Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases
The implementation of socially sustainable practices in suppliers situated in challenging institutional contexts is examined using institutional theory, both in terms of how institutional pressures affect implementation and what explains the decoupling of practices from the day-to-day reality. A mul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2020-01, Vol.161 (2), p.415-442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 442 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 415 |
container_title | Journal of business ethics |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Huq, Fahian Anisul Stevenson, Mark |
description | The implementation of socially sustainable practices in suppliers situated in challenging institutional contexts is examined using institutional theory, both in terms of how institutional pressures affect implementation and what explains the decoupling of practices from the day-to-day reality. A multi-case study approach is employed based on seven apparel industry suppliers in Bangladesh. Cross-case analysis highlights the coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures on suppliers to implement socially sustainable practices. A key pressure identified that has not previously been highlighted in the literature is horizontal collaboration between buyers, which intensifies coercive pressure on suppliers and increases the consequences of non-compliance. The factors that contribute to decoupling are categorized into firm-, supply chain-, and environmentrelated factors. Further, six propositions are developed on how specific forms of institutional pressure can tackle particular decoupling factors to support implementation. The paper responds to recent calls for greater scrutiny of why and how firms decouple ethical practices and supports the development of the literature specifically on social sustainability, which lags behind that on environmental sustainability and has been largely focused on the Western buyer perspective. The findings have implications for the diffusion of ethical practices into supply chains, especially distant suppliers in very different and challenging institutional contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-018-3951-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2058282763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45278215</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45278215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ab21d90737382b4b25179d94165f6a23e6a684438d51b834d63200188c8242103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMuOFCEYhYnRxLb1AdyRGJel3KHcaXmZTibRpMc1oaroHjo0lEBNup_CV5ZKmYwrWQDJ-c754QDwGqN3GCH5PmPEOW4QVg1t6-XyBGwwl7RBopVPwQZhIRvGGXsOXuR8QnVxzDbg9-48eXu2obhwhPs4OOP9Fe7nXIwLpvcW_khmKG6wGboAu_uq23Bc6F3IxZW5uBiMh10MxV5K_gA_zc6PC3B3b2O6wkOKZ7i3DzbAz3X3cVrELs6hpGXUNHlnE-xMtvkleHYwPttXf88t-Pn1y11309x-_7brPt42A2OiNKYneGyRpJIq0rOecCzbsWVY8IMwhFphhGKMqpHjXlE2CkpQLUcNijCCEd2CN2vulOKv2eaiT3FO9R9ZE8QVUUQKWim8UkOKOSd70FNyZ5OuGiO99K7X3nWN1kvv-lI9cPXYIQaXHx2iFYoTUXO3gKxIrmI42vQ4_H-5b1fTKZeY_n0IodXAOJGKYE7_ABZHnUI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058282763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Huq, Fahian Anisul ; Stevenson, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Huq, Fahian Anisul ; Stevenson, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>The implementation of socially sustainable practices in suppliers situated in challenging institutional contexts is examined using institutional theory, both in terms of how institutional pressures affect implementation and what explains the decoupling of practices from the day-to-day reality. A multi-case study approach is employed based on seven apparel industry suppliers in Bangladesh. Cross-case analysis highlights the coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures on suppliers to implement socially sustainable practices. A key pressure identified that has not previously been highlighted in the literature is horizontal collaboration between buyers, which intensifies coercive pressure on suppliers and increases the consequences of non-compliance. The factors that contribute to decoupling are categorized into firm-, supply chain-, and environmentrelated factors. Further, six propositions are developed on how specific forms of institutional pressure can tackle particular decoupling factors to support implementation. The paper responds to recent calls for greater scrutiny of why and how firms decouple ethical practices and supports the development of the literature specifically on social sustainability, which lags behind that on environmental sustainability and has been largely focused on the Western buyer perspective. The findings have implications for the diffusion of ethical practices into supply chains, especially distant suppliers in very different and challenging institutional contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3951-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Clothing industry ; Coercion ; Compliance ; Developing countries ; Education ; Ethics ; Implementation ; Institution building ; LDCs ; Management ; Noncompliance ; Organization theory ; Original Paper ; Philosophy ; Quality of Life Research ; Scrutiny ; Social responsibility ; Social sustainability ; Suppliers ; Supply ; Sustainability ; Sustainable practices</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2020-01, Vol.161 (2), p.415-442</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Business Ethics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved. © 2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ab21d90737382b4b25179d94165f6a23e6a684438d51b834d63200188c8242103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ab21d90737382b4b25179d94165f6a23e6a684438d51b834d63200188c8242103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45278215$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45278215$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huq, Fahian Anisul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>The implementation of socially sustainable practices in suppliers situated in challenging institutional contexts is examined using institutional theory, both in terms of how institutional pressures affect implementation and what explains the decoupling of practices from the day-to-day reality. A multi-case study approach is employed based on seven apparel industry suppliers in Bangladesh. Cross-case analysis highlights the coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures on suppliers to implement socially sustainable practices. A key pressure identified that has not previously been highlighted in the literature is horizontal collaboration between buyers, which intensifies coercive pressure on suppliers and increases the consequences of non-compliance. The factors that contribute to decoupling are categorized into firm-, supply chain-, and environmentrelated factors. Further, six propositions are developed on how specific forms of institutional pressure can tackle particular decoupling factors to support implementation. The paper responds to recent calls for greater scrutiny of why and how firms decouple ethical practices and supports the development of the literature specifically on social sustainability, which lags behind that on environmental sustainability and has been largely focused on the Western buyer perspective. The findings have implications for the diffusion of ethical practices into supply chains, especially distant suppliers in very different and challenging institutional contexts.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Clothing industry</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Institution building</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Noncompliance</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Scrutiny</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable practices</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMuOFCEYhYnRxLb1AdyRGJel3KHcaXmZTibRpMc1oaroHjo0lEBNup_CV5ZKmYwrWQDJ-c754QDwGqN3GCH5PmPEOW4QVg1t6-XyBGwwl7RBopVPwQZhIRvGGXsOXuR8QnVxzDbg9-48eXu2obhwhPs4OOP9Fe7nXIwLpvcW_khmKG6wGboAu_uq23Bc6F3IxZW5uBiMh10MxV5K_gA_zc6PC3B3b2O6wkOKZ7i3DzbAz3X3cVrELs6hpGXUNHlnE-xMtvkleHYwPttXf88t-Pn1y11309x-_7brPt42A2OiNKYneGyRpJIq0rOecCzbsWVY8IMwhFphhGKMqpHjXlE2CkpQLUcNijCCEd2CN2vulOKv2eaiT3FO9R9ZE8QVUUQKWim8UkOKOSd70FNyZ5OuGiO99K7X3nWN1kvv-lI9cPXYIQaXHx2iFYoTUXO3gKxIrmI42vQ4_H-5b1fTKZeY_n0IodXAOJGKYE7_ABZHnUI</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Huq, Fahian Anisul</creator><creator>Stevenson, Mark</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases</title><author>Huq, Fahian Anisul ; Stevenson, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ab21d90737382b4b25179d94165f6a23e6a684438d51b834d63200188c8242103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Clothing industry</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Institution building</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Noncompliance</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Scrutiny</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable practices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huq, Fahian Anisul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huq, Fahian Anisul</au><au>Stevenson, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>415-442</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>The implementation of socially sustainable practices in suppliers situated in challenging institutional contexts is examined using institutional theory, both in terms of how institutional pressures affect implementation and what explains the decoupling of practices from the day-to-day reality. A multi-case study approach is employed based on seven apparel industry suppliers in Bangladesh. Cross-case analysis highlights the coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures on suppliers to implement socially sustainable practices. A key pressure identified that has not previously been highlighted in the literature is horizontal collaboration between buyers, which intensifies coercive pressure on suppliers and increases the consequences of non-compliance. The factors that contribute to decoupling are categorized into firm-, supply chain-, and environmentrelated factors. Further, six propositions are developed on how specific forms of institutional pressure can tackle particular decoupling factors to support implementation. The paper responds to recent calls for greater scrutiny of why and how firms decouple ethical practices and supports the development of the literature specifically on social sustainability, which lags behind that on environmental sustainability and has been largely focused on the Western buyer perspective. The findings have implications for the diffusion of ethical practices into supply chains, especially distant suppliers in very different and challenging institutional contexts.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-018-3951-x</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2020-01, Vol.161 (2), p.415-442 |
issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2058282763 |
source | PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source; JSTOR; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Business and Management Business Ethics Clothing industry Coercion Compliance Developing countries Education Ethics Implementation Institution building LDCs Management Noncompliance Organization theory Original Paper Philosophy Quality of Life Research Scrutiny Social responsibility Social sustainability Suppliers Supply Sustainability Sustainable practices |
title | Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A16%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20Socially%20Sustainable%20Practices%20in%20Challenging%20Institutional%20Contexts:%20Building%20Theory%20from%20Seven%20Developing%20Country%20Supplier%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Huq,%20Fahian%20Anisul&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=415-442&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-018-3951-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45278215%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058282763&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45278215&rfr_iscdi=true |