Operation of Multiple Pumped-Water Sources with No Storage

AbstractThe cost of pumping is one of the most significant operational expenditures in a water distribution network. When a network has multiple water sources, which are associated with pumping stations, it may be possible to optimize those costs. One way to minimize costs is to determine the optima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of water resources planning and management 2018-09, Vol.144 (9)
Hauptverfasser: León-Celi, C. F, Iglesias-Rey, P. L, Martínez-Solano, F. J, Savic, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page
container_title Journal of water resources planning and management
container_volume 144
creator León-Celi, C. F
Iglesias-Rey, P. L
Martínez-Solano, F. J
Savic, D
description AbstractThe cost of pumping is one of the most significant operational expenditures in a water distribution network. When a network has multiple water sources, which are associated with pumping stations, it may be possible to optimize those costs. One way to minimize costs is to determine the optimal flow rate for each pumping station and for every point of the temporal demand curve, while keeping the energy cost minimized. This also requires that the required minimum pressure at the critical point in the network be satisfied. This paper introduces a principle known as the setpoint curve as the key component of the network optimization methodology. A direct search algorithm based on the Hooke–Jeeves approach is tested in two case studies. Two key cost factors, the electric tariff and the cost of water production, are considered for each water supply source. The model also considers the pressure-dependent consumption, which directly influences the setpoint curve. To test the methodology, a software application is implemented using the EPANET toolkit. The two case studies demonstrate the benefits of the approach in developing optimal pump operating policies which otherwise would be difficult to infer.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000971
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2056657683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2056657683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-866f27a16df150f9f11339464ce110a4d679c93059998d7d07ff0f648603e4423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMouFb_Q9CLHrYmm69Nb6XUD6hWWmWPIewmuqVt1iRL8d-7S6uenMvA8D4zwwPAJUZDjDi-vR4vJ9ObYjHEkpKUUZYNUVdS4COQ_M6OQYIEIamkkp-CsxBWXUYgliVgNG-M17F2W-gsfGrXsW7WBr60m8ZUaaGj8XDpWl-aAHd1_IDPDi6j8_rdnIMTq9fBXBz6ALzdTV8nD-lsfv84Gc9STXIW05xzmwmNeWUxQ1ZajAmRlNPSYIw0rbiQpSSISSnzSlRIWIsspzlHxFCakQG42u9tvPtsTYhq1T207U6qDDHOmeA56VKjfar0LgRvrGp8vdH-S2GkeldK9a5UsVC9F9V7UQdXHcz3sA6l-Vv_Q_4PfgPxuWt7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056657683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Operation of Multiple Pumped-Water Sources with No Storage</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>León-Celi, C. F ; Iglesias-Rey, P. L ; Martínez-Solano, F. J ; Savic, D</creator><creatorcontrib>León-Celi, C. F ; Iglesias-Rey, P. L ; Martínez-Solano, F. J ; Savic, D</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe cost of pumping is one of the most significant operational expenditures in a water distribution network. When a network has multiple water sources, which are associated with pumping stations, it may be possible to optimize those costs. One way to minimize costs is to determine the optimal flow rate for each pumping station and for every point of the temporal demand curve, while keeping the energy cost minimized. This also requires that the required minimum pressure at the critical point in the network be satisfied. This paper introduces a principle known as the setpoint curve as the key component of the network optimization methodology. A direct search algorithm based on the Hooke–Jeeves approach is tested in two case studies. Two key cost factors, the electric tariff and the cost of water production, are considered for each water supply source. The model also considers the pressure-dependent consumption, which directly influences the setpoint curve. To test the methodology, a software application is implemented using the EPANET toolkit. The two case studies demonstrate the benefits of the approach in developing optimal pump operating policies which otherwise would be difficult to infer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Cost engineering ; Costs ; Critical point ; Direct search algorithms ; Distribution management ; Expenditures ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Network management systems ; Optimization ; Policies ; Pressure ; Pressure dependence ; Pumping ; Pumping stations ; Search algorithms ; Storage ; Tariffs ; Technical Papers ; Test procedures ; Water distribution ; Water engineering ; Water resources management ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Journal of water resources planning and management, 2018-09, Vol.144 (9)</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Civil Engineers Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-866f27a16df150f9f11339464ce110a4d679c93059998d7d07ff0f648603e4423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-866f27a16df150f9f11339464ce110a4d679c93059998d7d07ff0f648603e4423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000971$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000971$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,75944,75952</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>León-Celi, C. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias-Rey, P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Solano, F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savic, D</creatorcontrib><title>Operation of Multiple Pumped-Water Sources with No Storage</title><title>Journal of water resources planning and management</title><description>AbstractThe cost of pumping is one of the most significant operational expenditures in a water distribution network. When a network has multiple water sources, which are associated with pumping stations, it may be possible to optimize those costs. One way to minimize costs is to determine the optimal flow rate for each pumping station and for every point of the temporal demand curve, while keeping the energy cost minimized. This also requires that the required minimum pressure at the critical point in the network be satisfied. This paper introduces a principle known as the setpoint curve as the key component of the network optimization methodology. A direct search algorithm based on the Hooke–Jeeves approach is tested in two case studies. Two key cost factors, the electric tariff and the cost of water production, are considered for each water supply source. The model also considers the pressure-dependent consumption, which directly influences the setpoint curve. To test the methodology, a software application is implemented using the EPANET toolkit. The two case studies demonstrate the benefits of the approach in developing optimal pump operating policies which otherwise would be difficult to infer.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Critical point</subject><subject>Direct search algorithms</subject><subject>Distribution management</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Network management systems</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure dependence</subject><subject>Pumping</subject><subject>Pumping stations</subject><subject>Search algorithms</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Water distribution</subject><subject>Water engineering</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>0733-9496</issn><issn>1943-5452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMouFb_Q9CLHrYmm69Nb6XUD6hWWmWPIewmuqVt1iRL8d-7S6uenMvA8D4zwwPAJUZDjDi-vR4vJ9ObYjHEkpKUUZYNUVdS4COQ_M6OQYIEIamkkp-CsxBWXUYgliVgNG-M17F2W-gsfGrXsW7WBr60m8ZUaaGj8XDpWl-aAHd1_IDPDi6j8_rdnIMTq9fBXBz6ALzdTV8nD-lsfv84Gc9STXIW05xzmwmNeWUxQ1ZajAmRlNPSYIw0rbiQpSSISSnzSlRIWIsspzlHxFCakQG42u9tvPtsTYhq1T207U6qDDHOmeA56VKjfar0LgRvrGp8vdH-S2GkeldK9a5UsVC9F9V7UQdXHcz3sA6l-Vv_Q_4PfgPxuWt7</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>León-Celi, C. F</creator><creator>Iglesias-Rey, P. L</creator><creator>Martínez-Solano, F. J</creator><creator>Savic, D</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Operation of Multiple Pumped-Water Sources with No Storage</title><author>León-Celi, C. F ; Iglesias-Rey, P. L ; Martínez-Solano, F. J ; Savic, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-866f27a16df150f9f11339464ce110a4d679c93059998d7d07ff0f648603e4423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Critical point</topic><topic>Direct search algorithms</topic><topic>Distribution management</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Network management systems</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure dependence</topic><topic>Pumping</topic><topic>Pumping stations</topic><topic>Search algorithms</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Water distribution</topic><topic>Water engineering</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>León-Celi, C. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias-Rey, P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Solano, F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savic, D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of water resources planning and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>León-Celi, C. F</au><au>Iglesias-Rey, P. L</au><au>Martínez-Solano, F. J</au><au>Savic, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Operation of Multiple Pumped-Water Sources with No Storage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water resources planning and management</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>0733-9496</issn><eissn>1943-5452</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe cost of pumping is one of the most significant operational expenditures in a water distribution network. When a network has multiple water sources, which are associated with pumping stations, it may be possible to optimize those costs. One way to minimize costs is to determine the optimal flow rate for each pumping station and for every point of the temporal demand curve, while keeping the energy cost minimized. This also requires that the required minimum pressure at the critical point in the network be satisfied. This paper introduces a principle known as the setpoint curve as the key component of the network optimization methodology. A direct search algorithm based on the Hooke–Jeeves approach is tested in two case studies. Two key cost factors, the electric tariff and the cost of water production, are considered for each water supply source. The model also considers the pressure-dependent consumption, which directly influences the setpoint curve. To test the methodology, a software application is implemented using the EPANET toolkit. The two case studies demonstrate the benefits of the approach in developing optimal pump operating policies which otherwise would be difficult to infer.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000971</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9496
ispartof Journal of water resources planning and management, 2018-09, Vol.144 (9)
issn 0733-9496
1943-5452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2056657683
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Case studies
Cost engineering
Costs
Critical point
Direct search algorithms
Distribution management
Expenditures
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Mathematical models
Methods
Network management systems
Optimization
Policies
Pressure
Pressure dependence
Pumping
Pumping stations
Search algorithms
Storage
Tariffs
Technical Papers
Test procedures
Water distribution
Water engineering
Water resources management
Water supply
title Operation of Multiple Pumped-Water Sources with No Storage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Operation%20of%20Multiple%20Pumped-Water%20Sources%20with%20No%20Storage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20resources%20planning%20and%20management&rft.au=Le%C3%B3n-Celi,%20C.%20F&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=0733-9496&rft.eissn=1943-5452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056657683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056657683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true