Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events
Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers (e.g., ocean and fluvial flooding, drought, and heat waves) leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extreme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2018-06, Vol.45 (11), p.5470-5480 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5480 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5470 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Sadegh, Mojtaba Moftakhari, Hamed Gupta, Hoshin V. Ragno, Elisa Mazdiyasni, Omid Sanders, Brett Matthew, Richard AghaKouchak, Amir |
description | Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers (e.g., ocean and fluvial flooding, drought, and heat waves) leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we review the existing multivariate design and hazard scenario concepts and introduce a novel copula‐based weighted average threshold scenario for an expected event with multiple drivers. The model can be used for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. The proposed model offers uncertainty ranges of most likely compound hazards using Bayesian inference. We show that the uncertainty ranges of design quantiles might be large and may differ significantly from one copula model to the other. We also demonstrate that the choice of marginal and copula functions may profoundly impact the multihazard design values. A robust analysis should account for these uncertainties within and between multivariate models that translate into multihazard design quantiles.
Plain Language Summary
Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers, leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. Hurricane Harvey, with more than 100 fatalities, is an example of concurrent hazards (extreme precipitation and storm surge); and recent mudslide in California, with a death toll of 20 people in Montecito, CA, is an example of consecutive hazards (significant precipitation a few weeks after the Thomas wildfire). In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we present a general framework for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. This framework also quantifies the underlying uncertainties of multihazard scenarios and employs an ensemble of univariate and multivariate models for robust risk assessment.
Key Points
We present a framework for multivariate analysis of natural hazards driven by multiple forcings
The choice of marginal probability distribution and copula can significantly influence design and hazard scenarios
Bayesian approach for parameter estimation illuminates the uncertainties of different multihazard scenarios |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018GL077317 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2059129351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2059129351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4102-2a845412413867b7b8e8815402208ba0fe46aa7cd5aa92fe9b998e084fff32fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1OwzAUBWALgUQpbDyAJVYC19dObQ8MVdUWpCAkfmbLSW2RKo2LnQDl6QkqAxPTvcOno6NDyDmDKwaorxGYWhYgJWfygIyYFiJTAPKQjAD08KOcHJOTlNYAwIGzEbm575uufrVfNq7oU-VaG-uQqA-RTlvb7FKdaPB0Fjbb0LcrOv_sots4On93bZdOyZG3TXJnv3dMXhbz59ltVjws72bTIrNiKJahVSIXDAXjaiJLWSqnFMsFIIIqLXgnJtbKapVbq9E7XWqtHCjhvefoKz4mF_vcbQxvvUudWYc-Dv2SQcg1Q81zNqjLvapiSCk6b7ax3ti4MwzMz0Dm70ADxz3_qBu3-9ea5WORS4HIvwEbdWVC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2059129351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Sadegh, Mojtaba ; Moftakhari, Hamed ; Gupta, Hoshin V. ; Ragno, Elisa ; Mazdiyasni, Omid ; Sanders, Brett ; Matthew, Richard ; AghaKouchak, Amir</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadegh, Mojtaba ; Moftakhari, Hamed ; Gupta, Hoshin V. ; Ragno, Elisa ; Mazdiyasni, Omid ; Sanders, Brett ; Matthew, Richard ; AghaKouchak, Amir</creatorcontrib><description>Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers (e.g., ocean and fluvial flooding, drought, and heat waves) leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we review the existing multivariate design and hazard scenario concepts and introduce a novel copula‐based weighted average threshold scenario for an expected event with multiple drivers. The model can be used for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. The proposed model offers uncertainty ranges of most likely compound hazards using Bayesian inference. We show that the uncertainty ranges of design quantiles might be large and may differ significantly from one copula model to the other. We also demonstrate that the choice of marginal and copula functions may profoundly impact the multihazard design values. A robust analysis should account for these uncertainties within and between multivariate models that translate into multihazard design quantiles.
Plain Language Summary
Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers, leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. Hurricane Harvey, with more than 100 fatalities, is an example of concurrent hazards (extreme precipitation and storm surge); and recent mudslide in California, with a death toll of 20 people in Montecito, CA, is an example of consecutive hazards (significant precipitation a few weeks after the Thomas wildfire). In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we present a general framework for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. This framework also quantifies the underlying uncertainties of multihazard scenarios and employs an ensemble of univariate and multivariate models for robust risk assessment.
Key Points
We present a framework for multivariate analysis of natural hazards driven by multiple forcings
The choice of marginal probability distribution and copula can significantly influence design and hazard scenarios
Bayesian approach for parameter estimation illuminates the uncertainties of different multihazard scenarios</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018GL077317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian inference ; compound extremes ; copula ; Design ; Design analysis ; Drought ; Extreme weather ; Fatalities ; Flooding ; Frameworks ; Hazards ; Heat waves ; Heatwaves ; Hurricanes ; Infrastructure ; Mathematical models ; Mudflows ; Mudslides ; multihazard scenario ; Precipitation ; Probability theory ; Quantiles ; Risk assessment ; Statistical inference ; Storm surges ; Storms ; Uncertainty ; uncertainty assessment ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2018-06, Vol.45 (11), p.5470-5480</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4102-2a845412413867b7b8e8815402208ba0fe46aa7cd5aa92fe9b998e084fff32fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4102-2a845412413867b7b8e8815402208ba0fe46aa7cd5aa92fe9b998e084fff32fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1775-5445 ; 0000-0003-3170-8653 ; 0000-0003-1107-1384 ; 0000-0002-6603-2502 ; 0000-0003-4689-8357 ; 0000-0001-9855-2839</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018GL077317$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018GL077317$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadegh, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moftakhari, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Hoshin V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragno, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazdiyasni, Omid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthew, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AghaKouchak, Amir</creatorcontrib><title>Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers (e.g., ocean and fluvial flooding, drought, and heat waves) leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we review the existing multivariate design and hazard scenario concepts and introduce a novel copula‐based weighted average threshold scenario for an expected event with multiple drivers. The model can be used for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. The proposed model offers uncertainty ranges of most likely compound hazards using Bayesian inference. We show that the uncertainty ranges of design quantiles might be large and may differ significantly from one copula model to the other. We also demonstrate that the choice of marginal and copula functions may profoundly impact the multihazard design values. A robust analysis should account for these uncertainties within and between multivariate models that translate into multihazard design quantiles.
Plain Language Summary
Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers, leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. Hurricane Harvey, with more than 100 fatalities, is an example of concurrent hazards (extreme precipitation and storm surge); and recent mudslide in California, with a death toll of 20 people in Montecito, CA, is an example of consecutive hazards (significant precipitation a few weeks after the Thomas wildfire). In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we present a general framework for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. This framework also quantifies the underlying uncertainties of multihazard scenarios and employs an ensemble of univariate and multivariate models for robust risk assessment.
Key Points
We present a framework for multivariate analysis of natural hazards driven by multiple forcings
The choice of marginal probability distribution and copula can significantly influence design and hazard scenarios
Bayesian approach for parameter estimation illuminates the uncertainties of different multihazard scenarios</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian inference</subject><subject>compound extremes</subject><subject>copula</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Heat waves</subject><subject>Heatwaves</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mudflows</subject><subject>Mudslides</subject><subject>multihazard scenario</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Quantiles</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Statistical inference</subject><subject>Storm surges</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>uncertainty assessment</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90L1OwzAUBWALgUQpbDyAJVYC19dObQ8MVdUWpCAkfmbLSW2RKo2LnQDl6QkqAxPTvcOno6NDyDmDKwaorxGYWhYgJWfygIyYFiJTAPKQjAD08KOcHJOTlNYAwIGzEbm575uufrVfNq7oU-VaG-uQqA-RTlvb7FKdaPB0Fjbb0LcrOv_sots4On93bZdOyZG3TXJnv3dMXhbz59ltVjws72bTIrNiKJahVSIXDAXjaiJLWSqnFMsFIIIqLXgnJtbKapVbq9E7XWqtHCjhvefoKz4mF_vcbQxvvUudWYc-Dv2SQcg1Q81zNqjLvapiSCk6b7ax3ti4MwzMz0Dm70ADxz3_qBu3-9ea5WORS4HIvwEbdWVC</recordid><startdate>20180616</startdate><enddate>20180616</enddate><creator>Sadegh, Mojtaba</creator><creator>Moftakhari, Hamed</creator><creator>Gupta, Hoshin V.</creator><creator>Ragno, Elisa</creator><creator>Mazdiyasni, Omid</creator><creator>Sanders, Brett</creator><creator>Matthew, Richard</creator><creator>AghaKouchak, Amir</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-5445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-8653</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-1384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-2502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-8357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-2839</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180616</creationdate><title>Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events</title><author>Sadegh, Mojtaba ; Moftakhari, Hamed ; Gupta, Hoshin V. ; Ragno, Elisa ; Mazdiyasni, Omid ; Sanders, Brett ; Matthew, Richard ; AghaKouchak, Amir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4102-2a845412413867b7b8e8815402208ba0fe46aa7cd5aa92fe9b998e084fff32fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian inference</topic><topic>compound extremes</topic><topic>copula</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Heat waves</topic><topic>Heatwaves</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mudflows</topic><topic>Mudslides</topic><topic>multihazard scenario</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Quantiles</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Statistical inference</topic><topic>Storm surges</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>uncertainty assessment</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadegh, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moftakhari, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Hoshin V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragno, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazdiyasni, Omid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthew, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AghaKouchak, Amir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadegh, Mojtaba</au><au>Moftakhari, Hamed</au><au>Gupta, Hoshin V.</au><au>Ragno, Elisa</au><au>Mazdiyasni, Omid</au><au>Sanders, Brett</au><au>Matthew, Richard</au><au>AghaKouchak, Amir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2018-06-16</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5470</spage><epage>5480</epage><pages>5470-5480</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers (e.g., ocean and fluvial flooding, drought, and heat waves) leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we review the existing multivariate design and hazard scenario concepts and introduce a novel copula‐based weighted average threshold scenario for an expected event with multiple drivers. The model can be used for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. The proposed model offers uncertainty ranges of most likely compound hazards using Bayesian inference. We show that the uncertainty ranges of design quantiles might be large and may differ significantly from one copula model to the other. We also demonstrate that the choice of marginal and copula functions may profoundly impact the multihazard design values. A robust analysis should account for these uncertainties within and between multivariate models that translate into multihazard design quantiles.
Plain Language Summary
Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers, leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. Hurricane Harvey, with more than 100 fatalities, is an example of concurrent hazards (extreme precipitation and storm surge); and recent mudslide in California, with a death toll of 20 people in Montecito, CA, is an example of consecutive hazards (significant precipitation a few weeks after the Thomas wildfire). In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenarios of extremes and compound events are ignored. In this paper, we present a general framework for obtaining multihazard design and risk assessment scenarios and their corresponding likelihoods. This framework also quantifies the underlying uncertainties of multihazard scenarios and employs an ensemble of univariate and multivariate models for robust risk assessment.
Key Points
We present a framework for multivariate analysis of natural hazards driven by multiple forcings
The choice of marginal probability distribution and copula can significantly influence design and hazard scenarios
Bayesian approach for parameter estimation illuminates the uncertainties of different multihazard scenarios</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018GL077317</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-5445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-8653</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-1384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-2502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-8357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-2839</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2018-06, Vol.45 (11), p.5470-5480 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2059129351 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Bayesian inference compound extremes copula Design Design analysis Drought Extreme weather Fatalities Flooding Frameworks Hazards Heat waves Heatwaves Hurricanes Infrastructure Mathematical models Mudflows Mudslides multihazard scenario Precipitation Probability theory Quantiles Risk assessment Statistical inference Storm surges Storms Uncertainty uncertainty assessment Wildfires |
title | Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A27%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multihazard%20Scenarios%20for%20Analysis%20of%20Compound%20Extreme%20Events&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Sadegh,%20Mojtaba&rft.date=2018-06-16&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5470&rft.epage=5480&rft.pages=5470-5480&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018GL077317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2059129351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2059129351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |