The spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner 1869) farmed in marine cages: review of growth models
The main purpose of this study was to review the growth models used in fish culture and demonstrate the benefit of using the most appropriate growth model for aquaculture studies. For this reason, another part of this study was to use a dataset from spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reviews in aquaculture 2018-06, Vol.10 (2), p.376-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 376 |
container_title | Reviews in aquaculture |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G. Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T. Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto |
description | The main purpose of this study was to review the growth models used in fish culture and demonstrate the benefit of using the most appropriate growth model for aquaculture studies. For this reason, another part of this study was to use a dataset from spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner, 1869) cultured in floating cages to determine what growth models were applicable to this species. A total of 558 weight‐at‐age data points from a commercial farm located near Nayarit, Mexico were used. The fish were cultured for 270 days in three cages of 125 m3 capacity. The initial density was 25 fish m−3, with an average weight of 2.07 ± 0.52 g. Four asymptotic models (von Bertalanffy growth model, a logistic model, the Gompertz growth model and the Ratkowsky modified model), three nonasymptotic models (exponential, power extended and persistence models) and three versions of the generalized Schnute model were selected as candidate models. The best model was selected based on the Akaike information criterion. The maximum log‐likelihood algorithm was used to parameterize the models considering a multiplicative error structure. The survival was 90%, and the average final weight was 429.84 ± 31.53 g. We concluded that the best model for describing the growth of spotted rose snapper farmed in marine floating cages was the Schnute model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/raq.12166 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2057449977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2057449977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-99d951dafa3a756d23b2509c50824005ca52c9ce4b5238b0542ec01aa312383c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAiz1sm49NsvFWil9QELWeQ5rNtlva7DbJWvrvja54cy4zwzwzw_sCcI3RGKeYeL0fY4I5PwEDLBjNGKb49K8m9BxchLBBiAsu8gFwi7WFoW1itCX0TUiN021rPbydd3GjXRfgqotRx1S8R1u7Upu1S3NccDmClfa7tFk7uNO-dhYavbLhDnr7WdsDbCq48s0hruGuKe02XIKzSm-DvfrNQ_DxcL-YPWXzl8fn2XSeGSIFz6QsJcOlrjTVgvGS0CVhSBqGCpIjxIxmxEhj8yUjtFgilhNrENaaJoUFNXQIbvq7rW_2nQ1RbZrOu_RSEcREnkspRKJGPWWS8uBtpVpfJx1HhZH6tlMlO9WPnYmd9Oyh3trj_6B6m772G1-dhnXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2057449977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner 1869) farmed in marine cages: review of growth models</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G. ; Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T. ; Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio ; Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo ; Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G. ; Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T. ; Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio ; Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo ; Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>The main purpose of this study was to review the growth models used in fish culture and demonstrate the benefit of using the most appropriate growth model for aquaculture studies. For this reason, another part of this study was to use a dataset from spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner, 1869) cultured in floating cages to determine what growth models were applicable to this species. A total of 558 weight‐at‐age data points from a commercial farm located near Nayarit, Mexico were used. The fish were cultured for 270 days in three cages of 125 m3 capacity. The initial density was 25 fish m−3, with an average weight of 2.07 ± 0.52 g. Four asymptotic models (von Bertalanffy growth model, a logistic model, the Gompertz growth model and the Ratkowsky modified model), three nonasymptotic models (exponential, power extended and persistence models) and three versions of the generalized Schnute model were selected as candidate models. The best model was selected based on the Akaike information criterion. The maximum log‐likelihood algorithm was used to parameterize the models considering a multiplicative error structure. The survival was 90%, and the average final weight was 429.84 ± 31.53 g. We concluded that the best model for describing the growth of spotted rose snapper farmed in marine floating cages was the Schnute model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-5123</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-5131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/raq.12166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Burwood: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Cages ; Capacity ; Commercial farms ; Data points ; Fish ; Fish culture ; Floating cages ; Floating structures ; Growth models ; Lutjanus guttatus ; Marine fishes ; Mathematical models ; multimodel approach ; Schnute ; von Bertalanffy ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Reviews in aquaculture, 2018-06, Vol.10 (2), p.376-384</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-99d951dafa3a756d23b2509c50824005ca52c9ce4b5238b0542ec01aa312383c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-99d951dafa3a756d23b2509c50824005ca52c9ce4b5238b0542ec01aa312383c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1043-0365</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fraq.12166$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fraq.12166$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>The spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner 1869) farmed in marine cages: review of growth models</title><title>Reviews in aquaculture</title><description>The main purpose of this study was to review the growth models used in fish culture and demonstrate the benefit of using the most appropriate growth model for aquaculture studies. For this reason, another part of this study was to use a dataset from spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner, 1869) cultured in floating cages to determine what growth models were applicable to this species. A total of 558 weight‐at‐age data points from a commercial farm located near Nayarit, Mexico were used. The fish were cultured for 270 days in three cages of 125 m3 capacity. The initial density was 25 fish m−3, with an average weight of 2.07 ± 0.52 g. Four asymptotic models (von Bertalanffy growth model, a logistic model, the Gompertz growth model and the Ratkowsky modified model), three nonasymptotic models (exponential, power extended and persistence models) and three versions of the generalized Schnute model were selected as candidate models. The best model was selected based on the Akaike information criterion. The maximum log‐likelihood algorithm was used to parameterize the models considering a multiplicative error structure. The survival was 90%, and the average final weight was 429.84 ± 31.53 g. We concluded that the best model for describing the growth of spotted rose snapper farmed in marine floating cages was the Schnute model.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Cages</subject><subject>Capacity</subject><subject>Commercial farms</subject><subject>Data points</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish culture</subject><subject>Floating cages</subject><subject>Floating structures</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Lutjanus guttatus</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>multimodel approach</subject><subject>Schnute</subject><subject>von Bertalanffy</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1753-5123</issn><issn>1753-5131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAiz1sm49NsvFWil9QELWeQ5rNtlva7DbJWvrvja54cy4zwzwzw_sCcI3RGKeYeL0fY4I5PwEDLBjNGKb49K8m9BxchLBBiAsu8gFwi7WFoW1itCX0TUiN021rPbydd3GjXRfgqotRx1S8R1u7Upu1S3NccDmClfa7tFk7uNO-dhYavbLhDnr7WdsDbCq48s0hruGuKe02XIKzSm-DvfrNQ_DxcL-YPWXzl8fn2XSeGSIFz6QsJcOlrjTVgvGS0CVhSBqGCpIjxIxmxEhj8yUjtFgilhNrENaaJoUFNXQIbvq7rW_2nQ1RbZrOu_RSEcREnkspRKJGPWWS8uBtpVpfJx1HhZH6tlMlO9WPnYmd9Oyh3trj_6B6m772G1-dhnXw</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G.</creator><creator>Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T.</creator><creator>Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio</creator><creator>Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo</creator><creator>Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1043-0365</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>The spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner 1869) farmed in marine cages: review of growth models</title><author>Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G. ; Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T. ; Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio ; Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo ; Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-99d951dafa3a756d23b2509c50824005ca52c9ce4b5238b0542ec01aa312383c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Cages</topic><topic>Capacity</topic><topic>Commercial farms</topic><topic>Data points</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish culture</topic><topic>Floating cages</topic><topic>Floating structures</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Lutjanus guttatus</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>multimodel approach</topic><topic>Schnute</topic><topic>von Bertalanffy</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Reviews in aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castillo‐Vargasmachuca, Sergio G.</au><au>Ponce‐Palafox, Jesús T.</au><au>Arámbul‐Muñoz, Eulalio</au><au>Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Guillermo</au><au>Aragón‐Noriega, Eugenio Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner 1869) farmed in marine cages: review of growth models</atitle><jtitle>Reviews in aquaculture</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>376-384</pages><issn>1753-5123</issn><eissn>1753-5131</eissn><abstract>The main purpose of this study was to review the growth models used in fish culture and demonstrate the benefit of using the most appropriate growth model for aquaculture studies. For this reason, another part of this study was to use a dataset from spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner, 1869) cultured in floating cages to determine what growth models were applicable to this species. A total of 558 weight‐at‐age data points from a commercial farm located near Nayarit, Mexico were used. The fish were cultured for 270 days in three cages of 125 m3 capacity. The initial density was 25 fish m−3, with an average weight of 2.07 ± 0.52 g. Four asymptotic models (von Bertalanffy growth model, a logistic model, the Gompertz growth model and the Ratkowsky modified model), three nonasymptotic models (exponential, power extended and persistence models) and three versions of the generalized Schnute model were selected as candidate models. The best model was selected based on the Akaike information criterion. The maximum log‐likelihood algorithm was used to parameterize the models considering a multiplicative error structure. The survival was 90%, and the average final weight was 429.84 ± 31.53 g. We concluded that the best model for describing the growth of spotted rose snapper farmed in marine floating cages was the Schnute model.</abstract><cop>Burwood</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/raq.12166</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1043-0365</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1753-5123 |
ispartof | Reviews in aquaculture, 2018-06, Vol.10 (2), p.376-384 |
issn | 1753-5123 1753-5131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2057449977 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aquaculture Cages Capacity Commercial farms Data points Fish Fish culture Floating cages Floating structures Growth models Lutjanus guttatus Marine fishes Mathematical models multimodel approach Schnute von Bertalanffy Weight |
title | The spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner 1869) farmed in marine cages: review of growth models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A13%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20spotted%20rose%20snapper%20(Lutjanus%20guttatus%20Steindachner%201869)%20farmed%20in%20marine%20cages:%20review%20of%20growth%20models&rft.jtitle=Reviews%20in%20aquaculture&rft.au=Castillo%E2%80%90Vargasmachuca,%20Sergio%20G.&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=376-384&rft.issn=1753-5123&rft.eissn=1753-5131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/raq.12166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2057449977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2057449977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |