxqLiUZa0bcfmfpb4uVikd2SwpGqPNonBriPTV0TcED2TDGIbOQsqT6yjNqMdMDnKA_EFwP0XC6dxscXTwgiMeaKAx3yV473oH2xATwZnN1RjgLYZDxOGmuPLYJ1r9-bLYPT7sNtuyfX163qzb8mR0LjVXDpl3liuGWKFV6A1JVqGxnDHDLXnjvKq8U8IKa4Qxkjdaa24bZUW9LG5_Z08xfE6U8v4YpjjOj_uKSaOY5DWrfwBFAVL2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2059605130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Jakus, Paul M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2155-3858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Logan: Jack H. Berryman Institute</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Animals ; Bans ; Cost analysis ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost estimates ; Costs ; Ecological effects ; Economics ; Estimates ; Horses ; Land management ; Land use planning ; Livestock ; Opportunity costs ; Population ; Tourism</subject><ispartof>Human-wildlife interactions, 2018-04, Vol.12 (1), p.58-74</ispartof><rights>Copyright Jack H. Berryman Institute Spring 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M</creatorcontrib><title>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</title><title>Human-wildlife interactions</title><description>This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><issn>2155-3858</issn><issn>2155-3874</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jUFLxDAUhIsouKz7Hx548FRI2iRNjuuirlDRw4LH5ZG8rF3aZk1S_ft2UZzLDHzDzEWxqLiUZa0bcfmfpb4uVikd2SwpGqPNonBriPTV0TcED2TDGIbOQsqT6yjNqMdMDnKA_EFwP0XC6dxscXTwgiMeaKAx3yV473oH2xATwZnN1RjgLYZDxOGmuPLYJ1r9-bLYPT7sNtuyfX163qzb8mR0LjVXDpl3liuGWKFV6A1JVqGxnDHDLXnjvKq8U8IKa4Qxkjdaa24bZUW9LG5_Z08xfE6U8v4YpjjOj_uKSaOY5DWrfwBFAVL2</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Jakus, Paul M</creator><general>Jack H. Berryman Institute</general><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</title><author>Jakus, Paul M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-816da0fdc160aa2ac6af9e502a9c10091cef9df62fd64c4c94995178881c76c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakus, Paul M</creatorcontrib><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Human-wildlife interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakus, Paul M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program</atitle><jtitle>Human-wildlife interactions</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>58-74</pages><issn>2155-3858</issn><eissn>2155-3874</eissn><abstract>This paper reviews literature addressing the benefits and costs of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro (WHB) Program. Within the framework of a comprehensive benefit cost analysis of the WHB Program, I And that program cost estimates are readily available from numerous sources. A more limited set of estimates of the opportunity cost of WHB on the range is available, as is a single estimate of the benefits provided by animal adoption. In contrast, there are no economic estimates of ecological damages caused by WHB in excess of the Appropriate Management Level, nor does a search of the literature reveal any estimate of the use and nonuse benefits of having WHB on the range. Dynamic bioeconomic models-which would be ideal for analysis of intertemporal program benefits and costs-have been restricted, for the most part, to only the analysis of costs. Further, I demonstrate how published opportunity cost estimates have sometimes been misinterpreted. This study sorts out confusion regarding reported opportunity costs and, using the missing elements of the comprehensive benefit cost analysis as a guide, identifies a path for future research.</abstract><cop>Logan</cop><pub>Jack H. Berryman Institute</pub><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2155-3858 |
ispartof | Human-wildlife interactions, 2018-04, Vol.12 (1), p.58-74 |
issn | 2155-3858 2155-3874 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2059605130 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; JSTOR Open Access Journals; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Accountability Animals Bans Cost analysis Cost benefit analysis Cost estimates Costs Ecological effects Economics Estimates Horses Land management Land use planning Livestock Opportunity costs Population Tourism |
title | A review of economic studies related to the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20economic%20studies%20related%20to%20the%20Bureau%20of%20Land%20Management's%20Wild%20Horse%20and%20Burro%20Program&rft.jtitle=Human-wildlife%20interactions&rft.au=Jakus,%20Paul%20M&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=58-74&rft.issn=2155-3858&rft.eissn=2155-3874&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2059605130%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2059605130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |