Science communication and the issue of trust
Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of science communication 2016-01, Vol.15 (5), p.C01 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | C01 |
container_title | Journal of science communication |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Weingart, Peter Guenther, Lars |
description | Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.22323/2.15050301 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2056463985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2056463985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-358afead718ea092334fc97258f666b896217490b5ec531014b23387d68526a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KxDAYRYMoOI6ufIGAS-345ctPk6UM_sGAC3Ud0jTFDrYZk3Th21sdBVf3Lg73wiHknMEKkSO_xhWTIIEDOyALplFUCMIc_uvH5CTnLcBM13pBrp59H0YfqI_DMI29d6WPI3VjS8tboH3OU6CxoyVNuZySo86953D2m0vyenf7sn6oNk_3j-ubTeXR6FJxqV0XXFszHRwY5Fx03tQodaeUarRRyGphoJHBS86AiWZmdN0qLVE5yZfkYr-7S_FjCrnYbZzSOF9aBKmE4kZ_U5d7yqeYcwqd3aV-cOnTMrA_OizaPx38C9QrTqE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056463985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science communication and the issue of trust</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Weingart, Peter ; Guenther, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Peter ; Guenther, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1824-2049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1824-2049</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22323/2.15050301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Trieste: Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati</publisher><subject>Communication ; Credibility ; Ecology ; Endangered ; Experts ; Journalists ; Mass media ; Research centers ; Science ; Social media ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of science communication, 2016-01, Vol.15 (5), p.C01</ispartof><rights>Copyright Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-358afead718ea092334fc97258f666b896217490b5ec531014b23387d68526a53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenther, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Science communication and the issue of trust</title><title>Journal of science communication</title><description>Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1824-2049</issn><issn>1824-2049</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1KxDAYRYMoOI6ufIGAS-345ctPk6UM_sGAC3Ud0jTFDrYZk3Th21sdBVf3Lg73wiHknMEKkSO_xhWTIIEDOyALplFUCMIc_uvH5CTnLcBM13pBrp59H0YfqI_DMI29d6WPI3VjS8tboH3OU6CxoyVNuZySo86953D2m0vyenf7sn6oNk_3j-ubTeXR6FJxqV0XXFszHRwY5Fx03tQodaeUarRRyGphoJHBS86AiWZmdN0qLVE5yZfkYr-7S_FjCrnYbZzSOF9aBKmE4kZ_U5d7yqeYcwqd3aV-cOnTMrA_OizaPx38C9QrTqE</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Weingart, Peter</creator><creator>Guenther, Lars</creator><general>Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Science communication and the issue of trust</title><author>Weingart, Peter ; Guenther, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-358afead718ea092334fc97258f666b896217490b5ec531014b23387d68526a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenther, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of science communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weingart, Peter</au><au>Guenther, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Science communication and the issue of trust</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science communication</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>C01</spage><pages>C01-</pages><issn>1824-2049</issn><eissn>1824-2049</eissn><abstract>Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them.</abstract><cop>Trieste</cop><pub>Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati</pub><doi>10.22323/2.15050301</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1824-2049 |
ispartof | Journal of science communication, 2016-01, Vol.15 (5), p.C01 |
issn | 1824-2049 1824-2049 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2056463985 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Communication Credibility Ecology Endangered Experts Journalists Mass media Research centers Science Social media Trust |
title | Science communication and the issue of trust |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A39%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science%20communication%20and%20the%20issue%20of%20trust&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20communication&rft.au=Weingart,%20Peter&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=C01&rft.pages=C01-&rft.issn=1824-2049&rft.eissn=1824-2049&rft_id=info:doi/10.22323/2.15050301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056463985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056463985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |