Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability

This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public administration review 2018-07, Vol.78 (4), p.556-566
Hauptverfasser: Yi, Hongtao, Ramaswami, Anu, Suo, Liming, Feiock, Richard C., Shen, Ruowen, Zhang, Jiasheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 566
container_issue 4
container_start_page 556
container_title Public administration review
container_volume 78
creator Yi, Hongtao
Ramaswami, Anu
Suo, Liming
Feiock, Richard C.
Shen, Ruowen
Zhang, Jiasheng
description This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/puar.12799
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2058913190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26648980</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26648980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs6Pi3eh4E3ozHeT4xh-DAbKdOCtpGkqGV0yk3Sy_97Oqngyl0Dyex94HwAuEByj_txsOhXGCBdSHoARYhTmHCN4CEYQEpITwvAxOIlxBSHCiIoReF2YN-udarN7vzXBKadNplydzVxMNnVp-Jz6tjU62a3JJnr_ljU-ZLdua4N3a-NSb567mJR1qrKtTbszcNSoNprz7_sULO9uX6YP-fzxfjadzHNNqZS5kBWhvGCUCYOJxkzXHFVVUSFUFUwXnDACK2gwJTU3GtZU0FpTxgqoG9k05BRcDbmb4N87E1O58l2_RxtLDJmQiCAJe3U9KB18jME05SbYtQq7EsFy31y5b678aq7H2YCN9s7GP5RKLDhjpCdoIB-2Nbt_wsqn5WTxE3s5zKxi8uF3BnNOhRSQfAI32YVx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058913190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Yi, Hongtao ; Ramaswami, Anu ; Suo, Liming ; Feiock, Richard C. ; Shen, Ruowen ; Zhang, Jiasheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yi, Hongtao ; Ramaswami, Anu ; Suo, Liming ; Feiock, Richard C. ; Shen, Ruowen ; Zhang, Jiasheng</creatorcontrib><description>This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/puar.12799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Cities ; Collaboration ; Collective action ; Cooperation ; Economic conditions ; Governance ; Heterogeneity ; Local authorities ; Regional government ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2018-07, Vol.78 (4), p.556-566</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>2017 by The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>2018 by The American Society for Public Administration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26648980$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26648980$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yi, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaswami, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suo, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feiock, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Ruowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiasheng</creatorcontrib><title>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Local authorities</subject><subject>Regional government</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs6Pi3eh4E3ozHeT4xh-DAbKdOCtpGkqGV0yk3Sy_97Oqngyl0Dyex94HwAuEByj_txsOhXGCBdSHoARYhTmHCN4CEYQEpITwvAxOIlxBSHCiIoReF2YN-udarN7vzXBKadNplydzVxMNnVp-Jz6tjU62a3JJnr_ljU-ZLdua4N3a-NSb567mJR1qrKtTbszcNSoNprz7_sULO9uX6YP-fzxfjadzHNNqZS5kBWhvGCUCYOJxkzXHFVVUSFUFUwXnDACK2gwJTU3GtZU0FpTxgqoG9k05BRcDbmb4N87E1O58l2_RxtLDJmQiCAJe3U9KB18jME05SbYtQq7EsFy31y5b678aq7H2YCN9s7GP5RKLDhjpCdoIB-2Nbt_wsqn5WTxE3s5zKxi8uF3BnNOhRSQfAI32YVx</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Yi, Hongtao</creator><creator>Ramaswami, Anu</creator><creator>Suo, Liming</creator><creator>Feiock, Richard C.</creator><creator>Shen, Ruowen</creator><creator>Zhang, Jiasheng</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</title><author>Yi, Hongtao ; Ramaswami, Anu ; Suo, Liming ; Feiock, Richard C. ; Shen, Ruowen ; Zhang, Jiasheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Local authorities</topic><topic>Regional government</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yi, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaswami, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suo, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feiock, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Ruowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiasheng</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yi, Hongtao</au><au>Ramaswami, Anu</au><au>Suo, Liming</au><au>Feiock, Richard C.</au><au>Shen, Ruowen</au><au>Zhang, Jiasheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>556-566</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><abstract>This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/puar.12799</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3352
ispartof Public administration review, 2018-07, Vol.78 (4), p.556-566
issn 0033-3352
1540-6210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2058913190
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals; Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Agreements
Cities
Collaboration
Collective action
Cooperation
Economic conditions
Governance
Heterogeneity
Local authorities
Regional government
Research Article
title Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A08%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20Governance%20and%20Institutional%20Collective%20Action%20for%20Environmental%20Sustainability&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Yi,%20Hongtao&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=556-566&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/puar.12799&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26648980%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058913190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26648980&rfr_iscdi=true