The Gravitational Stability of Lenses in Magma Mushes: Confined Rayleigh‐Taylor Instabilities
In the current paradigm, magma primarily exists in the crust as a crystalline mush containing distributed melt lenses. If a melt‐rich (or fluid) lens is less dense than the overlying mush, then Rayleigh‐Taylor (RT) instabilities will develop and could evolve into spheroids of ascending melt. Due to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2018-05, Vol.123 (5), p.3593-3607 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3607 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 3593 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Seropian, G. Rust, A. C. Sparks, R. S. J. |
description | In the current paradigm, magma primarily exists in the crust as a crystalline mush containing distributed melt lenses. If a melt‐rich (or fluid) lens is less dense than the overlying mush, then Rayleigh‐Taylor (RT) instabilities will develop and could evolve into spheroids of ascending melt. Due to contrasting melt‐mush rheologies, the theoretical RT instability wavelength can be orders of magnitude larger than the magmatic system. We explored how this confinement affects the gravitational stability of melt lenses through laboratory experiments with pairs of liquids with one layer much thinner and up to 2.2·105 times less viscous than the other; we extended the viscosity ratio to 106 with linear stability analysis. We found the growth rate of a bounded RT instability is approximately
ΔρgD6πμ2, where Δρ is the difference in density between the fluids, g is gravity, D is the container diameter, and μ2 is the viscosity of the thicker viscous layer. This differs from the unbounded case, where the growth rate also depends on the thickness and viscosity of the thin, low‐viscosity layer. Applying the results to melt lenses in magmatic mushes, we find that for the ranges of expected rheologies, the timescales for development of the instability, and the volumes of packets of rising melt generated span very wide ranges. They are comparable with the frequencies and sizes of volcanic eruptions and episodes of unrest and so suggest that RT instabilities in mush systems can cause episodic volcanism.
Key Points
Melt‐mush Rayleigh‐Taylor instabilities are generally laterally confined, which reduces the growth rate
The confined instability growth rate only depends on the mush viscosity, melt lens diameter, and density difference
Mush rheology is a key control on size and frequency of eruptions related to buoyancy instabilities |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018JB015523 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2057474378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2057474378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3684-3a744f8eda9310887225768de229f3b67470d9b56c80deee427cd255edbb66783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OwkAQxhujiQS5-QCbeLW6_3frTYgiBGKCeN5s6RSWlBZ3i6Y3H8Fn9EmsQown5zJfJr_5MvNF0TnBVwTT5Jpiosd9TISg7CjqUCKTOGFCHv9qwk6jXghr3JZuR4R3IjNfARp6--pqW7uqtAV6qm3qClc3qMrRBMoAAbkSTe1yY9F0F1YQbtCgKnNXQoZmtinALVef7x_zVlYejcpwcHAQzqKT3BYBeofejZ7v7-aDh3jyOBwNbiexZVLzmFnFea4hs-2ZWGtFqVBSZ0BpkrNUKq5wlqRCLjTOAIBTtcioEJClqZRKs250sffd-uplB6E262rn23eCoVi065z9UJd7auGrEDzkZuvdxvrGEGy-UzR_U2xxtsffXAHNv6wZD2d9QZXm7At4-HNW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2057474378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Gravitational Stability of Lenses in Magma Mushes: Confined Rayleigh‐Taylor Instabilities</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Seropian, G. ; Rust, A. C. ; Sparks, R. S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seropian, G. ; Rust, A. C. ; Sparks, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>In the current paradigm, magma primarily exists in the crust as a crystalline mush containing distributed melt lenses. If a melt‐rich (or fluid) lens is less dense than the overlying mush, then Rayleigh‐Taylor (RT) instabilities will develop and could evolve into spheroids of ascending melt. Due to contrasting melt‐mush rheologies, the theoretical RT instability wavelength can be orders of magnitude larger than the magmatic system. We explored how this confinement affects the gravitational stability of melt lenses through laboratory experiments with pairs of liquids with one layer much thinner and up to 2.2·105 times less viscous than the other; we extended the viscosity ratio to 106 with linear stability analysis. We found the growth rate of a bounded RT instability is approximately
ΔρgD6πμ2, where Δρ is the difference in density between the fluids, g is gravity, D is the container diameter, and μ2 is the viscosity of the thicker viscous layer. This differs from the unbounded case, where the growth rate also depends on the thickness and viscosity of the thin, low‐viscosity layer. Applying the results to melt lenses in magmatic mushes, we find that for the ranges of expected rheologies, the timescales for development of the instability, and the volumes of packets of rising melt generated span very wide ranges. They are comparable with the frequencies and sizes of volcanic eruptions and episodes of unrest and so suggest that RT instabilities in mush systems can cause episodic volcanism.
Key Points
Melt‐mush Rayleigh‐Taylor instabilities are generally laterally confined, which reduces the growth rate
The confined instability growth rate only depends on the mush viscosity, melt lens diameter, and density difference
Mush rheology is a key control on size and frequency of eruptions related to buoyancy instabilities</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JB015523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>crystal mush ; Fluids ; Geophysics ; Gravitation ; Gravity ; Growth rate ; Instability ; Laboratory experiments ; Lava ; Lenses ; Liquids ; Magma ; magma transport ; magmatic system ; melt layer ; Rayleigh‐Taylor ; Rheological properties ; Spheroids ; Stability ; Stability analysis ; Viscosity ; Viscosity ratio ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanic eruptions ; Volcanism ; Wavelength</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2018-05, Vol.123 (5), p.3593-3607</ispartof><rights>2018. The Authors.</rights><rights>2018. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3684-3a744f8eda9310887225768de229f3b67470d9b56c80deee427cd255edbb66783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3684-3a744f8eda9310887225768de229f3b67470d9b56c80deee427cd255edbb66783</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1885-4763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JB015523$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JB015523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seropian, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Gravitational Stability of Lenses in Magma Mushes: Confined Rayleigh‐Taylor Instabilities</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>In the current paradigm, magma primarily exists in the crust as a crystalline mush containing distributed melt lenses. If a melt‐rich (or fluid) lens is less dense than the overlying mush, then Rayleigh‐Taylor (RT) instabilities will develop and could evolve into spheroids of ascending melt. Due to contrasting melt‐mush rheologies, the theoretical RT instability wavelength can be orders of magnitude larger than the magmatic system. We explored how this confinement affects the gravitational stability of melt lenses through laboratory experiments with pairs of liquids with one layer much thinner and up to 2.2·105 times less viscous than the other; we extended the viscosity ratio to 106 with linear stability analysis. We found the growth rate of a bounded RT instability is approximately
ΔρgD6πμ2, where Δρ is the difference in density between the fluids, g is gravity, D is the container diameter, and μ2 is the viscosity of the thicker viscous layer. This differs from the unbounded case, where the growth rate also depends on the thickness and viscosity of the thin, low‐viscosity layer. Applying the results to melt lenses in magmatic mushes, we find that for the ranges of expected rheologies, the timescales for development of the instability, and the volumes of packets of rising melt generated span very wide ranges. They are comparable with the frequencies and sizes of volcanic eruptions and episodes of unrest and so suggest that RT instabilities in mush systems can cause episodic volcanism.
