Science communication and the issue of trust

Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of science communication 2016-01, Vol.15 (5), p.C01
Hauptverfasser: Weingart, Peter, Guenther, Lars
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page C01
container_title Journal of science communication
container_volume 15
creator Weingart, Peter
Guenther, Lars
description Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them.
doi_str_mv 10.22323/2.15050301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2056463985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2056463985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-358afead718ea092334fc97258f666b896217490b5ec531014b23387d68526a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KxDAYRYMoOI6ufIGAS-345ctPk6UM_sGAC3Ud0jTFDrYZk3Th21sdBVf3Lg73wiHknMEKkSO_xhWTIIEDOyALplFUCMIc_uvH5CTnLcBM13pBrp59H0YfqI_DMI29d6WPI3VjS8tboH3OU6CxoyVNuZySo86953D2m0vyenf7sn6oNk_3j-ubTeXR6FJxqV0XXFszHRwY5Fx03tQodaeUarRRyGphoJHBS86AiWZmdN0qLVE5yZfkYr-7S_FjCrnYbZzSOF9aBKmE4kZ_U5d7yqeYcwqd3aV-cOnTMrA_OizaPx38C9QrTqE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056463985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science communication and the issue of trust</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Weingart, Peter ; Guenther, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Peter ; Guenther, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1824-2049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1824-2049</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22323/2.15050301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Trieste: Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati</publisher><subject>Communication ; Credibility ; Ecology ; Endangered ; Experts ; Journalists ; Mass media ; Research centers ; Science ; Social media ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of science communication, 2016-01, Vol.15 (5), p.C01</ispartof><rights>Copyright Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-358afead718ea092334fc97258f666b896217490b5ec531014b23387d68526a53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenther, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Science communication and the issue of trust</title><title>Journal of science communication</title><description>Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1824-2049</issn><issn>1824-2049</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1KxDAYRYMoOI6ufIGAS-345ctPk6UM_sGAC3Ud0jTFDrYZk3Th21sdBVf3Lg73wiHknMEKkSO_xhWTIIEDOyALplFUCMIc_uvH5CTnLcBM13pBrp59H0YfqI_DMI29d6WPI3VjS8tboH3OU6CxoyVNuZySo86953D2m0vyenf7sn6oNk_3j-ubTeXR6FJxqV0XXFszHRwY5Fx03tQodaeUarRRyGphoJHBS86AiWZmdN0qLVE5yZfkYr-7S_FjCrnYbZzSOF9aBKmE4kZ_U5d7yqeYcwqd3aV-cOnTMrA_OizaPx38C9QrTqE</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Weingart, Peter</creator><creator>Guenther, Lars</creator><general>Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Science communication and the issue of trust</title><author>Weingart, Peter ; Guenther, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-358afead718ea092334fc97258f666b896217490b5ec531014b23387d68526a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenther, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of science communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weingart, Peter</au><au>Guenther, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Science communication and the issue of trust</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science communication</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>C01</spage><pages>C01-</pages><issn>1824-2049</issn><eissn>1824-2049</eissn><abstract>Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them.</abstract><cop>Trieste</cop><pub>Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati</pub><doi>10.22323/2.15050301</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1824-2049
ispartof Journal of science communication, 2016-01, Vol.15 (5), p.C01
issn 1824-2049
1824-2049
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2056463985
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Communication
Credibility
Ecology
Endangered
Experts
Journalists
Mass media
Research centers
Science
Social media
Trust
title Science communication and the issue of trust
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A39%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science%20communication%20and%20the%20issue%20of%20trust&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20communication&rft.au=Weingart,%20Peter&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=C01&rft.pages=C01-&rft.issn=1824-2049&rft.eissn=1824-2049&rft_id=info:doi/10.22323/2.15050301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056463985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056463985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true