Interaction between U/UO^sub 2^ bilayers and hydrogen studied by in-situ X-ray diffraction

This paper reports experiments investigating the reaction of H2 with uranium metal-oxide bilayers. The bilayers consist of ≤ 100 nm of epitaxial α-U (grown on a Nb buffer deposited on sapphire) with a UO2 overlayer of thicknesses of between 20 and 80 nm. The oxides were made either by depositing via...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear materials 2018-04, Vol.502, p.9
Hauptverfasser: Darnbrough, JE, Harker, RM, Griffiths, I, Wermeille, D, Lander, GH, Springell, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 9
container_title Journal of nuclear materials
container_volume 502
creator Darnbrough, JE
Harker, RM
Griffiths, I
Wermeille, D
Lander, GH
Springell, R
description This paper reports experiments investigating the reaction of H2 with uranium metal-oxide bilayers. The bilayers consist of ≤ 100 nm of epitaxial α-U (grown on a Nb buffer deposited on sapphire) with a UO2 overlayer of thicknesses of between 20 and 80 nm. The oxides were made either by depositing via reactive magnetron sputtering, or allowing the uranium metal to oxidise in air at room temperature. The bilayers were exposed to hydrogen, with sample temperatures between 80 and 200 C, and monitored via in-situ x-ray diffraction and complimentary experiments conducted using Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy - Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (STEM-EELS). Small partial pressures of H2 caused rapid consumption of the U metal and lead to changes in the intensity and position of the diffraction peaks from both the UO2 overlayers and the U metal. There is an orientational dependence in the rate of U consumption. From changes in the lattice parameter we deduce that hydrogen enters both the oxide and metal layers, contracting the oxide and expanding the metal. The air-grown oxide overlayers appear to hinder the H2-reaction up to a threshold dose, but then on heating from 80 to 140 C the consumption is more rapid than for the as-deposited overlayers. STEM-EELS establishes that the U-hydride layer lies at the oxide-metal interface, and that the initial formation is at defects or grain boundaries, and involves the formation of amorphous and/or nanocrystalline UH3. This explains why no diffraction peaks from UH3 are observed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2058645247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2058645247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20586452473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjL0KwjAYAIMoWH_e4QPnYJo2ts6i6ORiQRxaEpNqSkk1P0jf3g4-gNMNd9wIRXGeJTjNKRmjiBBKcRLHbIpmzjWEELYlLEK3k_HK8rvXnQGh_EcpA8W6OJcuCKAlCN3yXlkH3Eh49tJ2j6FwPkitJIgetMFO-wBXbHkPUtf1b7dAk5q3Ti1_nKPVYX_ZHfHLdu-gnK-aLlgzqIoSlm9SRtMs-a_6AvMDQ28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058645247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction between U/UO^sub 2^ bilayers and hydrogen studied by in-situ X-ray diffraction</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Darnbrough, JE ; Harker, RM ; Griffiths, I ; Wermeille, D ; Lander, GH ; Springell, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Darnbrough, JE ; Harker, RM ; Griffiths, I ; Wermeille, D ; Lander, GH ; Springell, R</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports experiments investigating the reaction of H2 with uranium metal-oxide bilayers. The bilayers consist of ≤ 100 nm of epitaxial α-U (grown on a Nb buffer deposited on sapphire) with a UO2 overlayer of thicknesses of between 20 and 80 nm. The oxides were made either by depositing via reactive magnetron sputtering, or allowing the uranium metal to oxidise in air at room temperature. The bilayers were exposed to hydrogen, with sample temperatures between 80 and 200 C, and monitored via in-situ x-ray diffraction and complimentary experiments conducted using Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy - Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (STEM-EELS). Small partial pressures of H2 caused rapid consumption of the U metal and lead to changes in the intensity and position of the diffraction peaks from both the UO2 overlayers and the U metal. There is an orientational dependence in the rate of U consumption. From changes in the lattice parameter we deduce that hydrogen enters both the oxide and metal layers, contracting the oxide and expanding the metal. The air-grown oxide overlayers appear to hinder the H2-reaction up to a threshold dose, but then on heating from 80 to 140 C the consumption is more rapid than for the as-deposited overlayers. STEM-EELS establishes that the U-hydride layer lies at the oxide-metal interface, and that the initial formation is at defects or grain boundaries, and involves the formation of amorphous and/or nanocrystalline UH3. This explains why no diffraction peaks from UH3 are observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier BV</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Bilayers ; Crystal defects ; Dependence ; Electron energy ; Electron energy loss spectroscopy ; Energy loss ; Energy transmission ; Epitaxial growth ; Grain boundaries ; Hydrogen ; Magnetron sputtering ; Metal oxides ; Metals ; Nanocrystals ; Oxides ; Sapphire ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Scanning transmission electron microscopy ; Spectroscopy ; Spectrum analysis ; Temperature ; Transmission electron microscopy ; Uranium ; Uranium dioxide ; Uranium hydride ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear materials, 2018-04, Vol.502, p.9</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Darnbrough, JE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harker, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wermeille, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lander, GH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springell, R</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction between U/UO^sub 2^ bilayers and hydrogen studied by in-situ X-ray diffraction</title><title>Journal of nuclear materials</title><description>This paper reports experiments investigating the reaction of H2 with uranium metal-oxide bilayers. The bilayers consist of ≤ 100 nm of epitaxial α-U (grown on a Nb buffer deposited on sapphire) with a UO2 overlayer of thicknesses of between 20 and 80 nm. The oxides were made either by depositing via reactive magnetron sputtering, or allowing the uranium metal to oxidise in air at room temperature. The bilayers were exposed to hydrogen, with sample temperatures between 80 and 200 C, and monitored via in-situ x-ray diffraction and complimentary experiments conducted using Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy - Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (STEM-EELS). Small partial pressures of H2 caused rapid consumption of the U metal and lead to changes in the intensity and position of the diffraction peaks from both the UO2 overlayers and the U metal. There is an orientational dependence in the rate of U consumption. From changes in the lattice parameter we deduce that hydrogen enters both the oxide and metal layers, contracting the oxide and expanding the metal. The air-grown oxide overlayers appear to hinder the H2-reaction up to a threshold dose, but then on heating from 80 to 140 C the consumption is more rapid than for the as-deposited overlayers. STEM-EELS establishes that the U-hydride layer lies at the oxide-metal interface, and that the initial formation is at defects or grain boundaries, and involves the formation of amorphous and/or nanocrystalline UH3. This explains why no diffraction peaks from UH3 are observed.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Bilayers</subject><subject>Crystal defects</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Electron energy</subject><subject>Electron energy loss spectroscopy</subject><subject>Energy loss</subject><subject>Energy transmission</subject><subject>Epitaxial growth</subject><subject>Grain boundaries</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Magnetron sputtering</subject><subject>Metal oxides</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Nanocrystals</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Sapphire</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Scanning transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>Uranium</subject><subject>Uranium dioxide</subject><subject>Uranium hydride</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>0022-3115</issn><issn>1873-4820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjL0KwjAYAIMoWH_e4QPnYJo2ts6i6ORiQRxaEpNqSkk1P0jf3g4-gNMNd9wIRXGeJTjNKRmjiBBKcRLHbIpmzjWEELYlLEK3k_HK8rvXnQGh_EcpA8W6OJcuCKAlCN3yXlkH3Eh49tJ2j6FwPkitJIgetMFO-wBXbHkPUtf1b7dAk5q3Ti1_nKPVYX_ZHfHLdu-gnK-aLlgzqIoSlm9SRtMs-a_6AvMDQ28</recordid><startdate>20180415</startdate><enddate>20180415</enddate><creator>Darnbrough, JE</creator><creator>Harker, RM</creator><creator>Griffiths, I</creator><creator>Wermeille, D</creator><creator>Lander, GH</creator><creator>Springell, R</creator><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180415</creationdate><title>Interaction between U/UO^sub 2^ bilayers and hydrogen studied by in-situ X-ray diffraction</title><author>Darnbrough, JE ; Harker, RM ; Griffiths, I ; Wermeille, D ; Lander, GH ; Springell, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20586452473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Bilayers</topic><topic>Crystal defects</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Electron energy</topic><topic>Electron energy loss spectroscopy</topic><topic>Energy loss</topic><topic>Energy transmission</topic><topic>Epitaxial growth</topic><topic>Grain boundaries</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Magnetron sputtering</topic><topic>Metal oxides</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Nanocrystals</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Sapphire</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Scanning transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>Uranium</topic><topic>Uranium dioxide</topic><topic>Uranium hydride</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Darnbrough, JE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harker, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wermeille, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lander, GH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springell, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Darnbrough, JE</au><au>Harker, RM</au><au>Griffiths, I</au><au>Wermeille, D</au><au>Lander, GH</au><au>Springell, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction between U/UO^sub 2^ bilayers and hydrogen studied by in-situ X-ray diffraction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle><date>2018-04-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>502</volume><spage>9</spage><pages>9-</pages><issn>0022-3115</issn><eissn>1873-4820</eissn><abstract>This paper reports experiments investigating the reaction of H2 with uranium metal-oxide bilayers. The bilayers consist of ≤ 100 nm of epitaxial α-U (grown on a Nb buffer deposited on sapphire) with a UO2 overlayer of thicknesses of between 20 and 80 nm. The oxides were made either by depositing via reactive magnetron sputtering, or allowing the uranium metal to oxidise in air at room temperature. The bilayers were exposed to hydrogen, with sample temperatures between 80 and 200 C, and monitored via in-situ x-ray diffraction and complimentary experiments conducted using Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy - Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (STEM-EELS). Small partial pressures of H2 caused rapid consumption of the U metal and lead to changes in the intensity and position of the diffraction peaks from both the UO2 overlayers and the U metal. There is an orientational dependence in the rate of U consumption. From changes in the lattice parameter we deduce that hydrogen enters both the oxide and metal layers, contracting the oxide and expanding the metal. The air-grown oxide overlayers appear to hinder the H2-reaction up to a threshold dose, but then on heating from 80 to 140 C the consumption is more rapid than for the as-deposited overlayers. STEM-EELS establishes that the U-hydride layer lies at the oxide-metal interface, and that the initial formation is at defects or grain boundaries, and involves the formation of amorphous and/or nanocrystalline UH3. This explains why no diffraction peaks from UH3 are observed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier BV</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3115
ispartof Journal of nuclear materials, 2018-04, Vol.502, p.9
issn 0022-3115
1873-4820
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2058645247
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Air temperature
Bilayers
Crystal defects
Dependence
Electron energy
Electron energy loss spectroscopy
Energy loss
Energy transmission
Epitaxial growth
Grain boundaries
Hydrogen
Magnetron sputtering
Metal oxides
Metals
Nanocrystals
Oxides
Sapphire
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning transmission electron microscopy
Spectroscopy
Spectrum analysis
Temperature
Transmission electron microscopy
Uranium
Uranium dioxide
Uranium hydride
X-ray diffraction
title Interaction between U/UO^sub 2^ bilayers and hydrogen studied by in-situ X-ray diffraction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T17%3A11%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20between%20U/UO%5Esub%202%5E%20bilayers%20and%20hydrogen%20studied%20by%20in-situ%20X-ray%20diffraction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20materials&rft.au=Darnbrough,%20JE&rft.date=2018-04-15&rft.volume=502&rft.spage=9&rft.pages=9-&rft.issn=0022-3115&rft.eissn=1873-4820&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2058645247%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058645247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true