Key Points
Melt‐mush Rayleigh‐Taylor instabilities are generally laterally confined, which reduces the growth rate
The confined instability growth rate only depends on the mush viscosity, melt lens diameter, and density difference
Mush rheology is a key control on size and frequency of eruptions related to buoyancy instabilities</description><subject>crystal mush</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Instability</subject><subject>Laboratory experiments</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Liquids</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>magma transport</subject><subject>magmatic system</subject><subject>melt layer</subject><subject>Rayleigh‐Taylor</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Spheroids</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><subject>Viscosity ratio</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>Volcanism</subject><subject>Wavelength</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9OwkAQxhujiQS5-QCbeLW6_3frTYgiBGKCeN5s6RSWlBZ3i6Y3H8Fn9EmsQown5zJfJr_5MvNF0TnBVwTT5Jpiosd9TISg7CjqUCKTOGFCHv9qwk6jXghr3JZuR4R3IjNfARp6--pqW7uqtAV6qm3qClc3qMrRBMoAAbkSTe1yY9F0F1YQbtCgKnNXQoZmtinALVef7x_zVlYejcpwcHAQzqKT3BYBeofejZ7v7-aDh3jyOBwNbiexZVLzmFnFea4hs-2ZWGtFqVBSZ0BpkrNUKq5wlqRCLjTOAIBTtcioEJClqZRKs250sffd-uplB6E262rn23eCoVi065z9UJd7auGrEDzkZuvdxvrGEGy-UzR_U2xxtsffXAHNv6wZD2d9QZXm7At4-HNW</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Seropian, G.</creator><creator>Rust, A. C.</creator><creator>Sparks, R. S. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-4763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>The Gravitational Stability of Lenses in Magma Mushes: Confined Rayleigh‐Taylor Instabilities</title><author>Seropian, G. ; Rust, A. C. ; Sparks, R. S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3684-3a744f8eda9310887225768de229f3b67470d9b56c80deee427cd255edbb66783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>crystal mush</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Instability</topic><topic>Laboratory experiments</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Liquids</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>magma transport</topic><topic>magmatic system</topic><topic>melt layer</topic><topic>Rayleigh‐Taylor</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Spheroids</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><topic>Viscosity ratio</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>Volcanism</topic><topic>Wavelength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seropian, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seropian, G.</au><au>Rust, A. C.</au><au>Sparks, R. S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Gravitational Stability of Lenses in Magma Mushes: Confined Rayleigh‐Taylor Instabilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3593</spage><epage>3607</epage><pages>3593-3607</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>In the current paradigm, magma primarily exists in the crust as a crystalline mush containing distributed melt lenses. If a melt‐rich (or fluid) lens is less dense than the overlying mush, then Rayleigh‐Taylor (RT) instabilities will develop and could evolve into spheroids of ascending melt. Due to contrasting melt‐mush rheologies, the theoretical RT instability wavelength can be orders of magnitude larger than the magmatic system. We explored how this confinement affects the gravitational stability of melt lenses through laboratory experiments with pairs of liquids with one layer much thinner and up to 2.2·105 times less viscous than the other; we extended the viscosity ratio to 106 with linear stability analysis. We found the growth rate of a bounded RT instability is approximately
ΔρgD6πμ2, where Δρ is the difference in density between the fluids, g is gravity, D is the container diameter, and μ2 is the viscosity of the thicker viscous layer. This differs from the unbounded case, where the growth rate also depends on the thickness and viscosity of the thin, low‐viscosity layer. Applying the results to melt lenses in magmatic mushes, we find that for the ranges of expected rheologies, the timescales for development of the instability, and the volumes of packets of rising melt generated span very wide ranges. They are comparable with the frequencies and sizes of volcanic eruptions and episodes of unrest and so suggest that RT instabilities in mush systems can cause episodic volcanism.
Key Points
Melt‐mush Rayleigh‐Taylor instabilities are generally laterally confined, which reduces the growth rate
The confined instability growth rate only depends on the mush viscosity, melt lens diameter, and density difference
Mush rheology is a key control on size and frequency of eruptions related to buoyancy instabilities</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JB015523</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-4763</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2018-05, Vol.123 (5), p.3593-3607 |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2057474378 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | crystal mush Fluids Geophysics Gravitation Gravity Growth rate Instability Laboratory experiments Lava Lenses Liquids Magma magma transport magmatic system melt layer Rayleigh‐Taylor Rheological properties Spheroids Stability Stability analysis Viscosity Viscosity ratio Volcanic activity Volcanic eruptions Volcanism Wavelength |
title | The Gravitational Stability of Lenses in Magma Mushes: Confined Rayleigh‐Taylor Instabilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A42%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Gravitational%20Stability%20of%20Lenses%20in%20Magma%20Mushes:%20Confined%20Rayleigh%E2%80%90Taylor%20Instabilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Seropian,%20G.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3593&rft.epage=3607&rft.pages=3593-3607&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JB015523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2057474378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2057474378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |