Optimising trait and source selection for explaining occurrence and abundance changes: A case study using British butterflies
Functional traits that define the ecological role of an organism are increasingly being used to determine and predict responses to environmental change. Functional trait analyses of butterflies remain underexplored compared with other taxa, such as plants. Previous works using butterfly functional t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Functional ecology 2018-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1609-1619 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1619 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1609 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Middleton-Welling, Joe Wade, Rachel A. Dennis, Roger L. H. Dapporto, Leonardo Shreeve, Tim G. |
description | Functional traits that define the ecological role of an organism are increasingly being used to determine and predict responses to environmental change. Functional trait analyses of butterflies remain underexplored compared with other taxa, such as plants. Previous works using butterfly functional traits have not comprehensively addressed issues about the quality of trait datasets used and the relative predictive power of different trait types.
We compare the consistency of trait descriptions between six widely used trait sources for the British butterfly fauna. We analysed consistency of trait sources using Fleiss's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. Principal component analysis was used to produce species ordinations, comparing outputs to examine which trait sets were better at explaining recent species range and abundance changes within the UK.
There was a large range in congruence values for specific traits between sources. No single source can be relied upon to produce accurate trait information for British butterflies. Most trait sets are poor predictors of abundance and occurrence changes but are better at predicting current occurrence. An extensive trait set, supplementing biotope‐related traits with explicit resource‐based information recovers more informative ecological classifications and models than those primarily based on life‐history traits or biotope descriptors. Smaller trait sets do, however, recover the specialist–generalist continuum.
We conclude that analyses of distribution and abundance changes that rely on traits are highly dependent on trait source and trait type. For butterflies, traits that are based on measures of biotope occupancy should be avoided in explaining changes of abundance and distribution. Including trait information that describes their resource requirements is essential for such analyses.
A plain language summary is available for this article.
Plain Language Summary |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2435.13082 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2056434035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48582818</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48582818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-bd1e5d1137da2dc1dc86685bec56d70a9a18201a4cfc7e70e052917284a5065d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdnT0LBc7f8bnqUsakw2MWdQ5akM6NLatKi--9tre5qLo88Pp_3Hl8A7hGcof7NEeEsx5SwGSJQ4AswOXcuwQRiXuaCcnINblI6QAhLhvEEbDdN644uOb_P2qhcmylvshS6qG2WbG1164LPqhAz-9XUyvmBDFp3MVrfMwOudp03avjpd-X3Nt2Cq0rVyd791inYrpZvi5d8vXl-XTytc00KgfOdQZYZhEhhFDYaGS04F2xnNeOmgKpUSGCIFNWVLmwBLWS4RAUWVDHImSFT8DjObWL46Gxq5aG_3PcrJYaMU0IhYT01HykdQ0rRVrKJ7qjiSSIoh-zkkJQckpI_2fUGG41PV9vTf7hcLRd_3sPoHVIb4tmjggkskCDf9tV6JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056434035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimising trait and source selection for explaining occurrence and abundance changes: A case study using British butterflies</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Middleton-Welling, Joe ; Wade, Rachel A. ; Dennis, Roger L. H. ; Dapporto, Leonardo ; Shreeve, Tim G.</creator><contributor>Seymour, Colleen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Middleton-Welling, Joe ; Wade, Rachel A. ; Dennis, Roger L. H. ; Dapporto, Leonardo ; Shreeve, Tim G. ; Seymour, Colleen</creatorcontrib><description>Functional traits that define the ecological role of an organism are increasingly being used to determine and predict responses to environmental change. Functional trait analyses of butterflies remain underexplored compared with other taxa, such as plants. Previous works using butterfly functional traits have not comprehensively addressed issues about the quality of trait datasets used and the relative predictive power of different trait types.
We compare the consistency of trait descriptions between six widely used trait sources for the British butterfly fauna. We analysed consistency of trait sources using Fleiss's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. Principal component analysis was used to produce species ordinations, comparing outputs to examine which trait sets were better at explaining recent species range and abundance changes within the UK.
There was a large range in congruence values for specific traits between sources. No single source can be relied upon to produce accurate trait information for British butterflies. Most trait sets are poor predictors of abundance and occurrence changes but are better at predicting current occurrence. An extensive trait set, supplementing biotope‐related traits with explicit resource‐based information recovers more informative ecological classifications and models than those primarily based on life‐history traits or biotope descriptors. Smaller trait sets do, however, recover the specialist–generalist continuum.
We conclude that analyses of distribution and abundance changes that rely on traits are highly dependent on trait source and trait type. For butterflies, traits that are based on measures of biotope occupancy should be avoided in explaining changes of abundance and distribution. Including trait information that describes their resource requirements is essential for such analyses.
A plain language summary is available for this article.
Plain Language Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Butterflies & moths ; butterfly biogeography ; Case studies ; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY ; Consistency ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Ecological monitoring ; Environmental changes ; functional traits ; habitat ; occurrence and abundance change ; Principal components analysis ; resource use</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2018-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1609-1619</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2018 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-bd1e5d1137da2dc1dc86685bec56d70a9a18201a4cfc7e70e052917284a5065d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-bd1e5d1137da2dc1dc86685bec56d70a9a18201a4cfc7e70e052917284a5065d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1863-221X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48582818$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48582818$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Seymour, Colleen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Middleton-Welling, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wade, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Roger L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dapporto, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shreeve, Tim G.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimising trait and source selection for explaining occurrence and abundance changes: A case study using British butterflies</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Functional traits that define the ecological role of an organism are increasingly being used to determine and predict responses to environmental change. Functional trait analyses of butterflies remain underexplored compared with other taxa, such as plants. Previous works using butterfly functional traits have not comprehensively addressed issues about the quality of trait datasets used and the relative predictive power of different trait types.
We compare the consistency of trait descriptions between six widely used trait sources for the British butterfly fauna. We analysed consistency of trait sources using Fleiss's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. Principal component analysis was used to produce species ordinations, comparing outputs to examine which trait sets were better at explaining recent species range and abundance changes within the UK.
There was a large range in congruence values for specific traits between sources. No single source can be relied upon to produce accurate trait information for British butterflies. Most trait sets are poor predictors of abundance and occurrence changes but are better at predicting current occurrence. An extensive trait set, supplementing biotope‐related traits with explicit resource‐based information recovers more informative ecological classifications and models than those primarily based on life‐history traits or biotope descriptors. Smaller trait sets do, however, recover the specialist–generalist continuum.
We conclude that analyses of distribution and abundance changes that rely on traits are highly dependent on trait source and trait type. For butterflies, traits that are based on measures of biotope occupancy should be avoided in explaining changes of abundance and distribution. Including trait information that describes their resource requirements is essential for such analyses.
A plain language summary is available for this article.
Plain Language Summary</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>butterfly biogeography</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>COMMUNITY ECOLOGY</subject><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>functional traits</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>occurrence and abundance change</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>resource use</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdnT0LBc7f8bnqUsakw2MWdQ5akM6NLatKi--9tre5qLo88Pp_3Hl8A7hGcof7NEeEsx5SwGSJQ4AswOXcuwQRiXuaCcnINblI6QAhLhvEEbDdN644uOb_P2qhcmylvshS6qG2WbG1164LPqhAz-9XUyvmBDFp3MVrfMwOudp03avjpd-X3Nt2Cq0rVyd791inYrpZvi5d8vXl-XTytc00KgfOdQZYZhEhhFDYaGS04F2xnNeOmgKpUSGCIFNWVLmwBLWS4RAUWVDHImSFT8DjObWL46Gxq5aG_3PcrJYaMU0IhYT01HykdQ0rRVrKJ7qjiSSIoh-zkkJQckpI_2fUGG41PV9vTf7hcLRd_3sPoHVIb4tmjggkskCDf9tV6JQ</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Middleton-Welling, Joe</creator><creator>Wade, Rachel A.</creator><creator>Dennis, Roger L. H.</creator><creator>Dapporto, Leonardo</creator><creator>Shreeve, Tim G.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1863-221X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Optimising trait and source selection for explaining occurrence and abundance changes</title><author>Middleton-Welling, Joe ; Wade, Rachel A. ; Dennis, Roger L. H. ; Dapporto, Leonardo ; Shreeve, Tim G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-bd1e5d1137da2dc1dc86685bec56d70a9a18201a4cfc7e70e052917284a5065d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>butterfly biogeography</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>COMMUNITY ECOLOGY</topic><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>functional traits</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>occurrence and abundance change</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>resource use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Middleton-Welling, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wade, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Roger L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dapporto, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shreeve, Tim G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Middleton-Welling, Joe</au><au>Wade, Rachel A.</au><au>Dennis, Roger L. H.</au><au>Dapporto, Leonardo</au><au>Shreeve, Tim G.</au><au>Seymour, Colleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimising trait and source selection for explaining occurrence and abundance changes: A case study using British butterflies</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1609</spage><epage>1619</epage><pages>1609-1619</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Functional traits that define the ecological role of an organism are increasingly being used to determine and predict responses to environmental change. Functional trait analyses of butterflies remain underexplored compared with other taxa, such as plants. Previous works using butterfly functional traits have not comprehensively addressed issues about the quality of trait datasets used and the relative predictive power of different trait types.
We compare the consistency of trait descriptions between six widely used trait sources for the British butterfly fauna. We analysed consistency of trait sources using Fleiss's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. Principal component analysis was used to produce species ordinations, comparing outputs to examine which trait sets were better at explaining recent species range and abundance changes within the UK.
There was a large range in congruence values for specific traits between sources. No single source can be relied upon to produce accurate trait information for British butterflies. Most trait sets are poor predictors of abundance and occurrence changes but are better at predicting current occurrence. An extensive trait set, supplementing biotope‐related traits with explicit resource‐based information recovers more informative ecological classifications and models than those primarily based on life‐history traits or biotope descriptors. Smaller trait sets do, however, recover the specialist–generalist continuum.
We conclude that analyses of distribution and abundance changes that rely on traits are highly dependent on trait source and trait type. For butterflies, traits that are based on measures of biotope occupancy should be avoided in explaining changes of abundance and distribution. Including trait information that describes their resource requirements is essential for such analyses.
A plain language summary is available for this article.
Plain Language Summary</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.13082</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1863-221X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2018-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1609-1619 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2056434035 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Abundance Butterflies & moths butterfly biogeography Case studies COMMUNITY ECOLOGY Consistency Correlation analysis Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Ecological monitoring Environmental changes functional traits habitat occurrence and abundance change Principal components analysis resource use |
title | Optimising trait and source selection for explaining occurrence and abundance changes: A case study using British butterflies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T03%3A27%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimising%20trait%20and%20source%20selection%20for%20explaining%20occurrence%20and%20abundance%20changes:%20A%20case%20study%20using%20British%20butterflies&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Middleton-Welling,%20Joe&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1609&rft.epage=1619&rft.pages=1609-1619&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.13082&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48582818%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056434035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48582818&rfr_iscdi=true |