Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability
This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration review 2018-07, Vol.78 (4), p.556-566 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 566 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 556 |
container_title | Public administration review |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Yi, Hongtao Ramaswami, Anu Suo, Liming Feiock, Richard C. Shen, Ruowen Zhang, Jiasheng |
description | This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/puar.12799 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2058913190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26648980</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26648980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs6Pi3eh4E3ozHeT4xh-DAbKdOCtpGkqGV0yk3Sy_97Oqngyl0Dyex94HwAuEByj_txsOhXGCBdSHoARYhTmHCN4CEYQEpITwvAxOIlxBSHCiIoReF2YN-udarN7vzXBKadNplydzVxMNnVp-Jz6tjU62a3JJnr_ljU-ZLdua4N3a-NSb567mJR1qrKtTbszcNSoNprz7_sULO9uX6YP-fzxfjadzHNNqZS5kBWhvGCUCYOJxkzXHFVVUSFUFUwXnDACK2gwJTU3GtZU0FpTxgqoG9k05BRcDbmb4N87E1O58l2_RxtLDJmQiCAJe3U9KB18jME05SbYtQq7EsFy31y5b678aq7H2YCN9s7GP5RKLDhjpCdoIB-2Nbt_wsqn5WTxE3s5zKxi8uF3BnNOhRSQfAI32YVx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058913190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Yi, Hongtao ; Ramaswami, Anu ; Suo, Liming ; Feiock, Richard C. ; Shen, Ruowen ; Zhang, Jiasheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yi, Hongtao ; Ramaswami, Anu ; Suo, Liming ; Feiock, Richard C. ; Shen, Ruowen ; Zhang, Jiasheng</creatorcontrib><description>This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/puar.12799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Cities ; Collaboration ; Collective action ; Cooperation ; Economic conditions ; Governance ; Heterogeneity ; Local authorities ; Regional government ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2018-07, Vol.78 (4), p.556-566</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>2017 by The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>2018 by The American Society for Public Administration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26648980$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26648980$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yi, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaswami, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suo, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feiock, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Ruowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiasheng</creatorcontrib><title>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Local authorities</subject><subject>Regional government</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs6Pi3eh4E3ozHeT4xh-DAbKdOCtpGkqGV0yk3Sy_97Oqngyl0Dyex94HwAuEByj_txsOhXGCBdSHoARYhTmHCN4CEYQEpITwvAxOIlxBSHCiIoReF2YN-udarN7vzXBKadNplydzVxMNnVp-Jz6tjU62a3JJnr_ljU-ZLdua4N3a-NSb567mJR1qrKtTbszcNSoNprz7_sULO9uX6YP-fzxfjadzHNNqZS5kBWhvGCUCYOJxkzXHFVVUSFUFUwXnDACK2gwJTU3GtZU0FpTxgqoG9k05BRcDbmb4N87E1O58l2_RxtLDJmQiCAJe3U9KB18jME05SbYtQq7EsFy31y5b678aq7H2YCN9s7GP5RKLDhjpCdoIB-2Nbt_wsqn5WTxE3s5zKxi8uF3BnNOhRSQfAI32YVx</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Yi, Hongtao</creator><creator>Ramaswami, Anu</creator><creator>Suo, Liming</creator><creator>Feiock, Richard C.</creator><creator>Shen, Ruowen</creator><creator>Zhang, Jiasheng</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</title><author>Yi, Hongtao ; Ramaswami, Anu ; Suo, Liming ; Feiock, Richard C. ; Shen, Ruowen ; Zhang, Jiasheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-89b34675458e23c25cd61bb7b11b75c763530b0e243d6ec0d484dc45570cf9ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Local authorities</topic><topic>Regional government</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yi, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaswami, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suo, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feiock, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Ruowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiasheng</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yi, Hongtao</au><au>Ramaswami, Anu</au><au>Suo, Liming</au><au>Feiock, Richard C.</au><au>Shen, Ruowen</au><au>Zhang, Jiasheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>556-566</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><abstract>This research investigates why various mechanisms of cooperation among local authorities are chosen using the theoretical lens of institutional collective action (ICA). The article analyzes 564 local collaboration agreements drawn from four urban regions of China to explain the choices of environmental collaboration agreements among cities. Examples of three forms of interlocal agreements—informal, formal, and imposed agreements—are analyzed. Ordinal logistic regressions are estimated to test which factors predicted by the ICA framework influence the form of collaboration selected. The results indicate that the involvement of national or provincial government, the number of policy actors involved, heterogeneity of economic conditions, and differences in administrative level among the actors involved influence how collaboration agreements are structured. Examining the choice of agreement type contributes to the understanding of interlocal collaboration and provides practical insights for public managers to structure interlocal collaboration.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/puar.12799</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3352 |
ispartof | Public administration review, 2018-07, Vol.78 (4), p.556-566 |
issn | 0033-3352 1540-6210 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2058913190 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals; Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Agreements Cities Collaboration Collective action Cooperation Economic conditions Governance Heterogeneity Local authorities Regional government Research Article |
title | Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A08%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20Governance%20and%20Institutional%20Collective%20Action%20for%20Environmental%20Sustainability&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Yi,%20Hongtao&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=556-566&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/puar.12799&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26648980%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058913190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26648980&rfr_iscdi=true |